1.
Campbell L, Ashworth A, Redmayne M. The criminal process. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
2.
Sanders A, Young R, Burton M. Criminal justice. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, USA; 2010.
3.
Sanders A, Young R, Burton M. Criminal justice. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
4.
Ashworth A, Redmayne M. The criminal process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
5.
Hillyard P, Tombs S. From ‘crime’ to social harm? Crime, Law and Social Change. 2007 Nov 14;48(1–2):9–25.
6.
CPS. The Code for Crown Prosecutors [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/publications/code_2013_accessible_english.pdf
7.
Tata C, Gormley JM. Sentencing and Plea Bargaining: Guilty Pleas versus Trial Verdicts. Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935383-e-40
8.
Penny Darbyshire. The mischief of plea bargaining and sentencing rewards. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2000;895–910. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
9.
Codes and protocols - Serious Fraud Office [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sfo.gov.uk/publications/guidance-policy-and-protocols/codes-and-protocols/
10.
Ashworth A, Redmayne M. The criminal process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
11.
Codes and protocols - Serious Fraud Office [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sfo.gov.uk/publications/guidance-policy-and-protocols/codes-and-protocols/
12.
David Ormerod. Prosecution policies. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2012;653–5. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
13.
Ashworth. Developments in the Public Prosecutor’s Office in England and Wales. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice [Internet]. 8(3):257–82. Available from: https://brill.com/view/journals/eccl/8/3/article-p257_6.xml
14.
Ian D. Brownlee. The statutory charging scheme in England and Wales: towards a unified prosecution system? Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2004;896–907. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
15.
Wells C, Quick O, Lacey N. Lacey, Wells and Quick Reconstructing criminal law: text and materials [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9780511742668
16.
Mulcahy A. The Justifications of Justice ‘Justice’: Legal Practitioners’ Accounts of Negotiated Case Settlements in Magistrates’ Courts. The British Journal of Criminology. 1994;34(4):411–30.
17.
Woodley M. Bargaining over Corporate Manslaughter--What Price a Life? The Journal of Criminal Law. 2013 Feb 1;77(1):33–40.
18.
Directors’ Guidance to accompany the Attorney General’s Guidelines on Plea Discussions in cases of Serious or Complex Fraud | The Crown Prosecution Service [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/directors-guidance-accompany-attorney-generals-guidelines-plea-discussions-cases
19.
R. v Dougall: case in detail. Archbold Review [Internet]. 2010;3–4. Available from: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IAAE297108BCC11DFAEDB9900A2997CFE/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
20.
Colbran MP. Policing, social media and the new media landscape: can the police and the traditional media ever successfully bypass each other? Policing and Society. 2018 Oct 10;1–15.
21.
Liebling A, Maruna S, McAra L, editors. The Oxford handbook of criminology. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
22.
de Maillard J, Savage SP. Policing as a performing art? The contradictory nature of contemporary police performance management. Criminology & Criminal Justice. 2018 Jul;18(3):314–31.
23.
Niko Kommenda. Why is violent crime on the rise – and who is most at risk? Guardian [Internet]. 2018 Apr 27; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/27/why-are-knife-and-gun-offences-on-the-rise-and-who-is-most-at-risk
24.
Crime in England and Wales: Year Ending June 2018 - Office for National Statistics [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingjune2018#main-points
25.
Chris Greer. We Predict a Riot? The British Journal of Criminology [Internet]. 50(6):1041–59. Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
26.
Rob C. Mawby. Chibnall Revisited. The British Journal of Criminology [Internet]. 50(6):1060–76. Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
27.
Reiner R. The politics of the police. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
28.
Bowling B, Reiner R, Sheptycki JWE. The politics of the police. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.
29.
Lacey N. Historicising Criminalisation: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. Modern Law Review. 2009 Nov;72(6):936–60.
30.
LOVEDAY B. Managing Crime: Police Use of Crime Data as an Indicator of Effectiveness. International Journal of the Sociology of Law. 2000 Sep;28(3):215–37.
31.
Rodger Patrick. ‘Reading Tea Leaves’: An Assessment of the Reliability of Police Recorded Crime Statistics1. The Police Journal [Internet]. 84(1). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
32.
Crandon GL, Dunne S. Symbiosis or vassalage? The media and the law enforcers ‐ the case of Avon and Somerset police. Policing and Society. 1997 Dec;8(1):77–91.
33.
