[1]
C. Brown and K. Ainley, ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’, in Understanding international relations, 4th ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009, pp. 1–17.
[2]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[3]
E. Adler and V. Pouliot, ‘International practices’, International Theory, vol. 3, no. 01, pp. 1–36, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1017/S175297191000031X.
[4]
B. Buzan and R. Little, ‘Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it’, Millennium, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 19–39, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1177/03058298010300010401.
[5]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Introduction’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
[6]
T. Dunne, L. Hansen, and C. Wight, ‘The end of International Relations theory?’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 405–425, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1354066113495485.
[7]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, ‘Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
[8]
V. Jabri, ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’, in Issues in international relations, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 289–313.
[9]
R. Jackson and G. Sorensen, ‘IR as an academic subject’, in Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 28–57.
[10]
M. W. Doyle and G. J. Ikenberry, ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’, in New thinking in international relations theory, Oxford: Westview Press, 1997.
[11]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[12]
M. NICHOLSON, ‘What’s the use of International Relations?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 183–198, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1017/S0260210500001832.
[13]
P. W. Schroeder, ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’, International Security, vol. 22, no. 1, Summer 1997, doi: 10.2307/2539329.
[14]
W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse-Kappen, and B. A. Simmons, ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’, in Handbook of international relations, 2nd ed., Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013.
[15]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates?’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[16]
S. M. Walt, ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’, Foreign Policy, no. 110, Spring 1998, doi: 10.2307/1149275.
[17]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, ‘Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
[18]
J. Baylis, S. Smith, and P. Owens, Eds., ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, Sixth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[19]
G. John Ikenberry, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–87, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[20]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
[21]
J. Charvet and E. Kaczynska-Nay, The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972
[22]
Michael W. Doyle, ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 463–466, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953
[23]
A. Franceschet, ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’, International Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, 1999, doi: 10.2307/40203406.
[24]
F. Fukuyama, The end of history and the last man, Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books, 2012.
[25]
R. N. Gardner, ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’, The Washington Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 23–39, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.1080/01636609009445391.
[26]
Jean-Yves Haine, ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’, International Journal, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 453–479, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518
[27]
S. Hoffmann, ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’, Foreign Policy, no. 98, Spring 1995, doi: 10.2307/1148964.
[28]
S. Lawson, ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’, in Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics, Cambridge, England: Polity, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448
[29]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[30]
R. Axelrod and R. O. Keohane, ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics, vol. 38, no. 01, pp. 226–254, Oct. 1985, doi: 10.2307/2010357.
[31]
J. L. Campbell and O. K. Pedersen, The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001.
[32]
G. John Ikenberry, ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 56–68, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
[33]
M. Koivisto and T. Dunne, ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 615–640, May 2010, doi: 10.1177/0305829810363509.
[34]
R. O. Keohane and L. L. Martin, ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, Summer 1995, doi: 10.2307/2539214.
[35]
Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons, ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 729–757, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356
[36]
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett, ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 781–810, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847
[37]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[38]
C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations, vol. Oxford handbooks of political science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
[39]
T. G. WEISS, ‘How United Nations ideas change history’, Review of International Studies, vol. 36, no. S1, pp. 3–23, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1017/S026021051100009X.
[40]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368
[41]
‘Mearsheimer, J., “Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.”’ [Online]. Available: https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp
[42]
William Bain, ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 445–464, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688
[43]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
[44]
Robert G. Gilpin, ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 287–304, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441
[45]
S. Guzzini, ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 533–568, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1177/1354066104047848.
[46]
Jervis, Robert, ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’, Social Research, vol. 61, no. 4 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[47]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[48]
R. N. Lebow, ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’, International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 329–336, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0047117805055410.
[49]
H. J. Morgenthau, ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’, American Political Science Review, vol. 46, no. 04, pp. 961–988, Dec. 1952, doi: 10.2307/1952108.
[50]
Justin Rosenberg, ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 285–303, 1990 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232
[51]
Richard K. Ashley, ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 225–286, 1984 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440
[52]
‘Guzzini, G., “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis” International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478.’ [Online]. Available: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf
[53]
R. O. Keohane and K. N. Waltz, Neorealism and its critics, vol. The political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
[54]
K. Booth and S. Smith, ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’, in International relations theory today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.
[55]
J. J. Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 15, no. 1, Summer 1990, doi: 10.2307/2538981.
[56]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[57]
N. Davis, ‘A rose by any other name’, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, vol. 25, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021.
[58]
K. N. Waltz, Theory of international politics. London: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
[59]
Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5–41, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772
[60]
Michael C. Williams, ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’, Review of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 103–121, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[61]
D. A. Baldwin, Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate, vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
[62]
Joseph M. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 485–507, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[63]
Robert Jervis, ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 42–63, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347
[64]
R. O. Keohane, ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.2307/2600589.
[65]
J. S. Nye, ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’, World Politics, vol. 40, no. 02, pp. 235–251, Jan. 1988, doi: 10.2307/2010363.
