Bibliography for POLI10003:Theories of International Relations BETA

Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Adam Jones. 1996. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 22 (4): 405–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459.

Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. ‘International Practices’. International Theory 3 (01): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X.

Alexander Wendt. 1992. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization 46 (2): 391–425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858.

Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. 1985. ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’. World Politics 38 (01): 226–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357.

Baldwin, David A. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. 2002. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 109–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.

Barry Buzan. 2001. ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’. Review of International Studies 27 (3): 471–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, eds. 2014a. ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2014b. ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beardsworth, Richard. 2011. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Polity.

Bellamy, Alex J., ed. 2004. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001.

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. 2006. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization 60 (4): 781–810. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847.

Biccum, April R. 2005. ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: A Reinvention of Colonial Discourse in DFID Promotional Literature’. Third World Quarterly 26 (6): 1005–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500139656.

Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. 2004. ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’. Capital & Class 28 (1): 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106.

Björkdahl, Annika. 2002. ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15 (1): 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216.

‘Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory’. n.d. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/.

Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. 1995. ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’. In International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brock, Gillian. 2009. Global Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001.

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. 2008. ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’. International Studies Review 10 (4): 693–707. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017.

Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009. ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’. In Understanding International Relations, 4th ed, 1–17. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, Garrett Wallace. 2009. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, eds. 2010a. ‘Editor’s Introduction’. In The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity.

———, eds. 2010b. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge: Polity.

Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bulmer, Sarah. 2013. ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15 (2): 137–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013a. ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368.

———. 2013b. ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. 2013c. ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. 2013d. ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. 2013e. ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. 2013f. ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

———. 2013g. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

———. 2013h. ‘Introduction’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burnham, Peter. 2001. ‘Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation’. Capital & Class 25 (3): 103–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109.

Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617.

———. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity.

Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2001. ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’. Millennium 30 (1): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.

Callinicos, Alex. 1989. ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’. In Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique, 62–91. Cambridge: Polity Press.

———. 2004. ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (3): 426–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x.

Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Caney, Simon. 2010. ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1): 203–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. 2013a. ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

———. 2013b. ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

———. 2013c. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

Carpenter, R. Charli. 2006. ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’. Security Dialogue 37 (1): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139.

Charvet, John, and Elisa Kaczynska-Nay. 2008. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’. World Politics 50 (02): 324–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133.

Chowdhury, Geeta, and Sheila Nair. 2002. ‘Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in International Relations’. In Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class, Routledge advances in international relations and global politics:1–32. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181.

‘Considine, L., “Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), Pp. 109-127.’ n.d. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf.

Cox, Robert W. 1981. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–55.

———. 1983. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’. Millennium : Journal of International Studies. 12 (2): 162–75.

Cynthia Weber. 1992. ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’. Review of International Studies 18 (3): 199–216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Darby, Phillip. 2004. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101.

David Campbell. 1990. ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 15 (3): 263–86. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Davis, Neville. 2014. ‘A Rose by Any Other Name’. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 25 (July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021.

Della Porta, Donatella, and Michael Keating, eds. 2008. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.

Dietzel, A. n.d. ‘Global Justice’. In International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/.

Dietzel, Alix. 2017. ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’ Global Policy 8 (3): 313–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12421.

Doty, Roxanne. 1996. ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’. In Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations, edited by Francis A. Beer and Robert Hariman, Rhetoric and public affairs series:331–45. East Lansing: Michigan State University press.

Doyle, Michael W., and G. John Ikenberry. 1997. ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’. In New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Oxford: Westview Press.

‘Dunn, B., “Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?” The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011’. n.d. http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis.

Dunne, T., L. Hansen, and C. Wight. 2013. ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’ European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 405–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.

Dunne, Timothy. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Vol. St Anthony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. 2013a. ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2013b. ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All These Debates?’ In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016a. ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016b. ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016c. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016d. ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016e. ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016f. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016g. ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016h. ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016i. ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———, eds. 2016j. ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edkins, Jenny, and Véronique Pin-Fat. 2005. ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101.

