[1]
Abrahms, M. 2006. Why Terrorism Does Not Work. International Security. 31, 2 (Oct. 2006), 42–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2006.31.2.42.
[2]
Adams, I. 2001. Political ideology today. Manchester University Press.
[3]
AELST, P. and WALGRAVE, S. 2001. Who is that (wo)man in the street? From the normalisation of protest to the normalisation of the protester. European Journal of Political Research. 39, 4 (Jun. 2001), 461–486. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00582.
[4]
Aggestam, L. 2016. What kind of power? European Union enlargement and beyond. Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. S. Smith et al., eds. Oxford University Press. 431–450.
[5]
Anand, D. 2007. Anxious Sexualities: Masculinity, Nationalism and Violence. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 9, 2 (May 2007), 257–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00282.x.
[6]
Ashe, F. 2014. ‘All about Eve’: Mothers, Masculinities and the 2011 UK Riots. Political Studies. 62, 3 (Oct. 2014), 652–668. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12033.
[7]
Baaz, M.E. and Stern, M. 2013. Sexual violence as a weapon of war?: perceptions, prescriptions, problems in the Congo and beyond. Zed Books.
[8]
Ball, T. et al. eds. 2017. Ideals and ideologies: a reader. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
[9]
Baradat, L.P. 2000. Political ideologies: their origins and impact. Prentice Hall.
[10]
Barakso, M. 2014. Understanding political science research methods: the challenge of inference. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
[11]
Barnett, M. and Duvall, R. 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization. 59, 01 (Jan. 2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050010.
[12]
Benoit, W.L. and Glantz, M.J. 2017. Persuasive attacks on Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential primary. Lexington Books.
[13]
Bevir, M. 2006. Political Studies as Narrative and Science, 1880–2000. Political Studies. 54, 3 (Oct. 2006), 583–606. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00616.x.
[14]
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. 2006. Interpretive Approaches to British Government and Politics. British Politics. 1, 1 (2006), 84–112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bp.4200001.
[15]
Bhattacharyya, G. 2008. Introduction: Dangerous brown men? Dangerous brown men: exploiting sex, violence and feminism in the war on terror. Zed. 1–17.
[16]
Bond, J.R. 2007. The Scientification of the Study of Politics: Some Observations on the Behavioral Evolution in Political Science. The Journal of Politics. 69, 4 (2007), 897–907. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00597.x.
[17]
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M. et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of political methodology. Oxford University Press.
[18]
BRASSETT, J. and RETHEL, L. 2015. Sexy money: the hetero-normative politics of global finance. Review of International Studies. 41, 03 (Jul. 2015), 429–449. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000461.
[19]
Burnham, P. et al. 2008. Chapter 1 - The Discipline of Politics. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan. 9–30.
[20]
Burnham, P. et al. 2008. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[21]
Carver, T. 2017. Ideology: the career of a concept. Ideals and ideologies: a reader. T. Ball et al., eds. Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group. 4–12.
[22]
Cassola, A. et al. 2014. Where do Women Stand? New Evidence on the Presence and Absence of Gender Equality in the World’s Constitutions. Politics & Gender. 10, 02 (Jun. 2014), 200–235. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1400004X.
[23]
Česnulytė, E. 2015. ‘I Do Not Work: I Do Commercial Sex Work’. Ambiguities in the Discourse and Practice of Selling Sex in Mombasa, Kenya. Development and Change. 46, 5 (Sep. 2015), 1159–1178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12192.
[24]
Childs, S. et al. 2012. Sex, gender and the Conservative party: from iron lady to kitten heels. Palgrave MacMillan.
[25]
Connell, R. 2005. Masculinities. Polity.
[26]
Cornwall, A. et al. 2011. Men and development: politicizing masculinities. Zed Books.
[27]
Could Trump’s blundering lead to war between China and Japan? 17AD. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/aug/17/could-trumps-blundering-lead-to-war-between-china-and-japan.
[28]
Dahl, R.A. 1961. The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest. The American Political Science Review. 55, 4 (1961). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1952525.
