Bibliography for CLAS12366 & CLAS22366: History of Thought [KL] BETA

Armstrong, David. 2016. ‘Utility and Affection in Epicurean Friendship’. In Hope, Joy, and Affection in the Classical World, edited by Ruth R. Caston and Robert A. Kaster, 182–208. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190278298.003.0010.

Asmis, Elizabeth. 1984. Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Vol. Cornell studies in classical philology. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Asmis, Elizabeth and Elizabeth Asmis. 2007. ‘Myth and Philosophy in Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus’. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 47 (4). http://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/751/831.

Atherton, Catherine. 2007. ‘Reductionism, Rationality and Responsibility: A Discussion of Tim O’Keefe, Epicurus on Freedom’. Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 89 (2). https://doi.org/10.1515/AGPH.2007.009.

Aurelius, Marcus. n.d. ‘2.5’. In Meditations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.31.xml.

———. n.d. ‘3.10 and 3.11’. In Meditations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.59.xml.

———. n.d. ‘4.3’. In Meditations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.67.xml.

———. n.d. ‘4.3’. In Meditations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.67.xml.

———. n.d. ‘4.4’. In Meditations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.71.xml.

———. n.d. ‘8.7’. In Meditations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.203.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Meditations 5.8’. In Meditations, 104–8. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.105.xml.

‘BBC Radio 4 - In Our Time, Epicureanism’. n.d. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01qf083.

‘BBC Radio 4 - In Our Time, Stoicism’. n.d. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p003k9fs.

Berryman, Sylvia. n.d. ‘Ancient Atomism’. Edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atomism-ancient/.

Blank, David. n.d. ‘Philodemus’. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philodemus/#PhiWor.

———. n.d. ‘Philodemus’. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/philodemus/#PhiWor.

Bobzien, Susanne and Oxford University Press. 2001. Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. [Place of publication not identified]: Oxford University Press.

Boris Nikolsky. 2001. ‘Epicurus on Pleasure’. Phronesis 46 (4): 440–65. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182681?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=epicurus&searchText=19&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Facc%3Don%26amp%3Bf0%3Dall%26amp%3Bla%3D%26amp%3Bsd%3D%26amp%3Bc6%3DAND%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bc1%3DAND%26amp%3Bc2%3DAND%26amp%3Bf3%3Dall%26amp%3Bf4%3Dall%26amp%3Bc3%3DAND%26amp%3Bq1%3D19%26amp%3Bisbn%3D%26amp%3Bc4%3DAND%26amp%3Bc5%3DAND%26amp%3Bq0%3Depicurus%26amp%3Bq3%3D%26amp%3Bpt%3D%26amp%3Bq2%3D%26amp%3Bf1%3Dall%26amp%3Bf2%3Dall%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bq4%3D%26amp%3Bq5%3D%26amp%3Bf6%3Dall%26amp%3Bf5%3Dall%26amp%3Bq6%3D&refreqid=search%3A627d10124a89036f14bf7e20c067446b&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Bowen, Alan C., Robert B. Todd, Cleomedes, dawsonera, and Cleomedes. 2004. Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy. Vol. Hellenistic culture and society. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780520928510.

Brennan, Tad. 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Brown, Eric. 2009. ‘Politics and Society’. In The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, The Cambridge companions to philosophy, religion and culture:179–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521873475.011.

Brunschwig, Jacques. 2006. ‘Stoic Metaphysics’. In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, 206–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052177005X.009.

Burke, Michael B. 1994. ‘Dion and Theon: An Essentialist Solution to an Ancient Puzzle’. Journal of Philosophy 91 (3): 129–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940990.

Cicero. n.d. ‘Academica 1.40-41’. In Academica. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-academica/1933/pb_LCL268.449.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Academica 2.77-8’. In Academica. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-academica/1933/pb_LCL268.563.xml.

———. n.d. Academica (2.83-86). Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-academica/1933/pb_LCL268.571.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Academica 2.144-45’. In Academica. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-academica/1933/pb_LCL268.653.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Nature of the Gods 1.43-56’. In De Natura Deorum. Harvard University Press. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008428534.

———. n.d. ‘Nature of the Gods 1.103-110’. In De Natura Deorum. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-de_natura_deorum/1933/pb_LCL268.101.xml.

———. n.d. ‘On Fate 27-30’. In De Fato. Harvard University Press. https://www-loebclassics-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-de_fato/1942/pb_LCL349.223.xml?result=2&rskey=z8YP9f.

