[1]
‘Welcome – Blackboard Learn’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ole.bris.ac.uk/webapps/portal/execute/tabs/tabAction?tab_tab_group_id=_17_1
[2]
‘POLI22202 Unit Summary’. [Online]. Available: https://www.bris.ac.uk/unit-programme-catalogue/UnitDetails.jsa?ayrCode=19%2F20&unitCode=POLI22202
[3]
‘Philosophy & Public Affairs’ [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10884963
[4]
‘Political Theory’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ptx
[5]
‘Ethics’ [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/loi/et
[6]
‘Political Studies’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/psx
[7]
‘Politics, Philosophy & Economics’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ppe
[8]
‘Contemporary Political Theory’ [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/41296
[9]
‘Journal of Political Philosophy’ [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14679760
[10]
‘Social Philosophy and Policy’ [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/all-issues
[11]
‘Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’. [Online]. Available: https://plato.stanford.edu/
[12]
A. Stilz, ‘Why Does the State Matter Morally?’,’ in Varieties of Sovereignty and Citizenship, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012, pp. 244–264 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3441798&ppg=253
[13]
J. Simmons, ‘The Problem and Its Significance’, in Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 93–101 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511809286A014/type/book_part
[14]
J. Simmons, ‘The Theories’, in Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 102–120 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511809286A015/type/book_part
[15]
Simmons, A. John, ‘The Principle of Fair Play’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 307–337 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265067?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[16]
R. P. Wolff, ‘The Conflict between Authority and Autonomy’, in In defense of anarchism, vol. Harper essays in philosophy, New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1976, pp. 20–31.
[17]
J. Hampton, Political philosophy. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1997.
[18]
J. Raz, The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986 [Online]. Available: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198248075.001.0001
[19]
J. Raz, ‘The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition’, in Ethics in the public domain: essays in the morality of law and politics, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198260691.001.0001/acprof-9780198260691-chapter-15
[20]
J.-J. Rousseau, ‘Book I, chapters 6-8.’, in Discours Sur l’Oeconomie Politique; Du Contrat Social: Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract, Oxford University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=737317&ppg=86
[21]
M. Huemer, The problem of political authority: an examination of the right to coerce and the duty to obey. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
[22]
C. W. Morris, An essay on the modern state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/an-essay-on-the-modern-state/8489C389B73031C1514B05AF9300B03E
[23]
J. C. Scott, Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1040747
[24]
A. J. Simmons, Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[25]
A. Stilz, Liberal loyalty: freedom, obligation, and the state. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rj1r
[26]
A. Stiltz, ‘Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism’, in The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory, J. T. Levy, Ed. 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198717133-e-7
[27]
M. Renzo, ‘Political Authority and Unjust Wars’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 336–357, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1111/phpr.12487.
[28]
J. Brennan, ‘The Right to a Competent Electorate’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 245, pp. 700–724, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.699.x.
[29]
E. Anderson, ‘Democracy: Intrinsic vs Instrumental value.’, in Contemporary debates in political philosophy, vol. 11, Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, pp. 213–227 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=428114&ppg=1
[30]
T. Christiano, ‘The Authority of Democracy*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 266–290, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x.
[31]
E. Anderson, ‘Democracy Intrinsic and instrumental value’, in Contemporary debates in political philosophy, vol. 11, Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, pp. 213–228 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=428114
[32]
N. Kolodny, ‘Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 287–336, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1111/papa.12037.
[33]
A. Abizadeh, ‘On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem’, American Political Science Review, vol. 106, no. 04, pp. 867–882, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000421.
[34]
E. Anderson, ‘Democracy: Instrumental versus Non-Instrumental Value’, in Contemporary debates in political philosophy, vol. 11, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=428114&ppg=1
[35]
E. Anderson, ‘The Epistemology of Democracy’, Episteme, vol. 3, no. 1–2, pp. 8–22, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8.
[36]
R. J. Arneson, ‘Democracy is not Intrinsically Just’, in Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 40–58 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/justice-and-democracy/democracy-is-not-intrinsically-just/16D69C089CC31609D7177DF8019E99D0
[37]
R. J. Arneson, ‘Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 122–132, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00170.