Philip Jenkins. Failure to Launch. The British Journal of Criminology [Internet]. 49(1):35–47. Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
34.
House of Commons - Home Affairs: Written evidence submitted by Dr Rodger Patrick [IPCC 03] [Internet]. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmhaff/494/494vw03.htm
35.
Wells C, Quick O, Lacey N. Lacey, Wells and Quick Reconstructing criminal law: text and materials [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9780511742668
36.
Wilcox A, Young R. How Green was Thames Valley?: Policing the Image of Restorative Justice Cautions. Policing and Society. 2007 Jun;17(2):141–63.
37.
Sillince JAA, Brown AD. Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites. Human Relations. 2009 Dec;62(12):1829–56.
38.
Hillyard P, Tombs S. From ‘crime’ to social harm? Crime, Law and Social Change. 2007 Nov 14;48(1–2):9–25.
39.
Hillyard P. Beyond criminology: taking harm seriously [Internet]. London: Pluto Press; 2004. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3386534
40.
Hillyard P, Crime and Society Foundation (Great Britain). Criminal obsessions: why harm matters more than crime. Vol. no. 1. London: Crime and Society Foundation; 2005.
41.
Morgan R, Reiner R, Maguire M. The Oxford handbook of criminology. 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012.
42.
Celia Wells. Corporate criminal liability : a ten year review. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2014;849–78. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
43.
Tombs S. The UK’s corporate killing law: Un/fit for purpose? Criminology & Criminal Justice. 2018 Sep;18(4):488–507.
44.
Ministry of Justice. Explanatory Notes to Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 [Internet]. Queen’s Printer of Acts of Parliament; Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/19/notes/contents
45.
Health and Safety Offences, Corporate Manslaughter and Food Safety and Hygiene Offences. Definitive Guideline [Internet]. Available from: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Health-and-Safety-Corporate-Manslaughter-Food-Safety-and-Hygiene-definitive-guideline-Web.pdf
46.
Company fined £550,000 in first corporate manslaughter sentencing under new guideline [Internet]. Available from: https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/news/company-fined-550000-in-first-corporate-manslaughter-sentencing-under-new-guideline
47.
Wells, C. Corporate Crime: Opening the Eyes of the Sentry. Legal Studies, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/legstd30&id=1
48.
Dobson A. Section 37 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 – re‐invigorated. International Journal of Law and Management. 2013 Mar 15;55(2):141–55.
49.
Victoria Roper. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007—A 10-Year Review. Journal of Criminal Law [Internet]. 82(1). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
50.
Gobert J. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 – Thirteen years in the making but was it worth the wait? Modern Law Review. 2008 May;71(3):413–33.
51.
Sarah Field. Five years on: the impact of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007: plus ca change? International Company and Commercial Law Review [Internet]. 2013;24:239–46. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
52.
Corporate Manslaughter - Sentencing Developments | Ashfords Solicitors [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ashfords.co.uk/news-and-events/general/corporate-manslaughter-sentencing-developments
53.
Gobert, J. The Politics of Corporate Manslaughter - The British Experience. Flinders Journal of Law Reform, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/flinlj8&id=3
54.
Courts and Tribunals Judiciary | R -v- Lion Steel Equipment Ltd [Internet]. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/r-v-steel-equip-ltd-sentencing-remarks/
55.
Hillyard P, Tombs S. Social Harm and Zemiology. In: Liebling A, Maruna S, McAra L, editors. The Oxford handbook of criminology. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 284–305.
56.
Suicide: Policy for Prosecutors in Respect of Cases of Encouraging or Assisting Suicide | The Crown Prosecution Service [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/suicide-policy-prosecutors-respect-cases-encouraging-or-assisting-suicide
57.
Lipscombe S, Barber S. Assisted Suicide, Notes to Parliamentary Briefing Paper. Available from: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN04857
58.
Plea discussions in cases of serious or complex fraud - GOV.UK [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/plea-discussions-in-cases-of-serious-or-complex-fraud--8
59.
Directors’ Guidance to accompany the Attorney General’s Guidelines on Plea Discussions in cases of Serious or Complex Fraud | The Crown Prosecution Service [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/directors-guidance-accompany-attorney-generals-guidelines-plea-discussions-cases
60.
Woodley M. Bargaining over Corporate Manslaughter--What Price a Life? The Journal of Criminal Law. 2013 Feb 1;77(1):33–40.
61.
R. v : case in detail. Archbold Review [Internet]. 2010;3–4. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
62.
