1.
McGlinchey S. Getting Started with International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2017/12/24/getting-started-with-international-relations-theory/
2.
Brown C, Ainley K. Introduction: Defining International Relations. In: Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan; 2009:1-17.
3.
Adler E, Pouliot V. International practices. International Theory. 2011;3(01):1-36. doi:10.1017/S175297191000031X
4.
Buzan B, Little R. Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium. 2001;30(1):19-39. doi:10.1177/03058298010300010401
5.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Introduction. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
6.
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19(3):405-425. doi:10.1177/1354066113495485
7.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
8.
Jabri V. Reflections on the Study of International Relations. In: Issues in International Relations. Routledge; 2000:289-313.
9.
Jackson R, Sorensen G. IR as an academic subject. In: Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2010:28-57. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780198862208.001.0001/hepl-9780198862208-chapter-2
10.
Doyle MW, Ikenberry GJ. Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’. In: New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Westview Press; 1997.
11.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2013.
12.
NICHOLSON M. What’s the use of International Relations? Review of International Studies. 2000;26(2):183-198. doi:10.1017/S0260210500001832
13.
Schroeder PW. History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit. International Security. 1997;22(1). doi:10.2307/2539329
14.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-1
15.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 1 ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’. In: Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2013.
16.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates? In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2013.
17.
Walt SM. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy. 1998;(110). doi:10.2307/1149275
18.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
19.
Meiser JW. Introducing Liberalism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/18/introducing-liberalism-in-international-relations-theory/
20.
G. John Ikenberry. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 2009;7(1):71-87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
21.
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, eds. Chapter 7 - Liberalism. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Sixth edition. Oxford University Press; 2014.
22.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 3 - Liberalism. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
23.
Charvet J, Kaczynska-Nay E. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge University Press; 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972
24.
Michael W. Doyle. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review. 2005;99(3):463-466. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953
25.
Franceschet A. The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 1999;54(3). doi:10.2307/40203406
26.
Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. Twentieth anniversary edition. Penguin Books; 2012.
27.
Gardner RN. The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. The Washington Quarterly. 1990;13(3):23-39. doi:10.1080/01636609009445391
28.
Jean-Yves Haine. The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 2009;64(2):453-479. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518
29.
Hoffmann S. The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. Foreign Policy. 1995;(98). doi:10.2307/1148964
30.
Lawson S. Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory. In: Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics. Polity; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448
31.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 5 - Liberalism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
32.
Axelrod R, Keohane RO. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics. 1985;38(01):226-254. doi:10.2307/2010357
33.
Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton University Press; 2001.
34.
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs. 2011;90(3):56-68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
35.
Koivisto M, Dunne T. Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2010;38(3):615-640. doi:10.1177/0305829810363509
36.
Keohane RO, Martin LL. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995;20(1). doi:10.2307/2539214
37.
Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization. 1998;52(4):729-757. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356
38.
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization. 2006;60(4):781-810. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847
39.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
40.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press; 2008.
41.
WEISS TG. How United Nations ideas change history. Review of International Studies. 2010;36(S1):3-23. doi:10.1017/S026021051100009X
42.
Antunes S, Camisao I. Introducing Realism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/27/introducing-realism-in-international-relations-theory/
43.
Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp
44.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 2 - Realism. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368
45.
William Bain. Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 2000;26(3):445-464. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688
46.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
47.
Robert G. Gilpin. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization. 1984;38(2):287-304. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441
48.
Guzzini S. The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2004;10(4):533-568. doi:10.1177/1354066104047848
49.
Jervis, Robert. Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research. 61(4). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
50.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 3 - Classical Realism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
51.
Lebow RN. Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations. 2005;19(3):329-336. doi:10.1177/0047117805055410
52.
Morgenthau HJ. Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review. 1952;46(04):961-988. doi:10.2307/1952108
53.
Justin Rosenberg. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies. 1990;16(4):285-303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232
54.
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 1984;38(2):225-286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440
55.
Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf
56.
Keohane RO, Waltz KN. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol The political economy of international change. Columbia University Press; 1986.
57.
Booth K, Smith S. Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice. In: International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press; 1995.
58.
Mearsheimer JJ. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 1990;15(1). doi:10.2307/2538981
59.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 4 - Structural Realism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
60.
Davis N. A rose by any other name. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014;25. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021
61.
Waltz KN. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill; 1979.
62.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. 2000;25(1):5-41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772
63.
Michael C. Williams. Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy. Review of International Studies. 1993;19(2):103-121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
64.
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1993.
65.
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 1988;42(3):485-507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
66.
Robert Jervis. Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security. 1999;24(1):42-63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347
67.
Keohane RO. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 1988;32(4). doi:10.2307/2600589
68.
Nye JS. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics. 1988;40(02):235-251. doi:10.2307/2010363
69.
Powell R. Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization. 1994;48(02). doi:10.1017/S0020818300028204
70.
