Bibliography for POLI10003:Theories of International Relations BETA

Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2010). Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge.

Adam Jones. (1996). Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 22(4), 405–429. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459

Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(01), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X

Alexander Wendt. (1992). Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858

Axelrod, R., & Keohane, R. O. (1985). Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics, 38(01), 226–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357

Baldwin, D. A. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Barkawi, T., & Laffey, M. (2002). Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601

Barry Buzan. (2001). The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies, 27(3), 471–488. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2014a). Chapter 7 - Liberalism. In The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.

Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2014b). Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations. In The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (Sixth edition). Oxford University Press.

Beardsworth, R. (2011). Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Polity.

Bellamy, A. J. (Ed.). (2004). International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. (2006). Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847

Biccum, A. R. (2005). Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly, 26(6), 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500139656

Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2004). A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class, 28(1), 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106

Björkdahl, A. (2002). Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216

Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. (n.d.). https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/

Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995). Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice. In International relations theory today. Polity Press.

Brock, G. (2009). Global Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. (2008). Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations. International Studies Review, 10(4), 693–707. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017

Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009). Introduction: Defining International Relations. In Understanding international relations (4th ed, pp. 1–17). Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, G. W. (2009). Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution. Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04

Brown, G. W., & Held, D. (Eds.). (2010a). Editor’s Introduction. In The cosmopolitanism reader. Polity.

Brown, G. W., & Held, D. (Eds.). (2010b). The cosmopolitanism reader. Polity.

Bull, H. (2002). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics (3rd ed). Palgrave.

Bulmer, S. (2013). Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013a). Chapter 2 - Realism. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013b). Chapter 3 - Liberalism. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013c). Chapter 4 - The English School. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013d). Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013e). Chapter 7 - Critical Theory. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013f). Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013g). Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368

Burchill, S., & Linklater, A. (2013h). Introduction. In Theories of international relations (Fifth edition). Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368

Burnham, P. (2001). Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class, 25(3), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109

Buzan, B. (2004). From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617

Buzan, B. (2014). An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Polity.

Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2001). Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium, 30(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401

Callinicos, A. (1989). Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism. In Against postmodernism: a marxist critique (pp. 62–91). Polity Press.

Callinicos, A. (2004). Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(3), 426–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x

Campbell, J. L., & Pedersen, O. K. (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton University Press.

Caney, S. (2010). Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., & Simmons, B. A. (2013a). Chapter 1 ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’. In Handbook of international relations (2nd ed). SAGE.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., & Simmons, B. A. (2013b). Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations. In Handbook of international relations (2nd ed). SAGE.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T., & Simmons, B. A. (2013c). Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. In Handbook of international relations (2nd ed). SAGE.

Carpenter, R. C. (2006). Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue, 37(1), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139

Charvet, J., & Kaczynska-Nay, E. (2008). The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972

Checkel, J. T. (1998). The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics, 50(02), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133

Chowdhury, G., & Nair, S. (2002). Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. In Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class: Vol. Routledge advances in international relations and global politics (pp. 1–32). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181

Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127. (n.d.). http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf

Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.

Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium : Journal of International Studies., 12(2), 162–175.

Cynthia Weber. (1992). Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies, 18(3), 199–216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Darby, P. (2004). Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101

David Campbell. (1990). Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 15(3), 263–286. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Davis, N. (2014). A rose by any other name. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021

Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (Eds.). (2008). Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters. In Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938

Dietzel, A. (n.d.). Global Justice. In International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/

Dietzel, A. (2017). The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health? Global Policy, 8(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12421

Doty, R. (1996). The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines. In F. A. Beer & R. Hariman (Eds.), Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations: Vol. Rhetoric and public affairs series (pp. 331–345). Michigan State University press.

Doyle, M. W., & Ikenberry, G. J. (1997). Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’. In New thinking in international relations theory. Westview Press.

Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011. (n.d.). http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis

Dunne, T. (1998). Inventing international society: a history of the English school: Vol. St Anthony’s series. Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford.

Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013). The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013a). Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013b). Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates? In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (3rd ed). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016a). Chapter 3 - Classical Realism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016b). Chapter 4 - Structural Realism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016c). Chapter 5 - Liberalism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016d). Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016e). Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016f). Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016g). Chapter 10 - Feminism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016h). Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016i). Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (Eds.). (2016j). Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. In International relations theories: discipline and diversity (Fourth edition). Oxford University Press.

Edkins, J., & Pin-Fat, V. (2005). Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101

Edkins, J., & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2009). Critical theorists and international relations: Vol. Interventions. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003

el-Ojeili, C. (2015). Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on. Critical Sociology, 41(4–5), 679–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513497377

Enloe, C. H. (2014). Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women? In Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics (Second edition, completely revised and updated). University of California Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669

Epstein, C. (2014). The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory, 6(02), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (2001). Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391

Foucault, M., & Rabinow, P. (1986). The Foucault reader. Penguin Books.

Franceschet, A. (1999). The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/40203406

Fukuyama, F. (2012). The end of history and the last man (Twentieth anniversary edition). Penguin Books.

G. John Ikenberry. (2009). Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 71–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

G. John Ikenberry. (2011). The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs, 90(3), 56–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408

Gallagher, A. M. (2012). A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(3), 334–357. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00403004

Gardiner, S. M. (2010). Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959

Gardner, R. N. (1990). The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. The Washington Quarterly, 13(3), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445391

Gill, S. R., & Law, D. (1989). Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523

Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q., & Nowell-Smith, G. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Lawrence and Wishart.

GROVOGUI, S. N. (2002). Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001

Gruffydd Jones, B. (Ed.). (2006). Decolonizing international relations. Rowman and Littlefield. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740

Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478. (n.d.). http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf

Guzzini, S. (2004). The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047848

Hansen, L. (2006). Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy. In Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war: Vol. The new international relations series (pp. 17–36). Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33

Hayden, P. (2005). Cosmopolitan global politics: Vol. Ethics and global politics. Ashgate.