Gillian Daly and Rosemary Pattenden. Racial Bias and the English Criminal Trial Jury. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 2005;64(3). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4500840?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
63.
David Ormerod. Prosecution policies. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2012;653–5. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
64.
Ashworth. Developments in the Public Prosecutor’s Office in England and Wales. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice [Internet]. 8(3):257–82. Available from: https://brill.com/view/journals/eccl/8/3/article-p257_6.xml
65.
Ian D. Brownlee. The statutory charging scheme in England and Wales: towards a unified prosecution system? Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2004;896–907. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
66.
Chris Greer. We Predict a Riot? The British Journal of Criminology [Internet]. 50(6):1041–59. Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
67.
John D. Jackson. The effect of legal culture and proof in decisions to prosecute. Law, Probability & Risk [Internet]. (2). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
68.
Wells C, Quick O, Lacey N. Lacey, Wells and Quick Reconstructing criminal law: text and materials [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9780511742668
69.
Mulcahy, A. The Justification of Justice - Legal Practitioners’ Accounts of Negotiated Case Settlements in Magistrates’ Courts. British Journal of Criminology, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/bjcrim34&id=1
70.
The investigation and prosecution of criminal offences in England and Wales: the law and procedure [Internet]. Available from: https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/result/pqpdocumentview?accountid=9730&groupid=107687&pgId=75fed896-2112-4571-b046-fd6de9b7b751&rsId=16BEB5D8D48
71.
Sanders A, Young R, Burton M. Criminal justice. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, USA; 2010.
72.
McConville, M. Plea Bargaining: Ethics and Politics. Journal of Law and Society, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jlsocty25&id=570
73.
Mulcahy, A. The Justification of Justice - Legal Practitioners’ Accounts of Negotiated Case Settlements in Magistrates’ Courts. British Journal of Criminology, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/bjcrim34&id=1
74.
Professor Michael Zander. Plea bargaining goes back a hundred years. The New Law Journal [Internet]. 148(6830). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
75.
Penny Darbyshire. The mischief of plea bargaining and sentencing rewards. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2000;895–910. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
76.
Diversity and Fairness in the Justice system [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/judicial-institute/sites/judicial-institute/files/diversity-fairness-in-the-jury-system.pdf
77.
Are Juries Fair? [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/publications/research-and-analysis/moj-research/are-juries-fair-research.pdf
78.
Sommers, S. R.; Ellsworth, P. C. How Much Do We Really Know about Race and Juries - A Review of Social Science Theory and Research. Chicago-Kent Law Review, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/chknt78&id=1
79.
Parmar A. Ethnicities, Racism, and Crime in England and Wales. In: Bucerius SM, Tonry MH, editors. The Oxford handbook of ethnicity, crime, and immigration [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; Available from: https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199859016.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199859016
80.
Parmar A. Stop and search in London: counter-terrorist or counter-productive? Policing and Society. 2011 Dec;21(4):369–82.
81.
Runnymede Trust / Race and Policing [Internet]. Available from: https://www.runnymedetrust.org/projects-and-publications/criminal-justice-3/justice-resistance-solidarity-race-and-policing-in-england-wales.html
82.
Dying for Justice [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/7201/Dying-for-Justice/pdf/Dying_for_Justice_web.pdf
83.
Angiolini E. Report of the Independent Review of Deaths and Serious Incidents in Police Custody [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/deaths-and-serious-incidents-in-police-custody
84.
Scarman LS, Great Britain. Home Office. The Brixton disorders, 10-12 April 1981: the Scarman report. Penguin; 1982.
85.
The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry - GOV.UK [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-stephen-lawrence-inquiry
86.
Smith G. A Most Enduring Problem: Police Complaints Reform in England and Wales. Journal of Social Policy. 2006 Jan;35(1):121–41.
87.
Athwal H, Burnett J. Investigated or ignored? An analysis of race-related deaths since the Macpherson Report. Race & Class. 2014 Jul;56(1):22–42.
88.
Kahn KB, Martin KD. Policing and Race: Disparate Treatment, Perceptions, and Policy Responses. Social Issues and Policy Review. 2016 Jan;10(1):82–121.
89.
Are Britain and America’s Drug Laws Racist? – Media Diversified [Internet]. Available from: https://mediadiversified.org/2015/07/24/racist-drug-law/
90.
Phillips C, Bowling B. Ethnicities, Racism, Crime and Criminal Justice. In: Liebling A, Maruna S, McAra L, editors. The Oxford handbook of criminology. Sixth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2017.
