1.
Brown C, Ainley K. Introduction: Defining International Relations. Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. p. 1–17.
2.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
3.
Adler E, Pouliot V. International practices. International Theory. 2011 Mar;3(01):1–36.
4.
Buzan B, Little R. Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium. 2001 Jan;30(1):19–39.
5.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Introduction. Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
6.
Dunne T, Hansen L, Wight C. The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations. 2013 Sep 1;19(3):405–425.
7.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
8.
Jabri V. Reflections on the Study of International Relations. Issues in international relations. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 289–313.
9.
Jackson R, Sorensen G. IR as an academic subject. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 28–57.
10.
Doyle MW, Ikenberry GJ. Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’. New thinking in international relations theory. Oxford: Westview Press; 1997.
11.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
12.
NICHOLSON M. What’s the use of International Relations? Review of International Studies. 2000 Apr;26(2):183–198.
13.
Schroeder PW. History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit. International Security. 1997 Summer;22(1).
14.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 1 ‘On the History and Historiography of International Relations’. Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2013.
15.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S. Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates? International relations theories: discipline and diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
16.
Walt SM. International Relations: One World, Many Theories. Foreign Policy. 1998 Spring;(110).
17.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
18.
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 7 - Liberalism. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
19.
G. John Ikenberry. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics [Internet]. American Political Science AssociationAmerican Political Science Association; 2009;7(1):71–87. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 3 - Liberalism. Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
21.
Charvet J, Kaczynska-Nay E. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972
22.
Michael W. Doyle. Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. American Political Science AssociationAmerican Political Science Association; 2005;99(3):463–466. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953
23.
Franceschet A. The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal. 1999;54(3).
24.
Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books; 2012.
25.
Gardner RN. The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism. The Washington Quarterly. 1990 Sep;13(3):23–39.
26.
Jean-Yves Haine. The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. International Journal [Internet]. Sage Publications, Ltd.Canadian International CouncilSage Publications, Ltd.; 2009;64(2):453–479. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518
27.
Hoffmann S. The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism. Foreign Policy. 1995 Spring;(98).
28.
Lawson S. Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory. Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics [Internet]. Cambridge, England: Polity; 2015. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448
29.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 5 - Liberalism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
30.
Axelrod R, Keohane RO. Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions. World Politics. 1985 Oct;38(01):226–254.
31.
Campbell JL, Pedersen OK. The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2001.
32.
G. John Ikenberry. The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. Council on Foreign RelationsCouncil on Foreign Relations; 2011;90(3):56–68. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408
33.
Koivisto M, Dunne T. Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2010 May;38(3):615–640.
34.
Keohane RO, Martin LL. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory. International Security. 1995 Summer;20(1).
35.
Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT PressInternational Organization Foundation; 1998;52(4):729–757. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356
36.
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization [Internet]. Cambridge University PressInternational Organization FoundationInternational Organization Foundation; 2006;60(4):781–810. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847
37.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
38.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
39.
WEISS TG. How United Nations ideas change history. Review of International Studies. 2010 Oct;36(S1):3–23.
40.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 2 - Realism. Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368
41.
Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ [Internet]. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp
42.
William Bain. Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 2000;26(3):445–464. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688
43.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
44.
Robert G. Gilpin. The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT PressInternational Organization Foundation; 1984;38(2):287–304. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441
45.
Guzzini S. The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2004 Dec;10(4):533–568.
46.
Jervis, Robert. Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics. Social Research [Internet]. 61(4). Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
47.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 3 - Classical Realism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
48.
Lebow RN. Tragedy, Politics and Political Science. International Relations. 2005 Sep;19(3):329–336.
49.
Morgenthau HJ. Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States. American Political Science Review. 1952 Dec;46(04):961–988.
50.
Justin Rosenberg. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 1990;16(4):285–303. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232
51.
Richard K. Ashley. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT PressInternational Organization Foundation; 1984;38(2):225–286. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440
52.
Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478. Available from: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf
53.
Keohane RO, Waltz KN. Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press; 1986.
54.
Booth K, Smith S. Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice. International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1995.
55.
Mearsheimer JJ. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 1990 Summer;15(1).
56.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 4 - Structural Realism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
57.
Davis N. A rose by any other name. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2014 Jul;25.
58.
Waltz KN. Theory of international politics. London: McGraw-Hill; 1979.
59.
Kenneth N. Waltz. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security [Internet]. The MIT PressThe MIT Press; 2000;25(1):5–41. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772
60.
Michael C. Williams. Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 1993;19(2):103–121. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
61.
Baldwin DA. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press; 1993.
62.
Joseph M. Grieco. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT PressInternational Organization Foundation; 1988;42(3):485–507. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
63.
