1.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
2.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
3.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
4.
Davies, P.S., Virgo, G., Virgo, G.: Equity & trusts: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press (2019).
5.
Garton, J., Moffat, G., Bean, G.M.D., Probert, R.: Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015).
6.
Hudson, A.: Understanding equity & trusts. Routledge, London (2017).
7.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
8.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
9.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
10.
Watts, G.: Introduction to Trusts and Equity, http://global.oup.com/uk/orc/law/trusts/watt/resources/video/.
11.
Hart, W. G.: What Is a Trust. Law Quarterly Review. (1899).
12.
Hudson, A.: Great debates in equity and trusts. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
13.
Garton, J., Moffat, G., Bean, G.M.D., Probert, R.: Moffat’s trusts law: text and materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015).
14.
Scott, A.W.: The Trust as an Instrument of Law Reform. The Yale Law Journal. 31, (1922). https://doi.org/10.2307/789370.
15.
Langbein, J.H.: The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce. The Yale Law Journal. 107, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/797278.
16.
Patrick Parkinson: Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal. 61, 657–683 (2002).
17.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
18.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
19.
Dickens, C.: Bleak House. Penguin, London (1994).
20.
Hudson, A.: Great debates in equity and trusts. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
21.
Neuberger, D.: Has Equity had its day?, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20131203071235/http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/mr-speech-hong-kong-lecture-12102010.pdf, (2010).
22.
Edelman, J.: Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 129, 66–86 (2013).
23.
Langbein, J.H.: The Contractarian Basis of the Law of Trusts. The Yale Law Journal. 105, (1995). https://doi.org/10.2307/797196.
24.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
25.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
26.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
27.
Emery, C.T.: The most hallowed principle: certainty of beneficiaries of trusts and powers of appointment. The Law quarterly review. 98, 551–586 (1982).
28.
Charles Harpum: Administrative Unworkability and Purpose Trusts. The Cambridge Law Journal. 45, 391–394 (1986).
29.
Patrick Parkinson: Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal. 61, 657–683 (2002).
30.
Grbich, Y.: Baden: Awakening the Conceptually Moribund Trust. The Modern Law Review. 37, 643–656 (1974).
31.
Glanville L. Williams: The Three Certainties. The Modern Law Review. 4, 20–26 (1940).
32.
Grubb, A.: Powers, Trusts and Classes of Objects. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 46, 432–441 (1982).
33.
Hayton, D.: Uncertainty of subject-matter of trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 110, 335–340 (1994).
34.
Martin, J.: Certainty of subject matter: a defence of Hunter v Moss. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 60, 223–227 (1996).
35.
Hudson, A.: Great debates in equity and trusts. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
36.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
37.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
38.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
39.
Halliwell, M.: Perfecting imperfect gifts and trusts: have we reached the end of the chancellor’s foot? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 67, 192–202 (2003).
40.
Law Commission - Making a Will, https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/, (2017).
41.
Garton, J.: The role of the trust mechanism in the Rule in Re Rose. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 67, 364–367 (2003).
42.
Roberts, N.: Donationes mortis causa in a dematerialised world. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 113–128 (2013).
43.
Abigail Doggett: Explaining ‘RE: Rose’: The Search Goes On? The Cambridge Law Journal. 62, 263–266 (2003).
44.
Rickett, C.: Completely constituting an inter vivos trust: property rules? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 65, (2001).
45.
Luxton, P.: In search of perfection: the Re Rose rule rationale. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 76, 70–75 (2012).
46.
Pawlowski, M.: Death bed gifts. New law journal. 144, (1994).
47.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
48.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
49.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
50.
Challinor, E.: Debunking the myth of secret trusts. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (2005).
51.
Allan, G. G.: The Secret is out There: Searching for the Legal Justification for the Doctrine of Secret Trusts through Analysis of the Case Law. Common Law World Review. (2011).
52.
Critchley, P.: Instruments of fraud, testamentary dispositions, and the doctrine of secret trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 115, 631–654 (1999).
53.
Kincaid, D.: The Tangled Web: the Relationship between a Secret Trust and a Will. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 420–426 (2000).
54.
Wilde, D.: Secret and semi-secret trusts: justifying distinctions between the two. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 366–367 (1995).
55.
Law Commission - Making a Will, https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/, (2017).
56.
• Evans, S.: Should professionally drafted half-secret trusts be extinct after Larke v Nugus? The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (2014).
57.
T. G. Youdan: Formalities for Trusts of Land, and the Doctrine in Rochefoucauld v. Boustead. The Cambridge Law Journal. 43, 306–336 (1984).