91.
The Police Have Their Own Crimes to Answer For – Media Diversified [Internet]. Available from: https://mediadiversified.org/2016/03/07/the-police-have-a-lot-to-answer-for/
92.
Ward T. State Harms. In: Beyond criminology: taking harm seriously [Internet]. London: Pluto Press; 2004. p. 84–100. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3386534
93.
Torrible C. Reconceptualising the police complaints process as a site of contested legitimacy claims. Policing and Society. 2018 May 4;28(4):464–79.
94.
Rees J. Reading the riots: investigating England’s summer of disorder. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46297/
95.
Injustice on Vimeo [Internet]. Available from: https://vimeo.com/34633260
96.
Baker D. Using narrative to construct accountability in cases of death after police contact. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 2019 Mar;52(1):60–75.
97.
BAKER DAVID. DEATHS AFTER POLICE CONTACT: constructing accountability in the 21st century. [Place of publication not identified]: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN; 2018.
98.
Gavin Evans. The unwelcome revival of ‘race science’. Guardian [Internet]. 2018 Mar 2; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/02/the-unwelcome-revival-of-race-science
99.
Online Fraud - National Audit Office (NAO) Report [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nao.org.uk/report/online-fraud/
100.
Rosemary Davidson. Brexit and criminal justice: the future of the UK’s cooperation relationship with the EU. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2017;379–95. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
101.
Levi M, Doig A, Gundur R, Wall D, Williams M. Cyberfraud and the implications for effective risk-based responses: themes from UK research. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2017 Feb;67(1):77–96.
102.
Levi M. The implications of economic cybercrime for policing. Available from: http://orca.cf.ac.uk/88156/
103.
Doig A, Levi M. A case of arrested development? Delivering the UK National Fraud Strategy within competing policing policy priorities. Public Money & Management. 2013 Mar;33(2):145–52.
104.
Blanco Hache AC, Ryder N. ’Tis the season to (                              ?) wise-up to online fraudsters. Criminals on the Web lurking to scam shoppers this Christmas:                              a critical analysis of the United Kingdom’s legislative provisions and policies to tackle online fraud. Information & Communications Technology Law. 2011 Mar;20(1):35–56.
105.
Take Five - To Stop Fraud [Internet]. Available from: https://takefive-stopfraud.org.uk/
106.
TakeFive [Internet]. Available from: https://takefive-stopfraud.org.uk/takethetest/
107.
Bobbies on the net: a police workforce for the digital age | Reform [Internet]. Available from: https://reform.uk/research/bobbies-net-police-workforce-digital-age
108.
Sheptycki J. Liquid modernity and the police                              ; thinking about information flows in police organisation. Global Crime. 2017 Jul 3;18(3):286–302.
109.
Leukfeldt ER, Kleemans ER, Stol WP. A typology of cybercriminal networks: from low-tech all-rounders to high-tech specialists. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2017 Feb;67(1):21–37.
110.
Button M, Blackbourn D, Tunley M. ‘The Not So Thin Blue Line After All?’ Investigative Resources Dedicated to Fighting Fraud/Economic Crime in the United Kingdom. Policing. 2015 Jun 1;9(2):129–42.
111.
Gannon R, Doig A. Ducking the answer? Fraud strategies and police resources. Policing and Society. 2010 Mar;20(1):39–60.
112.
Doig A, Levi M. Inter-agency work and the UK public sector investigation of fraud, 1996–2006: joined-up rhetoric and disjointed reality. Policing and Society. 2009 Sep;19(3):199–215.
113.
Digital Investigation and Intelligence: Policing capabilities for a digital age [Internet]. Available from: https://www.uk-osint.net/documents/Digital_Investigation_and_Intelligence_Policing_capabilities_for_a%20digital_age_April_2015.pdf
114.
Sanders A, Griffiths D. The road to the dock: prosecution decision-making in medical manslaughter cases. In: Griffiths D, Sanders A, editors. Bioethics, medicine, and the criminal law: Volume II: Medicine, crime, and society [Internet]. Cambridge [UK]: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 117–58. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/bioethics-medicine-and-the-criminal-law/0BAA9085241D1CEEB9FBF2398234E4EA
115.
Quick, O. Expert Evidence and Medical Manslaughter: Vagueness in Action. Journal of Law and Society, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jlsocty38&id=504
116.
