Bibliography for POLI10003:Theories of International Relations BETA

Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. Routledge.

Adam Jones. 1996. ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 22 (4): 405–29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459.

Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. ‘International Practices’. International Theory 3 (01): 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X.

Alexander Wendt. 1992. ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization 46 (2): 391–425. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858.

Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane. 1985. ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’. World Politics 38 (01): 226–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357.

Baldwin, David A. 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. 2002. ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (1): 109–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.

Barry Buzan. 2001. ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’. Review of International Studies 27 (3): 471–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, eds. 2014a. ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition. Oxford University Press.

Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, eds. 2014b. ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’. In The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition. Oxford University Press. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192898142.001.0001/hepl-9780192898142-chapter-8.

Beardsworth, Richard. 2011. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Polity.

Bellamy, Alex J., ed. 2004. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001.

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett. 2006. ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’. International Organization 60 (4): 781–810. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847.

Biccum, April R. 2005. ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: A Reinvention of Colonial Discourse in DFID Promotional Literature’. Third World Quarterly 26 (6): 1005–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500139656.

Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton. 2004. ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’. Capital & Class 28 (1): 85–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106.

Björkdahl, Annika. 2002. ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15 (1): 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216.

‘Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory’. n.d. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/.

Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. 1995. ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’. In International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press.

Brock, Gillian. 2009. Global Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001.

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True. 2008. ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’. International Studies Review 10 (4): 693–707. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017.

Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009. ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’. In Understanding International Relations, 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.

Brown, Garrett Wallace. 2009. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, eds. 2010a. ‘Editor’s Introduction’. In The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Polity.

Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, eds. 2010b. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Polity.

Bull, Hedley. 2002. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. Palgrave.

Bulmer, Sarah. 2013. ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15 (2): 137–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013a. ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013b. ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013c. ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013d. ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013e. ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013f. ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013g. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater. 2013h. ‘Introduction’. In Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition. Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burnham, Peter. 2001. ‘Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation’. Capital & Class 25 (3): 103–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109.

Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617.

Buzan, Barry. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Polity.

Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2001. ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’. Millennium 30 (1): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.

Callinicos, Alex. 1989. ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’. In Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique. Polity Press.

Callinicos, Alex. 2004. ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (3): 426–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x.

Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen. 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton University Press.

Caney, Simon. 2010. ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (1): 203–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. 2013a. ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. SAGE.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. 2013b. ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. SAGE.

Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons. 2013c. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. SAGE.

Carpenter, R. Charli. 2006. ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’. Security Dialogue 37 (1): 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139.

Charvet, John, and Elisa Kaczynska-Nay. 2008. The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972.

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998. ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’. World Politics 50 (02): 324–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133.

Chowdhury, Geeta, and Sheila Nair. 2002. ‘Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in International Relations’. In Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class, Routledge advances in international relations and global politics. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181.

Considine, L., ‘Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), Pp. 109-127. n.d. http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf.

Cox, Robert W. 1981. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10 (2): 126–55.

Cox, Robert W. 1983. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’. Millennium : Journal of International Studies. (London) 12 (2): 162–75.

Cynthia Weber. 1992. ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’. Review of International Studies 18 (3): 199–216. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Darby, Phillip. 2004. ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101.

David Campbell. 1990. ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 15 (3): 263–86. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Davis, Neville. 2014. ‘A Rose by Any Other Name’. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 25 (July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021.

Della Porta, Donatella, and Michael Keating, eds. 2008. ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’. In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.

Dietzel, A. n.d. ‘Global Justice’. In International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/.

Dietzel, Alix. 2017. ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’ Global Policy 8 (3): 313–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12421.

Doty, Roxanne. 1996. ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’. In Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations, edited by Francis A. Beer and Robert Hariman, Rhetoric and public affairs series. Michigan State University press.

Doyle, Michael W., and G. John Ikenberry. 1997. ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’. In New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Westview Press.

‘Dunn, B., “Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?” The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011’. n.d. http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis.

Dunne, T., L. Hansen, and C. Wight. 2013. ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’ European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 405–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.

Dunne, Timothy. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. St Anthony’s series. Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. 2013a. ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith. 2013b. ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All These Debates?’ In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016a. ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016b. ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016c. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016d. ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016e. ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016f. ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016g. ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-12.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016h. ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016i. ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press.

Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, eds. 2016j. ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’. In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition. Oxford University Press. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780192866455.001.0001/hepl-9780192866455-chapter-1.