58.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
59.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
60.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
61.
Jaffey, P.: Explaining the trust. Law Quarterly Review. 131, (2015).
62.
Brian Green: Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell. A Contextual Reappraisal. The Modern Law Review. 47, 385–421 (1984).
63.
Griffiths, G.: An inevitable tension? The disclosure of letters of wishes. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (2008).
64.
Matthews, P.: The comparative importance of the rule in Saunders v Vautier. Law Quarterly Review. 122, 266–264 (2006).
65.
Battersby, G.: Formalities for the disposition of equitable interests under a trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 43, 17–37 (1979).
66.
Scott, A.: Nature of Rights of the Cestui Que Trust. Columbia Law Review. (1917).
67.
Stone, H. F.: Nature of the Rights of the Cestui Que Trust. Columbia Law Review. (1917).
68.
Edelman, J.: Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts. Law Quarterly Review. 129, 66–86 (2013).
69.
Patrick Parkinson: Reconceptualising the Express Trust. The Cambridge Law Journal. 61, 657–683 (2002).
70.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
71.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
72.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
73.
Rosy Thornton: Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking. The Cambridge Law Journal. 67, 396–422 (2008).
74.
Hicks, A.: The Trustee Act 2000 and the modern meaning of "investment”. Trust Law International. 15, 203–213 (2001).
75.
Hudson, A.: Great debates in equity and trusts. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
76.
Fox, D.: Non-excludable trustee duties. Trusts & Trustees. 17, 17–26 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttq115.
77.
Birks, P.: The content of fiduciary obligation. Trust Law International. (2002).
78.
Matthew Conaglen: A Re-Appraisal of the Fiduciary Self-Dealing and Fair-Dealing Rules. The Cambridge Law Journal. 65, 366–396 (2006).
79.
Capper, D.: Compensation for Breach of Trust. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (1997).
80.
Nobles, R.L.: Charities and ethical investment. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (1992).
81.
Conaglen, M.: The nature and function of fiduciary loyalty. Law Quarterly Review. 121, (2005).
82.
Edelman, J.: When do fiduciary duties arise? Law quarterly review. 126, 302–327 (2010).
83.
Law Commission: Trustees’ Powers and Duties, https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/trustees-powers-and-duties/.
84.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
85.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
86.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
87.
Halliwell, M., Prochaska, E.: Assistance and dishonesty: ring-a-ring o’roses. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (2006).
88.
Hudson, A.: Great debates in equity and trusts. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014).
89.
Ryan, D.: Royal Brunei dishonesty: a clear welcome for Barlow Clowes. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (2007).
90.
Millett, P.: Tracing the proceeds of fraud. Law quarterly review. 107, (1991).
91.
Conaglen, M.: Difficulties with tracing backwards. Law quarterly review. 127, (2011).
92.
Lee, J.: Constructing and limiting liability in equity. Law quarterly review. 131, (2015).
93.
Evans, S.: Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution. Law quarterly review. 115, (1999).
94.
Turner, P.G.: Tracing to and fro. The Cambridge Law Journal. 75, 462–465 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197316000726.
95.
Virgo, G.: The principles of equity and trusts. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
96.
Watt, G.: Trusts & equity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2018).
97.
Webb, C., Akkouh, T.: Trusts law. Palgrave, London (2017).
98.
Synge, M.: Poverty: an essential element in charity after all? The Cambridge Law Journal. 70, 649–668 (2011).
99.
Charity Commission: Preston Down Trust: case report, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/preston-down-trust-case-report, (2016).
100.
Pawlowski, M., Summers, J.: Private purpose trusts – a reform proposal. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. 440–455 (2007).
101.
Harding, M.: Trusts for Religious Purposes and the Question of Public Benefit. The Modern Law Review. 71, 159–182 (2008).
102.
Rahmatian, A.: The continued relevance of the "poor relations” and "poor employees” cases under the Charities Act 2006. The Conveyancer and property lawyer. (2009).
103.
Sloan, B.: Public schools for public benefit? The Cambridge Law Journal. 71, 45–47 (2012).
104.
P. S. Atiyah: Public Benefit in Charities. The Modern Law Review. 21, 138–154 (1958).
105.
Charity Commission: Public benefit: the public benefit requirement (PB1), https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-benefit-the-public-benefit-requirement-pb1, (2013).
106.
Charity Commission: Charitable purposes, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/charitable-purposes, (2013).
107.
Charity Commission: Legal analysis: public benefit, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/legal-analysis-public-benefit, (2013).