1.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
2.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
3.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
4.
Davies PS, Virgo G, Virgo G. Equity & Trusts: Text, Cases, and Materials. Third edition. (Burn EH, ed.). Oxford University Press; 2019.
5.
Garton J, Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
6.
Hudson A. Understanding Equity & Trusts. Sixth edition. Routledge; 2017.
7.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
8.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
9.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
10.
Watts G. Introduction to Trusts and Equity. http://global.oup.com/uk/orc/law/trusts/watt/resources/video/
11.
Hart, W. G. What Is a Trust. Law Quarterly Review. 1899;(3). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lqr15&id=296
12.
Hudson A. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
13.
Garton J, Moffat G, Bean GMD, Probert R. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge University Press; 2015.
14.
Scott AW. The Trust as an Instrument of Law Reform. The Yale Law Journal. 1922;31(5). doi:10.2307/789370
15.
Langbein JH. The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce. The Yale Law Journal. 1997;107(1). doi:10.2307/797278
16.
Patrick Parkinson. Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2002;61(3):657-683. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936
17.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
18.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
19.
Dickens C. Bleak House. Penguin; 1994.
20.
Hudson A. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
21.
Neuberger D. Has Equity had its day? Published online 2010. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20131203071235/http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/mr-speech-hong-kong-lecture-12102010.pdf
22.
Edelman J. Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 2013;129:66-86. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
23.
Langbein JH. The Contractarian Basis of the Law of Trusts. The Yale Law Journal. 1995;105(3). doi:10.2307/797196
24.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
25.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
26.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
27.
Emery CT. The most hallowed principle: certainty of beneficiaries of trusts and powers of appointment. The Law quarterly review. 1982;98:551-586.
28.
Charles Harpum. Administrative Unworkability and Purpose Trusts. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1986;45(3):391-394. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4506923
29.
Patrick Parkinson. Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2002;61(3):657-683. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936
30.
Grbich Y. Baden: Awakening the Conceptually Moribund Trust. The Modern Law Review. 1974;37(6):643-656. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1094399
31.
Glanville L. Williams. The Three Certainties. The Modern Law Review. 1940;4(1):20-26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1089548
32.
Grubb A. Powers, Trusts and Classes of Objects. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 1982;46:432-441.
33.
Hayton D. Uncertainty of subject-matter of trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 1994;110:335-340. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICD03DB50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
34.
Martin J. Certainty of subject matter: a defence of Hunter v Moss. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 1996;60:223-227. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA764A961E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
35.
Hudson A. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
36.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
37.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
38.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
39.
Halliwell M. Perfecting imperfect gifts and trusts: have we reached the end of the chancellor’s foot? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2003;67:192-202. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I924BA6F0E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838/View/FullText.html
40.
Law Commission - Making a Will. 2017;231:226-237. https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/
41.
Garton J. The role of the trust mechanism in the Rule in Re Rose. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2003;67:364-367. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73B9D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
42.
Roberts N. Donationes mortis causa in a dematerialised world. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2013:113-128. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE22491D0A31E11E28E17C4EDF535ADDD/View/FullText.html
43.
Abigail Doggett. Explaining ‘RE: Rose’: The Search Goes On? The Cambridge Law Journal. 2003;62(2):263-266. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508993
44.
Rickett C. Completely constituting an inter vivos trust: property rules? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2001;65. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA74317A1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html
45.
Luxton P. In search of perfection: the Re Rose rule rationale. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 2012;76:70-75. https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID134E9B050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9/View/FullText.html
46.
Pawlowski M. Death bed gifts. New law journal. 1994;144. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal
47.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
48.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
49.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
50.
Challinor E. Debunking the myth of secret trusts. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2005. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
51.
Allan, G. G. The Secret is out There: Searching for the Legal Justification for the Doctrine of Secret Trusts through Analysis of the Case Law. Common Law World Review. 2011;(4). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/comlwr40&id=319
52.
Critchley P. Instruments of fraud, testamentary dispositions, and the doctrine of secret trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 1999;115:631-654. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
53.
Kincaid D. The Tangled Web: the Relationship between a Secret Trust and a Will. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2000:420-426. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
54.
Wilde D. Secret and semi-secret trusts: justifying distinctions between the two. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 1995:366-367. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
55.
Law Commission - Making a Will. 2017;231:226-237. https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/
56.
• Evans S. Should professionally drafted half-secret trusts be extinct after Larke v Nugus? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2014. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
57.
