1.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law [Internet]. Second edition. Smits JM, editor. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1034697
2.
De Cruz P. Comparative law in a changing world. 3rd ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish; 2007.
3.
Reimann M, Zimmermann R, editors. The Oxford handbook of comparative law. Second edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2019.
4.
Glenn HP. Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
5.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Second edition. Smits JM, editor. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012.
6.
De Cruz P. Comparative law in a changing world. 3rd ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish; 2007.
7.
Griss, I. How Judges Think: Judicial Reasoning in Tort Cases from a Comparative Perspective. Journal of European Tort Law, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jetl4&id=259
8.
Steiner E. French law: a comparative approach. Second edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2018.
9.
Glenn HP. Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
10.
Dainow J. The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some Points of Comparison. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1966;15(3).
11.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Second edition. Smits JM, editor. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012.
12.
Glenn HP. Comparative Legal Families and Comparative Legal Traditions. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198810230
13.
De Cruz P. Comparative law in a changing world. 3rd ed. London: Routledge-Cavendish; 2007.
14.
RALF MICHAELS. Comparative Law by Numbers? Legal Origins Thesis, Doing Business Reports, and the Silence of Traditional Comparative Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law [Internet]. 2009;57(4). Available from: https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/25652669?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Comparative&searchText=Law&searchText=by&searchText=Numbers&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DComparative%2BLaw%2Bby%2BNumbers%2B&ab_segments=0%2Fdefault-2%2Fcontrol&refreqid=search%3Ac05a3ae003fc902494e259b48514c412&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
15.
Frankenberg G. Comparative law as critique [Internet]. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016. Available from: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781785363931/9781785363931.xml
16.
Stanton K. Comparative Law in the House of Lords and Supreme Court. Common Law World Review. 2013 Sept;42(3):269–96.
17.
Glenn HP. Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2014.
18.
MARIANA PARGENDLER. The Rise and Decline of Legal Families. The American Journal of Comparative Law [Internet]. 2012;60(4). Available from: https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/41721695?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Rise&searchText=and&searchText=Decline&searchText=of&searchText=Legal&searchText=Families&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DRise%2Band%2BDecline%2Bof%2BLegal%2BFamilies%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj100060&ab_segments=0%2Fdefault-2%2Fcontrol&refreqid=search%3Ab6697aa70b91a6cbd106bfdf679b3bd8&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
19.
Robinson OF, Fergus TD, Gordon WM. An introduction to European legal history. Abingdon, Oxon: Professional Books; 1985.
20.
Legrand P. How to compare now. Legal Studies. 1996 July;16(2):232–42.
21.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Second edition. Smits JM, editor. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012.
22.
Watson A. Legal transplants and law reform. Law Quarterly Review. 1976;92.
23.
Legrand P. The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 1997 June;4(2):111–24.
24.
Graziadei M. Comparative Law, Transplants and Receptions. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198810230
25.
Dean M. Legal transplants and jury trial in Japan. Legal Studies. 2011 Dec;31(4):570–90.
26.
ROBIN EVANS-JONES.*. Receptions of law, mixed legal systems and the myth of the genius of Scots private law. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1998;228–49. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
27.
Gray A. The Incomplete Legal Transplant – Good Faith and the Common Law. In: Breda V, editor. Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p. 111–31.
28.
Harding A. The Legal Transplant Debate: Getting Beyond the Impasse? In: Breda V, editor. Legal Transplants in East Asia and Oceania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. p. 13–33.
29.
Menski W. Comparative law in a global context: the legal systems of Asia and Africa [Internet]. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/comparative-law-in-a-global-context/4705C7C2B21A97742DA59ED690FD9534
30.
Shah, P. Globalisation and the Challenge of Asian Legal Transplants in Europe. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/sjls2005&id=354
31.
Castellucci, Ignazio. Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau. McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill [Internet]. 57(4):665–720. Available from: https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/mlj/2012-v57-n4-mlj0351/1013028ar/
32.
John Gillespie. Transplanted Company Law: An Ideological and Cultural Analysis of Market-Entry in Vietnam. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2002;51(3). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3663071?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
33.
Siems M. Malicious legal transplants. Legal Studies. 2018 Mar;38(1):103–19.
34.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Second edition. Smits JM, editor. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012.
35.
Muir Watt H. Globalisation and comparative law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198810230
36.
Legrand P. European Legal Systems are not Converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1996 Jan;45(1):52–81.
37.
Gerard McMeel. The proposal for a Common European Sales Law: next stop a European Contract Code? Journal of International Banking & Financial Law [Internet]. 27(1). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
38.
Jansen, Corjo J.H. A European Civil Code and National Private Law: Lessons from History. European Review of Private Law [Internet]. 24(3):473–88. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.bris.idm.oclc.org/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=ERPL2016030
39.
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Common European Sales Law [Internet]. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52011PC0635
40.
Nils Jansen and Reinhard Zimmermann. ‘A European civil code in all but name’: Discussing the nature and purposes of the draft common frame of reference. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2010;69(1). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40731210?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
41.
Zimmermann R. Comparative Law and the Europeanization of Private Law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198810230
42.
Collins, Hugh. Why Europe Needs a Civil Code. European Review of Private Law [Internet]. 21(4):907–22. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.bris.idm.oclc.org/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=ERPL2013052
43.