Robert Jervis. Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate. International Security [Internet]. The MIT PressThe MIT Press; 1999;24(1):42–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347
64.
Keohane RO. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 1988 Dec;32(4).
65.
Nye JS. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics. 1988 Jan;40(02):235–251.
66.
Powell R. Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate. International Organization. 1994 Mar;48(02).
67.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 4 - The English School. Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
68.
Gallagher AM. A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect. 2012 Jan 1;4(3):334–357.
69.
Bellamy AJ, editor. International Society and its Critics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2004. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001/acprof-9780199265206
70.
Bull H. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002.
71.
Buzan B. An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Cambridge: Polity; 2014.
72.
Buzan B. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617
73.
Barry Buzan. The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 2001;27(3):471–488. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
74.
Dunne T. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford; 1998.
75.
Martha Finnemore. Exporting the English School? Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 2001;27(3):509–513. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753
76.
Jackson RH. The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
77.
Jackson RH, Sørensen G. Chapter 5 - International Society. Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
78.
Linklater A. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348
79.
Linklater A, Suganami H. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528
80.
LITTLE R. The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2000 Sep;6(3):395–422.
81.
Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/
82.
Wheeler NJ. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740
83.
Wheeler NJ. Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1992 Dec;21(3):463–487.
84.
Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P, editors. Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
85.
Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis
86.
Burnham P. Marx, international political economy and globalisation. Capital & Class. 2001 Oct;25(3):103–112.
87.
Bieler A, Morton AD. A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class. 2004 Mar;28(1):85–113.
88.
Callinicos A. Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2004 Aug;6(3):426–433.
89.
Cox RW. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1981 Jun;10(2):126–155.
90.
Cox RW. Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method. Millennium : journal of international studies. London: London School of Economics.; 1983;12(2):162–175.
91.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 7 - Critical Theory. Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
92.
el-Ojeili C. Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on. Critical Sociology. 2015 Jul;41(4–5):679–700.
93.
Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 1998;24(1):3–21. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503
94.
Gill SR, Law D. Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly. 1989 Dec;33(4).
95.
Gramsci A, Hoare Q, Nowell-Smith G. Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart; 1971.
96.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism. Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
97.
Maclean J. Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1988 Jun;17(2):295–319.
98.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
99.
Wallerstein I. Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2004. p. 23–41.
100.
Immanuel Wallerstein. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History [Internet]. Cambridge University PressSociety for Comparative Studies in Society and History; 1974;16(4):387–415. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015
101.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. Theories of international relations [Internet]. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013. Available from: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368
102.
Richard Price. A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT PressInternational Organization Foundation; 1995;49(1):73–103. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
103.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates. Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2013.
104.
Björkdahl A. Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 2002 Apr;15(1):9–23.
105.
R. Charli Carpenter. Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms. International Organization [Internet]. Cambridge University PressInternational Organization FoundationInternational Organization Foundation; 2011;65(1):69–102. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104
106.
Checkel JT. The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory. World Politics. 1998 Jan;50(02):324–348.
107.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 9 - Constructivism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
108.
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT PressInternational Organization Foundation; 1998;52(4):887–917. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
109.
Finnemore M, Sikkink K. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 2001 Jun;4(1):391–416.
110.
Hopf T. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. 1998 Summer;23(1).
111.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations. Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE; 2013.
112.
Della Porta D, Keating M, editors. Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters. Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938
113.
Onuf NG. Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations. New York: Routledge; 2013.
114.
Ronen Palan. A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 2000;26(4):575–598. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700
115.
Reus-Smit C. Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2002 Oct;4(3):487–509.
116.
Weldes J. Constructing National Interests’. European journal of international relations [Internet]. London: Sage; 1996;2:275–318. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001
117.
Alexander Wendt. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization [Internet]. The MIT PressInternational Organization Foundation; 1992;46(2):391–425. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858
118.
Burchill S, Linklater A. Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism. Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
119.
Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127. Available from: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf
120.
Smith S, Booth K, Zalewski M. ’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism. International theory: positivism and beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013
121.
Callinicos A. Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism. Against postmodernism: a marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1989. p. 62–91.
122.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
123.
David Campbell. Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political [Internet]. Sage Publications, Inc.Sage Publications, Inc.; 1990;15(3):263–286. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
124.
Shapiro MJ, Der Derian J. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books; 1989.
125.
Doty R. The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines. In: Beer FA, Hariman R, editors. Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. East Lansing: Michigan State University press; 1996. p. 331–345.
126.
Edkins J, Pin-Fat V. Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2005 Aug;34(1):1–24.
127.
