1.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292088471/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Front%20Cover
2.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292088471/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Front%20Cover
3.
Overdue and over Budget, over and over Again. Published online 9AD. http://gdc.galegroup.com/gdc/artemis/NewspapersDetailsPage/NewspapersDetailsWindow?disableHighlighting=false&displayGroupName=DVI-Newspapers&docIndex=1&source=&prodId=ECON&mode=view&limiter=&display-query=TX+Overdue+%23%23and%23%23+over+Budget%2C+over+%23%23and%23%23+over+Again%E2%80%99&contentModules=&action=e&sortBy=&windowstate=normal&currPage=1&dviSelectedPage=&scanId=&query=TX+Overdue+and+over+Budget%2C+over+and+over+Again%E2%80%99&search_within_results=&p=ECON&catId=&u=univbri&displayGroups=&documentId=GALE%7CGP4100353399&activityType=BasicSearch&failOverType=&commentary=
4.
Atkinson R. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management. 1999;17(6):337-342. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6
5.
Morris P. Reconstructing Project Management Reprised: A Knowledge Perspective. Project Management Journal. 2013;44(5):6-23. doi:10.1002/pmj.21369
6.
Cicmil S, Williams T, Thomas J, Hodgson D. Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(8):675-686. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006
7.
Hodgson DE, Cicmil S. Making Projects Critical. Palgrave Macmillan; 2006.
8.
Crawford L, Hobbs B, Turner JR. Aligning Capability with Strategy: Categorizing Projects to do the Right Projects and to do Them Right. Project Management Journal. 2006;37(2):38-50. doi:10.1177/875697280603700205
9.
Maylor H, Vidgen R, Carver S. Managerial Complexity in Project-Based Operations: A Grounded Model and Its Implications for Practice. Project Management Journal. 2008;39(1_suppl):S15-S26. doi:10.1002/pmj.20057
10.
Elder-Vass D. The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge University Press; 2010.
11.
Kim J. Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies. 1999;95(1/2):3-36. doi:10.1023/A:1004563122154
12.
Marras A. Emergence and reduction: Reply to Kim. Synthese. 2006;151(3):561-569. doi:10.1007/s11229-006-9026-z
13.
The future is bright, the future is… you! Project. https://www.apm.org.uk/project/
14.
Conditions for Project Success. https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/find-a-resource/conditions-for-project-success/
15.
Association for Project Management. APM Body of Knowledge. Seventh edition. Association for Project Management; 2019. https://www.apm.org.uk/body-of-knowledge/
16.
Winch GM. Three domains of project organising. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32(5):721-731. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.012
17.
Sydow J, Lindkvist L, DeFillippi R. Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial. Organization Studies. 2004;25(9):1475-1489. doi:10.1177/0170840604048162
18.
Garel G. A history of project management models: From pre-models to the standard models. International Journal of Project Management. 2013;31(5):663-669. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.011
19.
Padalkar M, Gopinath S. Are complexity and uncertainty distinct concepts in project management? A taxonomical examination from literature. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(4):688-700. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.009
20.
Daniel PA, Daniel C. Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(1):184-197. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.004
21.
NHS IT system one of ‘worst fiascos ever’, say MPs - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-24130684
22.
House of Commons - The National Programme for IT in the NHS: an update on the delivery of detailed care records systems - Public Accounts Committee. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubacc/1070/107002.htm
23.
John Carvel. NHS risks £20bn white elephant, say auditors. Guardian. Published online 16 June 2006. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/jun/16/egovernment.politics
24.
Cresswell K, Sheikh A. The NHS Care Record Service (NHS CRS): recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics. 2009;17(3):153-160. doi:10.14236/jhi.v17i3.730
25.
Ahola T, Ruuska I, Artto K, Kujala J. What is project governance and what are its origins? International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32(8):1321-1332. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.09.005
26.
Weick KE. Making Sense of the Organization: Vol. 2: The Impermanent Organization. Wiley
27.
Britain’s engineering reputation goes down the tube. The Economist. Published online 20181208. https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/12/08/britains-engineering-reputation-goes-down-the-tube
28.
Gupta SK, Gunasekaran A, Antony J, Gupta S, Bag S, Roubaud D. Systematic literature review of project failures: Current trends and scope for future research. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2019;127:274-285. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.002
29.
Krusi, Markus1Whitty, Stephen Jonathan1. The Practitioner’s Tapestry: Revealing the epistemological diversity to project management knowledge. The Practitioner’s Tapestry: Revealing the epistemological diversity to project management knowledge. 2019;7(Issue 3):196-226. doi:10.19255/JMPM02010
30.
Wysocki RK. Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme, Hybrid. Eighth edition. Wiley; 2019. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5747804
31.
Kerzner H. Project Management: Case Studies. Fourth edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2013.
32.
Milošević D, Patanakul P, Srivannaboon S. Case Studies in Project, Program, and Organizational Project Management. Wiley
33.
Verzuh E. The Fast Forward MBA in Project Management. 5th ed. Wiley; 2016.
34.
Morris PWG, Pinto JK, Söderlund J. The Oxford Handbook of Project Management. Oxford University Press; 2011.
35.
Lock D. Naked Project Management: The Bare Facts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd; 2013.
36.
Lientz BP. Project Management: A Problem-Based Approach. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
37.
Tuttle S. Illustrating PRINCE2: Project Management in Real Terms. IT Governance Pub; 2012.
38.
Nicholas JM, Steyn H. Project Management for Business, Engineering, and Technology: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann
39.
Kerzner H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Eleventh edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2013.
40.
PRINCE2 overview. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/j.ctt5hh70p.7.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A0df09d2c93fcca292d25438b58e842db
41.
APM /INCOSEUK Systems Thinking SIG. Systems Thinking for Portfolio, Programme and Project Managers. Published online 16AD. https://www.apm.org.uk/media/25516/systems-thinking-for-portfolio-programme-and-project-managers-v10.pdf
42.
Jackson MC. Critical Systems Thinking and the Management of Complexity: Responsible Leadership for a Complex World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2019.
43.