[29]
Deb, A.K. et al. 2015. ‘Man can’t give birth, woman can’t fish’: gender dynamics in the small-scale fisheries of Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture. 22, 3 (Mar. 2015), 305–324. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.855626.
[30]
Design Failures in the Eurozone - can they be fixed? - European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_paper/2013/ecp491_en.htm.
[31]
Dhamoon, R.K. 2011. Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly. 64, 1 (Mar. 2011), 230–243. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910379227.
[32]
Donoghue, M. 2016. Cohesion as ‘common sense’: Everyday narratives of community and cohesion in New Labour’s Britain. Politics. 36, 3 (Aug. 2016), 262–276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395715620811.
[33]
Easton, D. 1967. The Current Meaning of Behaviouralism. Contemporary political analysis. Free Press. 11–31.
[34]
Easton, D. et al. 1991. The Development of political science: a comparative survey. Routledge.
[35]
Easton, D. 1969. The New Revolution in Political Science. The American Political Science Review. 63, 4 (1969). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1955071.
[36]
Ehrenhalt, A. 2003. Political Science and Journalism: Bridging the Gap. Perspective On Politics. 1, 1 (2003), 127–130.
[37]
Eiermann, M. 2016. How Donald Trump fits into the history of American populism. New Perspectives Quarterly. 33, 2 (2016), 29–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.12033.
[38]
Enloe, C. 2014. Gender makes the world go round. Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. University of California Press. 1–36.
[39]
Enloe, C. 1996. Margins, silences and bottom rungs: how to overcome the underestimation of power in the study of international relations. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. 186–202.
[40]
Enloe, C.H. 2013. Seriously!: investigating crashes and crises as if women mattered. University of California Press.
[41]
Enloe, C.H. 2004. The curious feminist: searching for women in a new age of empire. University of California Press.
[42]
Farr, J. 1988. The History of Political Science. American Journal of Political Science. 32, 4 (Nov. 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2111205.
[43]
Ferguson, L. 2015. "This Is Our Gender Person”: The messy business of working as a gender expert in international development. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 17, 3 (Jul. 2015), 380–397. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2014.918787.
[44]
Finnemore, M. 1996. Norms, culture, and world politics: insights from sociology’s institutionalism. International Organization. 50, 02 (Mar. 1996). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028587.
[45]
Flood, M. 2011. Involving Men in Efforts to End Violence Against Women. Men and Masculinities. 14, 3 (Aug. 2011), 358–377. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X10363995.
[46]
Fluri, J. 2011. Armored peacocks and proxy bodies: gender geopolitics in aid/development spaces of Afghanistan. Gender, Place & Culture. 18, 4 (Aug. 2011), 519–536. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.583343.
[47]
Franklin, M.I. 2013. Veil Dressing and the Gender Geopolitics of "What Not to Wear”. International Studies Perspectives. 14, 4 (Nov. 2013), 394–416. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/insp.12019.
[48]
Freeden, M. et al. eds. 2013. The Oxford handbook of political ideologies. Oxford University Press.
[49]
Freeden, M. and dawsonera 2003. Ideology: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[50]
Freedman, L. 1998. Military Power and Political Influence. International Affairs. 74, 4 (Oct. 1998), 763–780. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00044.
[51]
Frisch, H. 2004. Perceptions of Israel in the Armies of Syria, Egypt and Jordan. Political Studies. 52, 3 (Oct. 2004), 395–412. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00487.x.
[52]
Furlong, P. and Marsh, D. 2010. Chapter 9 - A Skin Not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science. Theory and methods in political science. D. Marsh and G. Stoker, eds. Palgrave Macmillan. 184–211.
[53]
Geoghegan, V. and Wilford, R. eds. 2014. Political ideologies: an introduction. Routledge.
[54]
Gest, J. et al. 2017. Roots of the Radical Right: Nostalgic Deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies. (Jul. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720705.
[55]
Goodwin, B. 2007. Using political ideas. Wiley.
[56]
Gould, A.C. 2009. Muslim Elites and Ideologies in Portugal and Spain. West European Politics. 32, 1 (Jan. 2009), 55–76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802509818.
