1
Easterling PE. Women in Tragic Space. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 1987;34. doi:10.1111/j.2041-5370.1987.tb00551.x
2
Foley HP. Reflections of women in antiquity. New York: : Gordon and Breach Science Publishers 1981. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1111406
3
Foley HP. Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=445484
4
Goldhill S. Representing democracy: women at the Great Dionysia. In: Ritual, Finance, Politics: Athenian Democratic Accounts Presented to David Lewis. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994. 347–69.
5
Goldhill S. The audience of Athenian tragedy. In: Easterling PE, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge, U.K.: : Cambridge University Press 1997. 54–68.
6
Gould J. Law, Custom and Myth: Aspects of the Social Position of Women in Classical Athens. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 19800101;100. doi:10.2307/630731
7
Griffith M. Extended families, marriage, and inter-city relations in (later) Athenian  tragedy. In: Why Athens?: a reappraisal of tragic politics. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. 175–208.
8
Hall E. The sociology of Athenian tragedy. In: Easterling PE, ed. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge, U.K.: : Cambridge University Press 1997. 93–126.
9
Henderson J. Women and the Athenian Dramatic Festivals. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 1991;121.https://www.jstor.org/stable/284448
10
Marilyn A. Katz. The character of tragedy: women and the Greek imagination. Arethusa 1994;27.https://www.jstor.org/stable/26309598
11
King H. Bound to bleed: Artemis and Greek women. In: Images of women in antiquity. London: : Routledge 1993. 109–27.
12
Koloski-Ostrow AO, Lyons CL. Naked truths: women, sexuality, and gender in classical art and archaeology. London: : Routledge 1997.
13
Loraux N. Tragic ways of killing a woman. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1987.
14
Maitland J. Dynasty and Family in the Athenian City State: A View from Attic Tragedy. The Classical Quarterly 1992;42. doi:10.1017/S0009838800042555
15
March J. Euripides the misogynist. In: Euripides, women, and sexuality. London: : Routledge 1990. 32–75.
16
McClure L. Spoken like a woman: speech and gender in Athenian drama. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1999.
17
Mueller M. Gender. In: McClure L, ed. A companion to Euripides. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: : John Wiley & Sons Inc 2017. 500–14.
18
Ormand K. Exchange and the maiden: marriage in Sophoclean tragedy. 1st ed. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1999.
19
Pritchard DM. The position of Attic women in democratic Athens. Greece and Rome 2014;61. doi:10.1017/S0017383514000072
20
Rabinowitz NS. Anxiety veiled: Euripides and the traffic in women. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 1993.
21
Rehm R. Marriage to death: the conflation of wedding and funeral rituals in Greek tragedy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1994.
22
Seaford R. The Tragic Wedding. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 1987;107. doi:10.2307/630074
23
Seaford R. The structural problems of marriage in Euripides. In: Euripides, women, and sexuality. London: : Routledge 1990. 151–76.
24
Shaw M. The Female Intruder: Women in Fifth-Century Drama. Classical Philology 1975;70.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/268229
25
Tzanetou A. Citizen-mothers on the tragic stage. In: Mothering and motherhood in ancient Greece and Rome. Austin: : University of Texas Press 2012. 97–120.
26
Wohl V. Intimate commerce: exchange, gender, and subjectivity in Greek tragedy. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1998.
27
Zeitlin F. Playing the Other: theater, theatricality, and the feminine in Greek drama. In: Nothing to do with Dionysos?: Athenian drama in its social context. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1990. 63–96.
28
Easterling PE, editor. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. 1st ed. Cambridge, U.K.: : Cambridge University Press 1997. https://doi-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/10.1017/CCOL0521412455
29
Gregory J. A companion to Greek tragedy. Malden, MA: : Blackwell Pub 2005.
30
James SL, Dillon S. A companion to women in the ancient world. Malden, MA: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=837573
31
Lloyd M. Oxford Readings in Aeschylus. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
32
Markantonatos A, editor. Brill’s companion to Sophocles. Leiden: : Brill 2012.
33
McClure L, editor. A companion to Euripides. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: : John Wiley & Sons Inc 2017.
34
Mossman J. Oxford Readings in Euripides. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
35
Ormand K. A companion to Sophocles. Hoboken: : John Wiley & Sons 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=894693
36
Segal E. Oxford readings in Greek tragedy. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: : Oxford University Press 1983.
37
Foley HP. Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=445484
38
Goldhill S. Language, sexuality, narrative, the Oresteia. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: : Cambridge University Press 1984. https://doi-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552496
39
Goldhill S. Reading Greek tragedy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. https://doi-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627354
40
Goward B. Aeschylus: Agamemnon. London: : Duckworth 2005.