Jackson MC. Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. John Wiley & Sons
44.
Jackson MC. Critical Systems Thinking and the Management of Complexity: Responsible Leadership for a Complex World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2019.
45.
Mawby D, Stupples D. Systems thinking for managing projects. IEMC-2002: 2002 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference : Managing technology for the new economy : St John’s College, Cambridge, UK, 18-20 August, 2002 : proceedings.:344-349. doi:10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038455
46.
George Ellis. Project Management in Product Development : Leadership Skills and Management Techniques to Deliver Great Products. Elsevier Science & Technology; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=4003784
47.
Belbin Team Roles. https://www.belbin.com/about/belbin-team-roles/
48.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292088471/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Front%20Cover
49.
Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(8):687-698. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011
50.
Turner JR, Cochrane RA. Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project Management. 1993;11(2):93-102. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(93)90017-H
51.
Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press; 2003. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050891
52.
Carlile PR. A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development. Organization Science. 2002;13(4):442-455. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
53.
Dougherty D. Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms. Organization Science. 1992;3(2):179-202. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179
54.
Cicmil S, Hodgson D. New Possibilities for Project Management Theory: A Critical Engagement. Project Management Journal. 2006;37(3):111-122. doi:10.1177/875697280603700311
55.
Floricel S, Michela JL, Piperca S. Complexity, uncertainty-reduction strategies, and project performance. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(7):1360-1383. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.11.007
56.
Zwikael O, Chih YY, Meredith JR. Project benefit management: Setting effective target benefits. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(4):650-658. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.002
57.
Simard M, Aubry M, Laberge D. The utopia of order versus chaos: A conceptual framework for governance, organizational design and governmentality in projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(3):460-473. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.003
58.
RIBA Plan of Work 2013. https://www.ribaplanofwork.com/
59.
The NAO Guide to Initiating Successful Projects. Published online 2011. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/NAO_Guide_Initiating_successful_projects.pdf
60.
Jennings W. Executive Politics, Risk and the Mega-Project Paradox. In: Executive Politics in Times of Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:239-263.
61.
Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(8):687-698. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011
62.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5173571
63.
Daniel E, Daniel PA. Megaprojects as complex adaptive systems: The Hinkley point C case. International Journal of Project Management. Published online June 2019. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.001
64.
Williams T, Eden C, Ackermann F, Tait A. The Effects of Design Changes and Delays on Project Costs. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1995;46(7):809-818. https://linker2.worldcat.org/?date=1995-07-01&rft.content=fulltext&rft.institution_id=132607&linktype=best&spage=809&title=Journal+of+the+Operational+Research+Society%2C+The&localstem=https%3A%2F%2Fbris.idm.oclc.org%2Flogin%3Furl%3D&atitle=The+Effects+of+Design+Changes+and+Delays+on+Project+Costs&jHome=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstor.org%2Fjournal%2Fjoperresesoci&provider=jstor&pkgName=archive&rft.oclcnum=5549630755&linkclass=to_article&aulast=Williams&issue=7&jKey=joperresesoci&rfr_id=info%2Fsid%3Aoclc.org%2FWCL&eissn=1476-9360&volume=46&linkScheme=jstor&itemnum=10.2307%2F2583965&issn=0160-5682&rft.order_by=preference
65.
Rodrigues AG, Williams TM. System dynamics in project management: assessing the impacts of client behaviour on project performance. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1998;49(1):2-15. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600490
66.
Eden C, Williams T, Ackermann F, Howick S. The role of feedback dynamics in disruption and delay on the nature of disruption and delay (D&D) in major projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2000;51(3):291-300. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600919
67.
Love PED, Mandal P, Smith J, Li H. Modelling the dynamics of design error induced rework in construction. Construction Management and Economics. 2000;18(5):567-574. doi:10.1080/014461900407374
68.
The imperial units error that downed a multi-million-dollar Mars probe | New Scientist. https://institutions.newscientist.com/article/mg24332500-200-the-imperial-units-error-that-downed-a-multi-million-dollar-mars-probe/
69.
Fink L, Pinchovski B. It is about time: Bias and its mitigation in time-saving decisions in software development projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2020;38(2):99-111. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.01.001
70.
Feylizadeh MR, Mahmoudi A, Bagherpour M, Li DF. Project crashing using a fuzzy multi-objective model considering time, cost, quality and risk under fast tracking technique: A case study. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2018;35(3):3615-3631. doi:10.3233/JIFS-18171
71.
Wang N, Wei K, Sun H. Whole Life Project Management Approach to Sustainability. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2014;30(2):246-255. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000185
72.
ELIEZER, OREN1 orenel@post.jce.ac.ilDROR, SHUKI2 dror@braude.ac.il. QFD Methodology for LINKING PROJECT SUCCESS FACTORS: to Outcomes in a Specific Business Case. QFD Methodology for LINKING PROJECT SUCCESS FACTORS: to Outcomes in a Specific Business Case. Published online 2018:40-49. doi:10.19255/JMPM01504
73.
ROMERO, ALEJANDRO1 romero-torres.alejandro@uqam.caPARÉ, MAGALIE2KHEMICI, NASSIM2. The HOT POTATO GAME roles and responsibilities for realizing IT project benefits. The HOT POTATO GAME roles and responsibilities for realizing IT project benefits. Published online 2017:72-79. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=125356361&site=ehost-live
74.
Leach LP. Critical Chain Project Management. Third edition. Artech House; 2014.
75.
Milošević D, Martinelli RJ. Project Management Toolbox. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015.
76.
Norman ES, Brotherton SA, Fried RT. Work Breakdown Structures: The Foundation for Project Management Excellence. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
77.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292088471/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Front%20Cover
78.
Kutsch E, Hall M. Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. International Journal of Project Management. 2010;28(3):245-255. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.05.003
79.
Kutsch E, Hall M. Intervening conditions on the management of project risk: Dealing with uncertainty in information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2005;23(8):591-599. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.06.009
80.
Van Os A, Van Berkel F, De Gilder D, Van Dyck C, Groenewegen P. Project risk as identity threat: explaining the development and consequences of risk discourse in an infrastructure project. International Journal of Project Management. 2015;33(4):877-888. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.016
81.
Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press; 2003. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050891
82.
Chapman C. Key points of contention in framing assumptions for risk and uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(4):303-313. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.006
83.
Jaafari A. Management of risks, uncertainties and opportunities on projects: time for a fundamental shift. International Journal of Project Management. 2001;19(2):89-101. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00047-2
84.
Zuo F, Zhang K. Selection of risk response actions with consideration of secondary risks. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(2):241-254. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.11.002
85.
Qazi A, Quigley J, Dickson A, Kirytopoulos K. Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(7):1183-1198. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.05.008
86.
Van Os A, Van Berkel F, De Gilder D, Van Dyck C, Groenewegen P. Project risk as identity threat: explaining the development and consequences of risk discourse in an infrastructure project. International Journal of Project Management. 2015;33(4):877-888. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.016
87.
Wang SQ, Dulaimi MF, Aguria MY. Risk management framework for construction projects in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics. 2004;22(3):237-252. doi:10.1080/0144619032000124689
88.
Martin Schieg. Risk management in construction project management. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 7(2):77-83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/16111699.2006.9636126?src=recsys
89.
David Hillson. When is a Risk not a Risk. https://www.who.int/management/general/risk/WhenRiskNotRisk.pdf
90.
David Hillson. What is risk? Towards a common definition. http://risk-doctor.com/pdf-files/def0402.pdf
91.
Nicolas Bouleau. To understand risk, use your imagination | New Scientist. Published online 22AD. https://institutions.newscientist.com/article/mg21028186-400-to-understand-risk-use-your-imagination/
92.
Ward S, Chapman C. Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Project Management. 2003;21(2):97-105. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00080-1
93.
Daniel PA, Daniel C. Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(1):184-197. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.004
94.
Wied M, Koch-Ørvad N, Welo T, Oehmen J. Managing exploratory projects: A repertoire of approaches and their shared underpinnings. International Journal of Project Management. 2020;38(2):75-84. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.12.002
95.
Lima PF de A, Verbano C. Project Risk Management Implementation in SMEs: A Case Study from Italy. Journal of technology management & innovation. 2019;14(1):3-10. doi:10.4067/S0718-27242019000100003
96.
Miller R, Lessard D. Understanding and managing risks in large engineering projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2001;19(8):437-443. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00045-X
97.
Raftery J. Risk Analysis in Project Management. 1st ed. E & FN Spon
98.
Stewart RW, Fortune J. Application of systems thinking to the identification, avoidance and prevention of risk. International Journal of Project Management. 1995;13(5):279-286. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(95)00024-K
99.
Raydugin Y. Project Risk Management: Essential Methods for Project Teams and Decision Makers. Wiley; 2013.
100.
Kim Heldman , and Kim Heldman. Project Manager’s Spotlight on Risk Management. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2005. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=267263
101.
Willumsen P, Oehmen J, Stingl V, Geraldi J. Value creation through project risk management. International Journal of Project Management. 2019;37(5):731-749. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.007
102.
Taroun A. Towards a better modelling and assessment of construction risk: Insights from a literature review. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32(1):101-115. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.03.004
103.
Ackermann F, Eden C, Williams T, Howick S. Systemic risk assessment: a case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 2007;58(1):39-51. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602105
104.
Akintoye AS, MacLeod MJ. Risk analysis and management in construction. International Journal of Project Management. 1997;15(1):31-38. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X
105.
Xia N, Zou PXW, Griffin MA, Wang X, Zhong R. Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(5):701-715. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.006
106.
Farooq MU, Thaheem MJ, Arshad H. Improving the risk quantification under behavioural tendencies: A tale of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(3):414-428. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.12.004
107.
Chapman C. Project risk analysis and management—PRAM the generic process. International Journal of Project Management. 1997;15(5):273-281. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00079-8
108.
Zhang H. A redefinition of the project risk process: Using vulnerability to open up the event-consequence link. International Journal of Project Management. 2007;25(7):694-701. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.004
109.
Guo F, Chang-Richards Y, Wilkinson S, Li TC. Effects of project governance structures on the management of risks in major infrastructure projects: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32(5):815-826. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.001
110.
Raz T, Michael E. Use and benefits of tools for project risk management. International Journal of Project Management. 2001;19(1):9-17. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00036-8
111.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5173571
112.
Acebes F, Pajares J, Galán JM, López-Paredes A. A new approach for project control under uncertainty. Going back to the basics. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32(3):423-434. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.08.003
113.
Bryde D, Unterhitzenberger C, Joby R. Conditions of success for earned value analysis in projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(3):474-484. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.12.002
114.
The imperial units error that downed a multi-million-dollar Mars probe | New Scientist. Published online 2AD. https://institutions.newscientist.com/article/mg24332500-200-the-imperial-units-error-that-downed-a-multi-million-dollar-mars-probe/
115.
Zuo F, Zhang K. Selection of risk response actions with consideration of secondary risks. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(2):241-254. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.11.002
116.
Rozenes S, Vitner G, Spraggett S. Project Control: Literature Review. Project Management Journal. 2006;37(4):5-14. doi:10.1177/875697280603700402
117.
Jones stephen. Agile and Earned Value. https://www.apm.org.uk/media/1190/agile-and-earned-value.pdf
118.
Milošević D, Martinelli RJ. Project Management Toolbox. Second edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2015.
119.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292088471/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Front%20Cover
120.
Mirko Sokovic. Basic Quality Tools in Continuous Improvement Process. Strojniski Vestnik. 2009;55(5). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299050377_Basic_Quality_Tools_in_Continuous_Improvement_Process
121.
Shenhar AJ, Dvir D, Levy O, Maltz AC. Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept. Long Range Planning. 2001;34(6):699-725. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00097-8
122.
Atkinson R. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management. 1999;17(6):337-342. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6
123.
Jepsen AL, Eskerod P. Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International Journal of Project Management. 2009;27(4):335-343. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.04.002
124.
Friedman AL, Miles S. Developing Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management Studies. 2002;39(1):1-21. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00280
125.