[57]
Griffin, P. 2013. Gendering Global Finance. Men and Masculinities. 16, 1 (Apr. 2013), 9–34. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X12468097.
[58]
Hall, P.A. 2003. Aligning Ontology and Epistemology in Comparative Politics. Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer, eds. Cambridge University Press. 373–404.
[59]
Hall, P.A. 2010. Historical Institutionalism in Rationalist and Sociological Perspective. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. J. Mahoney and K.A. Thelen, eds. Cambridge University Press. 204–224.
[60]
Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. 1996. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 44, 5 (Dec. 1996), 936–957. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
[61]
Hancock, A.-M. 2007. When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics. 5, 01 (Mar. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065.
[62]
Hay, C. 2002. Chapter 1 - Analytical Perspectives, Analytical Controversies. Political analysis. Palgrave. 1–58.
[63]
Hay, C. 2002. Chapter 2 - What’s ‘Political’ about Political Science? Political analysis. Palgrave. 59–88.
[64]
Hay, C. 2002. Political analysis. Palgrave.
[65]
Hay, C. and Wincott, D. 1998. Structure, Agency and Historical Institutionalism. Political Studies. 46, 5 (Dec. 1998), 951–957. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00177.
[66]
Herr, R.S. 2016. Can Transnational Feminist Solidarity Accommodate Nationalism? Reflections from the Case Study of Korean "Comfort Women”. Hypatia. 31, 1 (Feb. 2016), 41–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12213.
[67]
Heywood, A. 2017. Political Ideologies and Why They Matter. Political ideologies: an introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. 1–23.
[68]
Higate, P. 2012. Drinking Vodka from the ‘Butt-Crack’. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 14, 4 (Dec. 2012), 450–469. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.726092.
[69]
Hix, S. and Hoyland, B. 2011. Economic and Monetary Union. The political system of the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan. 245–272.
[70]
Hochschild, J.L. 2005. APSA Presidents Reflect on Political Science: Who Knows What, When, and How? Perspectives on Politics. 3, 02 (Jun. 2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050231.
[71]
Hodson, D. and Puetter, U. 2016. The Euro Crisis and European Integration. European Union politics. M. Cini and N. Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, eds. Oxford University Press. 365–379.
[72]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1990. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon.
[73]
Hooper, C. 2001. The Economist, globalization and masculinities. Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. Columbia University Press. 149–195.
[74]
Hozic, A.A. and True, J. 2016. Making feminist sense of the global financial crisis. Scandalous economics: gender and the politics of financial crisis. A.A. Hozic and J. True, eds. Oxford University Press. 3–20.
[75]
Hutchings, K. 2008. Making Sense of Masculinity and War. Men and Masculinities. 10, 4 (Jun. 2008), 389–404. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X07306740.
[76]
Hyde-Price, A. 2006. ‘Normative’ power Europe: a realist critique. Journal of European Public Policy. 13, 2 (Mar. 2006), 217–234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500451634.
[77]
Inglehart, R. and Norris, P. 2017. Trump and the Populist Authoritarian Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse. Perspectives on Politics. 15, 02 (2017), 443–454. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000111.
[78]
Johnson, H.N. and Soeters, J.L. 2008. Jamaican Dons, Italian Godfathers and the Chances of a ‘Reversible Destiny’. Political Studies. 56, 1 (Mar. 2008), 166–191. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00682.x.
[79]
Jordan-Zachery, J.S. 2007. Am I a Black Woman or a Woman Who Is Black? A Few Thoughts on the Meaning of Intersectionality. Politics & Gender. 3, 02 (Jun. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X07000074.
[80]
Kang, J.W. 2014. The Two Faces of North Korean State Power. Politics. 34, 3 (Oct. 2014), 213–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12052.
[81]
Katz, J. 2016. Man Enough? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, and the politics of presidential masculinity. Interlink Books.
[82]
Kellner, D. 2016. American Nightmare: Donald Trump, media spectacle, and authoritarian populism. Sense Publishers.
[83]
Keohane, R.O. 1969. Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in Internatinal Politics. International Organization. 23, 02 (Mar. 1969). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003160X.
