Bibliography for POLI10003:Theories of International Relations BETA

Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge, 2010.

Adam Jones. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, 1996, pp. 405–29, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459.

Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. ‘International Practices’. International Theory, vol. 3, no. 01, Mar. 2011, pp. 1–36, https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X.

Alexander Wendt. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, 1992, pp. 391–425, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858.

Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’. World Politics, vol. 38, no. 01, Oct. 1985, pp. 226–54, https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357.

Baldwin, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Columbia University Press, 1993.

Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, Jan. 2002, pp. 109–27, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.

Barry Buzan. ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’. Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, 2001, pp. 471–88, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Baylis, John, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition, Oxford University Press, 2014.

Baylis, John, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition, Oxford University Press, 2014, https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192898142.001.0001/hepl-9780192898142-chapter-8.

Beardsworth, Richard. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Polity, 2011.

Bellamy, Alex J., editor. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001.

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization, vol. 60, no. 4, 2006, pp. 781–810, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847.

Biccum, April R. ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: A Reinvention of Colonial Discourse in DFID Promotional Literature’. Third World Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 6, Sept. 2005, pp. 1005–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500139656.

Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’. Capital & Class, vol. 28, no. 1, Mar. 2004, pp. 85–113, https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106.

Björkdahl, Annika. ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 15, no. 1, Apr. 2002, pp. 9–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216.

Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/.

Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’. International Relations Theory Today, Polity Press, 1995.

Brock, Gillian. Global Justice. Oxford University Press, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001.

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’. International Studies Review, vol. 10, no. 4, 2008, pp. 693–707, http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017.

Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’. Understanding International Relations, 4th ed, Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, pp. 1–17.

Brown, Garrett Wallace. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh University Press, 2009, http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, editors. ‘Editor’s Introduction’. The Cosmopolitanism Reader, Polity, 2010.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, editors. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Polity, 2010.

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed, Palgrave, 2002.

Bulmer, Sarah. ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 15, no. 2, June 2013, pp. 137–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368.

———. ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

———. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. ‘Introduction’. Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burnham, Peter. ‘Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation’. Capital & Class, vol. 25, no. 3, Oct. 2001, pp. 103–12, https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109.

Buzan, Barry. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Polity, 2014.

———. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press, 2004, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617.

Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’. Millennium, vol. 30, no. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 19–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.

Callinicos, Alex. ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’. Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique, Polity Press, 1989, pp. 62–91.

———. ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, Aug. 2004, pp. 426–33, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x.

Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton University Press, 2001.

Caney, Simon. ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 1, Mar. 2010, pp. 203–28, https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331.

Carlsnaes, Walter, et al. ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’. Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed, SAGE, 2013.

———. ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’. Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed, SAGE, 2013.

———. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’. Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed, SAGE, 2013.

Carpenter, R. Charli. ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’. Security Dialogue, vol. 37, no. 1, Mar. 2006, pp. 83–103, https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139.

Charvet, John, and Elisa Kaczynska-Nay. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge University Press, 2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’. World Politics, vol. 50, no. 02, Jan. 1998, pp. 324–48, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133.

Chowdhury, Geeta, and Sheila Nair. ‘Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in International Relations’. Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class, Routledge advances in international relations and global politics, Routledge, 2002, pp. 1–32, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181.

Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), Pp. 109-127. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf.

Cox, Robert W. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’. Millennium : Journal of International Studies. [London], vol. 12, no. 2, 1983, pp. 162–75.

———. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, June 1981, pp. 126–55.

Cynthia Weber. ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’. Review of International Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, 1992, pp. 199–216, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Darby, Phillip. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101.

David Campbell. ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 15, no. 3, 1990, pp. 263–86, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Davis, Neville. ‘A Rose by Any Other Name’. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 25, July 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021.

Della Porta, Donatella, and Michael Keating, editors. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge University Press, 2008, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.

Dietzel, A. ‘Global Justice’. International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction, https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/.

Dietzel, Alix. ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’ Global Policy, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2017, pp. 313–21, https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12421.

Doty, Roxanne. ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’. Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations, edited by Francis A. Beer and Robert Hariman, Rhetoric and public affairs series, Michigan State University press, 1996, pp. 331–45.

Doyle, Michael W., and G. John Ikenberry. ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’. New Thinking in International Relations Theory, Westview Press, 1997.

Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011. http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis.

Dunne, T., et al. ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’ European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, Sept. 2013, pp. 405–25, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.

Dunne, Timothy, et al. ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed, Oxford University Press, 2013.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016, https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-12.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016.

———. ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All These Debates?’ International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed, Oxford University Press, 2013.

Dunne, Timothy, et al., editors. ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition, Oxford University Press, 2016, https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-1.

———. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford, 1998.

Edkins, Jenny, and Véronique Pin-Fat. ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, Aug. 2005, pp. 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101.

Edkins, Jenny, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. Critical Theorists and International Relations. Routledge, 2009, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003.

el-Ojeili, Chamsy. ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades On’. Critical Sociology, vol. 41, nos 4–5, July 2015, pp. 679–700, https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513497377.

Enloe, Cynthia H. ‘Chapter 5 - Gender Makes the World Go Round: Where Are the Women?’ Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Second edition, Completely revised and Updated, University of California Press, 2014, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669.

Epstein, Charlotte. ‘The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction’. International Theory, vol. 6, no. 02, July 2014, pp. 294–311, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219.

Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 4, no. 1, June 2001, pp. 391–416, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.

Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow. The Foucault Reader. Penguin Books, 1986.

Franceschet, Antonio. ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, 1999, https://doi.org/10.2307/40203406.

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. Twentieth anniversary edition, Penguin Books, 2012.

G. John Ikenberry. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, no. 1, 2009, pp. 71–87, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

———. ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’. Foreign Affairs, vol. 90, no. 3, 2011, pp. 56–68, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408.

Gallagher, Adrian M. ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’. Global Responsibility to Protect, vol. 4, no. 3, Jan. 2012, pp. 334–57, https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00403004.

Gardiner, Stephen Mark. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press, 2010, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959.

Gardner, Richard N. ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, Sept. 1990, pp. 23–39, https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445391.

Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 4, Dec. 1989, https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523.

Gramsci, Antonio, et al. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Lawrence and Wishart, 1971.

GROVOGUI, SIBA N. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 8, no. 3, Sept. 2002, pp. 315–38, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001.

Gruffydd Jones, Branwen, editor. Decolonizing International Relations. Rowman and Littlefield, 2006, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740.

Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, Pp. 443-478. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

Guzzini, Stefano. ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 10, no. 4, Dec. 2004, pp. 533–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047848.

Hansen, Lene. ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, The new international relations series, Routledge, 2006, pp. 17–36, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33.

Hayden, Patrick. Cosmopolitan Global Politics. Ashgate, 2005.

Held, David. ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’ Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 04, Oct. 2003, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004650.

———. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Polity Press, 2010, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922.

Hoffmann, Stanley. ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. Foreign Policy, no. 98, Spring 1995, https://doi.org/10.2307/1148964.

Hollinger, Robert. ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’. Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach, Contemporary social theory, Sage, 1994.

Hooper, Charlotte. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. Columbia University Press, 2001.

Hopf, Ted. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security, vol. 23, no. 1, Summer 1998, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.

Immanuel Wallerstein. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 16, no. 4, 1974, pp. 387–415, http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015.

J. Ann Tickner. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, 1997, pp. 611–32, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Jabri, Vivienne. ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’. Issues in International Relations, Routledge, 2000, pp. 289–313.

Jackson, Robert H. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford University Press, 2000.

Jackson, Robert H., and Georg Sørensen. ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed, Oxford University Press, 2010.

Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. ‘IR as an Academic Subject’. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed, Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 28–57, https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780198862208.001.0001/hepl-9780198862208-chapter-2.

Jean-Yves Haine. ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal, vol. 64, no. 2, 2009, pp. 453–79, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518.

Jervis, Robert. ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’. Social Research, vol. 61, no. 4, https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

Joseph M. Grieco. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3, 1988, pp. 485–507, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Justin Rosenberg. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, 1990, pp. 285–303, https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232.

Kenneth N. Waltz. ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’. International Security, vol. 25, no. 1, 2000, pp. 5–41, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772.

Keohane, Robert O. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, Dec. 1988, https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589.

Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin. ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’. International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, Summer 1995, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.

Keohane, Robert O., and Kenneth Neal Waltz. Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia University Press, 1986.

Koivisto, Marjo, and Tim Dunne. ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, May 2010, pp. 615–40, https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810363509.

Lawrence, Peter. Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.

Lawson, Stephanie. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’. Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics, Polity, 2015, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448.

Lebow, Richard Ned. ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’. International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, Sept. 2005, pp. 329–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805055410.

Linklater, Andrew. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge University Press, 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348.

Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge University Press, 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528.

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’. International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, 1998, pp. 729–57, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356.

LITTLE, RICHARD. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, Sept. 2000, pp. 395–422, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.

Lu, Catherine. ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’. Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 2, June 2000, pp. 244–67, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101.

Maclean, John. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, June 1988, pp. 295–319, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.

Martha Finnemore. ‘Exporting the English School?’ Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, 2001, pp. 509–13, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, 1998, pp. 887–917, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Matin, Kamran. ‘Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 2, June 2013, pp. 353–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263.

Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp.

Mearsheimer, John J. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. International Security, vol. 15, no. 1, Summer 1990, https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.

Michael C. Williams. ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’. Review of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, 1993, pp. 103–21, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Michael W. Doyle. ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’. The American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 3, 2005, pp. 463–66, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953.

MILLIKEN, JENNIFER. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’: European Journal of International Relations, vol. 5, no. 2, June 1999, pp. 225–54, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.

Morgenthau, Hans J. ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’ American Political Science Review, vol. 46, no. 04, Dec. 1952, pp. 961–88, https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108.

Moss, Jeremy, editor. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge University Press, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340.

NICHOLSON, MICHAEL. ‘What’s the Use of International Relations?’ Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, Apr. 2000, pp. 183–98, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500001832.

Nye, Joseph S. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics, vol. 40, no. 02, Jan. 1988, pp. 235–51, https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. Routledge, 2013.

Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, Pp. 1-11. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf.

Pinar Bilgin. ‘Thinking Past “Western” IR?’ Third World Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, 2008, pp. 5–23, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023.

Powell, Robert. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization, vol. 48, no. 02, Mar. 1994, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.

R. Charli Carpenter. ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’. International Organization, vol. 65, no. 1, 2011, pp. 69–102, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104.

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, 1998, pp. 3–21, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503.

Reus-Smit, Christian. ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 4, no. 3, Oct. 2002, pp. 487–509, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00091.

Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal. ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford handbooks of political science, Oxford University Press, 2008.

Richard K. Ashley. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, 1984, pp. 225–86, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440.

Richard Price. ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’. International Organization, vol. 49, no. 1, 1995, pp. 73–103, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Rita Abrahamsen. ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’. African Affairs, vol. 102, no. 407, 2003, pp. 189–210, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676.

Robert G. Gilpin. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, 1984, pp. 287–304, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441.

Robert Jervis. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, 1999, pp. 42–63, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347.

Roff, Heather M. ‘Gendering a Warbot’. International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 18, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246.

Ronen Palan. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, 2000, pp. 575–98, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700.

Rosenau, Pauline. ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, Mar. 1990, pp. 83–110, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190010701.

Schroeder, Paul W. ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’. International Security, vol. 22, no. 1, Summer 1997, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539329.

Seth, Sanjay, editor. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Interventions, Routledge, 2013.

Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), Pp. 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila.

Shapiro, Michael. ‘Textualising Global Politics’. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, World Politics Series, Lexington Books, 1989, pp. 11–22.

Shapiro, Michael J., and James Der Derian. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington Books, 1989.

Shepherd, Laura J., editor. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Second edition, Routledge, 2015, https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819.

Shue, Henry. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford University Press, 2014, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931.

Smith, Steve, et al. ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

———. ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1996, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013.

———. ‘Chapter 16 - The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

———. ‘Chapter 18 - All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1996, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Steans, Jill. ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 5, no. 3, Aug. 2003, pp. 428–54, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00114.

———. ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’. Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates and Future Directions, 2nd ed., rev.Expanded, Polity, 2006, pp. 7–19.

Tan, Kok-Chor. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge University Press, 2004, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385.

TAYLOR, LUCY. ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’. International Studies Review, vol. 14, no. 3, Sept. 2012, pp. 386–400, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x.

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, 1998, pp. 283–97, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523.

Tickner, Arlene B. ‘Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, Sept. 2013, pp. 627–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323.

Tickner, J. Ann. ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security, New directions in world politics, Columbia University Press, 1992.

Vasilaki, Rosa. ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, Sept. 2012, pp. 3–22, https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, A John Hope Franklin Center book, Duke University Press, 2004, pp. 23–41, https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3007861&ppg=38.

Walt, Stephen M. ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’. Foreign Policy, no. 110, Spring 1998, https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275.

Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill, 1979.

WAYLEN, GEORGINA. ‘You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue between Feminists and (Critical) IPE’. Review of International Studies, vol. 32, no. 01, Feb. 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006966.

Weber, Cindy. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies [London], vol. 23, 1994, pp. 337–49.

WEISS, THOMAS G. ‘How United Nations Ideas Change History’. Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. S1, Oct. 2010, pp. 3–23, https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051100009X.

Weldes, Jutta. ‘Constructing National Interests’’. European Journal of International Relations [London], vol. 2, 1996, pp. 275–318, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001.

Wheeler, Nicholas J. ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, Dec. 1992, pp. 463–87, https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030201.

———. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford University Press, 2000, https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740.

William Bain. ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’. Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, 2000, pp. 445–64, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688.