Bibliography for POLI10003:Theories of International Relations BETA

Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Adam Jones. 1996. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 22(4):405–29.

Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. ‘International Practices’. International Theory 3(01):1–36. doi: 10.1017/S175297191000031X.

Alexander Wendt. 1992. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization 46(2):391–425.

Anon. n.d.-a. ‘Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory’. Retrieved (https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/).

Anon. n.d.-b. ‘Considine, L., “Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), Pp. 109-127.’

Anon. n.d.-c. ‘Dunn, B., “Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?” The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011’. Retrieved (http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis).

Anon. n.d.-d. ‘Guzzini, G., “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis” International Organization, 47(3), 1993, Pp. 443-478.’

Anon. n.d.-e. ‘Mearsheimer, J., “Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.”’ Retrieved (https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp).

Anon. n.d.-f. ‘Peterson V. S., “Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, Pp. 1-11.’

Anon. n.d.-g. ‘Seth, Sanjay (2011), “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), Pp. 167-183.’ doi: 10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila.

Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. 1985. ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’. World Politics 38(01):226–54. doi: 10.2307/2010357.

Baldwin, David A. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. 2002. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31(1):109–27. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310010601.

Barry Buzan. 2001. ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’. Review of International Studies 27(3):471–88.

Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, eds. 2014a. ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’. in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, eds. 2014b. ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’. in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beardsworth, Richard. 2011. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

Bellamy, Alex J., ed. 2004. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. 2006. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization 60(4):781–810.

Biccum, April R. 2005. ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: A Reinvention of Colonial Discourse in DFID Promotional Literature’. Third World Quarterly 26(6):1005–20. doi: 10.1080/01436590500139656.

Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. 2004. ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’. Capital & Class 28(1):85–113. doi: 10.1177/030981680408200106.

Björkdahl, Annika. 2002. ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15(1):9–23. doi: 10.1080/09557570220126216.

Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. 1995. ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’. in International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brock, Gillian. 2009. Global Justice. Oxford University Press.

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. 2008. ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’. International Studies Review 10(4):693–707.

Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009. ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’. Pp. 1–17 in Understanding international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, Garrett Wallace. 2009. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, eds. 2010a. ‘Editor’s Introduction’. in The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, eds. 2010b. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity.

Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bulmer, Sarah. 2013. ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15(2):137–56. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2012.746565.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013a. ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013b. ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013c. ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013d. ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013e. ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013f. ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013g. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013h. ‘Introduction’. in Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burnham, Peter. 2001. ‘Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation’. Capital & Class 25(3):103–12. doi: 10.1177/030981680107500109.

Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buzan, Barry. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity.

Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2001. ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’. Millennium 30(1):19–39. doi: 10.1177/03058298010300010401.

Callinicos, Alex. 1989. ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’. Pp. 62–91 in Against postmodernism: a marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Callinicos, Alex. 2004. ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6(3):426–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x.

Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Caney, Simon. 2010. ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13(1):203–28. doi: 10.1080/13698230903326331.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. 2013a. ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’. in Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. 2013b. ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’. in Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. 2013c. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’. in Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

Carpenter, R. Charli. 2006. ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’. Security Dialogue 37(1):83–103. doi: 10.1177/0967010606064139.

Charvet, John, and Elisa Kaczynska-Nay. 2008. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’. World Politics 50(02):324–48. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008133.

Chowdhury, Geeta, and Sheila Nair. 2002. ‘Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in International Relations’. Pp. 1–32 in Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class. Vol. Routledge advances in international relations and global politics. London: Routledge.

Cox, Robert W. 1981. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10(2):126–55.

Cox, Robert W. 1983. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’. Millennium : Journal of International Studies. 12(2):162–75.

Cynthia Weber. 1992. ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’. Review of International Studies 18(3):199–216.

Darby, Phillip. 2004. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33(1):1–32. doi: 10.1177/03058298040330010101.

David Campbell. 1990. ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 15(3):263–86.

Davis, Neville. 2014. ‘A Rose by Any Other Name’. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021.

Della Porta, Donatella, and Michael Keating, eds. 2008. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’. in Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dietzel, A. n.d. ‘Global Justice’. in International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction.

Dietzel, Alix. 2017. ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’ Global Policy 8(3):313–21. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12421.

Doty, Roxanne. 1996. ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’. Pp. 331–45 in Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. Vol. Rhetoric and public affairs series, edited by F. A. Beer and R. Hariman. East Lansing: Michigan State University press.

Doyle, Michael W., and G. John Ikenberry. 1997. ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’. in New thinking in international relations theory. Oxford: Westview Press.

