1
Brown C, Ainley K. Introduction: Defining International Relations. Understanding international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009:1–17.
2
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
3
Adler E, Pouliot V. International practices. International Theory. 2011;3:1–36. doi: 10.1017/S175297191000031X
4
Buzan B, Little R. Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium. 2001;30:19–39. doi: 10.1177/03058298010300010401
5
Burchill S, Linklater A. Introduction. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
6
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19:405–25. doi: 10.1177/1354066113495485
7
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
8
Jabri V. Reflections on the Study of International Relations. Issues in international relations. London: Routledge 2000:289–313.
9
Jackson R, Sorensen G. IR as an academic subject. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010:28–57.
10
Doyle MW, Ikenberry GJ. Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’. New thinking in international relations theory. Oxford: Westview Press 1997.
11
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
12
NICHOLSON M. What’s the use of International Relations? Review of International Studies. 2000;26:183–98. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500001832
13
Schroeder PW. History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit. International Security. 1997;22. doi: 10.2307/2539329
14
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 1 ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’. Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE 2013.
15
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates? International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
16
Walt SM. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy. Published Online First: Spring 1998. doi: 10.2307/1149275
17
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
18
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 7 - Liberalism. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
19
G. John Ikenberry. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics. 2009;7:71–87.
20
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 3 - Liberalism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
21
Charvet J, Kaczynska-Nay E. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.
22
Michael W. Doyle. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review. 2005;99:463–6.
23
Franceschet A. The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 1999;54. doi: 10.2307/40203406
24
Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books 2012.
25
Gardner RN. The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. The Washington Quarterly. 1990;13:23–39. doi: 10.1080/01636609009445391
26
Jean-Yves Haine. The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 2009;64:453–79.
27
Hoffmann S. The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. Foreign Policy. Published Online First: Spring 1995. doi: 10.2307/1148964
28
Lawson S. Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory. Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics. Cambridge, England: Polity 2015.
29
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 5 - Liberalism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
30
Axelrod R, Keohane RO. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics. 1985;38:226–54. doi: 10.2307/2010357
31
Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2001.
32
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs. 2011;90:56–68.
33
Koivisto M, Dunne T. Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2010;38:615–40. doi: 10.1177/0305829810363509
34
Keohane RO, Martin LL. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995;20. doi: 10.2307/2539214
35
Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization. 1998;52:729–57.
36
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization. 2006;60:781–810.
37
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
38
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
39
WEISS TG. How United Nations ideas change history. Review of International Studies. 2010;36:3–23. doi: 10.1017/S026021051100009X
40
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 2 - Realism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
41
Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp
42
William Bain. Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered. Review of International Studies. 2000;26:445–64.
43
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
44
Robert G. Gilpin. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization. 1984;38:287–304.
45
Guzzini S. The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2004;10:533–68. doi: 10.1177/1354066104047848
46
Jervis, Robert. Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research. ;61.
47
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 3 - Classical Realism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
48
Lebow RN. Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations. 2005;19:329–36. doi: 10.1177/0047117805055410
49
Morgenthau HJ. Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review. 1952;46:961–88. doi: 10.2307/1952108
50
Justin Rosenberg. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies. 1990;16:285–303.
51
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization. 1984;38:225–86.
52
Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478.
53
Keohane RO, Waltz KN. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press 1986.
54
Booth K, Smith S. Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press 1995.
55
Mearsheimer JJ. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 1990;15. doi: 10.2307/2538981
56
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 4 - Structural Realism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
57
Davis N. A rose by any other name. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014;25. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021
58
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. London: McGraw-Hill 1979.
59
Kenneth N. Waltz. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. 2000;25:5–41.
60
Michael C. Williams. Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy. Review of International Studies. 1993;19:103–21.
61
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press 1993.
62
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 1988;42:485–507.
63
Robert Jervis. Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security. 1999;24:42–63.
64
Keohane RO. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 1988;32. doi: 10.2307/2600589
65
Nye JS. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics. 1988;40:235–51. doi: 10.2307/2010363
66
Powell R. Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization. 1994;48. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300028204
67
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 4 - The English School. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
68
Gallagher AM. A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect. 2012;4:334–57. doi: 10.1163/1875984X-00403004
69
Bellamy AJ, editor. International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press 2004.
70
Bull H. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave 2002.
71
Buzan B. An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Cambridge: Polity 2014.
72
Buzan B. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
73
Barry Buzan. The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies. 2001;27:471–88.
74
Dunne T. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford 1998.
75
Martha Finnemore. Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies. 2001;27:509–13.
76
Jackson RH. The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
77
Jackson RH, Sørensen G. Chapter 5 - International Society. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
78
Linklater A. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011.
79
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
80
LITTLE R. The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2000;6:395–422. doi: 10.1177/1354066100006003004
81
Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/
82
Wheeler NJ. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
83
Wheeler NJ. Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1992;21:463–87. doi: 10.1177/03058298920210030201
84
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
85
Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011. http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis
86
Burnham P. Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class. 2001;25:103–12. doi: 10.1177/030981680107500109
87
Bieler A, Morton AD. A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class. 2004;28:85–113. doi: 10.1177/030981680408200106
88
Callinicos A. Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2004;6:426–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x
89
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1981;10:126–55.
90
Cox RW. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium : journal of international studies. 1983;12:162–75.