[66]
R. Powell, ‘Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate’, International Organization, vol. 48, no. 02, Mar. 1994, doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028204.
[67]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
[68]
A. M. Gallagher, ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’, Global Responsibility to Protect, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 334–357, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1163/1875984X-00403004.
[69]
A. J. Bellamy, Ed., International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001/acprof-9780199265206
[70]
H. Bull, The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics, 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.
[71]
B. Buzan, An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.
[72]
B. Buzan, From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation, vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617
[73]
Barry Buzan, ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’, Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 471–488, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[74]
T. Dunne, Inventing international society: a history of the English school, vol. St Anthony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford, 1998.
[75]
Martha Finnemore, ‘Exporting the English School?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 509–513, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753
[76]
R. H. Jackson, The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[77]
R. H. Jackson and G. Sørensen, ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’, in Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[78]
A. Linklater, The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348
[79]
A. Linklater and H. Suganami, The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment, vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528
[80]
R. LITTLE, ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 395–422, Sep. 2000, doi: 10.1177/1354066100006003004.
[81]
‘Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory’. [Online]. Available: https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/
[82]
N. J. Wheeler, Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740
[83]
N. J. Wheeler, ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 463–487, Dec. 1992, doi: 10.1177/03058298920210030201.
[84]
J. Baylis, S. Smith, and P. Owens, Eds., ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, Sixth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[85]
‘Dunn, B., “Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?” The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011’. [Online]. Available: http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis
[86]
P. Burnham, ‘Marx, international political economy and globalisation’, Capital & Class, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 103–112, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1177/030981680107500109.
[87]
A. Bieler and A. D. Morton, ‘A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations’, Capital & Class, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 85–113, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1177/030981680408200106.
[88]
A. Callinicos, ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 426–433, Aug. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x.
[89]
R. W. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 126–155, Jun. 1981.
[90]
R. W. Cox, ‘Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method’, Millennium : journal of international studies., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 162–175, 1983.
[91]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
[92]
C. el-Ojeili, ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on’, Critical Sociology, vol. 41, no. 4–5, pp. 679–700, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1177/0896920513497377.
[93]
Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny, ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3–21, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503
[94]
S. R. Gill and D. Law, ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 33, no. 4, Dec. 1989, doi: 10.2307/2600523.
[95]
A. Gramsci, Q. Hoare, and G. Nowell-Smith, Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971.
[96]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
[97]
J. Maclean, ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 295–319, Jun. 1988, doi: 10.1177/03058298880170021201.
[98]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[99]
I. Wallerstein, ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’, in World-systems analysis: an introduction, vol. A John Hope Franklin Center book, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2004, pp. 23–41.
[100]
Immanuel Wallerstein, ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 387–415, 1974 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015
[101]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
[102]
Richard Price, ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’, International Organization, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 73–103, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[103]
W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse-Kappen, and B. A. Simmons, ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’, in Handbook of international relations, 2nd ed., Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013.
[104]
A. Björkdahl, ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 9–23, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1080/09557570220126216.
[105]
R. Charli Carpenter, ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’, International Organization, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 69–102, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104
[106]
J. T. Checkel, ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, vol. 50, no. 02, pp. 324–348, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008133.
[107]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[108]
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 887–917, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[109]
M. Finnemore and K. Sikkink, ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 391–416, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.
[110]
T. Hopf, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, vol. 23, no. 1, Summer 1998, doi: 10.2307/2539267.
[111]
W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse-Kappen, and B. A. Simmons, ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’, in Handbook of international relations, 2nd ed., Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013.
[112]
D. Della Porta and M. Keating, Eds., ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’, in Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
[113]
N. G. Onuf, Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations, vol. The new international relations. New York: Routledge, 2013.
[114]
Ronen Palan, ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 575–598, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700
[115]
C. Reus-Smit, ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 487–509, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00091.
[116]
J. Weldes, ‘Constructing National Interests’’, European journal of international relations, vol. 2, pp. 275–318, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001
[117]
Alexander Wendt, ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 391–425, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858
[118]
S. Burchill and A. Linklater, ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’, in Theories of international relations, Fifth edition., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[119]
‘Considine, L., “Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127.’ [Online]. Available: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf
[120]
S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’, in International theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013
[121]
A. Callinicos, ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’, in Against postmodernism: a marxist critique, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989, pp. 62–91.
[122]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[123]
David Campbell, ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 263–286, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[124]
M. J. Shapiro and J. Der Derian, International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics, vol. World Politics Series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989.
[125]
R. Doty, ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’, in Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations, vol. Rhetoric and public affairs series, F. A. Beer and R. Hariman, Eds. East Lansing: Michigan State University press, 1996, pp. 331–345.
[126]
J. Edkins and V. Pin-Fat, ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–24, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1177/03058298050340010101.