T. G. Youdan. Formalities for Trusts of Land, and the Doctrine in Rochefoucauld v. Boustead. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1984;43(2):306-336. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4506654
58.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
59.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
60.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
61.
Jaffey P. Explaining the trust. Law Quarterly Review. 2015;131. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
62.
Brian Green. Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell. A Contextual Reappraisal. The Modern Law Review. 1984;47(4):385-421. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1095817
63.
Griffiths G. An inevitable tension? The disclosure of letters of wishes. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2008. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
64.
Matthews P. The comparative importance of the rule in Saunders v Vautier. Law Quarterly Review. 2006;122:266-264. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
65.
Battersby G. Formalities for the disposition of equitable interests under a trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 1979;43:17-37.
66.
Scott, A. Nature of Rights of the Cestui Que Trust. Columbia Law Review. 1917;(4). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/clr17&id=293
67.
Stone, H. F. Nature of the Rights of the Cestui Que Trust. Columbia Law Review. 1917;(6). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/clr17&id=491
68.
Edelman J. Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 2013;129:66-86. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
69.
Patrick Parkinson. Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2002;61(3):657-683. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936
70.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
71.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
72.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
73.
Rosy Thornton. Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2008;67(2):396-422. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25166411
74.
Hicks A. The Trustee Act 2000 and the modern meaning of "investment”. Trust Law International. 2001;15:203-213. https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/auth/checkbrowser.do?t=1645125976589&bhcp=1
75.
Hudson A. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
76.
Fox D. Non-excludable trustee duties. Trusts & Trustees. 2011;17(1):17-26. doi:10.1093/tandt/ttq115
77.
Birks P. The content of fiduciary obligation. Trust Law International. Published online 2002. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
78.
Matthew Conaglen. A Re-Appraisal of the Fiduciary Self-Dealing and Fair-Dealing Rules. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2006;65(2):366-396. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4509206
79.
Capper D. Compensation for Breach of Trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 1997. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
80.
Nobles RL. Charities and ethical investment. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 1992. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
81.
Conaglen M. The nature and function of fiduciary loyalty. Law Quarterly Review. 2005;121. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
82.
Edelman J. When do fiduciary duties arise? Law quarterly review. 2010;126:302-327. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
83.
Law Commission. Trustees’ Powers and Duties. Published 1999. https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/trustees-powers-and-duties/
84.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
85.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
86.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
87.
Halliwell M, Prochaska E. Assistance and dishonesty: ring-a-ring o’roses. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2006. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
88.
Hudson A. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159
89.
Ryan D. Royal Brunei dishonesty: a clear welcome for Barlow Clowes. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2007. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
90.
Millett P. Tracing the proceeds of fraud. Law quarterly review. 1991;107. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
91.
Conaglen M. Difficulties with tracing backwards. Law quarterly review. 2011;127. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
92.
Lee J. Constructing and limiting liability in equity. Law quarterly review. 2015;131. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
93.
Evans S. Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution. Law quarterly review. 1999;115. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
94.
Turner PG. Tracing to and fro. The Cambridge Law Journal. 2016;75(03):462-465. doi:10.1017/S0008197316000726
95.
Virgo G. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
96.
Watt G. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford University Press; 2018.
97.
Webb C, Akkouh T. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. Palgrave; 2017.
98.
Synge M. Poverty: an essential element in charity after all? The Cambridge Law Journal. 2011;70(3):649-668. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41301013
99.
Charity Commission. Preston Down Trust: case report. Published online 2016. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/preston-down-trust-case-report
100.
Pawlowski M, Summers J. Private purpose trusts – a reform proposal. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2007:440-455. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
101.
Harding M. Trusts for Religious Purposes and the Question of Public Benefit. The Modern Law Review. 2008;71(2):159-182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25151191
102.
Rahmatian A. The continued relevance of the "poor relations” and "poor employees” cases under the Charities Act 2006. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. Published online 2009. http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK
103.
Sloan B. Public schools for public benefit? The Cambridge Law Journal. 2012;71(1):45-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23253784
104.
P. S. Atiyah. Public Benefit in Charities. The Modern Law Review. 1958;21(2):138-154. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1091061
105.
Charity Commission. Public benefit: the public benefit requirement (PB1). Published online 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-benefit-the-public-benefit-requirement-pb1
106.
Charity Commission. Charitable purposes. Published online 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/charitable-purposes
107.
Charity Commission. Legal analysis: public benefit. Published online 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/legal-analysis-public-benefit