1
Brown C, Ainley K. Introduction: Defining International Relations. In: Understanding international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009. 1–17.
2
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
3
Adler E, Pouliot V. International practices. International Theory 2011;3:1–36. doi:10.1017/S175297191000031X
4
Buzan B, Little R. Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium 2001;30:19–39. doi:10.1177/03058298010300010401
5
Burchill S, Linklater A. Introduction. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
6
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations 2013;19:405–25. doi:10.1177/1354066113495485
7
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
8
Jabri V. Reflections on the Study of International Relations. In: Issues in international relations. London: : Routledge 2000. 289–313.
9
Jackson R, Sorensen G. IR as an academic subject. In: Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. 28–57.
10
Doyle MW, Ikenberry GJ. Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’. In: New thinking in international relations theory. Oxford: : Westview Press 1997.
11
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
12
NICHOLSON M. What’s the use of International Relations? Review of International Studies 2000;26:183–98. doi:10.1017/S0260210500001832
13
Schroeder PW. History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit. International Security 1997;22. doi:10.2307/2539329
14
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 1 ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’. In: Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: : SAGE 2013.
15
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates? In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
16
Walt SM. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy Published Online First: Spring 1998. doi:10.2307/1149275
17
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
18
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 7 - Liberalism. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
19
G. John Ikenberry. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics 2009;7:71–87.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 3 - Liberalism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
21
Charvet J, Kaczynska-Nay E. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972
22
Michael W. Doyle. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review 2005;99:463–6.http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953
23
Franceschet A. The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal 1999;54. doi:10.2307/40203406
24
Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: : Penguin Books 2012.
25
Gardner RN. The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. The Washington Quarterly 1990;13:23–39. doi:10.1080/01636609009445391
26
Jean-Yves Haine. The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal 2009;64:453–79.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518
27
Hoffmann S. The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. Foreign Policy Published Online First: Spring 1995. doi:10.2307/1148964
28
Lawson S. Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory. In: Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics. Cambridge, England: : Polity 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448
29
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 5 - Liberalism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
30
Axelrod R, Keohane RO. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics 1985;38:226–54. doi:10.2307/2010357
31
Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2001.
32
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs 2011;90:56–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
33
Koivisto M, Dunne T. Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2010;38:615–40. doi:10.1177/0305829810363509
34
Keohane RO, Martin LL. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security 1995;20. doi:10.2307/2539214
35
Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 1998;52:729–57.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356
36
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 2006;60:781–810.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847
37
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
38
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism. In: The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
39
WEISS TG. How United Nations ideas change history. Review of International Studies 2010;36:3–23. doi:10.1017/S026021051100009X
40
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 2 - Realism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368
41
Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp
42
William Bain. Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered. Review of International Studies 2000;26:445–64.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688
43
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism. In: International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
44
Robert G. Gilpin. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization 1984;38:287–304.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441
45
Guzzini S. The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 2004;10:533–68. doi:10.1177/1354066104047848
46
Jervis, Robert. Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research;61.https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
47
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 3 - Classical Realism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
48
Lebow RN. Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations 2005;19:329–36. doi:10.1177/0047117805055410
49
Morgenthau HJ. Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review 1952;46:961–88. doi:10.2307/1952108
50
Justin Rosenberg. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies 1990;16:285–303.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232
51
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization 1984;38:225–86.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440
52
Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf
53
Keohane RO, Waltz KN. Neorealism and its critics. New York: : Columbia University Press 1986.
54
Booth K, Smith S. Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice. In: International relations theory today. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1995.
55
Mearsheimer JJ. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security 1990;15. doi:10.2307/2538981
56
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 4 - Structural Realism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
57
Davis N. A rose by any other name. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2014;25. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021
58
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. London: : McGraw-Hill 1979.
59
Kenneth N. Waltz. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security 2000;25:5–41.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772
60
Michael C. Williams. Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy. Review of International Studies 1993;19:103–21.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
61
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: : Columbia University Press 1993.