Sutterfield JS, Friday-Stroud SS, Shivers-Blackwell SL. A Case Study of Project and Stakeholder Management Failures: Lessons Learned. Project Management Journal. 2006;37(5):26-35. doi:10.1177/875697280603700504
126.
Xia N, Zou PXW, Griffin MA, Wang X, Zhong R. Towards integrating construction risk management and stakeholder management: A systematic literature review and future research agendas. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(5):701-715. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.006
127.
Newcombe R. From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construction Management and Economics. 2003;21(8):841-848. doi:10.1080/0144619032000072137
128.
Jing Yang. Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 15(4):337-348. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3846/1392-3730.2009.15.337-348?src=recsys
129.
Karlsen JT. Project Stakeholder Management. Engineering Management Journal. 2002;14(4):19-24. doi:10.1080/10429247.2002.11415180
130.
Rowlinson S, Cheung YKF. Stakeholder management through empowerment: modelling project success. Construction Management and Economics. 2008;26(6):611-623. doi:10.1080/01446190802071182
131.
Bryson JM. What to do when Stakeholders matter. Public Management Review. 2004;6(1):21-53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722
132.
Olander S, Landin A. A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process. Construction Management and Economics. 2008;26(6):553-561. doi:10.1080/01446190701821810
133.
Olander S. Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction Management and Economics. 2007;25(3):277-287. doi:10.1080/01446190600879125
134.
LOVE PED, MANDAL P, LI H. Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction. Construction Management and Economics. 1999;17(4):505-517. doi:10.1080/014461999371420
135.
Love PED, Li H. Quantifying the causes and costs of rework in construction. Construction Management and Economics. 2000;18(4):479-490. doi:10.1080/01446190050024897
136.
Love PED, Edwards DJ. Forensic project management: The underlying causes of rework in construction projects. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems. 2004;21(3):207-228. doi:10.1080/10286600412331295955
137.
Cherns AB, Bryant DT. Studying the client’s role in construction management. Construction Management and Economics. 1984;2(2):177-184. doi:10.1080/01446198400000016
138.
Bresnen MJ, Haslam CO. Construction industry clients: A survey of their attributes and project management practices. Construction Management and Economics. 1991;9(4):327-342. doi:10.1080/01446199100000026
139.
Lehtinen J, Aaltonen K. Organizing external stakeholder engagement in inter-organizational projects: Opening the black box. International Journal of Project Management. 2020;38(2):85-98. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.12.001
140.
Ijs̃ L, Tuominen K. Quality in Project Management: ISO 10006 : Self-Assessment Work Book. Benchmarking Ltd; 2005.
141.
Gunsteren LA van, Binnekamp R, Graaf RP de. Stakeholder-Oriented Project Management: Tools and Concepts. Vol v. 6. IOS Press; 2011.
142.
Friedman AL, Miles S. Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press; 2006.
143.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292088471/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Front%20Cover
144.
Hall M. DBFO and the supply chain. Published online 2009. https://uob-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/eclaf_bristol_ac_uk/EWHDlFn23U1PkqdCnKbYg5sBfpmSLXYKCDKRM77UT-OORw?e=cxz6Ds
145.
Hall M, Holt R, Graves A. Private finance, public roads: configuring the supply chain in PFI highway construction. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. 2000;6(3-4):227-235. doi:10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00018-6
146.
Cui C, Liu Y, Hope A, Wang J. Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(5):773-794. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.004
147.
Wang Y, Cui P, Liu J. Analysis of the risk-sharing ratio in PPP projects based on government minimum revenue guarantees. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(6):899-909. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.007
148.
You J, Chen Y, Wang W, Shi C. Uncertainty, opportunistic behavior, and governance in construction projects: The efficacy of contracts. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(5):795-807. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.002
149.
Wang Y, Cui P, Liu J. Analysis of the risk-sharing ratio in PPP projects based on government minimum revenue guarantees. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(6):899-909. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.007
150.
Ning Y. Impact of quality performance ambiguity on contractor’s opportunistic behaviors in person-to-organization projects: The mediating roles of contract design and application. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(4):640-649. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.008
151.
Cui C, Liu Y, Hope A, Wang J. Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(5):773-794. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.004
152.
Benítez-Ávila C, Hartmann A, Dewulf G, Henseler J. Interplay of relational and contractual governance in public-private partnerships: The mediating role of relational norms, trust and partners’ contribution. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(3):429-443. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.12.005
153.
Thomé AMT, Scavarda LF, Scavarda A, Thomé FES de S. Similarities and contrasts of complexity, uncertainty, risks, and resilience in supply chains and temporary multi-organization projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(7):1328-1346. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.10.012
154.
Davies A, Dodgson M, Gann D. Dynamic Capabilities in Complex Projects: The Case of London Heathrow Terminal 5. Project Management Journal. 2016;47(2):26-46. doi:10.1002/pmj.21574
155.
Moodley K, Smith N, Preece CN. Stakeholder matrix for ethical relationships in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics. 2008;26(6):625-632. doi:10.1080/01446190801965368
156.
Taggart M, Koskela L, Rooke J. The role of the supply chain in the elimination and reduction of construction rework and defects: an action research approach. Construction Management and Economics. 2014;32(7-8):829-842. doi:10.1080/01446193.2014.904965
157.
Taggart M, Koskela L, Rooke J. The role of the supply chain in the elimination and reduction of construction rework and defects: an action research approach. Construction Management and Economics. 2014;32(7-8):829-842. doi:10.1080/01446193.2014.904965
158.
Osipova E, Eriksson PE. How procurement options influence risk management in construction projects. Construction Management and Economics. 2011;29(11):1149-1158. doi:10.1080/01446193.2011.639379
159.
Raisbeck P, Duffield C, Xu M. Comparative performance of PPPs and traditional procurement in Australia. Construction Management and Economics. 2010;28(4):345-359. doi:10.1080/01446190903582731
160.
Akintoye A. Design and build: a survey of construction contractors’ views. Construction Management and Economics. 1994;12(2):155-163. doi:10.1080/01446199400000021
161.
