[1]
H. Fronius, ‘‘"Weiber = Apologeten” and "Mode-Misogyne”:1 Ideologies of Gender’, in Women and literature in the Goethe era (1770-1820): determined dilettantes, vol. Oxford modern languages and literature monographs, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 10–52.
[2]
V. Jones, Women in the eighteenth century: constructions of femininity, vol. World and word series. London: Routledge, 1990.
[3]
M. W. Gray, Productive men, reproductive women: the agrarian household and the emergence of separate spheres during the German Enlightenment. New York: Berghahn, 2000.
[4]
‘Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte’.
[5]
C. Brentano, J. Behrens, W. Frühwald, D. Lüders, and Freies Deutsches Hochstift (Frankfurt am Main, Germany), Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, vol. Frankfurter Brentano-Ausgabe. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1975.
[6]
Brentano, Clemens, ‘Geschichte vom braven Kasperl und dem schönen Annerl’. [Online]. Available: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4503#download
[7]
R. Hirschenauer and A. Weber, Eds., Wege zum Gedicht, 7. erweiterte Auflage. München: Schnell und Steiner, 1968.
[8]
G. Häntzschel, Gottfried August Bürger. Munich: Beck, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.goethezeitportal.de/fileadmin/PDF/db/wiss/buerger/haentzschel_buerger.pdf
[9]
Heidelberger Kolloquium der Internationalen Arnim-Gesellschaft and dawsonera, Das ‘Wunderhorn’ und die Heidelberger Romantik: Mundlichkeit, Schriftlichkeit, Performanz : Heidelberger Kolloquium der Internationalen Arnim-Gesellschaft, vol. Schriften der Internationalen Arnim-Gesellschaft. Tubingen: M. Niemeyer, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9783110915495
[10]
Marburger Märchentagung, Das Selbstverständliche Wunder: Beiträge germanistischer Märchenforschung, vol. Marburger Studien zur Literatur. Marburg: Hitzeroth, 1986.
[11]
E. Pilsworth, ‘Infanticide in Des Knaben Wunderhorn and Faust I: Romantic Variations on a Sturm und Drang Theme’, Oxford German Studies, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 405–420, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/00787191.2016.1243326.
[12]
N. Saul, ‘Love, death and Liebestod in German Romanticism’, in The Cambridge companion to German Romanticism, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 163–174 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/companions/CBO9781139002554A013
[13]
J. R. Williams, ‘Goethe the poet’, in The Cambridge companion to Goethe, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 42–65 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/companions/CBO9780511999819A007
[14]
H. S. Madland, ‘Infanticide as Fiction: Goethe’s Urfaust and Schiller’s “Kindsmorderin” as Models’, The German Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 1, Winter 1989, doi: 10.2307/407033.
[15]
M. Luserke and G. Dommes, Schiller-Handbuch: Leben - Werk - Wirkung. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2005.
[16]
W. D. Wilson, ‘The “Halsgericht” for the Execution of Johanna Höhn in Weimar, 28 November 1783’, German Life and Letters, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 33–45, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0483.2007.00409.x.
[17]
W. D. Wilson, ‘Goethe, His Duke and Infanticide: New Documents and Reflections on a Controversial Execution’, German Life and Letters, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 7–32, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0483.2007.00408.x.
[18]
R. Scholz, Das kurze Leben der Johanna Catharina Höhn: Kindesmorde und Kindesmörderinnen im Weimar Carl Augusts und Goethes : die Akten zu den Fällen Johanna Catharina Höhn, Maria Sophia Rost und Margarethe Dorothea Altwein. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2005.
[19]
R. J. Baerlocher, ‘Das Kind in meinem Leib’: Sittlichkeitsdelikte und Kindsmord in Sachsen-Weimar-Eisenach unter Carl August : eine Quellenedition, 1777-1786, vol. Veröffentlichungen aus thüringischen Staatsarchiven. Weimar: Böhlaus Nachfolger, 2004.