41
Griffith M. Brilliant Dynasts: Power and Politics in the ‘Oresteia’. Classical Antiquity 1995;14.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/25000143
42
Hame KJ. Female Control of Funeral Rites in Greek Tragedy: Klytaimestra, Medea, and Antigone. Classical Philology 2008;103. doi:10.1086/590091
43
Marshall CW. Aeschylus, Libation bearers. London: : Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 2017.
44
McClure L. Spoken like a woman: speech and gender in Athenian drama. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1999.
45
McNeil L. Bridal Cloths, Cover-ups, and  Kharis: The ‘Carpet Scene’ in Aeschylus’  Agamemnon. Greece and Rome 2005;52.https://doi-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/gromej/cxi009
46
Robin Mitchell-Boyask. The Marriage of Cassandra and the ‘Oresteia’: Text, Image, Performance. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 2006;136.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4543294
47
Mitchell-Boyask R. Aeschylus: Eumenides. London: : Duckworth 2009.
48
Mueller M. Objects as actors: props and the poetics of performance in Greek tragedy. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2016. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226313009.001.0001
49
Charles P. Segal. Tragedy, Corporeality, and the Texture of Language: Matricide in the Three Electra Plays. The Classical World 1985;79.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4349798
50
Wohl V. Intimate commerce: exchange, gender, and subjectivity in Greek tragedy. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1998.
51
Zeitlin FI. The dynamics of misogyny: myth and mythmaking in the Oresteia. In: Playing the other: gender and society in classical Greek literature. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996. 87–122.
52
Dunn F. Where is Electra in Sophocles’ Electra? In: The play of texts and fragments: essays in honour of Martin Cropp. Leiden: : Brill 2009. 345–56.
53
Foley HP. Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=445484
54
Juffras DM. Sophocles’ Electra 973-85 and Tyrannicide. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 1991;121. doi:10.2307/284445
55
Kitzinger R. Why Mourning Becomes Elektra. Classical Antiquity 1991;10:298–327. doi:10.2307/25010954
56
Lloyd M. Sophocles: Electra. London: : Duckworth 2005.
57
Ormand K. Exchange and the maiden: marriage in Sophoclean tragedy. 1st ed. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1999.
58
Seaford R. The Destruction of Limits in Sophokles’ Elektra. The Classical Quarterly 1985;35.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/639065
59
Charles P. Segal. Tragedy, Corporeality, and the Texture of Language: Matricide in the Three Electra Plays. The Classical World 1985;79.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4349798
60
Sorum CE. The Family in Sophocles’ ‘Antigone’ and ‘Electra’. The Classical World 1982;75.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4349362
61
Wright M. The Joy of Sophocles’ Electra. Greece & Rome 2005;52.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/3567867
62
Foley HP. Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=445484
63
Gallagher RL. Making the Stronger Argument the Weaker: Euripides, ‘Electra’ 518-44. The Classical Quarterly 2003;53.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/3556211
64
BARBARA GOFF. Try to Make it Real Compared to What? Euripides’ ‘Electra’ and the Play of Genres. Illinois Classical Studies 2000;24:93–105.https://www.jstor.org/stable/23065360?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
65
Lloyd M. Realism and Character in Euripides’ ‘Electra’. Phoenix 1986;40.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/1088961
66
Mossman J. Women’s Speech in Greek Tragedy: The Case of Electra and Clytemnestra in Euripides’ ‘Electra’. The Classical Quarterly 2001;51.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/1088961
67
Charles P. Segal. Tragedy, Corporeality, and the Texture of Language: Matricide in the Three Electra Plays. The Classical World 1985;79.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4349798
68
Torrance IC. Metapoetry in Euripides. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2013. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199657834.001.0001
69
Wohl V. Euripides and the politics of form. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2015. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691166506.001.0001
70
Zeitlin FI. The Argive Festival of Hera and Euripides’ Electra. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 1970;101.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/2936074
71
Barlow SA. Stereotype and Reversal in Euripides’ ‘Medea’. Greece & Rome 1989;36.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/643169
72
Bongie EB. Heroic Elements in the Medea of Euripides. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 1977;107.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/284024
73
Cairns D. Medea: feminism or misogyny? In: Stuttard D, ed. Looking at Medea: essays and a translation of Euripides’ tragedy. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2014. 123–37.