Anumba CJ, Evbuomwan NFO. Concurrent engineering in design-build projects. Construction Management and Economics. 1997;15(3):271-281. doi:10.1080/014461997373006
162.
Ling FYY, Kerh SH. Comparing the Performance of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build Building Projects in Singapore. Architectural Science Review. 2004;47(2):163-175. doi:10.1080/00038628.2004.9697040
163.
Bresnen M, Marshall N. Partnering in construction: a critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction Management and Economics. 2000;18(2):229-237. doi:10.1080/014461900370852
164.
LAM EWM, Chan APC, Chan DWM. Potential Problems of Running Design-build Projects in Construction. HKIE Transactions. 2003;10(3):8-14. doi:10.1080/1023697X.2003.10667915
165.
Shakar Reddy, M. Raja1 rajashakarmalae@gmail.comJigeesh, Nasina2 jigeeshn@gmail.comKumar, Prabhu3 prabsjntu@yahoo.co.in. The Integration of Project Management with Supply Chain Management in Indian Pharmaceutical Projects. The Integration of Project Management with Supply Chain Management in Indian Pharmaceutical Projects. 2017;14(Issue 4):61-70. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=127233938&site=ehost-live
166.
Tang Y, Chen Y, Hua Y, Fu Y. Impacts of risk allocation on conflict negotiation costs in construction projects: Does managerial control matter? International Journal of Project Management. 2020;38(3):188-199. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.03.002
167.
Bing L, Akintoye A, Edwards PJ, Hardcastle C. The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management. 2005;23(1):25-35. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.006
168.
Loosemore M, McCarthy CS. Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice. 2008;134(1):95-105. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2008)134:1(95)
169.
Melese Y, Lumbreras S, Ramos A, Stikkelman R, Herder P. Cooperation under uncertainty: Assessing the value of risk sharing and determining the optimal risk-sharing rule for agents with pre-existing business and diverging risk attitudes. International Journal of Project Management. 2017;35(3):530-540. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.007
170.
Ng A, Loosemore M. Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure. International Journal of Project Management. 2007;25(1):66-76. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.005
171.
Shi C, Chen Y, You J, Yao H. Asset Specificity and Contractors’ Opportunistic Behavior: Moderating Roles of Contract and Trust. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2018;34(5). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000632
172.
Wang W, Chen Y, Zhang S, Wang Y. Contractual Complexity in Construction Projects. Project Management Journal. 2018;49(3):46-61. doi:10.1177/8756972818770589
173.
Xiang P, Zhou J, Zhou X, Ye K. Construction Project Risk Management Based on the View of Asymmetric Information. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2012;138(11):1303-1311. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000548
174.
Zaghloul R, Hartman F. Construction contracts: the cost of mistrust. International Journal of Project Management. 2003;21(6):419-424. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00082-0
175.
Zhang S, Zhang S, Gao Y, Ding X. Contractual Governance: Effects of Risk Allocation on Contractors’ Cooperative Behavior in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2016;142(6). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001111
176.
Turner JR. Contracting for Project Management. Ashgate Pub; 2007.
177.
Andreas Opelt, , Boris Gloger, , Wolfgang Pfarl, , and Ralf Mittermayr. Agile Contracts : Creating and Managing Successful Projects with Scrum. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=1191572
178.
Wang Y. Evolution of public–private partnership models in American toll road development: Learning based on public institutions’ risk management. International Journal of Project Management. 2015;33(3):684-696. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.10.006
179.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5173571
180.
Shore B. Systematic biases and culture in project failures. Project Management Journal. 2008;39(4):5-16. doi:10.1002/pmj.20082
181.
Flyvbjerg, Bent. Design by Deception: The Politics of Megaproject Approval. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2238047
182.
Carton AM, Cummings JM. A Theory of Subgroups in Work Teams. Academy of Management Review. 2012;37(3). http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=76609308&site=ehost-live
183.
Drach-Zahavy A, Somech A. From an Intrateam to an Interteam Perspective of Effectiveness: The Role of Interdependence and Boundary Activities. Small Group Research. 2010;41(2):143-174. doi:10.1177/1046496409356479
184.
Phua FTT. The antecedents of co‐operative behaviour among project team members: an alternative perspective on an old issue. Construction Management and Economics. 2004;22(10):1033-1045. doi:10.1080/01446190310001649092
185.
Brunet M. Governance-as-practice for major public infrastructure projects: A case of multilevel project governing. International Journal of Project Management. 2019;37(2):283-297. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.02.007
186.
Bjorvatn T, Wald A. Project complexity and team-level absorptive capacity as drivers of project management performance. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(6):876-888. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.05.003
187.
Winch GM. Three domains of project organising. International Journal of Project Management. 2014;32(5):721-731. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.012
188.
Aubry M, Lavoie-Tremblay M. Rethinking organizational design for managing multiple projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(1):12-26. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.012
189.
Bakker RM. Taking Stock of Temporary Organizational Forms: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010;12(4):466-486. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00281.x
190.
Miterev M, Mancini M, Turner R. Towards a design for the project-based organization. International Journal of Project Management. 2017;35(3):479-491. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.007
191.
Chizhik AW, Shelly RK, Troyer L. Intragroup Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction. Journal of Social Issues. 2009;65(2):251-259. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01599.x
192.
Jehn KA. A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995;40(2). doi:10.2307/2393638
193.
Jehn KA. A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1997;42(3). doi:10.2307/2393737
194.
Sutterfield, J. Scott1Friday-Stroud, Shawnta S.1Shivers-Blackwell, Sheryl L.1. How NOT to Manage a Project: Conflict Management Lessons Learned from a DOD Case Study. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management. 2007;8(Issue 3):218-238. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=26768057&site=ehost-live
195.
Wall JA, Callister RR. Conflict and Its Management. Journal of Management. 1995;21(3):515-558. doi:10.1177/014920639502100306
196.
Liu JYC, Chen HG, Chen CC, Sheu TS. Relationships among interpersonal conflict, requirements uncertainty, and software project performance. International Journal of Project Management. 2011;29(5):547-556. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.04.007
197.