91
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 7 - Critical Theory. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
92
el-Ojeili C. Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on. Critical Sociology. 2015;41:679–700. doi: 10.1177/0896920513497377
93
Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies. 1998;24:3–21.
94
Gill SR, Law D. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly. 1989;33. doi: 10.2307/2600523
95
Gramsci A, Hoare Q, Nowell-Smith G. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart 1971.
96
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
97
Maclean J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1988;17:295–319. doi: 10.1177/03058298880170021201
98
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
99
Wallerstein I. Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press 2004:23–41.
100
Immanuel Wallerstein. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 1974;16:387–415.
101
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
102
Richard Price. A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization. 1995;49:73–103.
103
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE 2013.
104
Björkdahl A. Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2002;15:9–23. doi: 10.1080/09557570220126216
105
R. Charli Carpenter. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization. 2011;65:69–102.
106
Checkel JT. The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics. 1998;50:324–48. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100008133
107
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
108
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization. 1998;52:887–917.
109
Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 2001;4:391–416. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
110
Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998;23. doi: 10.2307/2539267
111
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations. Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE 2013.
112
Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.
113
Onuf NG. Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations. New York: Routledge 2013.
114
Ronen Palan. A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 2000;26:575–98.
115
Reus-Smit C. Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2002;4:487–509. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00091
116
Weldes J. Constructing National Interests’. European journal of international relations. 1996;2:275–318.
117
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization. 1992;46:391–425.
118
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism. Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
119
Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127.
120
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. ’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996.
121
Callinicos A. Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism. Against postmodernism: a marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press 1989:62–91.
122
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
123
David Campbell. Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 1990;15:263–86.
124
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books 1989.
125
Doty R. The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines. In: Beer FA, Hariman R, eds. Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. East Lansing: Michigan State University press 1996:331–45.
126
Edkins J, Pin-Fat V. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2005;34:1–24. doi: 10.1177/03058298050340010101
127
Edkins J, Vaughan-Williams N. Critical theorists and international relations. London: Routledge 2009.
128
Hansen L. Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: Routledge 2006:17–36.
129
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 1999;5:225–54. doi: 10.1177/1354066199005002003
130
Foucault M, Rabinow P. The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books 1986.
131
Hollinger R. ‘Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations’. Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage 1994.
132
Shapiro M. Textualising Global Politics. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books 1989:11–22.
133
Rosenau P. Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1990;19:83–110. doi: 10.1177/03058298900190010701
134
Cynthia Weber. Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies. 1992;18:199–216.
135
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 10 - Feminism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
136
Roff HM. Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2016;18:1–18. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246
137
Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations. International Studies Review. 2008;10:693–707.
138
Bulmer S. Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2013;15:137–56. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2012.746565
139
Enloe CH. Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women? Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: University of California Press 2014.
140
Carpenter RC. Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue. 2006;37:83–103. doi: 10.1177/0967010606064139
141
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies. 1998;24:283–97.
142
Hooper C. Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press 2001.
143
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 1996;22:405–29.
144
Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11.
145
Shepherd LJ, editor. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Second edition. London: Routledge 2015.
146
Steans J. Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2003;5:428–54. doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00114
147
Steans J. Gender, Feminism, and International Relations. Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. Cambridge: Polity 2006:7–19.
148
Tickner JA. Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press 1992.
149
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly. 1997;41:611–32.
150
WAYLEN G. You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies. 2006;32. doi: 10.1017/S0260210506006966
151
Weber C. Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1994;23:337–49.
152
Epstein C. The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory. 2014;6:294–311. doi: 10.1017/S1752971914000219
153
Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. doi: 10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila
154
Rita Abrahamsen. African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African Affairs. 2003;102:189–210.
155
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2010.
156
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31:109–27. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310010601
157
Biccum AR. Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly. 2005;26:1005–20. doi: 10.1080/01436590500139656
158
Pinar Bilgin. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly. 2008;29:5–23.
159
Chowdhury G, Nair S. Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class. London: Routledge 2002:1–32.
160
Darby P. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2004;33:1–32. doi: 10.1177/03058298040330010101
161
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
162
GROVOGUI SN. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 2002;8:315–38. doi: 10.1177/1354066102008003001
163
Gruffydd Jones B, editor. Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield 2006.
164
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19:353–77. doi: 10.1177/1354066111425263
165
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Abingdon: Routledge 2013.
166
TAYLOR L. Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America. International Studies Review. 2012;14:386–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x
167
Tickner AB. Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2013;19:627–46. doi: 10.1177/1354066113494323
168
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012;41:3–22. doi: 10.1177/0305829812451720
169
Brown GW, Held D, editors. Editor’s Introduction. The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity 2010.
170
Dietzel A. The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health? Global Policy. 2017;8:313–21. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12421
171
Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: Polity 2011.
172
Brock G. Global Justice. Oxford University Press 2009.
173
Brown GW, Held D, editors. The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity 2010.
174
Brown GW. Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press 2009.
175
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010;13:203–28. doi: 10.1080/13698230903326331
176
Dietzel A. Global Justice. International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction.
177
Gardiner SM. Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
178
Lawrence P. Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2014.
179
Hayden P. Cosmopolitan global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate 2005.
180
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities. Cambridge: Polity Press 2010.
181
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed? Review of International Studies. 2003;29. doi: 10.1017/S0260210503004650
182
Lu C. The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2000;8:244–67. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00101
183
Moss J, editor. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015.
184
Shue H. Climate justice: vulnerability and protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
185
Tan K-C. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2004.