[38]
J. Brennan, ‘Polluting The Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 535–549, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00048400802587309.
[39]
T. Christiano, ‘Democracy as Equality’, in Democracy, vol. Blackwell readings in philosophy, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 31–50.
[40]
R. Dworkin, Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000.
[41]
D. M. Estlund, Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
[42]
N. Kolodny, ‘Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 195–229, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1111/papa.12035.
[43]
B. Saunders, ‘Democracy, Political Equality and Majority Rule’, Ethics, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 148–177, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/656474
[44]
A. Abizadeh, ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders’, Political Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 37–65, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20452610
[45]
S. Song, ‘The boundary problem in democratic theory: why the demos should be bounded by the state’, International Theory, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 39–68, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1017/S1752971911000248.
[46]
C. Lopez-Guerra, ‘Should Expatriates Vote?*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 216–234, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x.
[47]
R. E. Goodin, ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 40–68, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x.
[48]
F. G. Whelan, ‘Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem’, in Liberal democracy (Nomos XXV), New York: New York University Press, 1983.
[49]
D. Miller, ‘Democracy’s Domain’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 201–228, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x.
[50]
S. Näsström, ‘The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle’, Political Studies, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 116–134, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x.
[51]
A. Kolers, ‘The Territorial State in Cosmopolitan Justice.’, Social Theory & Practice, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 29–50, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=6876301&site=ehost-live
[52]
A. Buchanan, ‘The Morality of Inclusion’, Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 233–257, Jun. 1993, doi: 10.1017/S0265052500004210.
[53]
M. Mann, ‘The Dark Side of Democracy: The Modern Tradition of Ethnic and Political Cleansing’, New Left Review, vol. 235, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://newleftreview.org/I/235/michael-mann-the-dark-side-of-democracy-the-modern-tradition-of-ethnic-and-political-cleansing
[54]
D. Owen, ‘Constituting the polity, constituting the demos: on the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem’, Ethics & Global Politics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 129–152, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.3402/egp.v5i3.18617.
[55]
R. A. Dahl, Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
[56]
C. Lopez-Guerra, ‘Should Expatriates Vote?*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 216–234, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x.
[57]
D. Owen, ‘Resident Aliens, Non-resident Citizens and Voting Rights’, in Citizenship acquisition and national belonging: migration, membership and the liberal democratic state, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 52–73 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230246775
[58]
D. Owen, ‘Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: modes of membership and voting rights’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 641–663, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/13698230.2011.617123.
[59]
J. Waldron, The harm in hate speech, vol. 2009. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3301269
[60]
R. Dworkin, ‘Foreword’, in Extreme speech and democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.001.0001/acprof-9780199548781-miscMatter-4
[61]
S. J. Brison, ‘The Autonomy Defense of Free Speech’, Ethics, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 312–339, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1086/233807.
[62]
D. Braddon-Mitchell and C. West, ‘What is Free Speech?’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 437–460, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00208.x.
[63]
R. Dworkin, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, in Isaiah Berlin: a celebration, E. Ullmann-Margalit and A. Margalit, Eds. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[64]
J. Horton, ‘The Satanic Verses Controversy: A Brief Introduction’, in Liberalism, multiculturalism and toleration, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993.
[65]
P. Jones, ‘Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie’, in Toleration: philosophy and practice, J. Horton and P. P. Nicholson, Eds. Aldershot: Avebury, 1992.
[66]
C. Mckinnon, ‘Should We Tolerate Holocaust Denial?’, Res Publica, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 9–28, May 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11158-006-9013-8.
[67]
C. A. MacKinnon, Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987.
[68]
J. K. Miles, ‘Social Theory & Practice’, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 213–230, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=75500645&site=ehost-live
[69]
J. S. Mill and B. Little, On liberty. London: John W. Parker, 1859.
[70]
T. M. Scanlon, ‘A Theory of Freedom of Expression’, in The difficulty of tolerance: essays in political philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/difficulty-of-tolerance/theory-of-freedom-of-expression/3F20BF32C62FC6F810ED20ADF9CE0065
[71]
J. Waldron, ‘Rushdie and Religion’, in Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991, Cambridge, [England]: Cambridge Universtiy Press, 1993, pp. 134–143.