[84]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[85]
King, G. et al. 1994. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.
[86]
Leftwich, A. 1984. Thinking Politically: On the politics of Politics. What is politics?: the activity and its study. Blackwell. 1–22.
[87]
Lobasz, J.K. 2009. Beyond Border Security: Feminist Approaches to Human Trafficking. Security Studies. 18, 2 (Jun. 2009), 319–344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410902900020.
[88]
Lowndes, V. and Roberts, M. 2013. Why institutions matter: the new institutionalism in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[89]
Maclure, R. and Denov, M. 2006. "I Didn’t Want to Die So I Joined Them”: Structuration and the Process of Becoming Boy Soldiers in Sierra Leone. Terrorism and Political Violence. 18, 1 (Mar. 2006), 119–135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550500384801.
[90]
Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K. 2010. A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. J. Mahoney and K.A. Thelen, eds. Cambridge University Press. 1–37.
[91]
Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 40, 2 (Jun. 2002), 235–258. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00353.
[92]
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. Elaborating the New Institutionalism. The Oxford Handbook of Political Science.
[93]
Marsh, D. and Savigny, H. 2004. Political Science as a Broad Church: The Search for a Pluralist Discipline. Politics. 24, 3 (Sep. 2004), 155–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2004.00216.x.
[94]
Marsh, D. and Stoker, G. 2002. Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave Macmillan.
[95]
Martin, S. 2011. Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case. Political Studies. 59, 2 (Jun. 2011), 472–488. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00885.x.
[96]
MAULL, H.W. 2005. Europe and the new balance of global order. International Affairs. 81, 4 (Jul. 2005), 775–799. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00484.x.
[97]
McDermott, R. 2002. Experimental Methods in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science. 5, 1 (2002), 31–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.5.091001.170657.
[98]
McDonnell, D. 2013. Silvio Berlusconi’s Personal Parties: From Forza Italia to the Popolo Della Libertà. Political Studies. 61, 1_suppl (Apr. 2013), 217–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01007.x.
[99]
McLellan, D. 1995. Ideology. Open University Press.
[100]
McMillan, K. and Weyers, J. 2013. Chapter 3 - Misconceptions about plagiarism: How to recognise inappropriate use of the work of others. How to cite, reference & avoid plagiarism at university. Pearson. 24–32.
[101]
McMillan, K. and Weyers, J. 2012. Chapter 25 - Effective Academic Reading: how to read efficiently and with understanding. The Study Skills Book. Pearson. 141–150.
[102]
McMillan, K. and Weyers, J. 2012. Chapter 26 - Note-making from Texts: how to create effective notes for later reference. The study skills book. Pearson. 151–160.
[103]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2014. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
[104]
Men and Masculinities in International Relations Research | Journal of World Affairs: https://www.brown.edu/initiatives/journal-world-affairs/211-fall%E2%80%93winter-2014/men-and-masculinities-international-relations-research.
[105]
Merari, A. et al. 2009. Making Palestinian "Martyrdom Operations”/"Suicide Attacks”: Interviews With Would-Be Perpetrators and Organizers. Terrorism and Political Violence. 22, 1 (Dec. 2009), 102–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550903409403.
[106]
Mingst, K.A. and Snyder, J.L. eds. 2014. Essential readings in world politics. W.W. Norton & Company.
[107]
Minogue, K.R. 2000. Politics: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[108]
Minogue, K.R. 2000. Politics: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[109]
Morgenthau, H.J. et al. 2006. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. McGraw-Hill Education.
[110]
Moses, J.W. and Knutsen, T.L. 2012. Ways of knowing: competing methodologies in social and political research. Palgrave Macmillan.
[111]
Moury, C. and Fernandes, J.M. 2016. Minority Governments and Pledge Fulfilment: Evidence from Portugal. Government and Opposition. (May 2016), 1–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.14.
[112]
Nye, J.S. 1990. Soft Power. Foreign Policy. 80 (Autumn 1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580.
