1.
McGlinchey S. Getting Started with International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2017/12/24/getting-started-with-international-relations-theory/
2.
Brown C, Ainley K. Introduction: Defining International Relations. In: Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. p. 1–17.
3.
Adler E, Pouliot V. International practices. International Theory. 2011 Mar;3(01):1–36.
4.
Buzan B, Little R. Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium. 2001 Jan;30(1):19–39.
5.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Introduction. In: Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
6.
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013 Sep 1;19(3):405–25.
7.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
8.
Jabri V. Reflections on the Study of International Relations. In: Issues in international relations. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 289–313.
9.
Jackson R, Sorensen G. IR as an academic subject. In: Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches [Internet]. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 28–57. Available from: https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780198862208.001.0001/hepl-9780198862208-chapter-2
10.
Doyle MW, Ikenberry GJ. Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’. In: New thinking in international relations theory. Oxford: Westview Press; 1997.
11.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
12.
NICHOLSON M. What’s the use of International Relations? Review of International Studies. 2000 Apr;26(2):183–98.
13.
Schroeder PW. History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit. International Security. 1997 Summer;22(1).
14.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity [Internet]. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-1
15.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 1 ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’. In: Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2013.
16.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates? In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
17.
Walt SM. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy. 1998 Spring;(110).
18.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
19.
Meiser JW. Introducing Liberalism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/18/introducing-liberalism-in-international-relations-theory/
20.
G. John Ikenberry. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. 2009;7(1):71–87. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
21.
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 7 - Liberalism. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
22.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 3 - Liberalism. In: Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
23.
Charvet J, Kaczynska-Nay E. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972
24.
Michael W. Doyle. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2005;99(3):463–6. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953
25.
Franceschet A. The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 1999;54(3).
26.
Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books; 2012.
27.
Gardner RN. The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. The Washington Quarterly. 1990 Sep;13(3):23–39.
28.
Jean-Yves Haine. The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal [Internet]. 2009;64(2):453–79. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518
29.
Hoffmann S. The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. Foreign Policy. 1995 Spring;(98).
30.
Lawson S. Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory. In: Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics [Internet]. Cambridge, England: Polity; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448
31.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 5 - Liberalism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
32.
Axelrod R, Keohane RO. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics. 1985 Oct;38(01):226–54.
33.
Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2001.
34.
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2011;90(3):56–68. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
35.
Koivisto M, Dunne T. Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2010 May;38(3):615–40.
36.
Keohane RO, Martin LL. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995 Summer;20(1).
37.
Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization [Internet]. 1998;52(4):729–57. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356
38.
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization [Internet]. 2006;60(4):781–810. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847
39.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
40.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism. In: The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
41.
WEISS TG. How United Nations ideas change history. Review of International Studies. 2010 Oct;36(S1):3–23.
42.
Antunes S, Camisao I. Introducing Realism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/27/introducing-realism-in-international-relations-theory/
43.
Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ [Internet]. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp
44.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 2 - Realism. In: Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368
45.
William Bain. Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 2000;26(3):445–64. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688
46.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
47.
Robert G. Gilpin. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization [Internet]. 1984;38(2):287–304. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441
48.
Guzzini S. The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2004 Dec;10(4):533–68.
49.
Jervis, Robert. Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research [Internet]. 61(4). Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
50.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 3 - Classical Realism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
51.
Lebow RN. Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations. 2005 Sep;19(3):329–36.
52.
Morgenthau HJ. Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review. 1952 Dec;46(04):961–88.
53.
Justin Rosenberg. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies [Internet]. 1990;16(4):285–303. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232
54.
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization [Internet]. 1984;38(2):225–86. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440
55.
Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478. Available from: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf
56.
Keohane RO, Waltz KN. Neorealism and its critics. Vol. The political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press; 1986.
57.
Booth K, Smith S. Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1995.
58.
Mearsheimer JJ. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 1990 Summer;15(1).
59.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 4 - Structural Realism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
60.
Davis N. A rose by any other name. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014 Jul;25.
61.
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. London: McGraw-Hill; 1979.
62.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security [Internet]. 2000;25(1):5–41. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772
63.
Michael C. Williams. Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 1993;19(2):103–21. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
64.
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.
65.
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization [Internet]. 1988;42(3):485–507. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
66.
Robert Jervis. Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security [Internet]. 1999;24(1):42–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347
67.
Keohane RO. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 1988 Dec;32(4).
