1.
Welcome – Blackboard Learn. https://www.ole.bris.ac.uk/webapps/portal/execute/tabs/tabAction?tab_tab_group_id=_17_1.
2.
POLI22202 Unit Summary. https://www.bris.ac.uk/unit-programme-catalogue/UnitDetails.jsa?ayrCode=19%2F20&unitCode=POLI22202.
3.
Philosophy & Public Affairs.
7.
Politics, Philosophy & Economics.
8.
Contemporary Political Theory.
9.
Journal of Political Philosophy.
10.
Social Philosophy and Policy.
11.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/.
12.
Stilz, A. Why Does the State Matter Morally?’,. in Varieties of Sovereignty and Citizenship 244–264 (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012).
13.
Simmons, J. The Problem and Its Significance. in Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? 93–101 (Cambridge University Press, 2005). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809286.006.
14.
Simmons, J. The Theories. in Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? 102–120 (Cambridge University Press, 2005). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809286.007.
15.
Simmons, A. John. The Principle of Fair Play. Philosophy & Public Affairs 8, 307–337.
16.
Wolff, R. P. The Conflict between Authority and Autonomy. in In defense of anarchism vol. Harper essays in philosophy 20–31 (Harper Torchbooks, 1976).
17.
Hampton, J. Political philosophy. (Westview Press, 1997).
18.
Raz, J. The morality of freedom. (Clarendon, 1986).
19.
Raz, J. The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition. in Ethics in the public domain: essays in the morality of law and politics (Clarendon Press, 1994).
20.
Rousseau, J.-J. Book I, chapters 6-8. in Discours Sur l’Oeconomie Politique; Du Contrat Social: Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract (Oxford University Press, 1999).
21.
Huemer, M. The problem of political authority: an examination of the right to coerce and the duty to obey. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).
22.
Morris, C. W. An essay on the modern state. (Cambridge University Press, 1998).
23.
Scott, J. C. Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. (Princeton University Press, 2012).
24.
Simmons, A. J. Moral principles and political obligations. (Princeton University Press, 1979).
25.
Stilz, A. Liberal loyalty: freedom, obligation, and the state. (Princeton University Press, 2009).
26.
Stiltz, A. Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism. in The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory (ed. Levy, J. T.) (2016).
27.
Renzo, M. Political Authority and Unjust Wars. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99, 336–357 (2019).
28.
Brennan, J. The Right to a Competent Electorate. The Philosophical Quarterly 61, 700–724 (2011).
29.
Anderson, E. Democracy: Intrinsic vs Instrumental value. in Contemporary debates in political philosophy vol. 11 213–227 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).
30.
Christiano, T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy 12, 266–290 (2004).
31.
Anderson, E. Democracy Intrinsic and instrumental value. in Contemporary debates in political philosophy vol. 11 213–228 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).
32.
Kolodny, N. Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 42, 287–336 (2014).
33.
Abizadeh, A. On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem. American Political Science Review 106, 867–882 (2012).
34.
Anderson, E. Democracy: Instrumental versus Non-Instrumental Value. in Contemporary debates in political philosophy vol. 11 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).
35.
Anderson, E. The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 3, 8–22 (2006).
36.
Arneson, R. J. Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. in Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry 40–58 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
37.
Arneson, R. J. Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy 11, 122–132 (2003).
38.
Brennan, J. Polluting The Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87, 535–549 (2009).
39.
Christiano, T. Democracy as Equality. in Democracy vol. Blackwell readings in philosophy 31–50 (Blackwell, 2002).
40.
Dworkin, R. Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. (Harvard University Press, 2000).
41.
Estlund, D. M. Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. (Princeton University Press, 2008).
42.
Kolodny, N. Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy? Philosophy & Public Affairs 42, 195–229 (2014).
43.
Saunders, B. Democracy, Political Equality and Majority Rule. Ethics 121, 148–177 (2010).
44.
Abizadeh, A. Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory 36, 37–65 (2008).
45.
Song, S. The boundary problem in democratic theory: why the demos should be bounded by the state. International Theory 4, 39–68 (2012).
46.
Lopez-Guerra, C. Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy 13, 216–234 (2005).
47.
Goodin, R. E. Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs 35, 40–68 (2007).
48.
Whelan, F. G. Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem. in Liberal democracy (Nomos XXV) (New York University Press, 1983).
49.
Miller, D. Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs 37, 201–228 (2009).
50.
Näsström, S. The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies 59, 116–134 (2011).
51.
Kolers, A. The Territorial State in Cosmopolitan Justice. Social Theory & Practice 28, 29–50 (2002).
52.
Buchanan, A. The Morality of Inclusion. Social Philosophy and Policy 10, 233–257 (1993).
53.
Mann, M. The Dark Side of Democracy: The Modern Tradition of Ethnic and Political Cleansing. New Left Review 235, (1999).
54.
Owen, D. Constituting the polity, constituting the demos: on the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem. Ethics & Global Politics 5, 129–152 (2012).
55.
Dahl, R. A. Democracy and its critics. (Yale University Press, 1989).
56.
Lopez-Guerra, C. Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy 13, 216–234 (2005).
57.
Owen, D. Resident Aliens, Non-resident Citizens and Voting Rights. in Citizenship acquisition and national belonging: migration, membership and the liberal democratic state 52–73 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
58.
Owen, D. Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: modes of membership and voting rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14, 641–663 (2011).
59.
Waldron, J. The harm in hate speech. vol. 2009 (Harvard University Press, 2012).
60.
Dworkin, R. Foreword. in Extreme speech and democracy (Oxford University Press, 2009).
61.
Brison, S. J. The Autonomy Defense of Free Speech. Ethics 108, 312–339 (1998).
