1.
Edward Elgar Publishing: Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2012).
2.
De Cruz, P.: Comparative law in a changing world. Routledge-Cavendish, London (2007).
3.
Reimann, M., Zimmermann, R. eds: The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2019).
4.
Glenn, H.P.: Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2014).
5.
Edward Elgar Publishing: Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2012).
6.
De Cruz, P.: Comparative law in a changing world. Routledge-Cavendish, London (2007).
7.
Griss, I.: How Judges Think: Judicial Reasoning in Tort Cases from a Comparative Perspective. Journal of European Tort Law,.
8.
Steiner, E.: French law: a comparative approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2018).
9.
Glenn, H.P.: Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2014).
10.
Dainow, J.: The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 15, (1966). https://doi.org/10.2307/838275.
11.
Edward Elgar Publishing: Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2012).
12.
Glenn, H.P.: Comparative Legal Families and Comparative Legal Traditions. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.13.
13.
De Cruz, P.: Comparative law in a changing world. Routledge-Cavendish, London (2007).
14.
RALF MICHAELS: Comparative Law by Numbers? Legal Origins Thesis, Doing Business Reports, and the Silence of Traditional Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 57, (2009).
15.
Frankenberg, G.: Comparative law as critique. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK (2016).
16.
Stanton, K.: Comparative Law in the House of Lords and Supreme Court. Common Law World Review. 42, 269–296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1350/clwr.2013.42.3.0256.
17.
Glenn, H.P.: Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2014).
18.
MARIANA PARGENDLER: The Rise and Decline of Legal Families. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 60, (2012).
19.
Robinson, O.F., Fergus, T.D., Gordon, W.M.: An introduction to European legal history. Professional Books, Abingdon, Oxon (1985).
20.
Legrand, P.: How to compare now. Legal Studies. 16, 232–242 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.1996.tb00005.x.
21.
Edward Elgar Publishing: Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2012).
22.
Watson, A.: Legal transplants and law reform. Law Quarterly Review. 92, (1976).
23.
Legrand, P.: The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 4, 111–124 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X9700400202.
24.
Graziadei, M.: Comparative Law, Transplants and Receptions. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.14.
25.
Dean, M.: Legal transplants and jury trial in Japan. Legal Studies. 31, 570–590 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00197.x.
26.
ROBIN EVANS-JONES.*: Receptions of law, mixed legal systems and the myth of the genius of Scots private law. Law Quarterly Review. 228–249 (1998).
27.
Gray, A.: The Incomplete Legal Transplant – Good Faith and the Common Law. In: Breda, V. (ed.) Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania. pp. 111–131. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2019).
28.
Harding, A.: The Legal Transplant Debate: Getting Beyond the Impasse? In: Breda, V. (ed.) Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania. pp. 13–33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2019).
29.
Menski, W.: Comparative law in a global context: the legal systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge University Press, New York (2006).
30.
Shah, P.: Globalisation and the Challenge of Asian Legal Transplants in Europe. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies,.
31.
Castellucci, Ignazio: Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau. McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill. 57, 665–720. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7202/1013028arCopiedAn error has occurred.
32.
John Gillespie: Transplanted Company Law: An Ideological and Cultural Analysis of Market-Entry in Vietnam. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 51, (2002).
33.
Siems, M.: Malicious legal transplants. Legal Studies. 38, 103–119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.4.
34.
Edward Elgar Publishing: Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2012).
35.
Muir Watt, H.: Globalisation and comparative law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.18.
36.
Legrand, P.: European Legal Systems are not Converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 45, 52–81 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300058656.
37.
Gerard McMeel: The proposal for a Common European Sales Law: next stop a European Contract Code? Journal of International Banking & Financial Law. 27,.
38.
Jansen, Corjo J.H.: A European Civil Code and National Private Law: Lessons from History. European Review of Private Law. 24, 473–488.
39.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52011PC0635.
40.
Nils Jansen and Reinhard Zimmermann: ‘A European civil code in all but name’: Discussing the nature and purposes of the draft common frame of reference. The Cambridge Law Journal. 69, (2010).
41.
Zimmermann, R.: Comparative Law and the Europeanization of Private Law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.17.
42.
Collins, Hugh: Why Europe Needs a Civil Code. European Review of Private Law. 21, 907–922.
43.
Cotterrell, R.: What Is Transnational Law. Law & Social Inquiry,.
44.
Ginsburg, T., Dixon, R.: Comparative Constitutional Law. Edward Elgar Pub, Cheltenham (2011).