[72]
C. West, ‘The Free Speech Argument against Pornography’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 391–422, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40232191
[73]
W. Smith, ‘Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience’, Res Publica, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 353–377, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5.
[74]
C. Delmas, ‘Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 465–488, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10982-013-9189-y.
[75]
C. Delmas, ‘Disobedience, Civil and Otherwise’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 195–211, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11572-014-9347-9.
[76]
K. Brownlee, ‘Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience’, Res Publica, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 337–351, Dec. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6.
[77]
K. Brownlee, Conscience and conviction: the case for civil disobedience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001/acprof-9780199592944
[78]
R. Celikates, ‘Democratizing civil disobedience’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 982–994, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0191453716638562.
[79]
D. Lefkowitz, ‘In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience’, Res Publica, May 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11158-017-9362-5.
[80]
David Lyons, ‘Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 31–49, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2672840
[81]
D. Weinstock, ‘How Democratic is Civil Disobedience?’, Criminal Law and Philosophy, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 707–720, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11572-015-9367-0.
[82]
J. Rawls, A theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
[83]
J. Rawls, ‘Justice as fairness’, in A theory of justice, Rev. ed., Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 3–46.
[84]
G. A. Cohen, ‘Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 26, no. 1, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2961909?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[85]
D. Parfit and T. Scanlon, ‘The Tanner Lectures on Human Values at UC Berkeley - Lecture Three: Contractualism’. [Online]. Available: http://www.language.berkeley.edu/SA_MP3files/Tanner/1836_3.mp3
[86]
S. R. Freeman, ‘The Original Position’, in Rawls, vol. Routledge philosophers, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 141–198.
[87]
R. J. Arneson, ‘Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 77–112, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320904
[88]
S. Freeman, ‘ntroduction’, in The Cambridge companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[89]
J. Hampton, ‘Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory?’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 77, no. 6, Jun. 1980, doi: 10.2307/2025640.
[90]
J. C. Harsanyi, ‘The Maximin Principle’, in Contemporary political theory: a reader, C. P. Farrelly, Ed. London: SAGE, 2004, pp. 22–31 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781848605411
[91]
S. Maffettone, Rawls: an introduction. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.
[92]
J. Mandle, Rawls’s A theory of justice: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[93]
J. Mandle, What’s left of liberalism?: an interpretation and defense of justice as fairness. Lanham: Lexington, 2000.
[94]
R. S. Taylor, ‘Rawls’s Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 246–271, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3558006
[95]
E. S. Anderson, ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics, vol. 109, no. 2, pp. 287–337, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1086/233897.
[96]
Ronald Dworkin, ‘What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 10, no. 4, 1981 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265047?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[97]
G. A. Cohen, Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/selfownership-freedom-and-equality/26B021AEDD3ECE97D388586C27C90D18
[98]
C. C. Ryan, ‘Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty’, Ethics, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 126–141, 1977 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2380061
[99]
M. D. Friedman, Nozick’s libertarian project: an elaboration and defense. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2012.
[100]
E. Mack, ‘Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 237–276, Jun. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1470594X02001002004.
[101]
E. Mack, ‘Libertarianism’, in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, G. Klosko, Ed. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238804.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199238804-e-41
[102]
E. Mack, ‘Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 75–108, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1470594X02001001004.
[103]
J. Tomasi, Free market fairness. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://princeton.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.001.0001/upso-9780691144467
[104]
H. Steiner, ‘The Natural Right to the Means of Production’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 106, Jan. 1977, doi: 10.2307/2218927.
[105]
P. Vallentyne, ‘Libertarianism and the State’, Social Philosophy and Policy, vol. 24, no. 01, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S0265052507070082.
[106]
Z. Stemplowska, ‘Rescuing Luck Egalitarianism’, Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 402–419, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1111/josp.12039.
[107]
H. Lazenby, ‘One Kiss Too Many? Giving, Luck Egalitarianism and Other-affecting Choice*’, Journal of Political Philosophy, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00335.x.
[108]
K.-C. Tan, ‘A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 665–690, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20620136
[109]
M. Otsuka, ‘Luck, Insurance, and Equality’, Ethics, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 40–54, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1086/341322.