Held, D. (2003). Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed? Review of International Studies, 29(04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004650

Held, D. (2010). Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities. Polity Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922

Hoffmann, S. (1995). The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. Foreign Policy, 98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148964

Hollinger, R. (1994). ‘Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations’. In Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach: Vol. Contemporary social theory. Sage.

Hooper, C. (2001). Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. Columbia University Press.

Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267

Immanuel Wallerstein. (1974). The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387–415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015

J. Ann Tickner. (1997). You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Jabri, V. (2000). Reflections on the Study of International Relations. In Issues in international relations (pp. 289–313). Routledge.

Jackson, R. H. (2000). The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford University Press.

Jackson, R. H., & Sørensen, G. (2010). Chapter 5 - International Society. In Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (4th ed). Oxford University Press.

Jackson, R., & Sorensen, G. (2010). IR as an academic subject. In Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches (4th ed, pp. 28–57). Oxford University Press.

Jean-Yves Haine. (2009). The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal, 64(2), 453–479. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518

Jervis, Robert. (n.d.). Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research, 61(4). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo

Joseph M. Grieco. (1988). Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization, 42(3), 485–507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Justin Rosenberg. (1990). What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies, 16(4), 285–303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232

Kenneth N. Waltz. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security, 25(1), 5–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772

Keohane, R. O. (1988). International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589

Keohane, R. O., & Martin, L. L. (1995). The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214

Keohane, R. O., & Waltz, K. N. (1986). Neorealism and its critics: Vol. The political economy of international change. Columbia University Press.

Koivisto, M., & Dunne, T. (2010). Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38(3), 615–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810363509

Lawrence, P. (2014). Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lawson, S. (2015). Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory. In Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics. Polity. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448

Lebow, R. N. (2005). Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations, 19(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805055410

Linklater, A. (2011). The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348

Linklater, A., & Suganami, H. (2006). The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. (1998). Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization, 52(4), 729–757. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356

LITTLE, R. (2000). The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004

Lu, C. (2000). The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101

Maclean, J. (1988). Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201

Martha Finnemore. (2001). Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies, 27(3), 509–513. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Matin, K. (2013). Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263

Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ (n.d.). https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp

Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981

Michael C. Williams. (1993). Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy. Review of International Studies, 19(2), 103–121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Michael W. Doyle. (2005). Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review, 99(3), 463–466. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953

MILLIKEN, J. (1999). The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), 225–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003

Morgenthau, H. J. (1952). Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review, 46(04), 961–988. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108

Moss, J. (Ed.). (2015). Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340

NICHOLSON, M. (2000). What’s the use of International Relations? Review of International Studies, 26(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500001832

Nye, J. S. (1988). Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics, 40(02), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363

Onuf, N. G. (2013). Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations: Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.

Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11. (n.d.). http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf

Pinar Bilgin. (2008). Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023

Powell, R. (1994). Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization, 48(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204

R. Charli Carpenter. (2011). Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization, 65(1), 69–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. (1998). Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies, 24(1), 3–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503

Reus-Smit, C. (2002). Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00091

Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D. (2008). Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism. In The Oxford handbook of international relations: Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Richard K. Ashley. (1984). The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization, 38(2), 225–286. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440

Richard Price. (1995). A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization, 49(1), 73–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Rita Abrahamsen. (2003). African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African Affairs, 102(407), 189–210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676

Robert G. Gilpin. (1984). The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization, 38(2), 287–304. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441

Robert Jervis. (1999). Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security, 24(1), 42–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347

Roff, H. M. (2016). Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246

Ronen Palan. (2000). A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 26(4), 575–598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700

Rosenau, P. (1990). Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190010701

Schroeder, P. W. (1997). History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit. International Security, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539329

Seth, S. (Ed.). (2013). Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction: Vol. Interventions. Routledge.

Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila

Shapiro, M. (1989). Textualising Global Politics. In International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics: Vol. World Politics Series (pp. 11–22). Lexington Books.

Shapiro, M. J., & Der Derian, J. (1989). International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics: Vol. World Politics Series. Lexington Books.

Shepherd, L. J. (Ed.). (2015). Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations (Second edition). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819

Shue, H. (2014). Climate justice: vulnerability and protection. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996a). Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996b). ’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism. In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996c). Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054

Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996d). Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054

Steans, J. (2003). Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(3), 428–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00114

Steans, J. (2006). Gender, Feminism, and International Relations. In Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions (2nd ed., rev.expanded, pp. 7–19). Polity.

Tan, K.-C. (2004). Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism: Vol. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385

TAYLOR, L. (2012). Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America. International Studies Review, 14(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. (1998). Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies, 24(2), 283–297. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523

Tickner, A. B. (2013). Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323

Tickner, J. A. (1992). Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. In Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Vasilaki, R. (2012). Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720

Wallerstein, I. (2004). Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. In World-systems analysis: an introduction: Vol. A John Hope Franklin Center book (pp. 23–41). Duke University Press.

Walt, S. M. (1998). International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy, 110. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. McGraw-Hill.

WAYLEN, G. (2006). You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies, 32(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006966

Weber, C. (1994). Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23, 337–349.

WEISS, T. G. (2010). How United Nations ideas change history. Review of International Studies, 36(S1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051100009X

Weldes, J. (1996). Constructing National Interests’. European Journal of International Relations, 2, 275–318. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001

Wheeler, N. J. (1992). Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21(3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030201

Wheeler, N. J. (2000). Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740

William Bain. (2000). Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered. Review of International Studies, 26(3), 445–464. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688