Williams review into gross negligence manslaughter in healthcare - GOV.UK [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/williams-review-into-gross-negligence-manslaughter-in-healthcare
117.
Vaughn J, Quick O, Griffiths D. Medical Manslaughter: Where Next? The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England [Internet]. 2018;11(6):251–4. Available from: https://publishing.rcseng.ac.uk/doi/full/10.1308/rcsbull.2018.251
118.
Alghrani A, Brazier M, Farrell AM, Griffiths D, Allen N. Healthcare scandals in the NHS: crime and punishment. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2011 Apr 1;37(4):230–2.
119.
Brazier M, Alghrani A. Fatal medical malpractice and criminal liability. Professional Negligence [Internet]. 2009;25:51–67. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
120.
Wells C, Quick O, Lacey N. Lacey, Wells and Quick Reconstructing criminal law: text and materials. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
121.
McDowell SE, Ferner RE. Medical manslaughter. BMJ. 2013 Sep 18;347(sep18 1):f5609–f5609.
122.
Quick, O. Prosecuting Gross Medical Negligence: Manslaughter, Discretion, and the Crown Prosecution Service. Journal of Law and Society, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jlsocty33&id=427
123.
Hannah Quirk*. Sentencing white coat crime: the need for guidance in medical manslaughter cases. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2013;871–88. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
124.
Sanders A, Griffiths D. Following the law or using the law? Decision making in medical manslaughter. In: Exploring the ‘Legal’ in Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. p. 225–44.
125.
Silbey S. "Rotten Apples or a Rotting Barrel” [Internet]. Available from: http://web.mit.edu/ssilbey/www/pdf/Silbey_Ethics_Education_Comments2.pdf
126.
Hohl K, Stanko EA. Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology. 2015 May;12(3):324–41.
127.
McMillan L. Police officers’ perceptions of false allegations of rape. Journal of Gender Studies. 2018 Jan 2;27(1):9–21.
128.
Clare Gunby. Alcohol-related Rape Cases: Barristers’ Perspectives on the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and Its Impact on Practice. Journal of Criminal Law [Internet]. 74(6). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
129.
Smith O, Skinner T. How Rape Myths Are Used and Challenged in Rape and Sexual Assault Trials. Social & Legal Studies. 2017 Aug;26(4):441–66.
130.
Rees G. ‘It is Not for Me to Say Whether Consent Was Given or Not’: Forensic Medical Examiners’ Construction of ‘Neutral Reports’ in Rape Cases. Social & Legal Studies. 2010 Sep;19(3):371–86.
131.
Brian Brewis. Procedural Amendments for Adducing Sexual Behaviour Evidence Under s. 41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999. Journal of Criminal Law [Internet]. 82(5). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
132.
Clare McGlynn. Rape Trials and Sexual History Evidence: Reforming the Law on Third-Party Evidence. Journal of Criminal Law [Internet]. 81(5). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
133.
Gurnham D. Ched Evans, rape myths and Medusa’s gaze: a story of mirrors and windows. International Journal of Law in Context. 2018 Sep;14(3):454–68.
134.
Temkin J, Gray JM, Barrett J. Different Functions of Rape Myth Use in Court: Findings From a Trial Observation Study. Feminist Criminology. 2018 Apr;13(2):205–26.
135.
Reece H. Rape Myths: Is Elite Opinion Right and Popular Opinion Wrong? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2013 Sep 1;33(3):445–73.
136.
Conaghan J, Russell Y. Rape Myths, Law, and Feminist Research: ‘Myths About Myths’? Feminist Legal Studies. 2014 Apr;22(1):25–48.
137.
Conaghan J. Investigating rape: human rights and police accountability. Legal Studies. 2017 Mar;37(1):54–77.
138.
A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. Home Office Research Study 293. [Internet]. Available from: https://paladinservice.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/gap-or-chasm-rape-report.pdf
139.
Susan Leahy1. ‘No Means No’, But Where’s the Force? Addressing the Challenges of Formally Recognising Non-violent Sexual Coercion as a Serious Criminal Offence. Journal of Criminal Law [Internet]. 78(4). Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
140.
Larcombe W, Fileborn B, Powell A, Hanley N, Henry N. ‘I Think it’s Rape and I Think He Would be Found Not Guilty’. Social & Legal Studies. 2016 Oct;25(5):611–29.
141.