Arditi D, Nayak S, Damci A. Effect of organizational culture on delay in construction. International Journal of Project Management. 2017;35(2):136-147. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.018
198.
Lloyd Fletcher, Sturdy A. The Subjectivity of Boundary Spanning – Composite Boundaries in Project Working. https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/en/publications/the-subjectivity-of-boundary-spanning--composite-boundaries-in-project-working(7d572c51-231e-44a6-b9e4-67cca3eae718).html
199.
Dibble R, Gibson CB. Crossing team boundaries: A theoretical model of team boundary permeability and a discussion of why it matters. Human Relations. 2018;71(7):925-950. doi:10.1177/0018726717735372
200.
You really can fool some of the people, all of the time. The Economist. Published online 31AD. https://www-economist-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/international/2019/10/31/you-really-can-fool-some-of-the-people-all-of-the-time
201.
Simard M, Aubry M, Laberge D. The utopia of order versus chaos: A conceptual framework for governance, organizational design and governmentality in projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(3):460-473. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.01.003
202.
Stingl V, Geraldi J. Errors, lies and misunderstandings: Systematic review on behavioural decision making in projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2017;35(2):121-135. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.009
203.
UDDIN, SHAHADAT1 shahadat.uddin@sydney.edu.au. SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS in Project Management. SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS in Project Management. Published online 2017:106-113. doi:10.19255/JMPM01310
204.
Oswald A, Köhler J, Schmitt R. Project Management at the Edge of Chaos. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2018. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48261-2
205.
Maylor H. Project Management. 4th ed. Financial Times Prentice Hall; 2010. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292088471/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Front%20Cover
206.
Augustine S, Payne B, Sencindiver F, Woodcock S. Agile project management. Communications of the ACM. 2005;48(12):85-89. doi:10.1145/1101779.1101781
207.
Hodgson D, Cicmil S. The other side of projects: the case for critical project studies. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 2008;1(1):142-152. doi:10.1108/17538370810846487
208.
Winter M, Smith C, Morris P, Cicmil S. Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(8):638-649. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.009
209.
Highsmith JA. Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. Addison-Wesley http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&jid=3C85&site=ehost-live
210.
Swan J, Scarbrough H, Newell S. Why don’t (or do) organizations learn from projects? Management Learning. 2010;41(3):325-344. doi:10.1177/1350507609357003
211.
Patanakul P, Kwak YH, Zwikael O, Liu M. What impacts the performance of large-scale government projects? International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(3):452-466. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.001
212.
Duffield SM, Whitty SJ. Application of the Systemic Lessons Learned Knowledge model for Organisational Learning through Projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(7):1280-1293. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.07.001
213.
Love PED, Teo P, Ackermann F, et al. Reduce rework, improve safety: an empirical inquiry into the precursors to error in construction. Production Planning & Control. 2018;29(5):353-366. doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1424961
214.
Morris P. Reconstructing Project Management Reprised: A Knowledge Perspective. Project Management Journal. 2013;44(5):6-23. doi:10.1002/pmj.21369
215.
Pinto JK, Winch G. The unsettling of "settled science:” The past and future of the management of projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2016;34(2):237-245. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.07.011
216.
Cicmil S, Williams T, Thomas J, Hodgson D. Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(8):675-686. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006
217.
Thomas J. Problematising Project Management. In: Making Projects Critical. Palgrave Macmillan; 2006:90-107.
218.
The National Programme for IT in the NHS: an update on the delivery of detailed care records systems - Public Accounts Committee. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmpubacc/1070/107002.htm
219.
Ralph P. The two paradigms of software development research. Science of Computer Programming. 2018;156:68-89. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2018.01.002
220.
Heaton KM, Skok W, Kovela S. Learning Lessons from Software Implementation Projects: An Exploratory Study. Knowledge and Process Management. 2016;23(4):293-306. doi:10.1002/kpm.1525
221.
Koskela L, Ferrentelli A, Niiranen J, Pikas E. Epistemological Explanation of Lean Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 145(2). https://ascelibrary.org/doi/full/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0001597
222.
Daniel PA, Daniel C. Complexity, uncertainty and mental models: From a paradigm of regulation to a paradigm of emergence in project management. International Journal of Project Management. 2018;36(1):184-197. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.004
223.
Adelakun O, Garcia R, Tabaka T, Ismail R. Hybrid Project Management: Agile with Discipline. In: International Conference on Information Resources Management (CONF-IRM). ; 5AD. https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=confirm2017
224.
Alter R. Brexit and the moon landing from a project complexity perspective: A comparative case study. Case Studies in Business and Management. 2018;5(2). doi:10.5296/csbm.v5i2.13484
225.
MIRZAEI, MARYAM1 Mmirzaei@unitec.ac.nzMABIN, VICTORIA2. Agile Project Management and Public Policy Development Projects: A case study from New Zealand. Agile Project Management and Public Policy Development Projects: A case study from New Zealand. 2017;15(Issue 1):59-75. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=126200163&site=ehost-live
226.
Sanchez, Felipe1Bonjour, Eric2Micaëlli, Jean-Pierre3Monticolo, Davy4. A Step for Improving THE TRANSITION BETWEEN TRADITIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT TO AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT Using a Project Management Maturity Model. A Step for Improving THE TRANSITION BETWEEN TRADITIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT TO AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT Using a Project Management Maturity Model. 2019;7(Issue 1):102-119. doi:10.19255/JMPM01906
227.
HENRIKSEN, ANDRE1 andre.henriksen@uit.noPEDERSEN, SVEN ARNE R.2 sven.arne.r.pedersen@uit.no. A qualitative case study on AGILE PRACTICES AND PROJECT SUCCESS in agile software projects. A qualitative case study on AGILE PRACTICES AND PROJECT SUCCESS in agile software projects. Published online 2017:62-73. doi:10.19255/JMPM01306
228.
Gharaibeh, Hani1. Improving Project Team Learning in Major Projects -- A Case Study Comparison. Improving Project Team Learning in Major Projects -- A Case Study Comparison. 2011;9(Issue 2):1-13. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=110267984&site=ehost-live
229.