74
Easterling PE, Gould TF, Herington CJ. The infanticide in Euripides’ Medea. In: Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1977. 177–92. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511933738.007
75
Foley HP. Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=445484
76
Hame KJ. Female Control of Funeral Rites in Greek Tragedy: Klytaimestra, Medea, and Antigone. Classical Philology 2008;103. doi:10.1086/590091
77
Visser M. Medea: daughter, sister, wife, mother: natal family uersus conjugal family in Greek and Roman myths about women. In: Cropp M, Fantham E, Scully SE, eds. Greek tragedy and its legacy: essays presented to D.J. Conacher. Calgary, Alberta, Canada: : The University of Calgary Press 1986. 149–65.
78
Williamson M. A woman’s place in Euripides’ Medea. In: Euripides, women, and sexuality. London: : Routledge 1990. 16–31.
79
Burnett AP. Revenge in Attic and later tragedy. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1998.
80
Dué C. The captive woman’s lament in Greek tragedy. 1st ed. Austin: : University of Texas Press 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3443043
81
Foley HP. Euripides: Hecuba. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
82
Mossman J. Wild justice: a study of Euripides’ Hecuba. 2nd ed. London: : Bristol Classical Press 1999.
83
Papastamati S. The Poetics of kalos thanatos in Euripides’ Hecuba: Masculine and Feminine Motifs in Polyxena’s Death. Mnemosyne 2017;70. doi:10.1163/1568525X-12341972
84
Scodel R. Δόμων ἄγαλμα: Virgin Sacrifice and Aesthetic Object. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 1996;126.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/370174
85
Scodel R. The Captive’s Dilemma: Sexual Acquiescence in Euripides Hecuba and Troades. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 1998;98. doi:10.2307/311340
86
Segal C. Violence and the Other: Greek, Female, and Barbarian in Euripides’ Hecuba. Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-) 1990;120. doi:10.2307/283981
87
Segal C. Euripides and the poetics of sorrow: art, gender, and commemoration in Alcestis, Hippolytus, and Hecuba. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 1993. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1167594
88
Wohl V. Euripides and the politics of form. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2015. doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691166506.001.0001
89
Zeitlin FI. The body’s revenge: Dionysos and tragic action in Euripides’ Hekabe. In: Playing the other: gender and society in classical Greek literature. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996.
90
Cairns DL. Sophocles, Antigone. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2016. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=4585035
91
Cropp M. Antigone’s Final Speech (Sophocles, 891–928). Greece and Rome 1997;44:137–60. doi:10.1093/gr/44.2.137
92
Foley HP. Female acts in Greek tragedy. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=445484
93
Goldhill S. Reading Greek tragedy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. https://doi-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627354
94
Hame KJ. Female Control of Funeral Rites in Greek Tragedy: Klytaimestra, Medea, and Antigone. Classical Philology 2008;103. doi:10.1086/590091
95
Murnaghan S. Antigone 904-920 and the Institution of Marriage. The American Journal of Philology 1986;107. doi:10.2307/294602
96
Neuburg M. How Like a Woman: Antigone’s ‘Inconsistency’. The Classical Quarterly 1990;40. doi:10.1017/S000983880002680X
97
Ormand K. Exchange and the maiden: marriage in Sophoclean tragedy. 1st ed. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1999.
98
Richard Seaford. The Imprisonment of Women in Greek Tragedy. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 1990;110.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/631733
99
Segal E. Antigone: death and love, Hades and Dionysus. In: Oxford readings in Greek tragedy. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: : Oxford University Press 1983. 167–76.
100
Sorum CE. The Family in Sophocles’ ‘Antigone’ and ‘Electra’. The Classical World 1982;75.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4349362
101
Zellner HM. Antigone and the Wife of Intaphrenes. The Classical World 1997;90.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4351958
102
Goldhill S. Antigone and the Politics of Sisterhood. In: Sophocles and the language of tragedy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. 231–48.http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199796274.001.0001/acprof-9780199796274-chapter-9
103
Griffith M. The subject of desire in Sophocles’ Antigone. In: The soul of tragedy: essays on Athenian drama. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2005. 91–136.
104
Holland CA. After Antigone: Women, the Past, and the Future of Feminist Political Thought. American Journal of Political Science 1998;42.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/2991851
105
Holt P. Polis and Tragedy in the ‘Antigone’. Mnemosyne 1999;52.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/4433045
106
Honig B. Sacrifice, Sorority, Integrity. In: Antigone, interrupted. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. 151–89.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139583084.010
107
Honig B. Antigone, interrupted. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1139750
108
Sourvinou-Inwood C. Assumptions and the Creation of Meaning: Reading Sophocles’ Antigone. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 1989;109.https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/632037
109
Steiner G. Antigones. New York: : Oxford University Press 1984.