1
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
2
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
3
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
4
Davies PS, Virgo G, Virgo G. Equity & trusts: text, cases, and materials. Third edition. Oxford University Press 2019.
5
Garton J, Moffat G, Bean GMD, et al. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
6
Hudson A. Understanding equity & trusts. Sixth edition. London: : Routledge 2017.
7
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
8
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
9
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
10
Watts G. Introduction to Trusts and Equity. http://global.oup.com/uk/orc/law/trusts/watt/resources/video/
11
Hart, W. G. What Is a Trust. Law Quarterly Review Published Online First: 1899.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lqr15&id=296
12
Hudson A. Great debates in equity and trusts. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
13
Garton J, Moffat G, Bean GMD, et al. Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015.
14
Scott AW. The Trust as an Instrument of Law Reform. The Yale Law Journal 1922;31. doi:10.2307/789370
15
Langbein JH. The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce. The Yale Law Journal 1997;107. doi:10.2307/797278
16
Patrick Parkinson. Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal 2002;61:657–83.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936
17
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
18
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
19
Dickens C. Bleak House. London: : Penguin 1994.
20
Hudson A. Great debates in equity and trusts. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
21
Neuberger D. Has Equity had its day? 2010.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20131203071235/http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/mr-speech-hong-kong-lecture-12102010.pdf
22
Edelman J. Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts. Law Quarterly Review 2013;129:66–86.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
23
Langbein JH. The Contractarian Basis of the Law of Trusts. The Yale Law Journal 1995;105. doi:10.2307/797196
24
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
25
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
26
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
27
Emery CT. The most hallowed principle: certainty of beneficiaries of trusts and powers of appointment. The Law quarterly review 1982;98:551–86.
28
Charles Harpum. Administrative Unworkability and Purpose Trusts. The Cambridge Law Journal 1986;45:391–4.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4506923
29
Patrick Parkinson. Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal 2002;61:657–83.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936
30
Grbich Y. Baden: Awakening the Conceptually Moribund Trust. The Modern Law Review 1974;37:643–56.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1094399
31
Glanville L. Williams. The Three Certainties. The Modern Law Review 1940;4:20–6.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1089548
32
Grubb A. Powers, Trusts and Classes of Objects. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 1982;46:432–41.
33
Hayton D. Uncertainty of subject-matter of trusts. Law Quarterly Review 1994;110:335–40.https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICD03DB50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
34
Martin J. Certainty of subject matter: a defence of Hunter v Moss. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 1996;60:223–7.https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA764A961E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
35
Hudson A. Great debates in equity and trusts. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
36
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
37
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
38
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
39
Halliwell M. Perfecting imperfect gifts and trusts: have we reached the end of the chancellor’s foot? The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2003;67:192–202.https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I924BA6F0E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838/View/FullText.html
40
Law Commission - Making a Will. 2017;231:226–37.https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/
41
Garton J. The role of the trust mechanism in the Rule in Re Rose. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2003;67:364–7.https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73B9D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
42
Roberts N. Donationes mortis causa in a dematerialised world. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2013;:113–28.https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE22491D0A31E11E28E17C4EDF535ADDD/View/FullText.html
43
Abigail Doggett. Explaining ‘RE: Rose’: The Search Goes On? The Cambridge Law Journal 2003;62:263–6.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508993
44
Rickett C. Completely constituting an inter vivos trust: property rules? The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2001;65.https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA74317A1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
45
Luxton P. In search of perfection: the Re Rose rule rationale. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2012;76:70–5.https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID134E9B050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9/View/FullText.html
46
Pawlowski M. Death bed gifts. New law journal 1994;144.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
47
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
48
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
49
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
50
Challinor E. Debunking the myth of secret trusts. The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 2005.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
51
Allan, G. G. The Secret is out There: Searching for the Legal Justification for the Doctrine of Secret Trusts through Analysis of the Case Law. Common Law World Review Published Online First: 2011.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/comlwr40&id=319
52
Critchley P. Instruments of fraud, testamentary dispositions, and the doctrine of secret trusts. Law Quarterly Review 1999;115:631–54.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
53
Kincaid D. The Tangled Web: the Relationship between a Secret Trust and a Will. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2000;:420–6.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
54
Wilde D. Secret and semi-secret trusts: justifying distinctions between the two. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 1995;:366–7.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
55
Law Commission - Making a Will. 2017;231:226–37.https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/
56
• Evans S. Should professionally drafted half-secret trusts be extinct after Larke v Nugus? The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 2014.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
57
T. G. Youdan. Formalities for Trusts of Land, and the Doctrine in Rochefoucauld v. Boustead. The Cambridge Law Journal 1984;43:306–36.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4506654
58
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
59
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
60
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
61
Jaffey P. Explaining the trust. Law Quarterly Review 2015;131.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
62
Brian Green. Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell. A Contextual Reappraisal. The Modern Law Review 1984;47:385–421.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1095817
63
Griffiths G. An inevitable tension? The disclosure of letters of wishes. The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 2008.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
64
Matthews P. The comparative importance of the rule in Saunders v Vautier. Law Quarterly Review 2006;122:266–264.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
65
Battersby G. Formalities for the disposition of equitable interests under a trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 1979;43:17–37.