Edkins, Jenny, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Critical Theorists and International Relations. Vol. Interventions. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003.

Enloe, Cynthia H. 2014. ‘Chapter 5 - Gender Makes the World Go Round: Where Are the Women?’ In Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Second edition, completely revised and updated. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669.

Epstein, Charlotte. 2014. ‘The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction’. International Theory 6 (02): 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219.

Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.

Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow. 1986. The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Franceschet, Antonio. 1999. ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 54 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/40203406.

Fukuyama, Francis. 2012. The End of History and the Last Man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books.

G. John Ikenberry. 2009. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 71–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

———. 2011. ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’. Foreign Affairs 90 (3): 56–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408.

Gallagher, Adrian M. 2012. ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’. Global Responsibility to Protect 4 (3): 334–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00403004.

Gardiner, Stephen Mark. 2010. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959.

Gardner, Richard N. 1990. ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’. The Washington Quarterly 13 (3): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445391.

Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. 1989. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly 33 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523.

Gramsci, Antonio, Quintin Hoare, and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

GROVOGUI, SIBA N. 2002. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations 8 (3): 315–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001.

Gruffydd Jones, Branwen, ed. 2006. Decolonizing International Relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740.

‘Guzzini, G., “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis” International Organization, 47(3), 1993, Pp. 443-478.’ n.d. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

Guzzini, Stefano. 2004. ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 533–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047848.

Hansen, Lene. 2006. ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’. In Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, The new international relations series:17–36. London: Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33.

Hayden, Patrick. 2005. Cosmopolitan Global Politics. Vol. Ethics and global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Held, David. 2003. ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’ Review of International Studies 29 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004650.

———. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922.

Hoffmann, Stanley. 1995. ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. Foreign Policy, no. 98 (Spring). https://doi.org/10.2307/1148964.

Hollinger, Robert. 1994. ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’. In Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach. Vol. Contemporary social theory. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

Hooper, Charlotte. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Hopf, Ted. 1998. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.

Immanuel Wallerstein. 1974. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16 (4): 387–415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015.

J. Ann Tickner. 1997. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 611–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Jabri, Vivienne. 2000. ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’. In Issues in International Relations, 289–313. London: Routledge.

Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, Robert H., and Georg Sørensen. 2010. ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’. In Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. 2010. ‘IR as an Academic Subject’. In Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed, 28–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jean-Yves Haine. 2009. ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 64 (2): 453–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518.

Jervis, Robert. n.d. ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’. Social Research 61 (4). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

Joseph M. Grieco. 1988. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42 (3): 485–507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Justin Rosenberg. 1990. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies 16 (4): 285–303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232.

Kenneth N. Waltz. 2000. ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’. International Security 25 (1): 5–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772.

Keohane, Robert O. 1988. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589.

Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin. 1995. ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’. International Security 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.

Keohane, Robert O., and Kenneth Neal Waltz. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol. The political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press.

Koivisto, Marjo, and Tim Dunne. 2010. ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38 (3): 615–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810363509.

Lawrence, Peter. 2014. Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lawson, Stephanie. 2015. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’. In Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics. Cambridge, England: Polity. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448.

Lebow, Richard Ned. 2005. ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’. International Relations 19 (3): 329–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805055410.

Linklater, Andrew. 2011. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348.

Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528.

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. 1998. ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’. International Organization 52 (4): 729–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356.

LITTLE, RICHARD. 2000. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6 (3): 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.

Lu, Catherine. 2000. ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’. Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 244–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101.

Maclean, John. 1988. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17 (2): 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.

Martha Finnemore. 2001. ‘Exporting the English School?’ Review of International Studies 27 (3): 509–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Matin, Kamran. 2013. ‘Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 353–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263.

‘Mearsheimer, J., “Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.”’ n.d. https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp.

Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. International Security 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.