[110]
R. Dworkin, Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000.
[111]
Z. Stemplowska, ‘Global Poverty’, in Issues in political theory, Fourth Edition., C. McKinnon, R. Jubb, and P. Tomlin, Eds. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 199–219.
[112]
M. Zwolinski, ‘Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 689–727, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.5840/beq20071745. [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/27673206?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[113]
S. Caney, Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[114]
P. Gilabert, ‘The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative?’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 537–550, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10677-005-6489-9.
[115]
S. Daskal, ‘Confining Pogge’s Analysis of Global Poverty to Genuinely Negative Duties’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 369–391, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10677-012-9349-4.
[116]
V. Gauri and J. Sonderholm, ‘Global poverty: four normative positions’, Journal of Global Ethics, vol. 8, no. 2–3, pp. 193–213, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1080/17449626.2012.705787.
[117]
T. Christiano and J. P. Christman, ‘Distributive Justice at Home and Abroad’, in Contemporary debates in political philosophy, vol. 11, Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=428114
[118]
G. Schweiger, ‘Recognition theory and global poverty’, Journal of Global Ethics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 267–273, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/17449626.2014.969439.
[119]
H. Liberto, ‘Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 619–629, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10677-014-9494-z.
[120]
C. H. Wellman, ‘Immigration and Freedom of Association’, Ethics, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 109–141, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1086/592311.
[121]
C. Bertram, ‘Justifying a Migration Regime from an impartial perspective’, in Do states have the right to exclude immigrants?, Polity Press, 2018, pp. 29–63 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=5439385&ppg=29
[122]
A. Abizadeh, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller’, Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655537
[123]
S. Fine, ‘The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 254–268, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1111/phc3.12019.
[124]
C. H. Wellman and P. Cole, Debating the ethics of immigration: is there a right to exclude? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=800832
[125]
J. H. Carens, The ethics of immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1336461
[126]
M. Huemer, ‘Is There a Right to Immigrate?’, Social Theory & Practice, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 429–461, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=52811108&site=ehost-live
[127]
K. Oberman, ‘Immigration as a Human Right’, in Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership, S. Fine and L. Ypi, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[128]
D. Miller, ‘Is there a Human Right to Immigrate?’, in Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership, S. Fine and L. Ypi, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
[129]
D. Miller, ‘Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh’, Political Theory, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655536
[130]
S. M. Okin, ‘Justice and Gender’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 42–72, 1987 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265205
[131]
H. Brighouse and E. Olin Wright, ‘Strong Gender Egalitarianism’, Politics & Society, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 360–372, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0032329208320566.
[132]
G. Schouten, ‘Restricting Justice: Political Interventions in the Home and in the Market’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 357–388, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1111/papa.12022.
[133]
A. R. Baehr, ‘Perfectionism, Feminism and Public Reason’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 193–222, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10982-007-9017-3.
[134]
C. Chambers, Sex, culture, and justice: the limits of choice. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.
[135]
C. Chambers, ‘Gender’, in Issues in political theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 265–288 [Online]. Available: https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/view/10.1093/hepl/9780198784067.001.0001/hepl-9780198784067
[136]
G. A. Cohen, ‘Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice’, Philosophy Public Affairs, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 3–30, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00048.x.
[137]
E. Brake, ‘Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality?’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 293–309, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1177/174046810400100305.
[138]
G. Schouten, ‘Citizenship, reciprocity, and the gendered division of labor’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 174–209, May 2017, doi: 10.1177/1470594X15600830.
[139]
D. Satz, ‘Gender’, in The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy, D. Estlund, Ed. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195376692-e-19
[140]
S. M. Okin, ‘“Forty acres and a mule” for women: Rawls and feminism’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 233–248, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1470594X05052540.
[141]
A. Swift, ‘Justice, Luck and the family’, in Unequal chances: family background and economic success, S. Bowles, H. Gintis, and M. Osborne Groves, Eds. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2005, pp. 256–276.
[142]
S. M. Okin and M. Howard, Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5542046
[143]
J. Rawls, ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, The University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 64, no. 3, Summer 1997, doi: 10.2307/1600311.
[144]
J. Simmons, ‘The Theories’, in Is There a Duty to Obey the Law?, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 102–120 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511809286A015/type/book_part