Chen, Edward T.1 edwardchen@uml.edu. EMERGING TRENDS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: EXPEDITING BUSINESS. Published online 2015:1-13. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=116281798&site=ehost-live
230.
Keinz P, Hienerth C, Gemünden HG, Killen CP, Sicotte H. Special issue: Managing open and user innovation by projects: Sensing, seizing and transforming. International Journal of Project Management. Published online February 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.001
231.
Project Management Institute. Agile Project Management: Essentials from the Project Management Journal. J. Wiley & Sons; 2013.
232.
Morris PWG. Reconstructing Project Management. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
233.
Silvius G, Schipper R, Van den Brink J. Sustainability in Project Management. Ashgate Pub; 2012.
234.
University Of Roskilde. Project Management Theory Meets Practice. Samfundslitteratur; 2015.
235.
Kerzner H. Using the Project Management Maturity Model: Strategic Planning for Project Management. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2019.
236.
Rad PF, Levin G. Achieving Project Management Success Using Virtual Teams. J. Ross Publishing, Incorporated; 2014.
237.
Grisham TW. International Project Management: Leadership in Complex Environments. Wiley; 2010.
238.
Perrin R. Real World Project Management: Beyond Conventional Wisdom, Best Practices, and Project Methodologies. John Wiley & Sons
239.
Cobb CG. Making Sense of Agile Project Management: Balancing Control and Agility. Wiley
240.
Aramo-Immonen H, Vanharanta H. Project management: The task of holistic systems thinking. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing. 2009;19(6):582-600. doi:10.1002/hfm.20185
241.
Kim H. Pries , and Jon M. Quigley. Scrum Project Management. Taylor & Francis Group; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=589930
242.
John Goodpasture. Project Management the Agile Way : Making It Work in the Enterprise. J. Ross Publishing; 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3319473
243.
Jamie Lynn Cooke. Everything You Want to Know about Agile : How to Get Agile Results in a Less-Than-Agile Organization. IT Governance Ltd; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=918799
244.
Peter W. G. Morris. Reconstructing Project Management. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=1152686
245.
Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. International Journal of Project Management. 2006;24(8):687-698. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.011
246.
Britain’s engineering reputation goes down the tube. The Economist. Published online 20181208. https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/12/08/britains-engineering-reputation-goes-down-the-tube
247.
Britain’s government tries to trim the £56bn cost of HS2. The Economist. Published online 20190815. https://www.economist.com/britain/2019/08/15/britains-government-tries-to-trim-the-ps56bn-cost-of-hs2
248.
Louise Butcher. High Speed 2 (HS2) Phase 2a. https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN07082
249.
HS2: 12 arguments for and against - BBC News. Published online 24AD. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24159571
250.
Government announces independent review into HS2 programme - GOV.UK. Published online 21AD. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-independent-review-into-hs2-programme
251.
Andrew Haylen. High Speed 2: the business case, costs and spending. Published online 27AD. https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8601
252.
High Speed 2 - Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Speed_2
253.
High Speed Two (HS2) Limited - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/high-speed-two-limited
254.
House of Lords - The Economics of High Speed 2 - Economic Affairs Committee. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldeconaf/134/13404.htm
255.
HS2 - What is it and how can my business benefit? | GBCC. https://www.greaterbirminghamchambers.com/research-campaigning/hot-topics/hs2
256.
HS2 direct lines ‘could bring £1.4bn of benefits’ - The Transport Network. Published 9AD. https://www.transport-network.co.uk/HS2-direct-lines-could-bring-14bn-of-benefits/16147
257.
John Stone. HS2 is the only option for Britain’s railways | The Independent. Published online 31AD. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hs2-logistics-financial-benefit-controversy-a8937936.html
258.
HS2 make or break decision looms | Railnews | Today’s news for Tomorrow’s railway. Published online 21AD. https://www.railnews.co.uk/news/2019/08/21-hs2-make-or-break-decision.html
259.
HS2: Review to examine costs and benefits of rail project - BBC News. Published online 21AD. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49420332
260.
HS2 will serve wealthier passengers and deliver more benefits to London than the North | New Economics Foundation. https://neweconomics.org/2019/03/hs2-will-serve-wealthier-passengers-and-deliver-more-benefits-to-london-than-the-north
261.
High Speed 2 home page. https://www.hs2.org.uk/
262.
Simon Jenkins. Boris Johnson should have the guts to kill HS2 | Simon Jenkins. Guardian. Published online 28 August 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug/28/boris-johnson-hs2-disastrous-rail-scheme
263.
HS2 costs and benefits: a search for clear evidence | Letters. Guardian. Published online 25 August 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/aug/25/hs2-costs-and-benefits-a-search-for-clear-evidence
264.
Lords: HS2 needs new costs and benefits assessment | International Railway Journal. Published 16AD. https://www.railjournal.com/passenger/high-speed/lords-hs2-costs-benefits-assessment/
265.
Munro A. HS2 railway, UK – why the country needs it. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport. Published online 23 November 2018:1-9. doi:10.1680/jtran.18.00040
266.
Net zero: HS2 review to examine environmental benefits - Energy Live News. https://www.energylivenews.com/2019/08/21/net-zero-hs2-review-to-examine-environmental-benefits/
267.
Payne S. The benefits of HS2 are becoming harder to discern. Financial Times. Published online 26AD. https://www.ft.com/content/6c3981be-90bd-11e8-bb8f-a6a2f7bca546
268.
Plimmer G. Why HS2 rail line is way over budget and badly delayed. Financial Times. Published online 19AD. https://www.ft.com/content/cf3ff750-d92a-11e9-8f9b-77216ebe1f17
269.
Pros and Cons of High Speed Rail HS2 | Economics Help. https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/3088/economics/pros-and-cons-of-high-speed-rail-hs2/
270.
HS2 benefits ‘substantially undervalued’ amid rising costs | News | Railway Gazette. Published online 3AD. https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/hs2-benefits-substantially-undervalued-amid-rising-costs/54475.article
271.
STOP HS2 - The national campaign against High Speed Rail 2. http://stophs2.org/
272.