68.
Nye JS. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics. 1988 Jan;40(02):235–51.
69.
Powell R. Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization. 1994 Mar;48(02).
70.
Stivachtis Y. Introducing the English School in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/23/introducing-the-english-school-in-international-relations-theory/
71.
Gallagher AM. A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect. 2012 Jan 1;4(3):334–57.
72.
Bellamy AJ, editor. International Society and its Critics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2004. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001/acprof-9780199265206
73.
Bull H. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002.
74.
Buzan B. An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Cambridge: Polity; 2014.
75.
Buzan B. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617
76.
Barry Buzan. The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 2001;27(3):471–88. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
77.
Dunne T. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Vol. St Anthony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford; 1998.
78.
Martha Finnemore. Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies [Internet]. 2001;27(3):509–13. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753
79.
Jackson RH. The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
80.
Jackson RH, Sørensen G. Chapter 5 - International Society. In: Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
81.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 4 - The English School. In: Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
82.
Linklater A. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348
83.
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528
84.
LITTLE R. The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2000 Sep;6(3):395–422.
85.
Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/
86.
Wheeler NJ. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740
87.
Wheeler NJ. Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1992 Dec;21(3):463–87.
88.
Pal M. Introducing Marxism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/25/introducing-marxism-in-international-relations-theory/
89.
Ferreira MF. Introducing Critical Theory in International Relations. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/18/introducing-critical-theory-in-international-relations/
90.
Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis
91.
Burnham P. Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class. 2001 Oct;25(3):103–12.
92.
Bieler A, Morton AD. A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class. 2004 Mar;28(1):85–113.
93.
Callinicos A. Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2004 Aug;6(3):426–33.
94.
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1981 Jun;10(2):126–55.
95.
Cox RW. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium : journal of international studies. 1983;12(2):162–75.
96.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 7 - Critical Theory. In: Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
97.
el-Ojeili C. Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on. Critical Sociology. 2015 Jul;41(4–5):679–700.
98.
Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 1998;24(1):3–21. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503
99.
Gill SR, Law D. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly. 1989 Dec;33(4).
100.
Gramsci A, Hoare Q, Nowell-Smith G. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart; 1971.
101.
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations [Internet]. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192898142.001.0001/hepl-9780192898142-chapter-8
102.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism. In: Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
103.
Maclean J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1988 Jun;17(2):295–319.
104.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
105.
Wallerstein I. Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. In: World-systems analysis: an introduction [Internet]. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2004. p. 23–41. Available from: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3007861&ppg=38
106.
Immanuel Wallerstein. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History [Internet]. 1974;16(4):387–415. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015
107.
Theys S. Introducing Constructivism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/23/introducing-constructivism-in-international-relations-theory/
108.
Richard Price. A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization [Internet]. 1995;49(1):73–103. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. In: Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2013.
110.
Pretorius J. The Security Imaginary: Explaining Military Isomorphism. Security Dialogue. 2008 Mar;39(1):99–120.
111.
Björkdahl A. Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2002 Apr;15(1):9–23.
112.
R. Charli Carpenter. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization [Internet]. 2011;65(1):69–102. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104
113.
Checkel JT. The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics. 1998 Jan;50(02):324–48.
114.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
115.
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization [Internet]. 1998;52(4):887–917. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
116.
Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 2001 Jun;4(1):391–416.
117.
Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998 Summer;23(1).
118.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations. In: Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2013.
119.
Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters. In: Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
120.
Onuf NG. Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations. Vol. The new international relations. New York: Routledge; 2013.
121.
Ronen Palan. A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 2000;26(4):575–98. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700
122.
Reus-Smit C. Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2002 Oct;4(3):487–509.
123.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
124.
Weldes J. Constructing National Interests’. European journal of international relations [Internet]. 1996;2:275–318. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001
125.
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization [Internet]. 1992;46(2):391–425. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858
126.
McMorrow A. Introducing Poststructuralism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/13/introducing-poststructuralism-in-international-relations-theory/
127.
Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127. Available from: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf
128.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. ’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism. In: International theory: positivism and beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013
129.
Callinicos A. Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism. In: Against postmodernism: a marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1989. p. 62–91.
130.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
131.
David Campbell. Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. 1990;15(3):263–86. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
132.
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Vol. World Politics Series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books; 1989.
133.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism. In: Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
134.