[113]
Nye, J.S. 2004. Soft power: the means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
[114]
Nyhan, B. 2015. Scandal Potential: How Political Context and News Congestion Affect the President’s Vulnerability to Media Scandal. British Journal of Political Science. 45, 02 (Apr. 2015), 435–466. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000458.
[115]
Nyman, J. 2017. Energy security under Obama: Some hope, but not much change. The Obama Doctrine: a legacy of continuity in US foreign policy?. M. Bentley and J. Holland, eds. Routledge. 194–207.
[116]
O’Connell Davidson, J. 2015. Modern slavery: the margins of freedom. Palgrave Macmillan.
[117]
Olsen, J.P. 2009. Change and continuity: an institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. European Political Science Review. 1, 01 (Mar. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000022.
[118]
Olsen, J.P. 2013. The Institutional Basis of Democratic Accountability. West European Politics. 36, 3 (May 2013), 447–473. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.753704.
[119]
Oren, I. 2006. Can Political Science Emulate the Natural Sciences? The Problem of Self-Disconfirming Analysis. Polity. 38, 1 (Jan. 2006), 72–100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300039.
[120]
Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service) 2017. International politics and institutions in time. Oxford University Press.
[121]
Peters, B.G. 2012. Institutional theory in political science: the new institutionalism. Continuum.
[122]
PIERSON, P. 1996. The Path to European Integration. Comparative Political Studies. 29, 2 (Apr. 1996), 123–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414096029002001.
[123]
Puar, J. 2011. Citation and Censorship: The Politics of Talking About the Sexual Politics of Israel. Feminist Legal Studies. 19, 2 (Aug. 2011), 133–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-011-9176-3.
[124]
Referencing and avoiding plagiarism: https://he.palgrave.com/studentstudyskills/page/Referencing-and-Avoiding-Plagiarism/.
[125]
Reinares, F. 2011. Exit From Terrorism: A Qualitative Empirical Study on Disengagement and Deradicalization Among Members of ETA. Terrorism and Political Violence. 23, 5 (Nov. 2011), 780–803. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2011.613307.
[126]
Rhodes, R.A.W. 2009. Old institutionalisms: an overview. The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. R.E. Goodin, ed. Oxford University Press.
[127]
Rhodes, R.A.W. et al. 2008. The Oxford handbook of political institutions. Oxford University Press.
[128]
RITTBERGER, B. 2012. Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 50, (Mar. 2012), 18–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02225.x.
[129]
Roberts, A. 2015. The Political Economy of "Transnational Business Feminism”. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 17, 2 (Apr. 2015), 209–231. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2013.849968.
[130]
Robin, C. 2017. The reactionary mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. Oxford University Press.
[131]
Rooduijn, M. and Burgoon, B. 2017. The Paradox of Well-being: Do Unfavorable Socioeconomic and Sociocultural Contexts Deepen or Dampen Radical Left and Right Voting Among the Less Well-Off? Comparative Political Studies. (Jul. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017720707.
[132]
Rosamond, B. 2016. Brexit and the problem of European disintegration. Journal of Contemporary European Research. 12, 4 (2016), 864–871.
[133]
Ross, K. et al. 2013. The Gender of News and News of Gender. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 18, 1 (Jan. 2013), 3–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212457814.
[134]
Rudalevige, A. 2013. Presidential Authority in a Separated System of Governance. New directions in American politics. Routledge. 61–84.
[135]
Rudolph, S.H. 2005. ‘Perestroika and its Other’. Perestroika!: the raucous rebellion in political science. Yale University Press.
[136]
Sahin-Mencutek, Z. 2016. Strong in the Movement, Strong in the Party: Women’s Representation in the Kurdish Party of Turkey. Political Studies. 64, 2 (Jun. 2016), 470–487. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12188.
[137]
Sanders, D. 2010. Behavioural Analysis. Theory and methods in political science. G. Stoker, ed. Palgrave Macmillan. 23–41.
[138]
Savigny, H. and Marsden, L. 2011. Chapter 1 - Themes and Issues in Political Science and International Relations. Doing political science and international relations: theories in action. Palgrave Macmillan. 29–37.