62
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization 1988;42:485–507.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
63
Robert Jervis. Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security 1999;24:42–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347
64
Keohane RO. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 1988;32. doi:10.2307/2600589
65
Nye JS. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics 1988;40:235–51. doi:10.2307/2010363
66
Powell R. Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization 1994;48. doi:10.1017/S0020818300028204
67
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 4 - The English School. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
68
Gallagher AM. A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect 2012;4:334–57. doi:10.1163/1875984X-00403004
69
Bellamy AJ, editor. International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press 2004. doi:10.1093/0199265208.001.0001
70
Bull H. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2002.
71
Buzan B. An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Cambridge: : Polity 2014.
72
Buzan B. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617
73
Barry Buzan. The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies 2001;27:471–88.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
74
Dunne T. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Basingstoke: : Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford 1998.
75
Martha Finnemore. Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies 2001;27:509–13.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753
76
Jackson RH. The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000.
77
Jackson RH, Sørensen G. Chapter 5 - International Society. In: Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.
78
Linklater A. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348
79
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528
80
LITTLE R. The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 2000;6:395–422. doi:10.1177/1354066100006003004
81
Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/
82
Wheeler NJ. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740
83
Wheeler NJ. Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1992;21:463–87. doi:10.1177/03058298920210030201
84
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations. In: The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
85
Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011. http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis
86
Burnham P. Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class 2001;25:103–12. doi:10.1177/030981680107500109
87
Bieler A, Morton AD. A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class 2004;28:85–113. doi:10.1177/030981680408200106
88
Callinicos A. Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2004;6:426–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x
89
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1981;10:126–55.
90
Cox RW. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium : journal of international studies 1983;12:162–75.
91
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 7 - Critical Theory. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
92
el-Ojeili C. Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on. Critical Sociology 2015;41:679–700. doi:10.1177/0896920513497377
93
Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies 1998;24:3–21.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503
94
Gill SR, Law D. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly 1989;33. doi:10.2307/2600523
95
Gramsci A, Hoare Q, Nowell-Smith G. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: : Lawrence and Wishart 1971.
96
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
97
Maclean J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1988;17:295–319. doi:10.1177/03058298880170021201
98
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
99
Wallerstein I. Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. In: World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2004. 23–41.
100
Immanuel Wallerstein. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History 1974;16:387–415.http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015
101
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
102
Richard Price. A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization 1995;49:73–103.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
103
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. In: Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: : SAGE 2013.
104
Björkdahl A. Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 2002;15:9–23. doi:10.1080/09557570220126216
105
R. Charli Carpenter. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization 2011;65:69–102.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104
106
Checkel JT. The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics 1998;50:324–48. doi:10.1017/S0043887100008133
107
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
108
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 1998;52:887–917.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109
Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2001;4:391–416. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391
110
Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 1998;23. doi:10.2307/2539267
111
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations. In: Handbook of international relations. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: : SAGE 2013.
112
Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters. In: Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
113
Onuf NG. Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations. New York: : Routledge 2013.
114
Ronen Palan. A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies 2000;26:575–98.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700
115
Reus-Smit C. Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2002;4:487–509. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00091
116
Weldes J. Constructing National Interests’. European journal of international relations 1996;2:275–318.http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001
117
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization 1992;46:391–425.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858
118
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism. In: Theories of international relations. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
119
Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf
120
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. ’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism. In: International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013
121
Callinicos A. Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism. In: Against postmodernism: a marxist critique. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1989. 62–91.
122
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
123
David Campbell. Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 1990;15:263–86.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
124
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: : Lexington Books 1989.
125
Doty R. The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines. In: Beer FA, Hariman R, eds. Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. East Lansing: : Michigan State University press 1996. 331–45.