———. n.d. ‘On Fate 39-44’. In De Fato. Harvard University Press. https://www-loebclassics-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-de_fato/1942/pb_LCL349.235.xml.

———. n.d. ‘On Goals 1.29-33’. In On Goals. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-de_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum/1914/pb_LCL040.33.xml.

———. n.d. ‘On Goals 1.37-38’. In On Goals. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-de_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum/1914/pb_LCL040.41.xml.

———. n.d. ‘On Goals 1.55-57’. In On Goals. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-de_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum/1914/pb_LCL040.59.xml.

———. n.d. ‘On Goals 3.16-34’. In De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-de_finibus_bonorum_et_malorum/1914/pb_LCL040.233.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Tusculan Disputations 5.93-96’. In Tusculan Disputations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_tullius_cicero-tusculan_disputations/1927/pb_LCL141.519.xml.

Clay, Diskin. 1998. ‘The Cults of Epicurus’. In Paradosis and Survival: Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy, 75–101. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Cleanthes, and Frederick C. Grant (trans.). n.d. ‘Hymn to Zeus’. http://www.mircea-eliade.com/from-primitives-to-zen/139.html.

Daniel Nolan. 2006. ‘Stoic Gunk’. Phronesis 51 (2): 162–83. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182801?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Dennett, D. C. 2004. Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin.

Diogenes Laertius. n.d. ‘Diogenes Laertius 7.45-6, 49-54’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.1. Zeno. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_vii_chapter_1_zeno/1925/pb_LCL185.155.xml.

Diogenes of Oenoanda. 1993. ‘Fragment 3’. In The Epicurean Inscription, La scuola di Epicuro:368–368. Napoli: Bibliopolis.

Dobbin, Robert F. and Epictetus. 2008. Discourses and Selected Writings. Vol. Penguin classics. London: Penguin Books.

Duncan, Kennedy. 2007. ‘Making a Text of the Universe: Perspectives on Discursive Order in the De Rerum Natura’. In Lucretius, edited by Monica R. Gale, Oxford readings in classical studies:367–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191531989.

Empiricus, Sextus. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 7.203-16’. In Against the Dogmatists. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-against_logicians/1935/pb_LCL291.111.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 7.247-52’. In Against the Logicians. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-against_logicians/1935/pb_LCL291.133.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 7.253-60’. In Against the Logicians. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-against_logicians/1935/pb_LCL291.137.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 7.402-410’. In Against the Logicians. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-against_logicians/1935/pb_LCL291.215.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 8.11-13’. In Against the Logicians. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-against_logicians/1935/pb_LCL291.245.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 8.67-70’. In Against the Logicians. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-against_logicians/1935/pb_LCL291.271.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 9.211’. In Against the Physicists. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-physicists/1936/pb_LCL311.107.xml?result=5&rskey=phZCEc.

———. n.d. ‘Against the Dogmatists 10.219-227’. In Against the Dogmatists. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/sextus_empiricus-physicists/1936/pb_LCL311.319.xml.

Epictetus. n.d. ‘Discourses 1.1’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.7.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 1.2’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.15.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 1.12’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.89.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 1.20’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.135.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 1.28’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.175.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 1.28’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.175.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 2.1’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.207.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 2.5’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.233.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 2.8’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.253.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 2.10’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.269.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 2.11’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.277.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 2.17’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.327.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 2.18’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL131.341.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 3.3’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL218.29.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Discourses 3.8’. In Discourses. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-discourses/1925/pb_LCL218.61.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Encheiridion 1’. In Encheiridion. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-encheiridion/1928/pb_LCL218.483.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Encheiridion 2’. In Encheiridion. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-encheiridion/1928/pb_LCL218.485.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Encheiridion 17’. In Encheiridion. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-encheiridion/1928/pb_LCL218.497.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Encheiridion 30’. In Encheiridion. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-encheiridion/1928/pb_LCL218.511.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Encheiridion 45’. In Encheiridion. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/epictetus-encheiridion/1928/pb_LCL218.529.xml.

Epicurus. n.d. ‘Letter to Herodotus’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 10. Epicurus. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_x_epicurus/1925/pb_LCL185.565.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Letter to Herodotus’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 10. Epicurus. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_x_epicurus/1925/pb_LCL185.565.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Letter to Menoeceus’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 10. Epicurus. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_x_epicurus/1925/pb_LCL185.649.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Principal Doctrines (Aka “Sovran Maxims”)’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 10. Epicurus. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_x_epicurus/1925/pb_LCL185.663.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Principal Doctrines (Aka “Sovran Maxims”)’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 10. Epicurus. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_x_epicurus/1925/pb_LCL185.663.xml.