Ellison L, Munro VE, Hohl K, Wallang P. Challenging criminal justice? Psychosocial disability and rape victimization. Criminology & Criminal Justice. 2015 Apr;15(2):225–44.
142.
Ellison L, Munro VE. ‘Telling tales’: exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury room. Legal Studies. 2015 Jun;35(2):201–25.
143.
Gunby C, Carline A, Beynon C. Regretting it After? Focus Group Perspectives on Alcohol Consumption, Nonconsensual Sex and False Allegations of Rape. Social & Legal Studies. 2013 Mar;22(1):87–106.
144.
Damon Mitchell, Richard Hirschman and Gordon C. Nagayama Hall. Attributions of Victim Responsibility, Pleasure, and Trauma in Male Rape. The Journal of Sex Research [Internet]. 1999;36(4). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3813721?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
145.
Temkin, J. Prosecuting and Defending Rape: Perspectives from the Bar. Journal of Law and Society, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jlsocty27&id=1
146.
Rape and Sexual Offences | The Crown Prosecution Service [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/rape-and-sexual-offences
147.
Angiolini E. Report of the Independent Review into The Investigation and Prosecution of Rape in London | The Crown Prosecution Service [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/report-independent-review-investigation-and-prosecution-rape-london-rt-hon-dame-elish
148.
Forging the links: Rape investigation and prosecution - HMICFRS [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/publications/forging-the-links-rape-investigation-and-prosecution/
149.
Naughton M. Perspectives and Definitions. In: The innocent and the criminal justice system: a sociological analysis of miscarriages of justice [Internet]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4008428
150.
Naughton M. Rethinking miscarriages of justice: beyond the tip of the iceberg [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=736218
151.
Naughton M. Introduction. In: The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Hope for the Innocent? [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=555550
152.
Naughton M. The Importance of Innocence for the Criminal Justice System. In: The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Hope for the Innocent? [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=555550
153.
The Governance of Britain: Review of the Executive Royal Prerogative Powers: Final Report [Internet]. Available from: http://data.parliament.uk/DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2009-2493/DEP2009-2493.pdf
154.
Noël Sweeney. Adolf Beck: The Ghost of Justice. Criminal Law and Justice Weekly (formerly Justice of the Peace) [Internet]. (9). Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JDM-2WC0-TWWS-21H8&csi=280390&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
155.
Shell Shock and the case of Harry Farr - YouTube [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCk1bG5PBhw
156.
G.R. Rubin. Posthumous pardons, the Home Office and the Timothy Evans case. Criminal Law Review [Internet]. 2007;41–59. Available from: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue
157.
Caroli P. The Thin Line between Transitional Justice and Memory Activism: The Case of the German and British ‘Pardons’ for Convicted Homosexuals. International Journal of Transitional Justice. 2018 Nov 1;12(3):499–514.
158.
Miscarriages of Justice: The Impact of Wrongful Imprisonment - JustResearch Edition no.13 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/jr13/p5a.html
159.
Naughton, M. The Criminal Cases Review Commission: Innocence versus Safety and the Integrity of the Criminal Justice System. Criminal Law Quarterly, [Internet]. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/clwqrty58&id=1
160.
Quirk H. Identifying Miscarriages of Justice: Why Innocence in the UK is Not the Answer. Modern Law Review. 2007 Sep;70(5):759–77.
161.
Quirk H. Don’t Mention the War: The Court of Appeal, the Criminal Cases Review Commission and Dealing with the Past in Northern Ireland. The Modern Law Review. 2013 Nov;76(6):949–80.
162.
Roberts S. ‘Unsafe’ Convictions: Defining and Compensating Miscarriages of Justice. Modern Law Review. 2003 May;66(3):441–51.
163.
Nobles R, Schiff D. Guilt and Innocence in the Criminal Justice System: A Comment on R (Mullen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. Modern Law Review. 2006 Jan;69(1):80–91.
164.
Roderick Munday. The Province of the Prerogative of Mercy Determined. Criminal Law and Justice Weekly (formerly Justice of the Peace) [Internet]. (12). Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7V90-7V60-Y9DP-B0M8&csi=280390&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
165.
Devereaux S. Execution and Pardon at the Old Bailey 1730-1837. American Journal of Legal History. 2017 Dec 1;57(4):447–94.
166.
Owen Bowcott. UK issues posthumous pardons for thousands of gay men. Guardian [Internet]. 2017 Jan 31; Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/31/uk-issues-posthumous-pardons-thousands-gay-men-alan-turing-law