Dunne, T., L. Hansen, and C. Wight. 2013. ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’ European Journal of International Relations 19(3):405–25. doi: 10.1177/1354066113495485.

Dunne, Timothy. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Vol. St Anthony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. 2013a. ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. 2013b. ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All These Debates?’ in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016a. ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016b. ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016c. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016d. ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016e. ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016f. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016g. ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016h. ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016i. ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016j. ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’. in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edkins, Jenny, and Véronique Pin-Fat. 2005. ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34(1):1–24. doi: 10.1177/03058298050340010101.

Edkins, Jenny, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Critical Theorists and International Relations. Vol. Interventions. London: Routledge.

Enloe, Cynthia H. 2014. ‘Chapter 5 - Gender Makes the World Go Round: Where Are the Women?’ in Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Epstein, Charlotte. 2014. ‘The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction’. International Theory 6(02):294–311. doi: 10.1017/S1752971914000219.

Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science 4(1):391–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.

Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow. 1986. The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Franceschet, Antonio. 1999. ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 54(3). doi: 10.2307/40203406.

Fukuyama, Francis. 2012. The End of History and the Last Man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books.

G. John Ikenberry. 2009. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1):71–87.

G. John Ikenberry. 2011. ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’. Foreign Affairs 90(3):56–68.

Gallagher, Adrian M. 2012. ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’. Global Responsibility to Protect 4(3):334–57. doi: 10.1163/1875984X-00403004.

Gardiner, Stephen Mark. 2010. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gardner, Richard N. 1990. ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’. The Washington Quarterly 13(3):23–39. doi: 10.1080/01636609009445391.

Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. 1989. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly 33(4). doi: 10.2307/2600523.

Gramsci, Antonio, Quintin Hoare, and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

GROVOGUI, SIBA N. 2002. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations 8(3):315–38. doi: 10.1177/1354066102008003001.

Gruffydd Jones, Branwen, ed. 2006. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield.

Guzzini, Stefano. 2004. ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 10(4):533–68. doi: 10.1177/1354066104047848.

Hansen, Lene. 2006. ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’. Pp. 17–36 in Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. Vol. The new international relations series. London: Routledge.

Hayden, Patrick. 2005. Cosmopolitan Global Politics. Vol. Ethics and global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Held, David. 2003. ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’ Review of International Studies 29(04). doi: 10.1017/S0260210503004650.

Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Hoffmann, Stanley. 1995. ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. Foreign Policy (98). doi: 10.2307/1148964.

Hollinger, Robert. 1994. ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’. in Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach. Vol. Contemporary social theory. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

Hooper, Charlotte. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Hopf, Ted. 1998. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23(1). doi: 10.2307/2539267.

Immanuel Wallerstein. 1974. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16(4):387–415.

J. Ann Tickner. 1997. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly 41(4):611–32.

Jabri, Vivienne. 2000. ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’. Pp. 289–313 in Issues in international relations. London: Routledge.

Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, Robert H., and Georg Sørensen. 2010. ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’. in Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. 2010. ‘IR as an Academic Subject’. Pp. 28–57 in Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jean-Yves Haine. 2009. ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 64(2):453–79.

Jervis, Robert. n.d. ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’. Social Research 61(4).

Joseph M. Grieco. 1988. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42(3):485–507.

Justin Rosenberg. 1990. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies 16(4):285–303.

Kenneth N. Waltz. 2000. ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’. International Security 25(1):5–41.

Keohane, Robert O. 1988. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly 32(4). doi: 10.2307/2600589.

Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin. 1995. ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’. International Security 20(1). doi: 10.2307/2539214.

Keohane, Robert O., and Kenneth Neal Waltz. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol. The political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press.

Koivisto, Marjo, and Tim Dunne. 2010. ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38(3):615–40. doi: 10.1177/0305829810363509.

Lawrence, Peter. 2014. Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lawson, Stephanie. 2015. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’. in Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics. Cambridge, England: Polity.

Lebow, Richard Ned. 2005. ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’. International Relations 19(3):329–36. doi: 10.1177/0047117805055410.

Linklater, Andrew. 2011. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. 1998. ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’. International Organization 52(4):729–57.

LITTLE, RICHARD. 2000. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6(3):395–422. doi: 10.1177/1354066100006003004.

Lu, Catherine. 2000. ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’. Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2):244–67. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00101.

Maclean, John. 1988. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17(2):295–319. doi: 10.1177/03058298880170021201.