45.
Stone Sweet, A.: Constitutional Courts. In: The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law. pp. 816–830. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. (2012).
46.
Hunter-Henin, M.: Constitutional developments and human rights in France: One step forward, two steps back. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 60, 167–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589310000709.
47.
Boyron, S.: France. In: How constitutions change: a comparative study. pp. 115–142. Hart Pub, Oxford (2011).
48.
Boyron, S.: Germany. In: How constitutions change: a comparative study. pp. 143–167. Hart Pub, Oxford (2011).
49.
Boyron, S.: The United Kingdom. In: How constitutions change: a comparative study. pp. 329–355. Hart Pub, Oxford (2011).
50.
Tushnet, M.V.: Advanced introduction to comparative constitutional law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2018).
51.
Selection of QPC decisions, https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/selection-of-qpc-decisions.
52.
Ginsberg, T.: Written constitutions and the administrative state: on the constitutional character of administrative law. In: Comparative Administrative Law. pp. 60–70.
53.
Bell, J.: Comparative Administrative Law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. pp. 1259–1286.
54.
Thatcher, M.: Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics. 25, 125–147 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/713601588.
55.
Halberstam, D.: The promise of comparative administrative law: a constitutional perspective on independent agencies. In: Comparative Administrative Law. pp. 139–158.
56.
Rose-Ackerman, S.: Introduction. In: Comparative Administrative Law. pp. 1–20.
57.
Kingsbury, B.; Krisch, N.; Stewart, R. B.: The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems,.
58.
Ordonnance n° 2016-131 du 10 février 2016 portant réforme du droit des contrats, du régime général et de la preuve des obligations, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000032004939&categorieLien=id.
59.
The law of contract, the general regime of obligations, and proof of obilgations, http://www.textes.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/THE-LAW-OF-CONTRACT-2-5-16.pdf.
60.
Rowan, S.: The new French law of contract. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 66, 805–831 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589317000252.
61.
Edward Elgar Publishing: Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2012).
62.
Smits, J.M.: Contract law: a comparative introduction. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2017).
63.
Micklitz, HanssW.: On the Intellectual History of Freedom of Contract and Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2015). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2587696.
64.
Valcke, Catherine: Convergence and Divergence of the English, French, and German Conceptions of Contract. European Review of Private Law. 16, 29–62.
65.
Koetz, H.: Comparative contract law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.29.
66.
DE MOOR, A.: Contract and agreement in English and French law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 6, 275–287 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/6.2.275.
67.
Valcke, C.: On Comparing French and English Contract Law: Insights from Social Contract Theory. Journal of Comparative Law,.
68.
Whittaker, S.: Unfair Terms in Commercial Contracts and the Two Laws of Competition: French Law and English Law Contrasted. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 39, 404–434 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqz003.
69.
Pillet, G.: The Reform of French Contract Law and of the General Rules on Obligations: The Civil Code Faces the Challenges of the Market. International Business Law Journal,.
70.
Vaquer i Aloy, A.: Contract law in Spain. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands (2015).
71.
Wagner, G.: Comparative Tort Law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.013.32.
72.
Oliphant, K.: Cultures of Tort Law in Europe. Journal of European Tort Law,.
73.
Banakas, Stathis: Liability for Incorrect Financial Information: Theory and Practice in a General Clause System and in a Protected Interests System. European Review of Private Law. 7, 261–286.
74.
Brun, P., Quézel-Ambrunaz, C.: French Tort Law Facing Reform. Journal of European Tort Law. 4, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2013-0004.
75.
Sharkey, C.M.: Tort Liability for Pure Economic Loss: A Perspective from the United States and Some Comparative European Insights. Journal of European Tort Law. 7, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2016-0012.
76.
Borghetti, J.-S.: The Culture of Tort Law in France. Journal of European Tort Law. 3, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2012-0158.
77.
Fedtke, J.: The Culture of German Tort Law. Journal of European Tort Law. 3, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2012-0183.
78.
Borghetti, J.-S.: Non-Pecuniary Damages in France. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxv012.
79.
Magnus, U.: Damages for Non-pecuniary Loss in German Contract and Tort Law. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxv011.
80.
Projet de Réforme de la Responsabilite Civile, http://www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/Projet_de_reforme_de_la_responsabilite_civile_13032017.pdf.
81.
Projet de Réforme: du droit de la responsabilité civile, http://www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/dp_responsabilite.civile_20170310.pdf.