Edkins J, Vaughan-Williams N. Critical theorists and international relations [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003
128.
Hansen L. Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy. Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2006. p. 17–36. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33
129.
MILLIKEN J. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: European Journal of International Relations. 1999 Jun;5(2):225–254.
130.
Foucault M, Rabinow P. The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; 1986.
131.
Hollinger R. ‘Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations’. Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994.
132.
Shapiro M. Textualising Global Politics. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books; 1989. p. 11–22.
133.
Rosenau P. Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 1990 Mar;19(1):83–110.
134.
Cynthia Weber. Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 1992;18(3):199–216. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
135.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 10 - Feminism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
136.
Roff HM. Gendering a Warbot. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2016 Jan 2;18(1):1–18.
137.
Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations. International Studies Review [Internet]. WileyThe International Studies AssociationOxford University Press; 2008;10(4):693–707. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017
138.
Bulmer S. Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 2013 Jun;15(2):137–156.
139.
Enloe CH. Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women? Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics [Internet]. Second edition, completely revised and updated. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669
140.
Carpenter RC. Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations. Security Dialogue. 2006 Mar;37(1):83–103.
141.
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 1998;24(2):283–297. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523
142.
Hooper C. Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press; 2001.
143.
Adam Jones. Does ‘Gender’ Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations. Review of International Studies [Internet]. Cambridge University PressCambridge University Press; 1996;22(4):405–429. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459
144.
Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11. Available from: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf
145.
Shepherd LJ, editor. Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations [Internet]. Second edition. London: Routledge; 2015. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819
146.
Steans J. Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the ‘Mainstream’ of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2003 Aug;5(3):428–454.
147.
Steans J. Gender, Feminism, and International Relations. Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. 2nd ed., rev.expanded. Cambridge: Polity; 2006. p. 7–19.
148.
Tickner JA. Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press; 1992.
149.
J. Ann Tickner. You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. WileyThe International Studies AssociationOxford University Press; 1997;41(4):611–632. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
150.
WAYLEN G. You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies. 2006 Feb 27;32(01).
151.
Weber C. Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. London: London School of Economics; 1994;23:337–349.
152.
Epstein C. The postcolonial perspective: an introduction. International Theory. 2014 Jul;6(02):294–311.
153.
Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila
154.
Rita Abrahamsen. African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge. African Affairs [Internet]. Oxford University PressThe Royal African SocietyThe Royal African Society; 2003;102(407):189–210. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676
155.
Acharya A, Buzan B. Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2010.
156.
Barkawi T, Laffey M. Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002 Jan;31(1):109–127.
157.
Biccum AR. Development and the ‘New’ Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature. Third World Quarterly. 2005 Sep;26(6):1005–1020.
158.
Pinar Bilgin. Thinking past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly [Internet]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd.Third World Quarterly; 2008;29(1):5–23. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023
159.
Chowdhury G, Nair S. Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2002. p. 1–32. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181
160.
Darby P. Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2004 Jan;33(1):1–32.
161.
Dunne T, Kurki M, Smith S, editors. Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism. International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
162.
GROVOGUI SN. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations. 2002 Sep;8(3):315–338.
163.
Gruffydd Jones B, editor. Decolonizing international relations [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield; 2006. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740
164.
Matin K. Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations. 2013 Jun;19(2):353–377.
165.
Seth S, editor. Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Abingdon: Routledge; 2013.
166.
TAYLOR L. Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America. International Studies Review. 2012 Sep;14(3):386–400.
167.
Tickner AB. Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 2013 Sep;19(3):627–646.
168.
Vasilaki R. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2012 Sep;41(1):3–22.
169.
Brown GW, Held D, editors. Editor’s Introduction. The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity; 2010.
170.
Dietzel A. The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health? Global Policy. 2017 Sep;8(3):313–321.
171.
Beardsworth R. Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: Polity; 2011.
172.
Brock G. Global Justice [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001/acprof-9780199230938
173.
Brown GW, Held D, editors. The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity; 2010.
174.
Brown GW. Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution [Internet]. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04
175.
Caney S. Climate change and the duties of the advantaged. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2010 Mar;13(1):203–228.
176.
Dietzel A. Global Justice. International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction [Internet]. Available from: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/
177.
Gardiner SM. Climate ethics: essential readings [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959
178.
Lawrence P. Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2014.
179.
Hayden P. Cosmopolitan global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2005.
180.
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922
181.
Held D. Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed? Review of International Studies. 2003 Oct;29(04).
182.
Lu C. The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2000 Jun;8(2):244–267.
183.
Moss J, editor. Climate Change and Justice [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340
184.
Shue H. Climate justice: vulnerability and protection [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931
185.
Tan KC. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385