Martha Finnemore. 2001. ‘Exporting the English School?’ Review of International Studies 27(3):509–13.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52(4):887–917.

Matin, Kamran. 2013. ‘Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’. European Journal of International Relations 19(2):353–77. doi: 10.1177/1354066111425263.

Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. International Security 15(1). doi: 10.2307/2538981.

Michael C. Williams. 1993. ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’. Review of International Studies 19(2):103–21.

Michael W. Doyle. 2005. ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’. The American Political Science Review 99(3):463–66.

MILLIKEN, JENNIFER. 1999. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’: European Journal of International Relations 5(2):225–54. doi: 10.1177/1354066199005002003.

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1952. ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’ American Political Science Review 46(04):961–88. doi: 10.2307/1952108.

Moss, Jeremy, ed. 2015. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

NICHOLSON, MICHAEL. 2000. ‘What’s the Use of International Relations?’ Review of International Studies 26(2):183–98. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500001832.

Nye, Joseph S. 1988. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40(02):235–51. doi: 10.2307/2010363.

el-Ojeili, Chamsy. 2015. ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades On’. Critical Sociology 41(4–5):679–700. doi: 10.1177/0896920513497377.

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 2013. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. Vol. The new international relations. New York: Routledge.

Pinar Bilgin. 2008. ‘Thinking Past “Western” IR?’ Third World Quarterly 29(1):5–23.

Powell, Robert. 1994. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization 48(02). doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028204.

R. Charli Carpenter. 2011. ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’. International Organization 65(1):69–102.

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. 1998. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review of International Studies 24(1):3–21.

Reus-Smit, Christian. 2002. ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(3):487–509. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00091.

Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal. 2008. ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’. in The Oxford handbook of international relations. Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richard K. Ashley. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38(2):225–86.

Richard Price. 1995. ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’. International Organization 49(1):73–103.

Rita Abrahamsen. 2003. ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’. African Affairs 102(407):189–210.

Robert G. Gilpin. 1984. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization 38(2):287–304.

Robert Jervis. 1999. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security 24(1):42–63.

Roff, Heather M. 2016. ‘Gendering a Warbot’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 18(1):1–18. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246.

Ronen Palan. 2000. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. Review of International Studies 26(4):575–98.

Rosenau, Pauline. 1990. ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 19(1):83–110. doi: 10.1177/03058298900190010701.

Schroeder, Paul W. 1997. ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’. International Security 22(1). doi: 10.2307/2539329.

Seth, Sanjay, ed. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Vol. Interventions. Abingdon: Routledge.

Shapiro, Michael. 1989. ‘Textualising Global Politics’. Pp. 11–22 in International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Vol. World Politics Series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.

Shapiro, Michael J., and James Der Derian. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol. World Politics Series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.

Shepherd, Laura J., ed. 2015. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Second edition. London: Routledge.

Shue, Henry. 2014. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996a. ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’. in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996b. ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’. in International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996c. ‘Chapter 16 - The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’. in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996d. ‘Chapter 18 - All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’. in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steans, Jill. 2003. ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(3):428–54. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00114.

Steans, Jill. 2006. ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’. Pp. 7–19 in Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. Cambridge: Polity.

Tan, Kok-Chor. 2004. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Vol. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

TAYLOR, LUCY. 2012. ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’. International Studies Review 14(3):386–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x.

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. 1998. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review of International Studies 24(2):283–97.

Tickner, Arlene B. 2013. ‘Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 19(3):627–46. doi: 10.1177/1354066113494323.

Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’. in Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Vasilaki, Rosa. 2012. ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41(1):3–22. doi: 10.1177/0305829812451720.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’. Pp. 23–41 in World-systems analysis: an introduction. Vol. A John Hope Franklin Center book. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Walt, Stephen M. 1998. ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’. Foreign Policy (110). doi: 10.2307/1149275.

Waltz, Kenneth Neal. 1979. Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill.

WAYLEN, GEORGINA. 2006. ‘You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue between Feminists and (Critical) IPE’. Review of International Studies 32(01). doi: 10.1017/S0260210506006966.

Weber, Cindy. 1994. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23:337–49.

WEISS, THOMAS G. 2010. ‘How United Nations Ideas Change History’. Review of International Studies 36(S1):3–23. doi: 10.1017/S026021051100009X.

Weldes, Jutta. 1996. ‘Constructing National Interests’’. European Journal of International Relations 2:275–318.

Wheeler, Nicholas J. 1992. ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21(3):463–87. doi: 10.1177/03058298920210030201.

Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

William Bain. 2000. ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’. Review of International Studies 26(3):445–64.