Bibliography for POLI10003:Theories of International Relations BETA

Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2010. Print.

Adam Jones. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 22.4 (1996): 405–429. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459>.

Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. ‘International Practices’. International Theory 3.01 (2011): 1–36. Web.

Alexander Wendt. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization 46.2 (1992): 391–425. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858>.

Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’. World Politics 38.01 (1985): 226–254. Web.

Baldwin, David A. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993. Print.

Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31.1 (2002): 109–127. Web.

Barry Buzan. ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’. Review of International Studies 27.3 (2001): 471–488. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, eds. ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.

Beardsworth, Richard. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2011. Print.

Bellamy, Alex J., ed. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press, 2004. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001/acprof-9780199265206>.

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization 60.4 (2006): 781–810. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847>.

Biccum, April R. ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: A Reinvention of Colonial Discourse in DFID Promotional Literature’. Third World Quarterly 26.6 (2005): 1005–1020. Web.

Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’. Capital & Class 28.1 (2004): 85–113. Web.

Björkdahl, Annika. ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15.1 (2002): 9–23. Web.

‘Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/>.

Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’. International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995. Print.

Brock, Gillian. Global Justice. Oxford University Press, 2009. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001/acprof-9780199230938>.

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’. International Studies Review 10.4 (2008): 693–707. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017>.

Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 1–17. Print.

Brown, Garrett Wallace. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press, 2009. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04>.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, eds. ‘Editor’s Introduction’. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity, 2010. Print.

---, eds. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity, 2010. Print.

Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. Print.

Bulmer, Sarah. ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15.2 (2013): 137–156. Web.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368>.

---. ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>.

---. ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>.

---. ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>.

---. ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>.

---. ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Print.

---. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>.

---. ‘Introduction’. Theories of International Relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>.

Burnham, Peter. ‘Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation’. Capital & Class 25.3 (2001): 103–112. Web.

Buzan, Barry. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity, 2014. Print.

---. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617>.

Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’. Millennium 30.1 (2001): 19–39. Web.

Callinicos, Alex. ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’. Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989. 62–91. Print.

---. ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6.3 (2004): 426–433. Web.

Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001. Print.

Caney, Simon. ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13.1 (2010): 203–228. Web.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’. Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013. Print.

---. ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’. Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013. Print.

---. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’. Handbook of International Relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013. Print.

Carpenter, R. Charli. ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’. Security Dialogue 37.1 (2006): 83–103. Web.

Charvet, John, and Elisa Kaczynska-Nay. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972>.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’. World Politics 50.02 (1998): 324–348. Web.

Chowdhury, Geeta, and Sheila Nair. ‘Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in International Relations’. Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class. Routledge advances in international relations and global politics. London: Routledge, 2002. 1–32. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181>.

‘Considine, L., “Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), Pp. 109-127.’ n. pag. Web. <http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf>.

Cox, Robert W. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’. Millennium : journal of international studies. 12.2 (1983): 162–175. Print.

---. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10.2 (1981): 126–155. Print.

Cynthia Weber. ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’. Review of International Studies 18.3 (1992): 199–216. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Darby, Phillip. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33.1 (2004): 1–32. Web.

David Campbell. ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 15.3 (1990): 263–286. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Davis, Neville. ‘A Rose by Any Other Name’. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 25 (2014): n. pag. Web.

Della Porta, Donatella, and Michael Keating, eds. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’. Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938>.

Dietzel, A. ‘Global Justice’. International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction. N.p. Web. <https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/>.

Dietzel, Alix. ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’ Global Policy 8.3 (2017): 313–321. Web.

Doty, Roxanne. ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’. Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations. Ed. Francis A. Beer and Robert Hariman. Rhetoric and public affairs series. East Lansing: Michigan State University press, 1996. 331–345. Print.

Doyle, Michael W., and G. John Ikenberry. ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’. New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Oxford: Westview Press, 1997. Print.

‘Dunn, B., “Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?” The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis>.

Dunne, T., L. Hansen, and C. Wight. ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’ European Journal of International Relations 19.3 (2013): 405–425. Web.

Dunne, Timothy. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. St Anthony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford, 1998. Print.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---, eds. ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

---. ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All These Debates?’ International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.

---, eds. ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. Print.

Edkins, Jenny, and Véronique Pin-Fat. ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34.1 (2005): 1–24. Web.