Sweet R. HS2’s moment of truth. Construction Research and Innovation. 2019;10(3):54-59. doi:10.1080/20450249.2019.1654235
273.
The Case Against HS2 - High Speed 2 Action Alliance. http://www.hs2actionalliance.org/case-against-hs2/
274.
Unlocking the benefits of HS2 | Rail Engineer. https://www.railengineer.co.uk/2019/04/04/unlocking-the-benefits-of-hs2/
275.
HS2 in balance as government reviews rail scheme’s costs and benefits | News | Architects Journal. https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/hs2-in-balance-as-government-reviews-rail-schemes-costs-and-benefits/10044140.article
276.
What benefits will the HS2 Railway Network bring? – RG Group. https://rg-group.co.uk/what-benefits-will-the-hs2-railway-network-bring/
277.
Why archaeologists love HS2. The Economist. Published online 20181201. https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/12/01/why-archaeologists-love-hs2
278.
House of Lords - Rethinking High Speed 2 - Economic Affairs Committee. Published online 16AD. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201719/ldselect/ldeconaf/359/35902.htm
279.
HS2 should happen despite rising cost, says review - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50388738
280.
HS2 review criticised by deputy chair of panel - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50280270
281.
HS2 route: How much will the rail scheme cost? - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16473296
282.
HS2’s ballooning budget was ‘covered up’ - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49482701
283.
HS2 benefits hugely underestimated - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/cgdwvpvk35zt/hs2
284.
HS2 costs out of control, says review’s deputy chair - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50995116
285.
Rowena Mason. Cancelling HS2 would fail new Tory voters, Boris Johnson told. Guardian. Published online 7 January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/07/cancelling-hs2-would-fail-new-tory-voters-boris-johnson-told
286.
HS2 phase 2 civils design costs rise 50% | Construction Enquirer. https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2019/12/20/hs2-phase-2-civils-design-cost-rises-50/
287.
HS2 revises environmental policy document. https://www.endsreport.com/article/1668736/hs2-revises-environmental-policy-document
288.
HS2 Ltd denies watering down environmental pledges - The Transport Network. https://www.transport-network.co.uk/HS2-Ltd-denies-watering-down-environmental-pledges/16361
289.
HS2: Give me the facts, says Shapps - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51171249
290.
Christian Wolmar. HS2 is a calamity, but it would be politically toxic for Boris Johnson to scrap it | Christian Wolmar. Guardian. Published online 21 January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/21/boris-johnson-hs2-scrap-invest-buses
291.
Gwyn Topham. Can the troubled HS2 project get back on track? Guardian. Published online 20 January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/20/can-the-troubled-hs2-project-get-back-on-track
292.
Gwyn Topham. HS2 costs could rise to £106bn or more, warns government review. Guardian. Published online 20 January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/20/hs2-costs-government-review-west-midlands-manchester-leeds
293.
Use HS2 billions to help West Midlands and Staffordshire commuters - expert | Express & Star. https://www.expressandstar.com/news/transport/2020/01/27/use-hs2-billions-to-help-west-midlands-and-staffordshire-commuters-expert/
294.
Whistleblowers say public have been ‘deceived’ over cost of HS2: Wessex FM - News. https://www.wessexfm.com/news/national/3032238/whistleblowers-say-public-have-been-deceived-over-cost-of-hs2/
295.
HS2: Scrapping troubled rail link could cost £12bn, say reports | The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hs2-cost-scrap-railway-london-birmingham-manchester-leeds-a9302126.html
296.
HS2 risks misjudged from the start, says watchdog - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51223101
297.
High Speed Two: A progress update - National Audit Office (NAO) Report. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/high-speed-two-a-progress-update/
298.
High Speed Two: A progress update - National Audit Office (NAO) Report. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/high-speed-two-a-progress-update/
299.
Government underestimated HS2 "complexity and risk”, says National Audit Office. https://www.newstatesman.com/spotlight/transport/2020/01/government-underestimated-hs2-complexity-and-risk-says-national-audit
300.
HS2: Six reasons why the rail route is so expensive - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51415590
301.
Boris Johnson to repay the north by approving HS2 | News | The Times. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/boris-johnson-to-repay-north-by-approving-hs2-vwbgfjpdj
302.
North and Midlands most opposed to HS2, survey reveals | News | Building. https://www.building.co.uk/news/north-and-midlands-most-opposed-to-hs2-survey-reveals/5104118.article
303.
Oakervee review calls for HS2 Ltd to be stripped of Euston project. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/d8399f72-4744-11ea-aeb3-955839e06441
304.
HS2: Government to give high-speed rail line the go-ahead - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51443421
305.
Kate Proctor. HS2 to be given go-ahead by government despite fierce opposition. Guardian. Published online 11 February 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/feb/11/government-to-give-hs2-go-ahead-despite-fierce-opposition-boris-johnson-high-speed-rail
306.
HS2: UK in talks with China over construction of high-speed line - BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-51512831
307.
Jennings W. Executive Politics, Risk and the Mega-Project Paradox. In: Executive Politics in Times of Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012:239-263.
308.
Flyvbjerg B, Bruzelius N, Rothengatter W. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press; 2003. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050891
309.
HS2 and the Chinese: What now? | Comment | Building. https://www.building.co.uk/hs2-and-the-chinese-what-now/5104354.article
310.
HS2 | Curzon Street landowners could claim millions after court ruling - New Civil Engineer. https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-curzon-street-landowners-could-claim-millions-after-court-ruling-18-02-2020/
311.
HS2 ‘perfect example’ of broken funding system, claims finance chief - New Civil Engineer. https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-perfect-example-of-broken-funding-system-claims-finance-chief-25-02-2020/
312.
Birmingham MPs call for Boris Johnson to deliver the ‘promised benefits of HS2’ for Brummies - Birmingham Live. Published online 17AD. https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/birmingham-mps-call-boris-johnson-16929116
313.
High Speed Two: A progress update - National Audit Office (NAO) Press release. https://www.nao.org.uk/press-release/high-speed-two-a-progress-update/
