1.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. History. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
2.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. The Text and the World. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
3.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. Creative Writing. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
4.
Gutzwiller KJ. Pastoral as Genre. In: Theocritus’ pastoral analogies: the formation of a genre. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press; 1991. p. 3–22.
5.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. Voice. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
6.
Burnett AP. Praising a Victorious Athlete. In: Pindar. London: Bristol Classical Press; 2008. p. 16–33.
7.
Cohan S, Shires LM. Telling stories: a theoretical analysis of narrative fiction. Vol. New accents. London: Routledge; 1988.
8.
Kozak L. Enter Hektor. In: Experiencing Hektor: character in the Iliad [Internet]. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2016. p. 23–68. Available from: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=625763
9.
Bennett A, Royle N. Narrative. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory. 4th ed. Harlow: Longman; 2009.
10.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. Character. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
11.
Pelling C. Conclusion. In: Characterization and individuality in Greek literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990. p. 245–62.
12.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. Ideology. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
13.
Brian W. Breed. Tua, Caesar, Aetas: Horace Ode 4.15 and the Augustan Age. The American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2004;125(2):245–53. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1562198?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
14.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. Eco. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
15.
Klooster JJH. Theocritus. In: Space in ancient Greek literature: studies in ancient Greek narrative. Leiden: Brill; 2012. p. 99–117.
16.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. The Author. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
17.
Rutherford R. Poetics and literary criticism. In: The Cambridge companion to Horace [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 248–61. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/companions/CBO9781139001335A025
18.
Armstrong R. Classical Translations of the Classics: The Dynamics of Literary Tradition in Retranslating Epic Poetry. In: Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 162–202.
19.
Hall E. Navigating the Realms of Gold: Translation As Access Route to the Classics. In: Lianeri A, Zajko V, editors. Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 315–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288076.001.0001
20.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. Readers and Reading. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
21.
McConnell J. ‘"We are still mythical”: Kate Tempest’s Brand New Ancients’. :195–206. Available from: http://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2014/07/McConnell.pdf
22.
Bennett A, Royle N, dawsonera. The End. In: An introduction to literature, criticism and theory [Internet]. Fifth edition. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315652450
23.
Fowler D. Second Thoughts on Closure. In: Classical closure: reading the end in Greek and Latin literature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1997. p. 3–22.
24.
Worman N. Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139032827
25.
Joseph D. Reed. Arsinoe’s Adonis and the Poetics of Ptolemaic Imperialism. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) [Internet]. 2000;130:319–51. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284314?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
26.
Volk K. Vergil’s Eclogues. Vol. Oxford readings in classical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
27.
Steiner D. The Gorgons? Lament: Auletics, Poetics, and Chorality in Pindar?s Pythian 12. American Journal of Philology. 2013;134(2):173–208.
28.
Deborah Steiner. Feathers Flying: Avian Poetics in Hesiod, Pindar, and Callimachus. The American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2007;128(2):177–208. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4496958?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
29.
Steiner D. Indecorous Dining, Indecorous Speech: Pindar’s First Olympian and the Poetics of Consumption. Arethusa. 2002;35(2):297–314.
30.
Rose M. Authors and owners: the invention of copyright. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1993.
31.
Joseph D. Reed. Arsinoe’s Adonis and the Poetics of Ptolemaic Imperialism. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) [Internet]. 2000;130:319–51. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/284314?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
32.
Phillips T, Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service). Pindar’s library: performance poetry and material texts [Internet]. Vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198745730.001.0001
33.
Christine G. Perkell. The ‘Dying Gallus’ and the Design of Eclogue 10. Classical Philology [Internet]. 1996;91(2):128–40. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/270501?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
34.
Pelling C. Characterization and individuality in Greek literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990.
35.
Payne M. Theocritus and the invention of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
36.
Mark Payne. On Being Vatic: Pindar, Pragmatism, and Historicism. The American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2006;127(2):159–84. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3804909?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
37.
Maria Pavlou. Metapoetics, Poetic Tradition, and Praise in Pindar ‘Olympian’ 9. Mnemosyne [Internet]. 2008;61:533–67. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27736267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
38.
Michael Paschalis. Semina Ignis: The Interplay of Science and Myth in the Song of Silenus. The American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2001;122(2):201–22. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1561759?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
39.
Meban D. Virgil’s Eclogues and Social Memory. American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2009;130(1):99–130. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20616169
40.
Maslov B. Pindar and the Emergence of Literature [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316337707
41.
Mackie HS. Graceful errors: Pindar and the performance of praise. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2003.
42.
Lowrie M. Horace’s narrative odes. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1997.
43.
Lefkowitz MR. First-person fictions: Pindar’s poetic ‘I’. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1991.
44.
Leach EW. Personal and Communal Memory in the Reading of Horace’s Odes, Books 1-3. Arethusa. 1998;31(1):43–74.
45.
Kurke L. The traffic in praise: Pindar and the poetics of social economy. Vol. Myth and poetics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 1991.
46.
Kania R. Virgil’s Eclogues and the Art of Fiction: A Study of the Poetic Imagination [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139946612
47.
Jong IJF de. Space in ancient Greek literature: studies in ancient Greek narrative. Vol. Mnemosyne supplements. Leiden: Brill; 2012.
48.
Trends in Classics (Conference), Aristoteleio Panepistēmio Thessalonikēs. Tomeas Klassikōn Spoudōn. Hellenistic studies at a crossroads: exploring texts, contexts and metatexts. Hunter RL, Rengakos A, Sistakou E, editors. Vol. Trends in classic-Supplementary volumes. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2014.