Edkins, Jenny, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. Critical Theorists and International Relations. Interventions. London: Routledge, 2009. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003>.

el-Ojeili, Chamsy. ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades On’. Critical Sociology 41.4–5 (2015): 679–700. Web.

Enloe, Cynthia H. ‘Chapter 5 - Gender Makes the World Go Round: Where Are the Women?’ Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Second edition, completely revised and updated. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669>.

Epstein, Charlotte. ‘The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction’. International Theory 6.02 (2014): 294–311. Web.

Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science 4.1 (2001): 391–416. Web.

Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow. The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1986. Print.

Franceschet, Antonio. ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 54.3 (1999): n. pag. Web.

Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books, 2012. Print.

G. John Ikenberry. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7.1 (2009): 71–87. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

---. ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’. Foreign Affairs 90.3 (2011): 56–68. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408>.

Gallagher, Adrian M. ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’. Global Responsibility to Protect 4.3 (2012): 334–357. Web.

Gardiner, Stephen Mark. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959>.

Gardner, Richard N. ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’. The Washington Quarterly 13.3 (1990): 23–39. Web.

Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly 33.4 (1989): n. pag. Web.

Gramsci, Antonio, Quintin Hoare, and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971. Print.

GROVOGUI, SIBA N. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations 8.3 (2002): 315–338. Web.

Gruffydd Jones, Branwen, ed. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740>.

‘Guzzini, G., “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis” International Organization, 47(3), 1993, Pp. 443-478.’ n. pag. Web. <http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf>.

Guzzini, Stefano. ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 10.4 (2004): 533–568. Web.

Hansen, Lene. ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. The new international relations series. London: Routledge, 2006. 17–36. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&amp;ppg=33>.

Hayden, Patrick. Cosmopolitan Global Politics. Ethics and global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005. Print.

Held, David. ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’ Review of International Studies 29.04 (2003): n. pag. Web.

---. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922>.

Hoffmann, Stanley. ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. Foreign Policy 98 (1995): n. pag. Web.

Hollinger, Robert. ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’. Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach. Contemporary social theory. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1994. Print.

Hooper, Charlotte. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001. Print.

Hopf, Ted. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23.1 (1998): n. pag. Web.

Immanuel Wallerstein. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16.4 (1974): 387–415. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015>.

J. Ann Tickner. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly 41.4 (1997): 611–632. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Jabri, Vivienne. ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’. Issues in International Relations. London: Routledge, 2000. 289–313. Print.

Jackson, Robert H. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Print.

Jackson, Robert H., and Georg Sørensen. ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. ‘IR as an Academic Subject’. Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 28–57. Print.

Jean-Yves Haine. ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 64.2 (2009): 453–479. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518>.

Jervis, Robert. ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’. Social Research 61.4 n. pag. Web. <https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&amp;rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo>.

Joseph M. Grieco. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42.3 (1988): 485–507. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Justin Rosenberg. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies 16.4 (1990): 285–303. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232>.

Kenneth N. Waltz. ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’. International Security 25.1 (2000): 5–41. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772>.

Keohane, Robert O. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly 32.4 (1988): n. pag. Web.

Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin. ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’. International Security 20.1 (1995): n. pag. Web.

Keohane, Robert O., and Kenneth Neal Waltz. Neorealism and Its Critics. The political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. Print.

Koivisto, Marjo, and Tim Dunne. ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38.3 (2010): 615–640. Web.

Lawrence, Peter. Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014. Print.

Lawson, Stephanie. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’. Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics. Cambridge, England: Polity, 2015. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448>.

Lebow, Richard Ned. ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’. International Relations 19.3 (2005): 329–336. Web.

Linklater, Andrew. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348>.

Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528>.

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’. International Organization 52.4 (1998): 729–757. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356>.

LITTLE, RICHARD. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6.3 (2000): 395–422. Web.

Lu, Catherine. ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’. Journal of Political Philosophy 8.2 (2000): 244–267. Web.

Maclean, John. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17.2 (1988): 295–319. Web.

Martha Finnemore. ‘Exporting the English School?’ Review of International Studies 27.3 (2001): 509–513. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753>.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52.4 (1998): 887–917. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Matin, Kamran. ‘Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’. European Journal of International Relations 19.2 (2013): 353–377. Web.

‘Mearsheimer, J., “Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.”’ N.p., n.d. Web. <https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp>.