Doty R. The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines. In: Beer FA, Hariman R, editors. Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. East Lansing: Michigan State University press; 1996. p. 331–45.
135.
Edkins J, Pin-Fat V. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2005 Aug;34(1):1–24.
136.
Edkins J, Vaughan-Williams N. Critical theorists and international relations [Internet]. Vol. Interventions. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003
137.
Hansen L. Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy. In: Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 17–36. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33
138.
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 1999 Jun;5(2):225–54.
139.
Foucault M, Rabinow P. The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1986.
140.
Hollinger R. ‘Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations’. In: Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
141.
Shapiro M. Textualising Global Politics. In: International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books; 1989. p. 11–22.
142.
Rosenau P. Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1990 Mar;19(1):83–110.
143.
Cynthia Weber. Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 1992;18(3):199–216. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
144.
Smith S. Introducing Feminism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/04/feminism-in-international-relations-theory/
145.
Roff HM. Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2016 Jan 2;18(1):1–18.
146.
Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations. International Studies Review [Internet]. 2008;10(4):693–707. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017
147.
Bulmer S. Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2013 Jun;15(2):137–56.
148.
Enloe CH. Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women? In: Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics [Internet]. Second edition, completely revised and updated. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669
149.
Carpenter RC. Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue. 2006 Mar;37(1):83–103.
150.
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 1998;24(2):283–97. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523
151.
Hooper C. Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 2001.
152.
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies [Internet]. 1996;22(4):405–29. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459
153.
Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11. Available from: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf
154.
Shepherd LJ, editor. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations [Internet]. Second edition. London: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819
155.
Steans J. Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2003 Aug;5(3):428–54.
156.
Steans J. Gender, Feminism, and International Relations. In: Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. 2nd ed., rev.expanded. Cambridge: Polity; 2006. p. 7–19.
157.
Tickner JA. Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. In: Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press; 1992.
158.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 10 - Feminism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity [Internet]. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-12
159.
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. 1997;41(4):611–32. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
160.
WAYLEN G. You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies. 2006 Feb 27;32(01).
161.
Weber C. Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1994;23:337–49.
162.
Nair S. Introducing Postcolonialism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2017/12/08/postcolonialism-in-international-relations-theory/
163.
De Genova N. The "migrant crisis” as racial crisis: do Black Lives Matter in Europe? Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2018 Aug 9;41(10):1765–82.
164.
Rita Abrahamsen. African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African Affairs [Internet]. 2003;102(407):189–210. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676
165.
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2010.
166.
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002 Jan;31(1):109–27.
167.
Biccum AR. Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly. 2005 Sep;26(6):1005–20.
168.
Pinar Bilgin. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;29(1):5–23. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023
169.
Chowdhury G, Nair S. Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. In: Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 1–32. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181
170.
Darby P. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2004 Jan;33(1):1–32.
171.
Epstein C. The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory. 2014 Jul;6(02):294–311.
172.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
173.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
174.
Gruffydd Jones B, editor. Decolonizing international relations [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740
175.
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 2013 Jun;19(2):353–77.
176.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Vol. Interventions. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
177.
Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila
178.
TAYLOR L. Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America. International Studies Review. 2012 Sep;14(3):386–400.
179.
Tucker K. Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement. International Political Sociology. 2018 Sep 1;12(3):215–32.
180.
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012 Sep;41(1):3–22.
181.
Dietzel A. Introducing Global Justice in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., editors. International Relations Theory [Internet]. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing; Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/
182.
Dietzel A. The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health? Global Policy. 2017 Sep;8(3):313–21.
183.
Brown GW, Held D, editors. Editor’s Introduction. In: The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity; 2010.
184.
Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: Polity; 2011.
185.
Brock G. Global Justice [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001/acprof-9780199230938
186.
Brown GW, Held D, editors. The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity; 2010.
187.
Brown GW. Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution [Internet]. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04
188.
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010 Mar;13(1):203–28.
189.
Gardiner SM. Climate ethics: essential readings [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959
190.
Lawrence P. Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014.
191.
Hayden P. Cosmopolitan global politics. Vol. Ethics and global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2005.
192.
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922
193.
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed? Review of International Studies. 2003 Oct;29(04).
194.
Lu C. The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2000 Jun;8(2):244–67.
195.
Moss J, editor. Climate Change and Justice [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340
196.
Shue H. Climate justice: vulnerability and protection [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931
197.
Tan KC. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism [Internet]. Vol. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385