49.
Hunter RL. Theocritus and the archaeology of Greek poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
50.
Hunt JM. The Politics of Death in Theocritus’ First Idyll. American Journal of Philology. 2011;132(3):379–96.
51.
Harrison SJ. Generic enrichment in Vergil and Horace. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
52.
Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service). Augustan poetry and the irrational [Internet]. Hardie PR, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724728.001.0001
53.
Hamilton JT. Soliciting darkness: Pindar, obscurity, and the classical tradition. Vol. Harvard studies in comparative literature. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2003.
54.
Halperin DM. Before pastoral: Theocritus and the ancient tradition of bucolic poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1983.
55.
dawsonera. Brill’s companion to Horace [Internet]. Günther HC, editor. Leiden: Brill; 2013. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9789004241961
56.
Griffith RD. Alph, the Sacred River, Ran: Geographical Subterfuge in Pindar Olympian 1.20. Mouseion: Journal of the Classical Association of Canada. 2008;8(1):1–8.
57.
Fredericksen E. Finding another Alexis: pastoral tradition and the reception of Vergil’s second eclogue. Classical Receptions Journal. 2015 Dec;7(3):422–41.
58.
Fowler D. Second Thoughts on Closure. In: Classical closure: reading the end in Greek and Latin literature. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1997. p. 3–22.
59.
J. Andrew Foster. Arsinoe II as Epic Queen: Encomiastic Allusion in Theocritus, Idyll 15. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) [Internet]. 2006;136(1):133–48. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4543286
60.
Andrew Fenton. The Forest and the Trees: Pattern and Meaning in Horace, ‘Odes’ 1. The American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2008;129(4):559–80. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27566730?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
61.
Oxford Scholarship Online (Online service). Augustan poetry and the Roman Republic [Internet]. Farrell J, Nelis D, editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199587223.001.0001
62.
Joseph Farrell. Classical Genre in Theory and Practice. New Literary History [Internet]. 2003;34(3):383–408. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20057790
63.
Ebbeler, Jennifer. Linus as a Figure for Pastoral Poetics in Vergil’s Eclogues. Helios. 2010;37(2):187–205.
64.
Davis G. Polyhymnia: the rhetoric of Horatian lyric discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1991.
65.
Currie B. Pindar and the cult of heroes. Vol. Oxford classical monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
66.
Cohan S, Shires LM. Telling stories: a theoretical analysis of narrative fiction. Vol. New accents. London: Routledge; 1988.
67.
Burton JB. Theocritus’s urban mimes: mobility, gender, and patronage. Vol. Hellenistic culture and society. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995.
68.
Burnett AP. Praising a Victorious Athlete. In: Pindar. London: Bristol Classical Press; 2008. p. 16–33.
69.
Breed BW. Pastoral inscriptions: reading and writing Virgil’s Eclogues. Vol. Classical literature and society. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2012.
70.
Brian W. Breed. Tua, Caesar, Aetas: Horace Ode 4.15 and the Augustan Age. The American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2004;125(2):245–53. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1562198?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
71.
Bennett A, Royle N. An introduction to literature, criticism and theory. Fifth edition. London: Routledge; 2016.
72.
Armstrong R. Classical Translations of the Classics: The Dynamics of Literary Tradition in Retranslating Epic Poetry. In: Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 162–202.
73.
Eva Anagnostou-Laoutides and David Konstan. Daphnis and Aphrodite: A Love Affair in Theocritus ‘Idyll’ 1. The American Journal of Philology [Internet]. 2008;129(4):497–527. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27566728
74.
Fletcher R, Hanink J. Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists and Biography [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/creative-lives-in-classical-antiquity/F8A5D97977F51C91573FA06F4609C780
75.
Gainsford P. Early Greek hexameter poetry. Vol. Greece&Rome: New surveys in the classics. Cambridge: Published for the Classical Association, Cambridge University Press; 2015.
76.
Carson A, Sappho. If not, winter: fragments of Sappho. London: Virago; 2002.
77.
McConnell J. ‘"We are still mythical”: Kate Tempest’s Brand New Ancients’. :195–206. Available from: http://www.bu.edu/arion/files/2014/07/McConnell.pdf
78.
Oswald A, Homer. Memorial: an excavation of the Iliad. London: Faber and Faber; 2011.
79.
Logue C, Homer. War music: an account of Books 1-4 and 16-19 of Homer’s Iliad. London: Faber; 2001.
80.
Rutherford R. Poetics and literary criticism. In: The Cambridge companion to Horace [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 248–61. Available from: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/companions/CBO9781139001335A025
81.
Gutzwiller K. Pastoral as Genre. In: Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre. 1991. p. 3–22.
82.
Kozak L. Enter Hektor. In: Experiencing Hektor: character in the Iliad [Internet]. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2016. p. 23–68. Available from: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=625763
83.
Hall E. Navigating the Realms of Gold: Translation As Access Route to the Classics. In: Lianeri A, Zajko V, editors. Translation and the classic: identity as change in the history of culture [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 315–40. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288076.001.0001
84.
Bierl A, Lardinois APMH, editors. The newest Sappho (P. Sapph. Obbink and P. GC inv. 105, frs. 1-4): studies in archaic and classical Greek song, vol. 2 [Internet]. Vol. volume 392. Leiden: Brill; 2016. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004314832
85.
Greene E, editor. Reading Sappho [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996. Available from: http://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft3199n81q&brand=ucpress
86.
Fowler RL, Cambridge Collections Online (Online service). The Cambridge companion to Homer [Internet]. Vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521813026