[127]
J. Edkins and N. Vaughan-Williams, Critical theorists and international relations, vol. Interventions. London: Routledge, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003
[128]
L. Hansen, ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’, in Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war, vol. The new international relations series, London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 17–36 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33
[129]
J. MILLIKEN, ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’:, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 225–254, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1177/1354066199005002003.
[130]
M. Foucault and P. Rabinow, The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1986.
[131]
R. Hollinger, ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’, in Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach, vol. Contemporary social theory, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1994.
[132]
M. Shapiro, ‘Textualising Global Politics’, in International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics, vol. World Politics Series, Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989, pp. 11–22.
[133]
P. Rosenau, ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 83–110, Mar. 1990, doi: 10.1177/03058298900190010701.
[134]
Cynthia Weber, ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’, Review of International Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 199–216, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[135]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[136]
H. M. Roff, ‘Gendering a Warbot’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–18, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246.
[137]
Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True, ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’, International Studies Review, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 693–707, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017
[138]
S. Bulmer, ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 137–156, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1080/14616742.2012.746565.
[139]
C. H. Enloe, ‘Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women?’, in Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics, Second edition, Completely revised and Updated., Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669
[140]
R. C. Carpenter, ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’, Security Dialogue, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 83–103, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0967010606064139.
[141]
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires, ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review of International Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 283–297, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523
[142]
C. Hooper, Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001.
[143]
Adam Jones, ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 405–429, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459
[144]
‘Peterson V. S., “Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf
[145]
L. J. Shepherd, Ed., Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations, Second edition. London: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819
[146]
J. Steans, ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 428–454, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00114.
[147]
J. Steans, ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’, in Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions, 2nd ed., rev.Expanded., Cambridge: Polity, 2006, pp. 7–19.
[148]
J. A. Tickner, ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’, in Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security, vol. New directions in world politics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
[149]
J. Ann Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 611–632, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[150]
G. WAYLEN, ‘You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE’, Review of International Studies, vol. 32, no. 01, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1017/S0260210506006966.
[151]
C. Weber, ‘Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 23, pp. 337–349, 1994.
[152]
C. Epstein, ‘The postcolonial perspective: an introduction’, International Theory, vol. 6, no. 02, pp. 294–311, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1017/S1752971914000219.
[153]
‘Seth, Sanjay (2011), “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183.’, doi: 10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila
[154]
Rita Abrahamsen, ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’, African Affairs, vol. 102, no. 407, pp. 189–210, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676
[155]
A. Acharya and B. Buzan, Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2010.
[156]
T. Barkawi and M. Laffey, ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 109–127, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1177/03058298020310010601.
[157]
A. R. Biccum, ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1005–1020, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1080/01436590500139656.
[158]
Pinar Bilgin, ‘Thinking past “Western” IR?’, Third World Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 5–23, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023
[159]
G. Chowdhury and S. Nair, ‘Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations’, in Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class, vol. Routledge advances in international relations and global politics, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 1–32 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181
[160]
P. Darby, ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–32, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1177/03058298040330010101.
[161]
T. Dunne, M. Kurki, and S. Smith, Eds., ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity, Fourth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[162]
S. N. GROVOGUI, ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 315–338, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1354066102008003001.
[163]
B. Gruffydd Jones, Ed., Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740
[164]
K. Matin, ‘Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 353–377, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1354066111425263.
[165]
S. Seth, Ed., Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction, vol. Interventions. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
[166]
L. TAYLOR, ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’, International Studies Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 386–400, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x.
[167]
A. B. Tickner, ‘Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 627–646, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1354066113494323.
[168]
R. Vasilaki, ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 3–22, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0305829812451720.
[169]
G. W. Brown and D. Held, Eds., ‘Editor’s Introduction’, in The cosmopolitanism reader, Cambridge: Polity, 2010.
[170]
A. Dietzel, ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’, Global Policy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 313–321, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12421.
[171]
R. Beardsworth, Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: Polity, 2011.
[172]
G. Brock, Global Justice. Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001/acprof-9780199230938
[173]
G. W. Brown and D. Held, Eds., The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.
[174]
G. W. Brown, Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04
[175]
S. Caney, ‘Climate change and the duties of the advantaged’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 203–228, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13698230903326331.
[176]
A. Dietzel, ‘Global Justice’, in International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction, [Online]. Available: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/
[177]
S. M. Gardiner, Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959
[178]
P. Lawrence, Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.
[179]
P. Hayden, Cosmopolitan global politics, vol. Ethics and global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005.
[180]
D. Held, Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922
[181]
D. Held, ‘Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed?’, Review of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 04, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1017/S0260210503004650.
[182]
C. Lu, ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 244–267, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00101.
[183]
J. Moss, Ed., Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340
[184]
H. Shue, Climate justice: vulnerability and protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931
[185]
K.-C. Tan, Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism, vol. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385
