[1]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘History’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[2]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘The Text and the World’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[3]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘Creative Writing’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[4]
K. J. Gutzwiller, ‘Pastoral as Genre’, in Theocritus’ pastoral analogies: the formation of a genre, vol. Wisconsin studies in classics, Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991, pp. 3–22.
[5]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘Voice’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[6]
A. P. Burnett, ‘Praising a Victorious Athlete’, in Pindar, vol. Ancients in action, London: Bristol Classical Press, 2008, pp. 16–33.
[7]
S. Cohan and L. M. Shires, Telling stories: a theoretical analysis of narrative fiction, vol. New accents. London: Routledge, 1988.
[8]
L. Kozak, ‘Enter Hektor’, in Experiencing Hektor: character in the Iliad, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016, pp. 23–68 [Online]. Available: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=625763
[9]
A. Bennett and N. Royle, ‘Narrative’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, 4th ed., Harlow: Longman, 2009.
[10]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘Character’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[11]
C. Pelling, ‘Conclusion’, in Characterization and individuality in Greek literature, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, pp. 245–262.
[12]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘Ideology’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[13]
Brian W. Breed, ‘Tua, Caesar, Aetas: Horace Ode 4.15 and the Augustan Age’, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1562198?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[14]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘Eco’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[15]
J. J. H. Klooster, ‘Theocritus’, in Space in ancient Greek literature: studies in ancient Greek narrative, vol. Mnemosyne supplements, Leiden: Brill, 2012, pp. 99–117.
[16]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘The Author’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[17]
R. Rutherford, ‘Poetics and literary criticism’, in The Cambridge companion to Horace, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 248–261 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/companions/CBO9781139001335A025
[18]
R. Armstrong, ‘Classical Translations of the Classics: The Dynamics of Literary Tradition in Retranslating Epic Poetry’, in Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture, vol. Classical presences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 162–202.
[19]
E. Hall, ‘Navigating the Realms of Gold: Translation As Access Route to the Classics’, in Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture, vol. Classical presences, A. Lianeri and V. Zajko, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 315–340 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288076.001.0001
[20]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘Readers and Reading’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[21]
J. McConnell, ‘‘"We are still mythical”: Kate Tempest’s Brand New Ancients’’, pp. 195–206 [Online]. Available: http://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2014/07/McConnell.pdf
[22]
A. Bennett, N. Royle, and dawsonera, ‘The End’, in An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition., Abingdon: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
[23]
D. Fowler, ‘Second Thoughts on Closure’, in Classical closure: reading the end in Greek and Latin literature, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997, pp. 3–22.
[24]
N. Worman, Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139032827
[25]
Joseph D. Reed, ‘Arsinoe’s Adonis and the Poetics of Ptolemaic Imperialism’, Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-), vol. 130, pp. 319–351, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284314?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[26]
K. Volk, Vergil’s Eclogues, vol. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[27]
D. Steiner, ‘The Gorgons? Lament: Auletics, Poetics, and Chorality in Pindar?s Pythian 12’, American Journal of Philology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 173–208, 2013, doi: 10.1353/ajp.2013.0015.
[28]
Deborah Steiner, ‘Feathers Flying: Avian Poetics in Hesiod, Pindar, and Callimachus’, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 177–208, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4496958?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[29]
D. Steiner, ‘Indecorous Dining, Indecorous Speech: Pindar’s First Olympian and the Poetics of Consumption’, Arethusa, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 297–314, 2002, doi: 10.1353/are.2002.0020.
[30]
M. Rose, Authors and owners: the invention of copyright. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1993.
[31]
Joseph D. Reed, ‘Arsinoe’s Adonis and the Poetics of Ptolemaic Imperialism’, Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-), vol. 130, pp. 319–351, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284314?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[32]
T. Phillips and Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service), Pindar’s library: performance poetry and material texts, vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745730.001.0001
[33]
Christine G. Perkell, ‘The “Dying Gallus” and the Design of Eclogue 10’, Classical Philology, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 128–140, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/270501?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[34]
C. Pelling, Characterization and individuality in Greek literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
[35]
M. Payne, Theocritus and the invention of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[36]
Mark Payne, ‘On Being Vatic: Pindar, Pragmatism, and Historicism’, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 159–184, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3804909?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[37]
Maria Pavlou, ‘Metapoetics, Poetic Tradition, and Praise in Pindar “Olympian” 9’, Mnemosyne, vol. 61, pp. 533–567, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27736267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[38]
Michael Paschalis, ‘Semina Ignis: The Interplay of Science and Myth in the Song of Silenus’, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 201–222, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1561759?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[39]
D. Meban, ‘Virgil’s Eclogues and Social Memory’, American Journal of Philology, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 99–130, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20616169
[40]
B. Maslov, Pindar and the Emergence of Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316337707
[41]
H. S. Mackie, Graceful errors: Pindar and the performance of praise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2003.
[42]
M. Lowrie, Horace’s narrative odes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.
[43]
M. R. Lefkowitz, First-person fictions: Pindar’s poetic ‘I’. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
[44]
E. W. Leach, ‘Personal and Communal Memory in the Reading of Horace’s Odes, Books 1-3’, Arethusa, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43–74, 1998, doi: 10.1353/are.1998.0002.
[45]
L. Kurke, The traffic in praise: Pindar and the poetics of social economy, vol. Myth and poetics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
[46]
R. Kania, Virgil’s Eclogues and the Art of Fiction: A Study of the Poetic Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139946612
[47]
I. J. F. de Jong, Space in ancient Greek literature: studies in ancient Greek narrative, vol. Mnemosyne supplements. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
[48]
Trends in Classics (Conference) and Aristoteleio Panepistēmio Thessalonikēs. Tomeas Klassikōn Spoudōn, Hellenistic studies at a crossroads: exploring texts, contexts and metatexts, vol. Trends in classic-Supplementary volumes. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.