Cotterrell, R. What Is Transnational Law. Law & Social Inquiry, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lsociq37&id=1
44.
Ginsburg T, Dixon R. Comparative Constitutional Law [Internet]. The rise of specialized constitutional courts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=714157
45.
Stone Sweet A. Constitutional Courts. In: The Oxford handbook of comparative constitutional law [Internet]. 1st ed. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 816–30. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199578610.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199578610
46.
Hunter-Henin M. Constitutional developments and human rights in France: One step forward, two steps back. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2011 Jan;60(1):167–88.
47.
Boyron S. France. In: How constitutions change: a comparative study [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Pub; 2011. p. 115–42. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1778909
48.
Boyron S. Germany. In: How constitutions change: a comparative study [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Pub; 2011. p. 143–67. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1778909
49.
Boyron S. The United Kingdom. In: How constitutions change: a comparative study [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Pub; 2011. p. 329–55. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1778909
50.
Tushnet MV. Advanced introduction to comparative constitutional law. Second edition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2018.
51.
Selection of QPC decisions [Internet]. Available from: https://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/en/selection-of-qpc-decisions
52.
Ginsberg T. Written constitutions and the administrative state: on the constitutional character of administrative law. In: Comparative Administrative Law [Internet]. p. 60–70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718671.00011
53.
Bell J. Comparative Administrative Law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law [Internet]. p. 1259–86. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198810230
54.
Thatcher M. Delegation to Independent Regulatory Agencies: Pressures, Functions and Contextual Mediation. West European Politics. 2002 Jan;25(1):125–47.
55.
Halberstam D. The promise of comparative administrative law: a constitutional perspective on independent agencies. In: Comparative Administrative Law [Internet]. p. 139–58. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718671.00017
56.
Rose-Ackerman S. Introduction. In: Comparative Administrative Law [Internet]. p. 1–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718671.00006
57.
Kingsbury, B.; Krisch, N.; Stewart, R. B. The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. Law and Contemporary Problems, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lcp68&id=607
58.
Ordonnance n° 2016-131 du 10 février 2016 portant réforme du droit des contrats, du régime général et de la preuve des obligations [Internet]. Available from: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000032004939&categorieLien=id
59.
The law of contract, the general regime of obligations, and proof of obilgations [Internet]. Available from: http://www.textes.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/THE-LAW-OF-CONTRACT-2-5-16.pdf
60.
Rowan S. The new French law of contract. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2017 Oct;66(4):805–31.
61.
Edward Elgar Publishing. Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law. Second edition. Smits JM, editor. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2012.
62.
Smits JM. Contract law: a comparative introduction [Internet]. Second edition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2017. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5267325
63.
Micklitz HanssW. On the Intellectual History of Freedom of Contract and Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2015;
64.
Valcke, Catherine. Convergence and Divergence of the English, French, and German Conceptions of Contract. European Review of Private Law [Internet]. 16(1):29–62. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.bris.idm.oclc.org/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=ERPL2008003
65.
Koetz H. Comparative contract law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198810230
66.
DE MOOR A. Contract and agreement in English and French law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1986;6(2):275–87.
67.
Valcke, C. On Comparing French and English Contract Law: Insights from Social Contract Theory. Journal of Comparative Law, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jrnatila4&id=75
68.
Whittaker S. Unfair Terms in Commercial Contracts and the Two Laws of Competition: French Law and English Law Contrasted. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2019 June 1;39(2):404–34.
69.
Pillet, G. The Reform of French Contract Law and of the General Rules on Obligations: The Civil Code Faces the Challenges of the Market. International Business Law Journal, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ibuslj2016&id=241
70.
Vaquer i Aloy A. Contract law in Spain. Second edition. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International; 2015.
71.
Wagner G. Comparative Tort Law. In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198810230.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198810230
72.
Oliphant, K. Cultures of Tort Law in Europe. Journal of European Tort Law, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jetl3&id=1
73.
Banakas, Stathis. Liability for Incorrect Financial Information: Theory and Practice in a General Clause System and in a Protected Interests System. European Review of Private Law [Internet]. 7(3):261–86. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.bris.idm.oclc.org/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=252529
74.
Brun P, Quézel-Ambrunaz C. French Tort Law Facing Reform. Journal of European Tort Law. 2013 Jan;4(1).
75.
Sharkey CM. Tort Liability for Pure Economic Loss: A Perspective from the United States and Some Comparative European Insights. Journal of European Tort Law. 2016 Jan 1;7(3).
76.
Borghetti JS. The Culture of Tort Law in France. Journal of European Tort Law. 2012 Jan;3(2).
77.
Fedtke J. The Culture of German Tort Law. Journal of European Tort Law. 2012 Jan;3(2).
78.
Borghetti JS. Non-Pecuniary Damages in France. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. 2015 Oct 8;
79.
Magnus U. Damages for Non-pecuniary Loss in German Contract and Tort Law. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. 2015 Aug 12;
80.
Projet de Réforme de la Responsabilite Civile [Internet]. Available from: http://www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/Projet_de_reforme_de_la_responsabilite_civile_13032017.pdf
81.
Projet de Réforme: du droit de la responsabilité civile [Internet]. Available from: http://www.justice.gouv.fr/publication/dp_responsabilite.civile_20170310.pdf