Mearsheimer, John J. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. International Security 15.1 (1990): n. pag. Web.

Michael C. Williams. ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’. Review of International Studies 19.2 (1993): 103–121. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Michael W. Doyle. ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’. The American Political Science Review 99.3 (2005): 463–466. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953>.

MILLIKEN, JENNIFER. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’: European Journal of International Relations 5.2 (1999): 225–254. Web.

Morgenthau, Hans J. ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’ American Political Science Review 46.04 (1952): 961–988. Web.

Moss, Jeremy, ed. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340>.

NICHOLSON, MICHAEL. ‘What’s the Use of International Relations?’ Review of International Studies 26.2 (2000): 183–198. Web.

Nye, Joseph S. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40.02 (1988): 235–251. Web.

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. The new international relations. New York: Routledge, 2013. Print.

‘Peterson V. S., “Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, Pp. 1-11.’ n. pag. Web. <http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf>.

Pinar Bilgin. ‘Thinking Past “Western” IR?’ Third World Quarterly 29.1 (2008): 5–23. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023>.

Powell, Robert. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization 48.02 (1994): n. pag. Web.

R. Charli Carpenter. ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’. International Organization 65.1 (2011): 69–102. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104>.

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review of International Studies 24.1 (1998): 3–21. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503>.

Reus-Smit, Christian. ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4.3 (2002): 487–509. Web.

Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal. ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. Print.

Richard K. Ashley. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38.2 (1984): 225–286. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440>.

Richard Price. ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’. International Organization 49.1 (1995): 73–103. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.

Rita Abrahamsen. ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’. African Affairs 102.407 (2003): 189–210. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676>.

Robert G. Gilpin. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization 38.2 (1984): 287–304. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441>.

Robert Jervis. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security 24.1 (1999): 42–63. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347>.

Roff, Heather M. ‘Gendering a Warbot’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 18.1 (2016): 1–18. Web.

Ronen Palan. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. Review of International Studies 26.4 (2000): 575–598. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700>.

Rosenau, Pauline. ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 19.1 (1990): 83–110. Web.

Schroeder, Paul W. ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’. International Security 22.1 (1997): n. pag. Web.

Seth, Sanjay, ed. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Interventions. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013. Print.

‘Seth, Sanjay (2011), “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), Pp. 167-183.’ n. pag. Web. <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila>.

Shapiro, Michael. ‘Textualising Global Politics’. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. World Politics Series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989. 11–22. Print.

Shapiro, Michael J., and James Der Derian. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. World Politics Series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989. Print.

Shepherd, Laura J., ed. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Second edition. London: Routledge, 2015. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819>.

Shue, Henry. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931>.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054>.

---. ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013>.

---. ‘Chapter 16 - The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054>.

---. ‘Chapter 18 - All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054>.

Steans, Jill. ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5.3 (2003): 428–454. Web.

---. ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’. Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates and Future Directions. 2nd ed., rev.expanded. Cambridge: Polity, 2006. 7–19. Print.

Tan, Kok-Chor. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Web. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385>.

TAYLOR, LUCY. ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’. International Studies Review 14.3 (2012): 386–400. Web.

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review of International Studies 24.2 (1998): 283–297. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523>.

Tickner, Arlene B. ‘Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 19.3 (2013): 627–646. Web.

Tickner, J. Ann. ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992. Print.

Vasilaki, Rosa. ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41.1 (2012): 3–22. Web.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. A John Hope Franklin Center book. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2004. 23–41. Print.

Walt, Stephen M. ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’. Foreign Policy 110 (1998): n. pag. Web.

Waltz, Kenneth Neal. Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill, 1979. Print.

WAYLEN, GEORGINA. ‘You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue between Feminists and (Critical) IPE’. Review of International Studies 32.01 (2006): n. pag. Web.

Weber, Cindy. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23 (1994): 337–349. Print.

WEISS, THOMAS G. ‘How United Nations Ideas Change History’. Review of International Studies 36.S1 (2010): 3–23. Web.

Weldes, Jutta. ‘Constructing National Interests’’. European journal of international relations 2 (1996): 275–318. Web. <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001>.

Wheeler, Nicholas J. ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21.3 (1992): 463–487. Web.

---. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740>.

William Bain. ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’. Review of International Studies 26.3 (2000): 445–464. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688>.