Bibliography for Copy of POLI10003: Theories of International Relations BETA

1.

McGlinchey, S.: Getting Started with International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

2.

Brown, C., Ainley, K.: Introduction: Defining International Relations. In: Understanding international relations. pp. 1–17. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).

3.

Adler, E., Pouliot, V.: International practices. International Theory. 3, 1–36 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X.

4.

Buzan, B., Little, R.: Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium. 30, 19–39 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.

5.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Introduction. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

6.

Dunne, T., Hansen, L., Wight, C.: The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 19, 405–425 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.

7.

Smith, S., Booth, K., Zalewski, M.: Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).

8.

Jabri, V.: Reflections on the Study of International Relations. In: Issues in international relations. pp. 289–313. Routledge, London (2000).

9.

Jackson, R., Sorensen, G.: IR as an academic subject. In: Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. pp. 28–57. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).

10.

Doyle, M.W., Ikenberry, G.J.: Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’. In: New thinking in international relations theory. Westview Press, Oxford (1997).

11.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S.: Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013).

12.

NICHOLSON, M.: What’s the use of International Relations? Review of International Studies. 26, 183–198 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500001832.

13.

Schroeder, P.W.: History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit. International Security. 22, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539329.

14.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

15.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., Simmons, B.A.: Chapter 1 ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’. In: Handbook of international relations. SAGE, Los Angeles, [Calif.] (2013).

16.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S.: Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates? In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013).

17.

Walt, S.M.: International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy. (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275.

18.

Smith, S., Booth, K., Zalewski, M.: Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).

19.

Meiser, J.W.: Introducing Liberalism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

20.

G. John Ikenberry: Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 7, 71–87 (2009).

21.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., Owens, P. eds: Chapter 7 - Liberalism. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).

22.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Chapter 3 - Liberalism. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

23.

Charvet, J., Kaczynska-Nay, E.: The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).

24.

Michael W. Doyle: Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review. 99, 463–466 (2005).

25.

Franceschet, A.: The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 54, (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/40203406.

26.

Fukuyama, F.: The end of history and the last man. Penguin Books, London (2012).

27.

Gardner, R.N.: The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. The Washington Quarterly. 13, 23–39 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445391.

28.

Jean-Yves Haine: The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 64, 453–479 (2009).

29.

Hoffmann, S.: The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. Foreign Policy. (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/1148964.

30.

Lawson, S.: Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory. In: Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics. Polity, Cambridge, England (2015).

31.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 5 - Liberalism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

32.

Axelrod, R., Keohane, R.O.: Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics. 38, 226–254 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357.

33.

Campbell, J.L., Pedersen, O.K.: The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2001).

34.

G. John Ikenberry: The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs. 90, 56–68 (2011).

35.

Koivisto, M., Dunne, T.: Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 38, 615–640 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810363509.

36.

Keohane, R.O., Martin, L.L.: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 20, (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.

37.

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons: Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization. 52, 729–757 (1998).

38.

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett: Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization. 60, 781–810 (2006).

39.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

40.

Reus-Smit, C., Snidal, D.: Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism. In: The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).

41.

WEISS, T.G.: How United Nations ideas change history. Review of International Studies. 36, 3–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051100009X.

42.

Antunes, S., Camisao, I.: Introducing Realism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

43.

Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’, https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp.

44.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Chapter 2 - Realism. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

45.

William Bain: Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 26, 445–464 (2000).

46.

Smith, S., Booth, K., Zalewski, M.: Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).

47.

Robert G. Gilpin: The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization. 38, 287–304 (1984).

48.

Guzzini, S.: The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 10, 533–568 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047848.

49.

Jervis, Robert: Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research. 61,.

50.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 3 - Classical Realism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

51.

Lebow, R.N.: Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations. 19, 329–336 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805055410.

52.

Morgenthau, H.J.: Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review. 46, 961–988 (1952). https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108.

53.

Justin Rosenberg: What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies. 16, 285–303 (1990).

54.

Richard K. Ashley: The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 38, 225–286 (1984).

55.

Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478.

56.

Keohane, R.O., Waltz, K.N.: Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press, New York (1986).

57.

Booth, K., Smith, S.: Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice. In: International relations theory today. Polity Press, Cambridge (1995).

58.

Mearsheimer, J.J.: Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 15, (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.

59.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 4 - Structural Realism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

60.

Davis, N.: A rose by any other name. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 25, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021.

61.

Waltz, K.N.: Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill, London (1979).

62.

Kenneth N. Waltz: Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. 25, 5–41 (2000).

63.

Michael C. Williams: Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy. Review of International Studies. 19, 103–121 (1993).

64.

Baldwin, D.A.: Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. Columbia University Press, New York (1993).

