Abigail Doggett. ‘Explaining “RE: Rose”: The Search Goes On?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 62.2 (2003): 263–266. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508993>.
Allan, G. G. ‘The Secret Is out There: Searching for the Legal Justification for the Doctrine of Secret Trusts through Analysis of the Case Law’. Common Law World Review 4 (2011): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/comlwr40&amp;id=319>.
Battersby, Graham. ‘Formalities for the Disposition of Equitable Interests under a Trust’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 43 (1979): 17–37. Print.
Birks, Peter. ‘The Content of Fiduciary Obligation’. Trust Law International (2002): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Brian Green. ‘Grey, Oughtred and Vandervell. A Contextual Reappraisal’. The Modern Law Review 47.4 (1984): 385–421. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1095817>.
Capper, D. ‘Compensation for Breach of Trust’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (1997): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Challinor, Emma. ‘Debunking the Myth of Secret Trusts’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Charity Commission. ‘Charitable Purposes’. 2013. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/charitable-purposes>.
---. ‘Legal Analysis: Public Benefit’. 2013. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/legal-analysis-public-benefit>.
---. ‘Preston Down Trust: Case Report’. 2016. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/preston-down-trust-case-report>.
---. ‘Public Benefit: The Public Benefit Requirement (PB1)’. 2013. Web. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-benefit-the-public-benefit-requirement-pb1>.
Charles Harpum. ‘Administrative Unworkability and Purpose Trusts’. The Cambridge Law Journal 45.3 (1986): 391–394. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4506923>.
Conaglen, Matthew. ‘Difficulties with Tracing Backwards’. Law quarterly review 127 (2011): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
---. ‘The Nature and Function of Fiduciary Loyalty’. Law Quarterly Review 121 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Critchley, Patricia. ‘Instruments of Fraud, Testamentary Dispositions, and the Doctrine of Secret Trusts’. Law Quarterly Review 115 (1999): 631–654. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Davies, Paul S., Graham Virgo, and Graham Virgo. Equity & Trusts: Text, Cases, and Materials. Ed. E. H. Burn. Third edition. Oxford University Press, 2019. Print.
Dickens, Charles. Bleak House. London: Penguin, 1994. Print.
Edelman, James. ‘Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts’. Law Quarterly Review 129 (2013): 66–86. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
---. ‘Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts’. Law Quarterly Review 129 (2013): 66–86. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
---. ‘When Do Fiduciary Duties Arise?’ Law quarterly review 126 (2010): 302–327. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Emery, C.T. ‘The Most Hallowed Principle: Certainty of Beneficiaries of Trusts and Powers of Appointment’. The Law quarterly review 98 (1982): 551–586. Print.
Evans, S. ‘Rethinking Tracing and the Law of Restitution’. Law quarterly review 115 (1999): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
• Evans, Steve. ‘Should Professionally Drafted Half-Secret Trusts Be Extinct after Larke v Nugus?’ The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2014): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Fox, D. ‘Non-Excludable Trustee Duties’. Trusts & Trustees 17.1 (2011): 17–26. Web.
Garton, Jonathan et al. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Print.
---. Moffat’s Trusts Law: Text and Materials. Sixth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Print.
---. ‘The Role of the Trust Mechanism in the Rule in Re Rose’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 67 (2003): 364–367. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA73B9D90E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Glanville L. Williams. ‘The Three Certainties’. The Modern Law Review 4.1 (1940): 20–26. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1089548>.
Grbich, Yuri. ‘Baden: Awakening the Conceptually Moribund Trust’. The Modern Law Review 37.6 (1974): 643–656. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1094399>.
Griffiths, Gerwyn. ‘An Inevitable Tension? The Disclosure of Letters of Wishes’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2008): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Grubb, Andrew. ‘Powers, Trusts and Classes of Objects’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 46 (1982): 432–441. Print.
Halliwell, Margaret. ‘Perfecting Imperfect Gifts and Trusts: Have We Reached the End of the Chancellor’s Foot?’ The Conveyancer and property lawyer 67 (2003): 192–202. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I924BA6F0E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838/View/FullText.html>.
Halliwell, Margaret, and Elizabeth Prochaska. ‘Assistance and Dishonesty: Ring-a-Ring o’roses’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Harding, Matthew. ‘Trusts for Religious Purposes and the Question of Public Benefit’. The Modern Law Review 71.2 (2008): 159–182. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/25151191>.
Hart, W. G. ‘What Is a Trust’. Law Quarterly Review 3 (1899): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/lqr15&amp;id=296>.
Hayton, David. ‘Uncertainty of Subject-Matter of Trusts’. Law Quarterly Review 110 (1994): 335–340. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICD03DB50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Hicks, Andrew. ‘The Trustee Act 2000 and the Modern Meaning of "investment”’. Trust Law International 15 (2001): 203–213. Web. <https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/auth/checkbrowser.do?t=1645125976589&bhcp=1>.
Hudson, Alastair. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159>.
---. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159>.
---. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159>.
---. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159>.
---. Great Debates in Equity and Trusts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4763159>.
---. Understanding Equity & Trusts. Sixth edition. London: Routledge, 2017. Print.