Stivachtis Y. Introducing the English School in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/23/introducing-the-english-school-in-international-relations-theory/
71.
Gallagher AM. A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect. 2012;4(3):334-357. doi:10.1163/1875984X-00403004
72.
Bellamy AJ, ed. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press; 2004. doi:10.1093/0199265208.001.0001
73.
Bull H. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. Palgrave; 2002.
74.
Buzan B. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Polity; 2014.
75.
Buzan B. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Vol Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press; 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617
76.
Barry Buzan. The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies. 2001;27(3):471-488. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
77.
Dunne T. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Vol St Anthony’s series. Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford; 1998.
78.
Martha Finnemore. Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies. 2001;27(3):509-513. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753
79.
Jackson RH. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford University Press; 2000.
80.
Jackson RH, Sørensen G. Chapter 5 - International Society. In: Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
81.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 4 - The English School. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
82.
Linklater A. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge University Press; 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348
83.
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Vol Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press; 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528
84.
LITTLE R. The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2000;6(3):395-422. doi:10.1177/1354066100006003004
85.
Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/
86.
Wheeler NJ. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford University Press; 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740
87.
Wheeler NJ. Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1992;21(3):463-487. doi:10.1177/03058298920210030201
88.
Pal M. Introducing Marxism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/25/introducing-marxism-in-international-relations-theory/
89.
Ferreira MF. Introducing Critical Theory in International Relations. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/18/introducing-critical-theory-in-international-relations/
90.
Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011. http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis
91.
Burnham P. Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class. 2001;25(3):103-112. doi:10.1177/030981680107500109
92.
Bieler A, Morton AD. A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class. 2004;28(1):85-113. doi:10.1177/030981680408200106
93.
Callinicos A. Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2004;6(3):426-433. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x
94.
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1981;10(2):126-155.
95.
Cox RW. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium : journal of international studies. 1983;12(2):162-175.
96.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 7 - Critical Theory. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
97.
el-Ojeili C. Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on. Critical Sociology. 2015;41(4-5):679-700. doi:10.1177/0896920513497377
98.
Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies. 1998;24(1):3-21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503
99.
Gill SR, Law D. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly. 1989;33(4). doi:10.2307/2600523
100.
Gramsci A, Hoare Q, Nowell-Smith G. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Lawrence and Wishart; 1971.
101.
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, eds. Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Sixth edition. Oxford University Press; 2014. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192898142.001.0001/hepl-9780192898142-chapter-8
102.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
103.
Maclean J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1988;17(2):295-319. doi:10.1177/03058298880170021201
104.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
105.
Wallerstein I. Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. In: World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Vol A John Hope Franklin Center book. Duke University Press; 2004:23-41. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3007861&ppg=38
106.
Immanuel Wallerstein. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 1974;16(4):387-415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015
107.
Theys S. Introducing Constructivism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/23/introducing-constructivism-in-international-relations-theory/
108.
Richard Price. A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization. 1995;49(1):73-103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. In: Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2013.
110.
Pretorius J. The Security Imaginary: Explaining Military Isomorphism. Security Dialogue. 2008;39(1):99-120. doi:10.1177/0967010607086825
111.
Björkdahl A. Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2002;15(1):9-23. doi:10.1080/09557570220126216
112.
R. Charli Carpenter. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization. 2011;65(1):69-102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104
113.
Checkel JT. The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics. 1998;50(02):324-348. doi:10.1017/S0043887100008133
114.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
115.
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 1998;52(4):887-917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
116.
Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 2001;4(1):391-416. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
117.
Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23(1). doi:10.2307/2539267
118.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations. In: Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2013.
119.
Della Porta D, Keating M, eds. Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters. In: Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge University Press; 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
120.
Onuf NG. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. Vol The new international relations. Routledge; 2013.
121.
Ronen Palan. A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 2000;26(4):575-598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700
122.
Reus-Smit C. Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2002;4(3):487-509. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00091
123.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
124.
Weldes J. Constructing National Interests’. European journal of international relations. 1996;2:275-318. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001
125.
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992;46(2):391-425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858
126.
McMorrow A. Introducing Poststructuralism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/13/introducing-poststructuralism-in-international-relations-theory/
127.
Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf
128.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. ’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press; 1996. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013
129.
Callinicos A. Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism. In: Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Polity Press; 1989:62-91.
130.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
131.
David Campbell. Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 1990;15(3):263-286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
132.
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol World Politics Series. Lexington Books; 1989.
133.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism. In: Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
134.
Doty R. The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines. In: Beer FA, Hariman R, eds. Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations. Vol Rhetoric and public affairs series. Michigan State University press; 1996:331-345.
135.
Edkins J, Pin-Fat V. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2005;34(1):1-24. doi:10.1177/03058298050340010101
136.
Edkins J, Vaughan-Williams N. Critical Theorists and International Relations. Vol Interventions. Routledge; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003
137.