66
Scott, A. Nature of Rights of the Cestui Que Trust. Columbia Law Review Published Online First: 1917.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/clr17&id=293
67
Stone, H. F. Nature of the Rights of the Cestui Que Trust. Columbia Law Review Published Online First: 1917.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/clr17&id=491
68
Edelman J. Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts. Law Quarterly Review 2013;129:66–86.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
69
Patrick Parkinson. Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal 2002;61:657–83.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936
70
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
71
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
72
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
73
Rosy Thornton. Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. The Cambridge Law Journal 2008;67:396–422.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25166411
74
Hicks A. The Trustee Act 2000 and the modern meaning of "investment”. Trust Law International 2001;15:203–13.https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/auth/checkbrowser.do?t=1645125976589&bhcp=1
75
Hudson A. Great debates in equity and trusts. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
76
Fox D. Non-excludable trustee duties. Trusts & Trustees 2011;17:17–26. doi:10.1093/tandt/ttq115
77
Birks P. The content of fiduciary obligation. Trust Law International Published Online First: 2002.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
78
Matthew Conaglen. A Re-Appraisal of the Fiduciary Self-Dealing and Fair-Dealing Rules. The Cambridge Law Journal 2006;65:366–96.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4509206
79
Capper D. Compensation for Breach of Trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 1997.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
80
Nobles RL. Charities and ethical investment. The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 1992.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
81
Conaglen M. The nature and function of fiduciary loyalty. Law Quarterly Review 2005;121.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
82
Edelman J. When do fiduciary duties arise? Law quarterly review 2010;126:302–27.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
83
Law Commission. Trustees’ Powers and Duties. 1999;260.https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/trustees-powers-and-duties/
84
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
85
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
86
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
87
Halliwell M, Prochaska E. Assistance and dishonesty: ring-a-ring o’roses. The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 2006.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
88
Hudson A. Great debates in equity and trusts. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
89
Ryan D. Royal Brunei dishonesty: a clear welcome for Barlow Clowes. The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 2007.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
90
Millett P. Tracing the proceeds of fraud. Law quarterly review 1991;107.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
91
Conaglen M. Difficulties with tracing backwards. Law quarterly review 2011;127.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
92
Lee J. Constructing and limiting liability in equity. Law quarterly review 2015;131.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
93
Evans S. Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution. Law quarterly review 1999;115.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
94
Turner PG. Tracing to and fro. The Cambridge Law Journal 2016;75:462–5. doi:10.1017/S0008197316000726
95
Virgo G. The principles of equity and trusts. Third edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
96
Watt G. Trusts & equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2018.
97
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts law. Fifth edition. London: : Palgrave 2017.
98
Synge M. Poverty: an essential element in charity after all? The Cambridge Law Journal 2011;70:649–68.https://www.jstor.org/stable/41301013
99
Charity Commission. Preston Down Trust: case report. 2016.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/preston-down-trust-case-report
100
Pawlowski M, Summers J. Private purpose trusts – a reform proposal. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 2007;:440–55.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
101
Harding M. Trusts for Religious Purposes and the Question of Public Benefit. The Modern Law Review 2008;71:159–82.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25151191
102
Rahmatian A. The continued relevance of the "poor relations” and "poor employees” cases under the Charities Act 2006. The Conveyancer and property lawyer Published Online First: 2009.http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
103
Sloan B. Public schools for public benefit? The Cambridge Law Journal 2012;71:45–7.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23253784
104
P. S. Atiyah. Public Benefit in Charities. The Modern Law Review 1958;21:138–54.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1091061
105
Charity Commission. Public benefit: the public benefit requirement (PB1). 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-benefit-the-public-benefit-requirement-pb1
106
Charity Commission. Charitable purposes. 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/charitable-purposes
107
Charity Commission. Legal analysis: public benefit. 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/legal-analysis-public-benefit