Edkins, Jenny, and Véronique Pin-Fat. 2005. ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 34 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101.

Edkins, Jenny, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Critical Theorists and International Relations. Interventions. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003.

Enloe, Cynthia H. 2014. ‘Chapter 5 - Gender Makes the World Go Round: Where Are the Women?’ In Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Second edition, completely revised and updated. University of California Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669.

Epstein, Charlotte. 2014. ‘The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction’. International Theory 6 (02): 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219.

Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’. Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.

Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow. 1986. The Foucault Reader. Penguin Books.

Franceschet, Antonio. 1999. ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 54 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/40203406.

Fukuyama, Francis. 2012. The End of History and the Last Man. Twentieth anniversary edition. Penguin Books.

G. John Ikenberry. 2009. ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 71–87. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

G. John Ikenberry. 2011. ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’. Foreign Affairs 90 (3): 56–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408.

Gallagher, Adrian M. 2012. ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’. Global Responsibility to Protect 4 (3): 334–57. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00403004.

Gardiner, Stephen Mark. 2010. Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959.

Gardner, Richard N. 1990. ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’. The Washington Quarterly 13 (3): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445391.

Gill, Stephen R., and David Law. 1989. ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’. International Studies Quarterly 33 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523.

Gramsci, Antonio, Quintin Hoare, and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Lawrence and Wishart.

GROVOGUI, SIBA N. 2002. ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’. European Journal of International Relations 8 (3): 315–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001.

Gruffydd Jones, Branwen, ed. 2006. Decolonizing International Relations. Rowman and Littlefield. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740.

Guzzini, G., ‘Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis’ International Organization, 47(3), 1993, Pp. 443-478. n.d. http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

Guzzini, Stefano. 2004. ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 10 (4): 533–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047848.

Hansen, Lene. 2006. ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’. In Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War, The new international relations series. Routledge. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33.

Hayden, Patrick. 2005. Cosmopolitan Global Politics. Ethics and Global politics. Ashgate.

Held, David. 2003. ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’ Review of International Studies 29 (04). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004650.

Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities. Polity Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922.

Hoffmann, Stanley. 1995. ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. Foreign Policy, no. 98 (Spring). https://doi.org/10.2307/1148964.

Hollinger, Robert. 1994. ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’. In Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach, Contemporary social theory. Sage.

Hooper, Charlotte. 2001. Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics. Columbia University Press.

Hopf, Ted. 1998. ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’. International Security 23 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.

Immanuel Wallerstein. 1974. ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 16 (4): 387–415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015.

J. Ann Tickner. 1997. ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 611–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Jabri, Vivienne. 2000. ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’. In Issues in International Relations. Routledge.

Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford University Press.

Jackson, Robert H., and Georg Sørensen. 2010. ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’. In Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed. Oxford University Press.

Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen. 2010. ‘IR as an Academic Subject’. In Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed. Oxford University Press. https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/hepl/9780198862208.001.0001/hepl-9780198862208-chapter-2.

Jean-Yves Haine. 2009. ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’. International Journal 64 (2): 453–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518.

Jervis, Robert. n.d. ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’. Social Research 61 (4). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

Joseph M. Grieco. 1988. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42 (3): 485–507. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Justin Rosenberg. 1990. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies 16 (4): 285–303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232.

Kenneth N. Waltz. 2000. ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’. International Security 25 (1): 5–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772.

Keohane, Robert O. 1988. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589.

Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin. 1995. ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’. International Security 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.

Keohane, Robert O., and Kenneth Neal Waltz. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. The political economy of international change. Columbia University Press.

Koivisto, Marjo, and Tim Dunne. 2010. ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 38 (3): 615–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810363509.

Lawrence, Peter. 2014. Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lawson, Stephanie. 2015. ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’. In Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics. Polity. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448.

Lebow, Richard Ned. 2005. ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’. International Relations 19 (3): 329–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805055410.

Linklater, Andrew. 2011. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348.

Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528.

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons. 1998. ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’. International Organization 52 (4): 729–57. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356.

LITTLE, RICHARD. 2000. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6 (3): 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.

Lu, Catherine. 2000. ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’. Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 244–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101.

Maclean, John. 1988. ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17 (2): 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.

Martha Finnemore. 2001. ‘Exporting the English School?’ Review of International Studies 27 (3): 509–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Matin, Kamran. 2013. ‘Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 353–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263.