Hansen L. Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy. In: Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. Vol The new international relations series. Routledge; 2006:17-36. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33
138.
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 1999;5(2):225-254. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003
139.
Foucault M, Rabinow P. The Foucault Reader. Penguin Books; 1986.
140.
Hollinger R. ‘Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations’. In: Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach. Vol Contemporary social theory. Sage; 1994.
141.
Shapiro M. Textualising Global Politics. In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol World Politics Series. Lexington Books; 1989:11-22.
142.
Rosenau P. Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1990;19(1):83-110. doi:10.1177/03058298900190010701
143.
Cynthia Weber. Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies. 1992;18(3):199-216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
144.
Smith S. Introducing Feminism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/04/feminism-in-international-relations-theory/
145.
Roff HM. Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2016;18(1):1-18. doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246
146.
Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations. International Studies Review. 2008;10(4):693-707. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017
147.
Bulmer S. Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2013;15(2):137-156. doi:10.1080/14616742.2012.746565
148.
Enloe CH. Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women? In: Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Second edition, completely revised and updated. University of California Press; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669
149.
Carpenter RC. Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue. 2006;37(1):83-103. doi:10.1177/0967010606064139
150.
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies. 1998;24(2):283-297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523
151.
Hooper C. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. Columbia University Press; 2001.
152.
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22(4):405-429. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459
153.
Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf
154.
Shepherd LJ, ed. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Second edition. Routledge; 2015. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819
155.
Steans J. Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2003;5(3):428-454. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00114
156.
Steans J. Gender, Feminism, and International Relations. In: Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates and Future Directions. 2nd ed., rev.expanded. Polity; 2006:7-19.
157.
Tickner JA. Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. In: Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Vol New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press; 1992.
158.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 10 - Feminism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-12
159.
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41(4):611-632. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
160.
WAYLEN G. You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies. 2006;32(01). doi:10.1017/S0260210506006966
161.
Weber C. Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1994;23:337-349.
162.
Nair S. Introducing Postcolonialism in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2017/12/08/postcolonialism-in-international-relations-theory/
163.
De Genova N. The "migrant crisis” as racial crisis: do Black Lives Matter in Europe? Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2018;41(10):1765-1782. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1361543
164.
Rita Abrahamsen. African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African Affairs. 2003;102(407):189-210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676
165.
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge; 2010.
166.
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31(1):109-127. doi:10.1177/03058298020310010601
167.
Biccum AR. Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly. 2005;26(6):1005-1020. doi:10.1080/01436590500139656
168.
Pinar Bilgin. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 2008;29(1):5-23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023
169.
Chowdhury G, Nair S. Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. In: Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class. Vol Routledge advances in international relations and global politics. Routledge; 2002:1-32. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181
170.
Darby P. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2004;33(1):1-32. doi:10.1177/03058298040330010101
171.
Epstein C. The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory. 2014;6(02):294-311. doi:10.1017/S1752971914000219
172.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, eds. Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism. In: International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford University Press; 2016.
173.
Hobson JM. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge University Press; 2012. https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139096829
174.
Gruffydd Jones B, ed. Decolonizing International Relations. Rowman and Littlefield; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740
175.
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19(2):353-377. doi:10.1177/1354066111425263
176.
Seth S, ed. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Vol Interventions. Routledge; 2013.
177.
Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. doi:10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila
178.
TAYLOR L. Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America. International Studies Review. 2012;14(3):386-400. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x
179.
Tucker K. Unraveling Coloniality in International Relations: Knowledge, Relationality, and Strategies for Engagement. International Political Sociology. 2018;12(3):215-232. doi:10.1093/ips/oly005
180.
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012;41(1):3-22. doi:10.1177/0305829812451720
181.
Dietzel A. Introducing Global Justice in International Relations Theory. In: McGlinchey S, et al., eds. International Relations Theory. E-International Relations Publishing. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/
182.
Dietzel A. The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health? Global Policy. 2017;8(3):313-321. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12421
183.
Brown GW, Held D, eds. Editor’s Introduction. In: The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Polity; 2010.
184.
Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Polity; 2011.
185.
Brock G. Global Justice. Oxford University Press; 2009. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001
186.
Brown GW, Held D, eds. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Polity; 2010.
187.
Brown GW. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh University Press; 2009. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04
188.
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010;13(1):203-228. doi:10.1080/13698230903326331
189.
Gardiner SM. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959
190.
Lawrence P. Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014.
191.
Hayden P. Cosmopolitan Global Politics. Vol Ethics and global politics. Ashgate; 2005.
192.
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Polity Press; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922
193.
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed? Review of International Studies. 2003;29(04). doi:10.1017/S0260210503004650
194.
Lu C. The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2000;8(2):244-267. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00101
195.
Moss J, ed. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge University Press; 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340
196.
Shue H. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford University Press; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931
197.
Tan KC. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Vol Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge University Press; 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385