126
Edkins J, Pin-Fat V. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2005;34:1–24. doi:10.1177/03058298050340010101
127
Edkins J, Vaughan-Williams N. Critical theorists and international relations. London: : Routledge 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003
128
Hansen L. Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy. In: Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: : Routledge 2006. 17–36.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33
129
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations 1999;5:225–54. doi:10.1177/1354066199005002003
130
Foucault M, Rabinow P. The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: : Penguin Books 1986.
131
Hollinger R. ‘Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations’. In: Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage 1994.
132
Shapiro M. Textualising Global Politics. In: International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: : Lexington Books 1989. 11–22.
133
Rosenau P. Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1990;19:83–110. doi:10.1177/03058298900190010701
134
Cynthia Weber. Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies 1992;18:199–216.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
135
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 10 - Feminism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
136
Roff HM. Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics 2016;18:1–18. doi:10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246
137
Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations. International Studies Review 2008;10:693–707.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017
138
Bulmer S. Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics 2013;15:137–56. doi:10.1080/14616742.2012.746565
139
Enloe CH. Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women? In: Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669
140
Carpenter RC. Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue 2006;37:83–103. doi:10.1177/0967010606064139
141
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies 1998;24:283–97.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523
142
Hooper C. Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: : Columbia University Press 2001.
143
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies 1996;22:405–29.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459
144
Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf
145
Shepherd LJ, editor. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Second edition. London: : Routledge 2015. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819
146
Steans J. Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2003;5:428–54. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00114
147
Steans J. Gender, Feminism, and International Relations. In: Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. Cambridge: : Polity 2006. 7–19.
148
Tickner JA. Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. In: Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: : Columbia University Press 1992.
149
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly 1997;41:611–32.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
150
WAYLEN G. You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies 2006;32. doi:10.1017/S0260210506006966
151
Weber C. Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1994;23:337–49.
152
Epstein C. The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory 2014;6:294–311. doi:10.1017/S1752971914000219
153
Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. doi:10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila
154
Rita Abrahamsen. African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African Affairs 2003;102:189–210.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676
155
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2010.
156
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2002;31:109–27. doi:10.1177/03058298020310010601
157
Biccum AR. Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly 2005;26:1005–20. doi:10.1080/01436590500139656
158
Pinar Bilgin. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly 2008;29:5–23.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023
159
Chowdhury G, Nair S. Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. In: Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class. London: : Routledge 2002. 1–32.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181
160
Darby P. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2004;33:1–32. doi:10.1177/03058298040330010101
161
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism. In: International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016.
162
GROVOGUI SN. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations 2002;8:315–38. doi:10.1177/1354066102008003001
163
Gruffydd Jones B, editor. Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: : Rowman and Littlefield 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740
164
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations 2013;19:353–77. doi:10.1177/1354066111425263
165
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Abingdon: : Routledge 2013.
166
TAYLOR L. Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America. International Studies Review 2012;14:386–400. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x
167
Tickner AB. Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 2013;19:627–46. doi:10.1177/1354066113494323
168
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 2012;41:3–22. doi:10.1177/0305829812451720
169
Brown GW, Held D, editors. Editor’s Introduction. In: The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: : Polity 2010.
170
Dietzel A. The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health? Global Policy 2017;8:313–21. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12421
171
Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: : Polity 2011.
172
Brock G. Global Justice. Oxford University Press 2009. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001
173
Brown GW, Held D, editors. The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: : Polity 2010.
174
Brown GW. Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution. Edinburgh [Scotland]: : Edinburgh University Press 2009. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04
175
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2010;13:203–28. doi:10.1080/13698230903326331
176
Dietzel A. Global Justice. In: International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction.https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/
177
Gardiner SM. Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959
178
Lawrence P. Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar Publishing 2014.
179
Hayden P. Cosmopolitan global politics. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2005.
180
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922
181
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed? Review of International Studies 2003;29. doi:10.1017/S0260210503004650
182
Lu C. The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy 2000;8:244–67. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00101
183
Moss J, editor. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340
184
Shue H. Climate justice: vulnerability and protection. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931
185
Tan K-C. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385