Michael C. Williams. 1993. ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’. Review of International Studies 19 (2): 103–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Michael W. Doyle. 2005. ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’. The American Political Science Review 99 (3): 463–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953.

MILLIKEN, JENNIFER. 1999. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’: European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1952. ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’ American Political Science Review 46 (04): 961–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108.

Moss, Jeremy, ed. 2015. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340.

NICHOLSON, MICHAEL. 2000. ‘What’s the Use of International Relations?’ Review of International Studies 26 (2): 183–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500001832.

Nye, Joseph S. 1988. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40 (02): 235–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.

Ojeili, Chamsy el-. 2015. ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades On’. Critical Sociology 41 (4–5): 679–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513497377.

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 2013. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. Vol. The new international relations. New York: Routledge.

‘Peterson V. S., “Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, Pp. 1-11.’ n.d. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf.

Pinar Bilgin. 2008. ‘Thinking Past “Western” IR?’ Third World Quarterly 29 (1): 5–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023.

Powell, Robert. 1994. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization 48 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.

R. Charli Carpenter. 2011. ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’. International Organization 65 (1): 69–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104.

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. 1998. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review of International Studies 24 (1): 3–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503.

Reus-Smit, Christian. 2002. ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (3): 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00091.

Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal. 2008. ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Vol. Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richard K. Ashley. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38 (2): 225–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440.

Richard Price. 1995. ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’. International Organization 49 (1): 73–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Rita Abrahamsen. 2003. ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’. African Affairs 102 (407): 189–210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676.

Robert G. Gilpin. 1984. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization 38 (2): 287–304. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441.

Robert Jervis. 1999. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security 24 (1): 42–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347.

Roff, Heather M. 2016. ‘Gendering a Warbot’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 18 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246.

Ronen Palan. 2000. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. Review of International Studies 26 (4): 575–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700.

Rosenau, Pauline. 1990. ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 19 (1): 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190010701.

Schroeder, Paul W. 1997. ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’. International Security 22 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539329.

Seth, Sanjay, ed. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Vol. Interventions. Abingdon: Routledge.

‘Seth, Sanjay (2011), “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), Pp. 167-183.’ n.d. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila.

Shapiro, Michael. 1989. ‘Textualising Global Politics’. In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, World Politics Series:11–22. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.

Shapiro, Michael J., and James Der Derian. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol. World Politics Series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.

Shepherd, Laura J., ed. 2015. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Second edition. London: Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819.

Shue, Henry. 2014. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996a. ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

———. 1996b. ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013.

———. 1996c. ‘Chapter 16 - The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

———. 1996d. ‘Chapter 18 - All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Steans, Jill. 2003. ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5 (3): 428–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00114.

———. 2006. ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’. In Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates and Future Directions, 2nd ed., rev.expanded, 7–19. Cambridge: Polity.

Tan, Kok-Chor. 2004. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Vol. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385.

TAYLOR, LUCY. 2012. ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’. International Studies Review 14 (3): 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x.

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. 1998. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review of International Studies 24 (2): 283–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523.

Tickner, Arlene B. 2013. ‘Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 627–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323.

Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’. In Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Vasilaki, Rosa. 2012. ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’. In World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, A John Hope Franklin Center book:23–41. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Walt, Stephen M. 1998. ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’. Foreign Policy, no. 110 (Spring). https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275.

Waltz, Kenneth Neal. 1979. Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill.

WAYLEN, GEORGINA. 2006. ‘You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue between Feminists and (Critical) IPE’. Review of International Studies 32 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006966.

Weber, Cindy. 1994. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23: 337–49.

WEISS, THOMAS G. 2010. ‘How United Nations Ideas Change History’. Review of International Studies 36 (S1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051100009X.

Weldes, Jutta. 1996. ‘Constructing National Interests’’. European Journal of International Relations 2: 275–318. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001.

Wheeler, Nicholas J. 1992. ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21 (3): 463–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030201.

———. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740.

William Bain. 2000. ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’. Review of International Studies 26 (3): 445–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688.