65.

Joseph M. Grieco: Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 42, 485–507 (1988).

66.

Robert Jervis: Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security. 24, 42–63 (1999).

67.

Keohane, R.O.: International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 32, (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589.

68.

Nye, J.S.: Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics. 40, 235–251 (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.

69.

Powell, R.: Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization. 48, (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.

70.

Stivachtis, Y.: Introducing the English School in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

71.

Gallagher, A.M.: A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect. 4, 334–357 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00403004.

72.

Bellamy, A.J. ed: International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001.

73.

Bull, H.: The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Palgrave, Basingstoke (2002).

74.

Buzan, B.: An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Polity, Cambridge (2014).

75.

Buzan, B.: From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).

76.

Barry Buzan: The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies. 27, 471–488 (2001).

77.

Dunne, T.: Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford, Basingstoke (1998).

78.

Martha Finnemore: Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies. 27, 509–513 (2001).

79.

Jackson, R.H.: The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).

80.

Jackson, R.H., Sørensen, G.: Chapter 5 - International Society. In: Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).

81.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Chapter 4 - The English School. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

82.

Linklater, A.: The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).

83.

Linklater, A., Suganami, H.: The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).

84.

LITTLE, R.: The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 6, 395–422 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.

85.

Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory, https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/.

86.

Wheeler, N.J.: Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).

87.

Wheeler, N.J.: Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 21, 463–487 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030201.

88.

Pal, M.: Introducing Marxism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

89.

Ferreira, M.F.: Introducing Critical Theory in International Relations. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

90.

Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011, http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis.

91.

Burnham, P.: Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class. 25, 103–112 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109.

92.

Bieler, A., Morton, A.D.: A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class. 28, 85–113 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106.

93.

Callinicos, A.: Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 6, 426–433 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x.

94.

Cox, R.W.: Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 10, 126–155 (1981).

95.

Cox, R.W.: Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium : journal of international studies. 12, 162–175 (1983).

96.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Chapter 7 - Critical Theory. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

97.

el-Ojeili, C.: Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on. Critical Sociology. 41, 679–700 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513497377.

98.

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny: Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies. 24, 3–21 (1998).

99.

Gill, S.R., Law, D.: Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly. 33, (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523.

100.

Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q., Nowell-Smith, G.: Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Lawrence and Wishart, London (1971).

101.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., Owens, P. eds: Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).

102.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

103.

Maclean, J.: Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 17, 295–319 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.

104.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

105.

Wallerstein, I.: Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. In: World-systems analysis: an introduction. pp. 23–41. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C. (2004).

106.

Immanuel Wallerstein: The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 16, 387–415 (1974).

107.

Theys, S.: Introducing Constructivism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

108.

Richard Price: A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization. 49, 73–103 (1995).

109.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., Simmons, B.A.: Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. In: Handbook of international relations. SAGE, Los Angeles, [Calif.] (2013).

110.

Pretorius, J.: The Security Imaginary: Explaining Military Isomorphism. Security Dialogue. 39, 99–120 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607086825.

111.

Björkdahl, A.: Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 15, 9–23 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216.

112.

R. Charli Carpenter: Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization. 65, 69–102 (2011).

113.

Checkel, J.T.: The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics. 50, 324–348 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133.

114.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

115.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink: International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 52, 887–917 (1998).

116.

Finnemore, M., Sikkink, K.: Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 4, 391–416 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.

117.

Hopf, T.: The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 23, (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.

118.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., Simmons, B.A.: Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations. In: Handbook of international relations. SAGE, Los Angeles, [Calif.] (2013).

119.

Della Porta, D., Keating, M. eds: Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters. In: Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).

120.

Onuf, N.G.: Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations. Routledge, New York (2013).

121.

Ronen Palan: A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 26, 575–598 (2000).

122.

Reus-Smit, C.: Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 4, 487–509 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00091.

123.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

124.

Weldes, J.: Constructing National Interests’. European journal of international relations. 2, 275–318 (1996).

125.

Alexander Wendt: Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 46, 391–425 (1992).

126.

McMorrow, A.: Introducing Poststructuralism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

127.

Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127.

128.

Smith, S., Booth, K., Zalewski, M.: ’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).

129.

Callinicos, A.: Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism. In: Against postmodernism: a marxist critique. pp. 62–91. Polity Press, Cambridge (1989).

130.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

131.

David Campbell: Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 15, 263–286 (1990).

132.

Shapiro, M.J., Der Derian, J.: International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass (1989).

133.

Burchill, S., Linklater, A.: Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism. In: Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

134.

Doty, R.: The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines. In: Beer, F.A. and Hariman, R. (eds.) Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. pp. 331–345. Michigan State University press, East Lansing (1996).