‘Epicurus - Letter to Idomeneus’. n.d. http://www.epicurus.net/en/idomeneus.html.

‘Epicurus - Letter to Menoeceus’. n.d. http://www.epicurus.net/en/menoeceus.html.

‘Epicurus - Principal Doctrines’. n.d. http://www.epicurus.net/en/principal.html.

‘———’. n.d. http://www.epicurus.net/en/principal.html.

‘Epicurus - Vatican Sayings’. n.d. http://www.epicurus.net/en/vatican.html.

‘———’. n.d. http://www.epicurus.net/en/vatican.html.

‘———’. n.d. http://www.epicurus.net/en/vatican.html.

Eric Brown. 2002. ‘Epicurus on the Value of Friendship (“Sententia Vaticana” 23)’. Classical Philology 97 (1): 68–80. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1215547?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Eusebius, and E. H. Gifford (trans). 1903. ‘Preparation for the Gospel Book 15 Chapters 14-15’. In Eusebius of Caesarea: Praeparatio Evangelica (Preparation for the Gospel). Tr. E.H. Gifford (1903) -- Book 15. Oxford. http://www.tertullian.org/fathers/eusebius_pe_15_book15.htm.

Frede, Michael. 2007. ‘A Notion of a Person in Epictetus’. In The Philosophy of Epictetus, 153–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233076.003.0011.

Gellius, Aulus. n.d. ‘7.2’. In Attic Nights. Harvard University Press. https://www-loebclassics-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/view/gellius-attic_nights/1927/pb_LCL200.95.xml.

Gigante, Marcello. 1995. ‘Philodemus at the Villa of Herculaneum: Meetings at the Belvedere’. In Philodemus in Italy: The Books from Herculaneum, The body, in theory:53–61. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Gill, Christopher. 2006. ‘The School in the Roman Imperial Period’. In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, The Cambridge companions to philosophy, religion and culture:33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052177005X.003.

Habicht, Christian. 1997. ‘Chapter’. In Athens from Alexander to Antony, 67–97. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Hadot, Pierre. 2002. ‘Introduction’. In What Is Ancient Philosophy?, 1–6. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Hadot, Pierre, and Arnold Ira Davidson. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hard, Robin, Christopher Gill, and Marcus Aurelius. 2011. Meditations. Vol. Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Harven, Vanessa de. 2015. ‘How Nothing Can Be Something’. Ancient Philosophy 35 (2): 405–29. https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil201535229.

Inwood, Brad, and Lloyd P. Gerson. 1997. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.

James I., Porter. 2003. ‘Lucretius and the Poetics of Void’. In Le Jardin Romain: Épicurisme et Poésie à Rome : Mélanges Offerts à Mayotte Bollack, Collection UL3: Travaux et recherches:197–226. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Université Charles-de-Gaulle - Lille 3.

James Warren. 2006. ‘Epicureans and the Present Past’. Phronesis 51 (4): 362–87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4182815?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=epicurean&searchText=accidents&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq4%3D%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bq6%3D%26amp%3Bf1%3Dall%26amp%3Bf5%3Dall%26amp%3Bpt%3D%26amp%3Bq0%3Depicurean%26amp%3Bc4%3DAND%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone%26amp%3Bf3%3Dall%26amp%3Bsd%3D%26amp%3Bc5%3DAND%26amp%3Bq1%3Daccidents%26amp%3Bf2%3Dall%26amp%3Bc1%3DAND%26amp%3Bisbn%3D%26amp%3Bf6%3Dall%26amp%3Bf0%3Dall%26amp%3Bla%3D%26amp%3Bq5%3D%26amp%3Bc3%3DAND%26amp%3Bc2%3DAND%26amp%3Bq3%3D%26amp%3Bf4%3Dall%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bc6%3DAND%26amp%3Bq2%3D&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Kapstein, Matthew T. 2013. ‘Stoics and Boddhisatvas: Spiritual Exercises and Faith in Two Philosophical Traditions’. In Philosophy as a Way of Life: Ancients and Moderns : Essays in Honor of Pierre Hadot, edited by Michael Chase, Stephen R. L. Clark, and Michael McGhee, 100–115. Chicehster: Wiley Blackwell. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781118609217.