[20]
S. Kord, ‘Chapter 5. Shame: child-killers’, in Murderesses in German writing, 1720-1860: heroines of horror, vol. Cambridge studies in German, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009, pp. 121–153.
[21]
Helen Fronius, Women and Death: Representations of Female Victims and Perpetrators in German Culture 1500-2000. .
[22]
K. Peters, Der Kindsmord als schöne Kunst betrachtet: eine motivgeschichtliche Untersuchung der Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts, vol. Epistemata. Reihe Literaturwissenschaft. Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann, 2001.
[23]
‘Witch and Infanticide: Imaging the Female in Faust I’, Goethe Yearbook, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 1994, doi: 10.1353/gyr.2011.0352.
[24]
‘Enlightenment and the Transnational Literary Text: Reflections on Goethe’s Faust. A Tribute to T. J. Reed’ [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09593683.2017.1368930
[25]
J. K. Brown, ‘Faust’, in The Cambridge companion to Goethe, vol. The Cambridge companions to literature and classics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 84–100 [Online]. Available: http://universitypublishingonline.org/ref/id/companions/CBO9780511999819A009
[26]
Cyrus Hamlin, ‘Faust in Performance: Peter Stein’s Production of Goethe’s Faust, Parts 1 and 2’, Theater, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 116–136, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/34200
[27]
N. Boyle, Goethe: Faust, part one, vol. Landmarks of world literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[28]
R. Möhrmann and B. Mrytz, Verklärt, verkitscht, vergessen: die Mutter als ästhetische Figur. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1996.
[29]
W. D. Wilson, Das Goethe-Tabu: Protest und Menschenrechte im klassischen Weimar. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, 1999.
[30]
M. Oergel, ‘The Faustian “Gretchen”: Overlooked Aspects of a Famous Male Fantasy’, German Life and Letters, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 43–55, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0483.2010.01518.x.
[31]
H. Schulte, J. Noyes, and P. Kleber, Goethe’s Faust: theatre of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
[32]
J. K. Brown, Goethe’s Faust: the German tragedy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985.
[33]
K. Hilliard and University of London. Institute of Germanic & Romance Studies, Freethinkers, libertines and Schwärmer heterodoxy in German literature, 1750-1800, vol. IGRS books. London: Institute of Germanic and Romance Studies, 2011.
[34]
J. K. Brown, M. Lee, and T. P. Saine, Interpreting Goethe’s ‘Faust’ today. Columbia, S.C.: Camden House, 1994.
[35]
E. Boa, ‘LOSING THE PLOT? KLEIST, KAFKA, AND DISAPPEARING GRAND NARRATIVES’, German Life and Letters, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 137–154, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1111/glal.12143.
[36]
C. C. Bentzel, ‘Knowledge in Narrative: The Significance of the Swan in Kleist’s “Die Marquise von O...”’, The German Quarterly, vol. 64, no. 3, Summer 1991, doi: 10.2307/406392.
[37]
M. H. Birkhold, ‘The Trial of the Marquise of O …: A Case for Enlightened Jurisprudence?’, The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1080/00168890.2012.654434.
[38]
M. Chaouli, ‘Irresistible Rape: The Lure of Closure in "The Marquise of O. . . . "’, The Yale Journal of Criticism, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 51–81, 2004, doi: 10.1353/yale.2004.0002.
[39]
S. Allan, ‘“... auf einen Lasterhaften war ich gefasst, aber auf keinen - Teufel”: Heinrich von Kleist’s Die Marquise von O ...’, German Life and Letters, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 307–322, Jul. 1997, doi: 10.1111/1468-0483.00058.
[40]
H. Murphy, ‘Theatres of Emptiness: The case of Kleist’s                              …’, Oxford German Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 80–111, Jan. 1995, doi: 10.1179/ogs.1995.24.1.80.