135.

Edkins, J., Pin-Fat, V.: Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 34, 1–24 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101.

136.

Edkins, J., Vaughan-Williams, N.: Critical theorists and international relations. Routledge, London (2009).

137.

Hansen, L.: Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy. In: Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. pp. 17–36. Routledge, London (2006).

138.

MILLIKEN, J.: The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 5, 225–254 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.

139.

Foucault, M., Rabinow, P.: The Foucault reader. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth (1986).

140.

Hollinger, R.: ‘Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations’. In: Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1994).

141.

Shapiro, M.: Textualising Global Politics. In: International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. pp. 11–22. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass (1989).

142.

Rosenau, P.: Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 19, 83–110 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190010701.

143.

Cynthia Weber: Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies. 18, 199–216 (1992).

144.

Smith, S.: Introducing Feminism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

145.

Roff, H.M.: Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 18, 1–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246.

146.

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True: Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations. International Studies Review. 10, 693–707 (2008).

147.

Bulmer, S.: Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 15, 137–156 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565.

148.

Enloe, C.H.: Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women? In: Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. University of California Press, Berkeley (2014).

149.

Carpenter, R.C.: Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue. 37, 83–103 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139.

150.

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires: Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies. 24, 283–297 (1998).

151.

Hooper, C.: Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. Columbia University Press, New York (2001).

152.

Adam Jones: Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 22, 405–429 (1996).

153.

Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11.

154.

Shepherd, L.J. ed: Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Routledge, London (2015).

155.

Steans, J.: Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 5, 428–454 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00114.

156.

Steans, J.: Gender, Feminism, and International Relations. In: Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. pp. 7–19. Polity, Cambridge (2006).

157.

Tickner, J.A.: Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. In: Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. Columbia University Press, New York (1992).

158.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 10 - Feminism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

159.

J. Ann Tickner: You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 41, 611–632 (1997).

160.

WAYLEN, G.: You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies. 32, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006966.

161.

Weber, C.: Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 23, 337–349 (1994).

162.

Nair, S.: Introducing Postcolonialism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

163.

De Genova, N.: The "migrant crisis” as racial crisis: do Black Lives Matter in Europe? Ethnic and Racial Studies. 41, 1765–1782 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1361543.

164.

Rita Abrahamsen: African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African Affairs. 102, 189–210 (2003).

165.

Acharya, A., Buzan, B.: Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2010).

166.

Barkawi, T., Laffey, M.: Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 31, 109–127 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.

167.

Biccum, A.R.: Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly. 26, 1005–1020 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500139656.

168.

Pinar Bilgin: Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 29, 5–23 (2008).

169.

Chowdhury, G., Nair, S.: Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. In: Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class. pp. 1–32. Routledge, London (2002).

170.

Darby, P.: Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 33, 1–32 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101.

171.

Epstein, C.: The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory. 6, 294–311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219.

172.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., Smith, S. eds: Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).

173.

Hobson, J.M.: The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).

174.

Gruffydd Jones, B. ed: Decolonizing international relations. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2006).

175.

Matin, K.: Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 19, 353–377 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263.

176.

Seth, S. ed: Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Routledge, Abingdon (2013).

177.

Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila.

178.

TAYLOR, L.: Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America. International Studies Review. 14, 386–400 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x.

179.

Tucker, K.: Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement. International Political Sociology. 12, 215–232 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly005.

180.

Vasilaki, R.: Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 41, 3–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.

181.

Dietzel, A.: Introducing Global Justice in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey, S. and et al. (eds.) International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing, Bristol.

182.

Dietzel, A.: The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health? Global Policy. 8, 313–321 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12421.

183.

Brown, G.W., Held, D. eds: Editor’s Introduction. In: The cosmopolitanism reader. Polity, Cambridge (2010).

184.

Beardsworth, R.: Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Polity, Cambridge (2011).

185.

Brock, G.: Global Justice. Oxford University Press (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001.

186.

Brown, G.W., Held, D. eds: The cosmopolitanism reader. Polity, Cambridge (2010).

187.

Brown, G.W.: Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh [Scotland] (2009).

188.

Caney, S.: Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 13, 203–228 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331.

189.

Gardiner, S.M.: Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).

190.

Lawrence, P.: Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2014).

191.

Hayden, P.: Cosmopolitan global politics. Ashgate, Aldershot (2005).

192.

Held, D.: Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities. Polity Press, Cambridge (2010).

193.

Held, D.: Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed? Review of International Studies. 29, (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004650.

194.

Lu, C.: The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy. 8, 244–267 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101.

195.

Moss, J. ed: Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015).

196.

Shue, H.: Climate justice: vulnerability and protection. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).

197.

Tan, K.-C.: Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).