Konstan, David. 1997. ‘The Hellenistic World’. In Friendship in the Classical World, Key Themes in Ancient History:93–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612152.004.

Kurt Lampe. 2016. ‘Kristeva, Stoicism, and the “True Life of Interpretations”’. SubStance 45 (1): 22–43. https://muse-jhu-edu.bris.idm.oclc.org/article/612887.

Laertius, Diogenes. n.d. ‘Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.84-107’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.1. Zeno. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_vii_chapter_1_zeno/1925/pb_LCL185.193.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.101-109’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.1. Zeno. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_vii_chapter_1_zeno/1925/pb_LCL185.207.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.134-9’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.1. Zeno. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_vii_chapter_1_zeno/1925/pb_LCL185.239.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.134-9, 7.147-49’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 7.1. Zeno. Harvard University Press. https://www-loebclassics-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_vii_chapter_1_zeno/1925/pb_LCL185.239.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Lives of the Eminent Philosophers 10.31-34’. In Lives of Eminent Philosophers 10. Epicurus. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/diogenes_laertius-lives_eminent_philosophers_book_x_epicurus/1925/pb_LCL185.559.xml.

Lampe, Kurt. 2013. ‘Obeying Your Father: Stoic Theology between Myth and Masochism’. In Classical Myth and Psychoanalysis: Ancient and Modern Stories of the Self, 183–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656677.003.0011.

Leonard, Miriam. 2008. How to Read Ancient Philosophy. Vol. How to read. London: Granta.

Lisa Wendlandt and Dirk Baltzly. 2004. ‘Knowing Freedom: Epicurean Philosophy beyond Atomism and the Swerve’. Phronesis 49 (1): 41–71. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182743.

Long, A. A. 1996. ‘Hierocles on Proprioception’. In Stoic Studies, 250–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 2002. Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

———. 2006a. ‘Hellenistic Ethics and Philosophical Power’. In From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, 3–22. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279128.003.0001.

———. 2006b. ‘Pleasure and Social Utility: The Virtues of Being Epicurean’. In From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy, 178–201. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279128.003.0009.

Long, A. A., and D. N. Sedley. 1987a. ‘51A-E’. In The Hellenistic Philosophers: Vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary, 304–5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1987b. ‘“Free Will” in The Hellenistic Philosophers: Vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary’. In The Hellenistic Philosophers: Vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary, 102–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———. 1987c. The Hellenistic Philosophers: Vol. 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lucretius. n.d. ‘Lucretius 1.449-481’. In De Rerum Natura. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/lucretius-de_rerum_natura/1924/pb_LCL181.39.xml?result=1&rskey=RiATKM.

———. n.d. ‘Lucretius 4.469-512’. In De Rerum Natura. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/lucretius-de_rerum_natura/1924/pb_LCL181.313.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Lucretius 4.469-512’. In De Rerum Natura. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/lucretius-de_rerum_natura/1924/pb_LCL181.313.xml.

———. n.d. ‘The Nature of Things 1.1-160’. In De Rerum Natura. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/lucretius-de_rerum_natura/1924/pb_LCL181.3.xml?rskey=1hsCkL&result=1.

———. n.d. ‘The Nature of Things 5.110-234’. In De Rerum Natura. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/lucretius-de_rerum_natura/1924/pb_LCL181.387.xml.

Lucretius Carus, Titus, A. E. Stallings, and Richard Jenkyns. 2007. The Nature of Things. Vol. Penguin classics. London: Penguin Books.

Marcelo D. Boeri. 2001. ‘The Stoics on Bodies and Incorporeals’. The Review of Metaphysics 54 (4): 723–52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20131617?seq=1&refreqid=excelsior%3Ad5c8e84c7561b5e2587b19ce59826c44.

Marcus Aurelius. n.d. ‘Marcus Aurelius 2.14-2.17’. In Meditations. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/marcus_aurelius-meditations/1916/pb_LCL058.37.xml.

Menn, Stephen. 1999. ‘The Stoic Theory of Categories’. Edited by David Sedley. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 216–47.

Nagel, Thomas. 2012. ‘Death’. In Mortal Questions, Canto Classics:1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107341050.003.

O’Connor, David K. n.d. ‘The Invulnerable Pleasures of Epicurean Friendship’. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30 (2). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1301509087?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

O’Keefe, Tim and Cambridge Books Online (Online service). 2005. Epicurus on Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482571.