[49]
R. L. Hunter, Theocritus and the archaeology of Greek poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
[50]
J. M. Hunt, ‘The Politics of Death in Theocritus’ First Idyll’, American Journal of Philology, vol. 132, no. 3, pp. 379–396, 2011, doi: 10.1353/ajp.2011.0026.
[51]
S. J. Harrison, Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[52]
Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service), Augustan poetry and the irrational. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724728.001.0001
[53]
J. T. Hamilton, Soliciting darkness: Pindar, obscurity, and the classical tradition, vol. Harvard studies in comparative literature. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2003.
[54]
D. M. Halperin, Before pastoral: Theocritus and the ancient tradition of bucolic poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
[55]
dawsonera, Brill’s companion to Horace. Leiden: Brill, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004241961
[56]
R. D. Griffith, ‘Alph, the Sacred River, Ran: Geographical Subterfuge in Pindar Olympian 1.20’, Mouseion: Journal of the Classical Association of Canada, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2008, doi: 10.1353/mou.0.0046.
[57]
E. Fredericksen, ‘Finding another Alexis: pastoral tradition and the reception of Vergil’s second eclogue’, Classical Receptions Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 422–441, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1093/crj/clu024.
[58]
D. Fowler, ‘Second Thoughts on Closure’, in Classical closure: reading the end in Greek and Latin literature, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997, pp. 3–22.
[59]
J. Andrew Foster, ‘Arsinoe II as Epic Queen: Encomiastic Allusion in Theocritus, Idyll 15’, Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-), vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 133–148, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4543286
[60]
Andrew Fenton, ‘The Forest and the Trees: Pattern and Meaning in Horace, “Odes” 1’, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 559–580, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27566730?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[61]
Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service), Augustan poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001
[62]
Joseph Farrell, ‘Classical Genre in Theory and Practice’, New Literary History, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 383–408, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20057790
[63]
Ebbeler, Jennifer, ‘Linus as a Figure for Pastoral Poetics in Vergil’s Eclogues’, Helios, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 187–205, 2010, doi: 10.1353/hel.2010.0016.
[64]
G. Davis, Polyhymnia: the rhetoric of Horatian lyric discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.
[65]
B. Currie, Pindar and the cult of heroes, vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[66]
S. Cohan and L. M. Shires, Telling stories: a theoretical analysis of narrative fiction, vol. New accents. London: Routledge, 1988.
[67]
J. B. Burton, Theocritus’s urban mimes: mobility, gender, and patronage, vol. Hellenistic culture and society. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995.
[68]
A. P. Burnett, ‘Praising a Victorious Athlete’, in Pindar, vol. Ancients in action, London: Bristol Classical Press, 2008, pp. 16–33.
[69]
B. W. Breed, Pastoral inscriptions: reading and writing Virgil’s Eclogues, vol. Classical literature and society. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.
[70]
Brian W. Breed, ‘Tua, Caesar, Aetas: Horace Ode 4.15 and the Augustan Age’, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1562198?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[71]
A. Bennett and N. Royle, An introduction to literature, criticism and theory, Fifth edition. London: Routledge, 2016.
[72]
R. Armstrong, ‘Classical Translations of the Classics: The Dynamics of Literary Tradition in Retranslating Epic Poetry’, in Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture, vol. Classical presences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 162–202.
[73]
Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides and David Konstan, ‘Daphnis and Aphrodite: A Love Affair in Theocritus “Idyll” 1’, The American Journal of Philology, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 497–527, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27566728
[74]
R. Fletcher and J. Hanink, Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists and Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/creative-lives-in-classical-antiquity/F8A5D97977F51C91573FA06F4609C780
[75]
P. Gainsford, Early Greek hexameter poetry, vol. Greece&Rome: New surveys in the classics. Cambridge: Published for the Classical Association, Cambridge University Press, 2015.
[76]
A. Carson and Sappho, If not, winter: fragments of Sappho. London: Virago, 2002.
[77]
J. McConnell, ‘‘"We are still mythical”: Kate Tempest’s Brand New Ancients’’, pp. 195–206 [Online]. Available: http://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2014/07/McConnell.pdf
[78]
A. Oswald and Homer, Memorial: an excavation of the Iliad. London: Faber and Faber, 2011.
[79]
C. Logue and Homer, War music: an account of Books 1-4 and 16-19 of Homer’s Iliad. London: Faber, 2001.
[80]
R. Rutherford, ‘Poetics and literary criticism’, in The Cambridge companion to Horace, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 248–261 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/companions/CBO9781139001335A025
[81]
K. Gutzwiller, ‘Pastoral as Genre’, in Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre, 1991, pp. 3–22.
[82]
L. Kozak, ‘Enter Hektor’, in Experiencing Hektor: character in the Iliad, London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016, pp. 23–68 [Online]. Available: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=625763
[83]
E. Hall, ‘Navigating the Realms of Gold: Translation As Access Route to the Classics’, in Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture, vol. Classical presences, A. Lianeri and V. Zajko, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 315–340 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288076.001.0001
[84]
A. Bierl and A. P. M. H. Lardinois, Eds., The newest Sappho (P. Sapph. Obbink and P. GC inv. 105, frs. 1-4): studies in archaic and classical Greek song, vol. 2, vol. volume 392. Leiden: Brill, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004314832
[85]
E. Greene, Ed., Reading Sappho. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft3199n81q&brand=ucpress
[86]
R. L. Fowler and Cambridge Collections Online (Online service), The Cambridge companion to Homer, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521813026