1.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2012).
2.
De Cruz, P. Comparative Law in a Changing World. (Routledge-Cavendish, London, 2007).
3.
The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2019).
4.
Glenn, H. P. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2014).
5.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2012).
6.
De Cruz, P. Comparative Law in a Changing World. (Routledge-Cavendish, London, 2007).
7.
Griss, I. How Judges Think: Judicial Reasoning in Tort Cases from a Comparative Perspective. Journal of European Tort Law,.
8.
Steiner, E. French Law: A Comparative Approach. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2018).
9.
Glenn, H. P. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2014).
10.
Dainow, J. The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison. The American Journal of Comparative Law 15, (1966).
11.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2012).
12.
Glenn, H. P. Comparative Legal Families and Comparative Legal Traditions. in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.13.
13.
De Cruz, P. Comparative Law in a Changing World. (Routledge-Cavendish, London, 2007).
14.
RALF MICHAELS. Comparative Law by Numbers? Legal Origins Thesis, Doing Business Reports, and the Silence of Traditional Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law 57, (2009).
15.
Frankenberg, G. Comparative Law as Critique. (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 2016).
16.
Stanton, K. Comparative Law in the House of Lords and Supreme Court. Common Law World Review 42, 269–296 (2013).
17.
Glenn, H. P. Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2014).
18.
MARIANA PARGENDLER. The Rise and Decline of Legal Families. The American Journal of Comparative Law 60, (2012).
19.
Robinson, O. F., Fergus, T. D. & Gordon, W. M. An Introduction to European Legal History. (Professional Books, Abingdon, Oxon, 1985).
20.
Legrand, P. How to compare now. Legal Studies 16, 232–242 (1996).
21.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2012).
22.
Watson, A. Legal transplants and law reform. Law Quarterly Review 92, (1976).
23.
Legrand, P. The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 4, 111–124 (1997).
24.
Graziadei, M. Comparative Law, Transplants and Receptions. in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.14.
25.
Dean, M. Legal transplants and jury trial in Japan. Legal Studies 31, 570–590 (2011).
26.
ROBIN EVANS-JONES.*. Receptions of law, mixed legal systems and the myth of the genius of Scots private law. Law Quarterly Review 228–249 (1998).
27.
Gray, A. The Incomplete Legal Transplant – Good Faith and the Common Law. in Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania (ed. Breda, V.) 111–131 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).
28.
Harding, A. The Legal Transplant Debate: Getting Beyond the Impasse? in Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania (ed. Breda, V.) 13–33 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2019).
29.
Menski, W. Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006).
30.
Shah, P. Globalisation and the Challenge of Asian Legal Transplants in Europe. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies,.
31.
Castellucci, Ignazio. Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau. McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill 57, 665–720.
32.
John Gillespie. Transplanted Company Law: An Ideological and Cultural Analysis of Market-Entry in Vietnam. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51, (2002).
33.
Siems, M. Malicious legal transplants. Legal Studies 38, 103–119 (2018).
34.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2012).
35.
Muir Watt, H. Globalisation and comparative law. in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.18.
36.
Legrand, P. European Legal Systems are not Converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45, 52–81 (1996).
37.
Gerard McMeel. The proposal for a Common European Sales Law: next stop a European Contract Code? Journal of International Banking & Financial Law 27,.
38.
Jansen, Corjo J.H. A European Civil Code and National Private Law: Lessons from History. European Review of Private Law 24, 473–488.
39.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52011PC0635.
40.
Nils Jansen and Reinhard Zimmermann. ‘A European civil code in all but name’: Discussing the nature and purposes of the draft common frame of reference. The Cambridge Law Journal 69, (2010).
41.
Zimmermann, R. Comparative Law and the Europeanization of Private Law. in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.17.
42.
Collins, Hugh. Why Europe Needs a Civil Code. European Review of Private Law 21, 907–922.
43.
Cotterrell, R. What Is Transnational Law. Law & Social Inquiry,.
44.
Ginsburg, T. & Dixon, R. Comparative Constitutional Law. The rise of specialized constitutional courts (Edward Elgar Pub, Cheltenham, 2011).