Jaffey, Peter. ‘Explaining the Trust’. Law Quarterly Review 131 (2015): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Kincaid, Diana. ‘The Tangled Web: The Relationship between a Secret Trust and a Will’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2000): 420–426. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Langbein, John H. ‘The Contractarian Basis of the Law of Trusts’. The Yale Law Journal 105.3 (1995): n. pag. Web.
---. ‘The Secret Life of the Trust: The Trust as an Instrument of Commerce’. The Yale Law Journal 107.1 (1997): n. pag. Web.
Law Commission. ‘Trustees’ Powers and Duties’. N.p., 1999. Web. <https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/trustees-powers-and-duties/>.
‘Law Commission - Making a Will’. July 2017 : 226–237. Web. <https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/>.
‘---’. July 2017 : 226–237. Web. <https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/wills/>.
Lee, J. ‘Constructing and Limiting Liability in Equity’. Law quarterly review 131 (2015): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Luxton, Peter. ‘In Search of Perfection: The Re Rose Rule Rationale’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 76 (2012): 70–75. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID134E9B050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9/View/FullText.html>.
Martin, Jill. ‘Certainty of Subject Matter: A Defence of Hunter v Moss’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer 60 (1996): 223–227. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA764A961E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Matthew Conaglen. ‘A Re-Appraisal of the Fiduciary Self-Dealing and Fair-Dealing Rules’. The Cambridge Law Journal 65.2 (2006): 366–396. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4509206>.
Matthews, Paul. ‘The Comparative Importance of the Rule in Saunders v Vautier’. Law Quarterly Review 122 (2006): 266–264. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Millett, Peter. ‘Tracing the Proceeds of Fraud’. Law quarterly review 107 (1991): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Neuberger, David. ‘Has Equity Had Its Day?’ 2010. Web. <http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20131203071235/http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Speeches/mr-speech-hong-kong-lecture-12102010.pdf>.
Nobles, Richard L. ‘Charities and Ethical Investment’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (1992): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
P. S. Atiyah. ‘Public Benefit in Charities’. The Modern Law Review 21.2 (1958): 138–154. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1091061>.
Patrick Parkinson. ‘Reconceptualising the Express Trust’. The Cambridge Law Journal 61.3 (2002): 657–683. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936>.
---. ‘Reconceptualising the Express Trust’. The Cambridge Law Journal 61.3 (2002): 657–683. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936>.
---. ‘Reconceptualising the Express Trust’. The Cambridge Law Journal 61.3 (2002): 657–683. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4508936>.
Pawlowski, Mark. ‘Death Bed Gifts’. New law journal 144 (1994): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal>.
Pawlowski, Mark, and Jo Summers. ‘Private Purpose Trusts – a Reform Proposal’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2007): 440–455. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Rahmatian, Andreas. ‘The Continued Relevance of the "poor Relations” and "Poor Employees” Cases under the Charities Act 2006’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Rickett, Charles. ‘Completely Constituting an Inter Vivos Trust: Property Rules?’ The Conveyancer and property lawyer 65 (2001): n. pag. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IA74317A1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html>.
Roberts, Nicholas. ‘Donationes Mortis Causa in a Dematerialised World’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2013): 113–128. Web. <https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE22491D0A31E11E28E17C4EDF535ADDD/View/FullText.html>.
Rosy Thornton. ‘Ethical Investments: A Case of Disjointed Thinking’. The Cambridge Law Journal 67.2 (2008): 396–422. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/25166411>.
Ryan, D. ‘Royal Brunei Dishonesty: A Clear Welcome for Barlow Clowes’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (2007): n. pag. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.
Scott, A. ‘Nature of Rights of the Cestui Que Trust’. Columbia Law Review 4 (1917): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/clr17&amp;id=293>.
Scott, Austin W. ‘The Trust as an Instrument of Law Reform’. The Yale Law Journal 31.5 (1922): n. pag. Web.
Sloan, Brian. ‘Public Schools for Public Benefit?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 71.1 (2012): 45–47. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/23253784>.
Stone, H. F. ‘Nature of the Rights of the Cestui Que Trust’. Columbia Law Review 6 (1917): n. pag. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/clr17&amp;id=491>.
Synge, Mary. ‘Poverty: An Essential Element in Charity after All?’ The Cambridge Law Journal 70.3 (2011): 649–668. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/41301013>.
T. G. Youdan. ‘Formalities for Trusts of Land, and the Doctrine in Rochefoucauld v. Boustead’. The Cambridge Law Journal 43.2 (1984): 306–336. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4506654>.
Turner, P.G. ‘Tracing to and Fro’. The Cambridge Law Journal 75.03 (2016): 462–465. Web.
Virgo, Graham. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. The Principles of Equity and Trusts. Third edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
Watt, Gary. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
---. Trusts & Equity. Eighth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. Print.
Watts, Gary. ‘Introduction to Trusts and Equity’. Web. <http://global.oup.com/uk/orc/law/trusts/watt/resources/video/>.
Webb, Charlie, and Tim Akkouh. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
---. Trusts Law. Fifth edition. London: Palgrave, 2017. Print.
Wilde, David. ‘Secret and Semi-Secret Trusts: Justifying Distinctions between the Two’. The Conveyancer and property lawyer (1995): 366–367. Web. <http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp.bris.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth&amp;returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fwestlawuk.thomsonreuters.co.uk%2FBrowse%2FHome%2FWestlawUK>.