Parker, Robert. 2011. ‘Why Believe without Revelation?’ In On Greek Religion, Cornell studies in classical philology:1–39. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Philodemus. 2009. ‘On Death (Part of Bk 4)’. In Philodemus, On Death, Writings from the Greco-Roman world:27–45. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

Plutarch. n.d. ‘A Pleasant Life 1101A-B’. In A Pleasant Life. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/plutarch-moralia_that_epicurus_actually_makes_pleasant_life_impossible/1967/pb_LCL428.109.xml?result=1&rskey=v1dSoC.

———. n.d. Against the Stoics on Common Conceptions 1083a (p. 146)-1084a (p. 155). Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/plutarch-moralia_stoics_common_conceptions/1976/pb_LCL470.847.xml?result=1&rskey=R9yXLA.

Porter, James. 2003. ‘Lucretius and the Poetics of Void’. In Le Jardin Romain: Épicurisme et Poésie à Rome : Mélanges Offerts à Mayotte Bollack, Collection UL3: Travaux et recherches:197–226. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Université Charles-de-Gaulle - Lille 3.

Salles, Ricardo. 2009. God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schofield, Malcolm. n.d. ‘The Retrenchable Present’. In Matter and Metaphysics : Fourth Symposium Hellenisticum, edited by Mario Mignucci and Jonathan Barnes, 329–70. Naples: Bibliopolis.

Sedley, D. N. 2009. ‘“The Epicurean Critique of Creationism” from V. The Atomists’. In Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity, Sather classical lectures:139–66. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pp3r3.9.

Sedley, David. 2006. ‘The School, from Zeno to Arius Didymus’. In The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics, The Cambridge companions to philosophy, religion and culture:7–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL052177005X.002.

Segal, Charles. 1990. Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Sellars, John. 2003. The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy. Vol. Ashgate new critical thinking in philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Seneca. 2010. ‘Natural Questions 2.32.1-2.51’. In Natural Questions. Vol. Complete works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226748542.

———. n.d. ‘Letter 9’. Epistles. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/seneca_younger-epistles/1917/pb_LCL075.43.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Letter 58.11-15’. In Epistles. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/seneca_younger-epistles/1917/pb_LCL075.393.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Letter 113’. Epistles. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/seneca_younger-epistles/1917/pb_LCL077.283.xml.

———. n.d. ‘Letter 117.13’. In Epistles, 344–46. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/seneca_younger-epistles/1917/pb_LCL077.345.xml.

———. n.d. ‘On Providence 4’. In De Providentia, 25–33. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/seneca_younger-de_providentia/1928/pb_LCL214.25.xml?result=1&rskey=EK9fsk.

Seneca, Lucius Annaeus and dawsonera. 2010. Natural Questions. Vol. Complete works of Lucius Annaeus Seneca. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226748542.

Seneca the Younger. n.d. Letter 71. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/seneca_younger-epistles/1917/pb_LCL076.73.xml.

———. n.d. Letter 93. Harvard University Press. https://www.loebclassics.com/view/seneca_younger-epistles/1917/pb_LCL077.3.xml.

Shearin, W. H. 2015. ‘Lucretian Promises’. In The Language of Atoms, 46–97. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190202422.003.0002.

‘Stoic Natural Philosophy (Physics and Cosmology) (Chapter 5) - The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics’. n.d. https://www-cambridge-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-the-stoics/stoic-natural-philosophy-physics-and-cosmology/66FFBAB8E9CA52DC8ABFCD1692449570.

Taylor, C. C. W. 2008. ‘“All Perceptions Are True”’. In Pleasure, Mind, and Soul, 23–41. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226399.003.0002.

Totschnig, Wolfhart. 2013. ‘Bodies and Their Effects: The Stoics on Causation and Incorporeals’. Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 95 (2): 119–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2013-0006.

Tsouna-McKirahan, Voula and Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service). 2007. The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199292172.001.0001.

Tsouna-McKirahan, Voula, Philodemus, and Society of Biblical Literature. 2012. ‘Columns XII-XX of On Property Management’. In On Property Management, Writings from the Greco-Roman world:33–57. Atlanta, Ga: Society of Biblical Literature.

Verlinsky, Alexander. 2005. ‘Epicurus and His Predecessors on the Origin of Language’. In Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age : Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium Hellenisticum, 56–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vogt, Katja. n.d. ‘Ancient Skepticism’. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/skepticism-ancient/#AcaSke.

Warren, James. 2004. Facing Death. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252890.001.0001.

Warren, James and Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). 2009. The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Vol. The Cambridge companions to philosophy, religion and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521873475.