[139]
Savigny, H. and Marsden, L. 2011. Chapter 1 - Themes and Issues in Political Science and International Relations. Doing political science and international relations: theories in action. Palgrave Macmillan. 21–29.
[140]
Schmidt, V.A. 2014. Speaking to the Markets or to the People? A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the EU’s Sovereign Debt Crisis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 16, 1 (Feb. 2014), 188–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12023.
[141]
Shepherd, L.J. 2010. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Routledge.
[142]
Smismans, S. 2003. European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests. European Law Journal. 9, 4 (Sep. 2003), 473–495. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0386.00187.
[143]
Squires, J. 2000. Gender in political theory. Polity Press.
[144]
Squires, J. and Weldes, J. 2007. Beyond Being Marginal: Gender and International Relations in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 9, 2 (May 2007), 185–203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2007.00289.x.
[145]
Statement by President Trump on the Paris Climate Accord: 1AD. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/06/01/statement-president-trump-paris-climate-accord.
[146]
Steinsson, S. 2016. The Cod Wars: a re-analysis. European Security. 25, 2 (Apr. 2016), 256–275. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.1160376.
[147]
Stone Sweet, A. et al. 2001. The institutionalization of Europe. Oxford University Press.
[148]
Straus, S. 2008. The Order of Genocide: race, power, and war in Rwanda. Cornell University Press.
[149]
Tansey, S.D. and Jackson, N.A. 2008. Politics: the basics. Routledge.
[150]
The EU’s role in Brexit negotiations | The Institute for Government: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/brexit-explained/brexit-explained-eu-role-brexit-negotiations.
[151]
There is something very wrong with Donald Trump: 1AD. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/there-is-something-very-wrong-with-donald-trump/2016/08/01/73809c72-57fe-11e6-831d-0324760ca856_story.html?utm_term=.707f61c35388.
[152]
This is how fascism comes to America: 18AD. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/this-is-how-fascism-comes-to-america/2016/05/17/c4e32c58-1c47-11e6-8c7b-6931e66333e7_story.html?utm_term=.7034ec799816.
[153]
Thompson, S.K. and Bucerius, S.M. 2017. Transnational radicalization, diaspora groups, and within-group sentiment pools: Young Tamil and Somali Canadians on the LTTE and al Shabaab. Terrorism and Political Violence. (Jan. 2017), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2016.1264938.
[154]
Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto players: how political institutions work. Russell Sage Foundation.
[155]
Understanding Institutions and Logics of Appropriateness: Introductory Essay - ARENA Centre for European Studies: http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/publications/arena-working-papers/2001-2010/2007/wp07_13.html.
[156]
Vachudova, M.A. 2005. Europe Undivided. Oxford University Press.
[157]
Verdun, A. 2015. A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy. 22, 2 (Feb. 2015), 219–237. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.994023.
[158]
Verdun, A. 2016. Economic and Monetary Union. European Union politics. M. Cini and N. Pérez-Solórzano Borragán, eds. Oxford University Press. 295–307.
[159]
Vincent, A. and dawsonera 2010. Modern political ideologies. Wiley-Blackwell.
[160]
Vliegenthart, R. et al. 2016. Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research. 55, 2 (May 2016), 283–301. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12134.
[161]
Ware, A. 2016. Donald Trump’s hijacking of the Republican Party in historical perspective. The Political Quarterly. 87, 3 (2016), 406–414. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12275.
[162]
Wendt, A. 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization. 46, 02 (Mar. 1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
[163]
Whiteley, P. and Seyd, P. 1992. Labour’s Vote and Local Activism: The Impact of Local Constituency Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs. 45, 4 (1992), 582–595. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a052384.
[164]
Williams, M. 2000. Chapter 3 - Social science as science. Science and social science: an introduction. Routledge. 49–69.
[165]
Williams, M. 1999. Chapter 5 - Against science in social science. Science and social science: an introduction. Routledge.
[166]
Wilson, G.K. 2017. Brexit, Trump and the special relationship. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19, 3 (2017), 543–557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117713719.
[167]
Postcolonial Studies: Vol 19, No 4.