45.
Stone Sweet, A. Constitutional Courts. in The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law 816–830 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2012).
46.
Hunter-Henin, M. Constitutional developments and human rights in France: One step forward, two steps back. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60, 167–188 (2011).
47.
Boyron, S. France. in How constitutions change: a comparative study 115–142 (Hart Pub, Oxford, 2011).
48.
Boyron, S. Germany. in How constitutions change: a comparative study 143–167 (Hart Pub, Oxford, 2011).
49.
Boyron, S. The United Kingdom. in How constitutions change: a comparative study 329–355 (Hart Pub, Oxford, 2011).
50.
Tushnet, M. V. Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2018).
51.
Selection of QPC decisions. https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/selection-of-qpc-decisions.
52.
Ginsberg, T. Written constitutions and the administrative state: on the constitutional character of administrative law. in Comparative Administrative Law 60–70.
53.
Bell, J. Comparative Administrative Law. in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 1259–1286.
54.
Thatcher, M. Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics 25, 125–147 (2002).
55.
Halberstam, D. The promise of comparative administrative law: a constitutional perspective on independent agencies. in Comparative Administrative Law 139–158.
56.
Rose-Ackerman, S. Introduction. in Comparative Administrative Law 1–20.
57.
Kingsbury, B.; Krisch, N.; Stewart, R. B. The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems,.
58.
Ordonnance n° 2016-131 du 10 février 2016 portant réforme du droit des contrats, du régime général et de la preuve des obligations. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000032004939&categorieLien=id.
59.
The law of contract, the general regime of obligations, and proof of obilgations.
60.
Rowan, S. The new French law of contract. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 66, 805–831 (2017).
61.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2012).
62.
Smits, J. M. Contract Law: A Comparative Introduction. (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 2017).
63.
Micklitz, HanssW. On the Intellectual History of Freedom of Contract and Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal (2015) doi:10.2139/ssrn.2587696.
64.
Valcke, Catherine. Convergence and Divergence of the English, French, and German Conceptions of Contract. European Review of Private Law 16, 29–62.
65.
Koetz, H. Comparative contract law. in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.29.
66.
DE MOOR, A. Contract and agreement in English and French law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 6, 275–287 (1986).
67.
Valcke, C. On Comparing French and English Contract Law: Insights from Social Contract Theory. Journal of Comparative Law,.
68.
Whittaker, S. Unfair Terms in Commercial Contracts and the Two Laws of Competition: French Law and English Law Contrasted. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 39, 404–434 (2019).
69.
Pillet, G. The Reform of French Contract Law and of the General Rules on Obligations: The Civil Code Faces the Challenges of the Market. International Business Law Journal,.
70.
Vaquer i Aloy, A. Contract Law in Spain. (Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands, 2015).
71.
Wagner, G. Comparative Tort Law. in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.32.
72.
Oliphant, K. Cultures of Tort Law in Europe. Journal of European Tort Law,.
73.
Banakas, Stathis. Liability for Incorrect Financial Information: Theory and Practice in a General Clause System and in a Protected Interests System. European Review of Private Law 7, 261–286.
74.
Brun, P. & Quézel-Ambrunaz, C. French Tort Law Facing Reform. Journal of European Tort Law 4, (2013).
75.
Sharkey, C. M. Tort Liability for Pure Economic Loss: A Perspective from the United States and Some Comparative European Insights. Journal of European Tort Law 7, (2016).
76.
Borghetti, J.-S. The Culture of Tort Law in France. Journal of European Tort Law 3, (2012).
77.
Fedtke, J. The Culture of German Tort Law. Journal of European Tort Law 3, (2012).
78.
Borghetti, J.-S. Non-Pecuniary Damages in France. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law (2015) doi:10.1093/cjcl/cxv012.
79.
Magnus, U. Damages for Non-pecuniary Loss in German Contract and Tort Law. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law (2015) doi:10.1093/cjcl/cxv011.
80.
Projet de Réforme de la Responsabilite Civile.
81.
Projet de Réforme: du droit de la responsabilité civile.