‘Mearsheimer, J., “Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.”’ n.d. https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp.

Mearsheimer, John J. 1990. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. International Security 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.

Michael C. Williams. 1993. ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’. Review of International Studies 19 (2): 103–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Michael W. Doyle. 2005. ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’. The American Political Science Review 99 (3): 463–66. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953.

MILLIKEN, JENNIFER. 1999. ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’: European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.

Morgenthau, Hans J. 1952. ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’ American Political Science Review 46 (04): 961–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108.

Moss, Jeremy, ed. 2015. Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340.

NICHOLSON, MICHAEL. 2000. ‘What’s the Use of International Relations?’ Review of International Studies 26 (2): 183–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500001832.

Nye, Joseph S. 1988. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40 (02): 235–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.

Ojeili, Chamsy el-. 2015. ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades On’. Critical Sociology 41 (4–5): 679–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513497377.

Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 2013. Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations. The new international relations. Routledge.

Peterson V. S., ‘Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR’ Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, Pp. 1-11. n.d. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf.

Pinar Bilgin. 2008. ‘Thinking Past “Western” IR?’ Third World Quarterly 29 (1): 5–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023.

Powell, Robert. 1994. ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. International Organization 48 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.

R. Charli Carpenter. 2011. ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’. International Organization 65 (1): 69–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104.

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny. 1998. ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’. Review of International Studies 24 (1): 3–21. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503.

Reus-Smit, Christian. 2002. ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (3): 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00091.

Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal. 2008. ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford University Press.

Richard K. Ashley. 1984. ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’. International Organization 38 (2): 225–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440.

Richard Price. 1995. ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’. International Organization 49 (1): 73–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Rita Abrahamsen. 2003. ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’. African Affairs 102 (407): 189–210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676.

Robert G. Gilpin. 1984. ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’. International Organization 38 (2): 287–304. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441.

Robert Jervis. 1999. ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’. International Security 24 (1): 42–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347.

Roff, Heather M. 2016. ‘Gendering a Warbot’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 18 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246.

Ronen Palan. 2000. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. Review of International Studies 26 (4): 575–98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700.

Rosenau, Pauline. 1990. ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 19 (1): 83–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190010701.

Schroeder, Paul W. 1997. ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’. International Security 22 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2539329.

Seth, Sanjay, ed. 2013. Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction. Interventions. Routledge.

Seth, Sanjay (2011), ‘Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), Pp. 167-183. n.d. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila.

Shapiro, Michael. 1989. ‘Textualising Global Politics’. In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, World Politics Series. Lexington Books.

Shapiro, Michael J., and James Der Derian. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. World Politics Series. Lexington Books.

Shepherd, Laura J., ed. 2015. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. Second edition. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819.

Shue, Henry. 2014. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996a. ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996b. ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996c. ‘Chapter 16 - The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996d. ‘Chapter 18 - All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Steans, Jill. 2003. ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5 (3): 428–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00114.

Steans, Jill. 2006. ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’. In Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates and Future Directions, 2nd ed., rev.expanded. Polity.

Tan, Kok-Chor. 2004. Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Contemporary Political Theory. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385.

TAYLOR, LUCY. 2012. ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’. International Studies Review 14 (3): 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x.

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires. 1998. ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’. Review of International Studies 24 (2): 283–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523.

Tickner, Arlene B. 2013. ‘Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 627–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323.

Tickner, J. Ann. 1992. ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’. In Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security, New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.

Vasilaki, Rosa. 2012. ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004. ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’. In World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, A John Hope Franklin Center book. Duke University Press. https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3007861&ppg=38.

Walt, Stephen M. 1998. ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’. Foreign Policy, no. 110 (Spring). https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275.

Waltz, Kenneth Neal. 1979. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.

WAYLEN, GEORGINA. 2006. ‘You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue between Feminists and (Critical) IPE’. Review of International Studies 32 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006966.

Weber, Cindy. 1994. ‘Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies (London) 23: 337–49.

WEISS, THOMAS G. 2010. ‘How United Nations Ideas Change History’. Review of International Studies 36 (S1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051100009X.

Weldes, Jutta. 1996. ‘Constructing National Interests’’. European Journal of International Relations (London) 2: 275–318. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001.

Wheeler, Nicholas J. 1992. ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21 (3): 463–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030201.

Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740.

William Bain. 2000. ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’. Review of International Studies 26 (3): 445–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688.