62.
Braddon-Mitchell, D. & West, C. What is Free Speech? Journal of Political Philosophy 12, 437–460 (2004).
63.
Dworkin, R. Two Concepts of Liberty. in Isaiah Berlin: a celebration (eds. Ullmann-Margalit, E. & Margalit, A.) (University of Chicago Press, 1991).
64.
Horton, J. The Satanic Verses Controversy: A Brief Introduction. in Liberalism, multiculturalism and toleration (Macmillan, 1993).
65.
Jones, P. Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie. in Toleration: philosophy and practice (eds. Horton, J. & Nicholson, P. P.) (Avebury, 1992).
66.
Mckinnon, C. Should We Tolerate Holocaust Denial? Res Publica 13, 9–28 (2007).
67.
MacKinnon, C. A. Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. (Harvard University Press, 1987).
68.
Miles, J. K. Social Theory & Practice. 38, 213–230 (2012).
69.
Mill, J. S. & Little, B. On liberty. (John W. Parker, 1859).
70.
Scanlon, T. M. A Theory of Freedom of Expression. in The difficulty of tolerance: essays in political philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
71.
Waldron, J. Rushdie and Religion. in Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991 134–143 (Cambridge Universtiy Press, 1993).
72.
West, C. The Free Speech Argument against Pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33, 391–422 (2003).
73.
Smith, W. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 10, 353–377 (2004).
74.
Delmas, C. Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness. Law and Philosophy 33, 465–488 (2014).
75.
Delmas, C. Disobedience, Civil and Otherwise. Criminal Law and Philosophy 11, 195–211 (2017).
76.
Brownlee, K. Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 10, 337–351 (2004).
77.
Brownlee, K. Conscience and conviction: the case for civil disobedience. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
78.
Celikates, R. Democratizing civil disobedience. Philosophy & Social Criticism 42, 982–994 (2016).
79.
Lefkowitz, D. In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience. Res Publica (2017) doi:10.1007/s11158-017-9362-5.
80.
David Lyons. Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27, 31–49 (1998).
81.
Weinstock, D. How Democratic is Civil Disobedience? Criminal Law and Philosophy 10, 707–720 (2016).
82.
Rawls, J. A theory of justice. (Clarendon Press, 1972).
83.
Rawls, J. Justice as fairness. in A theory of justice 3–46 (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1999).
84.
G. A. Cohen. Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 26, (1997).
85.
Parfit, D. & Scanlon, T. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values at UC Berkeley - Lecture Three: Contractualism.
86.
Freeman, S. R. The Original Position. in Rawls vol. Routledge philosophers 141–198 (Routledge, 2007).
87.
Arneson, R. J. Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 93, 77–112 (1999).
88.
Freeman, S. ntroduction. in The Cambridge companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003). doi:10.1017/CCOL0521651670.001.
89.
Hampton, J. Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory? The Journal of Philosophy 77, (1980).
90.
Harsanyi, J. C. The Maximin Principle. in Contemporary political theory: a reader (ed. Farrelly, C. P.) 22–31 (SAGE, 2004).
91.
Maffettone, S. Rawls: an introduction. (Polity, 2010).
92.
Mandle, J. Rawls’s A theory of justice: an introduction. (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
93.
Mandle, J. What’s left of liberalism?: an interpretation and defense of justice as fairness. (Lexington, 2000).
94.
Taylor, R. S. Rawls’s Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction. Philosophy & Public Affairs 31, 246–271 (2003).
95.
Anderson, E. S. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109, 287–337 (1999).
96.
Ronald Dworkin. What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10, (1981).
97.
Cohen, G. A. Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. (Cambridge University Press, 1995).
98.
Ryan, C. C. Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty. Ethics 87, 126–141 (1977).
99.
Friedman, M. D. Nozick’s libertarian project: an elaboration and defense. (Bloomsbury Academic, 2012).
100.
Mack, E. Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 1, 237–276 (2002).
101.
Mack, E. Libertarianism. in The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy (ed. Klosko, G.) (2011).
102.
Mack, E. Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 1, 75–108 (2002).
103.
Tomasi, J. Free market fairness. (Princeton University Press, 2013).
104.
Steiner, H. The Natural Right to the Means of Production. The Philosophical Quarterly 27, (1977).
105.
Vallentyne, P. Libertarianism and the State. Social Philosophy and Policy 24, (2007).
106.
Stemplowska, Z. Rescuing Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy 44, 402–419 (2013).
107.
Lazenby, H. One Kiss Too Many? Giving, Luck Egalitarianism and Other-affecting Choice*. Journal of Political Philosophy (2009) doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00335.x.
108.
Tan, K.-C. A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism. The Journal of Philosophy 105, 665–690 (2008).
109.
Otsuka, M. Luck, Insurance, and Equality. Ethics 113, 40–54 (2002).
110.
Dworkin, R. Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. (Harvard University Press, 2000).
111.
Stemplowska, Z. Global Poverty. in Issues in political theory (eds. McKinnon, C., Jubb, R. & Tomlin, P.) 199–219 (Oxford University Press, 2019).
112.
Zwolinski, M. Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly 17, 689–727 (2007).
113.
Caney, S. Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. (Oxford University Press, 2005).
114.
Gilabert, P. The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7, 537–550 (2005).
115.
Daskal, S. Confining Pogge’s Analysis of Global Poverty to Genuinely Negative Duties. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, 369–391 (2013).
116.
Gauri, V. & Sonderholm, J. Global poverty: four normative positions. Journal of Global Ethics 8, 193–213 (2012).
117.
Christiano, T. & Christman, J. P. Distributive Justice at Home and Abroad. in Contemporary debates in political philosophy vol. 11 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).
118.
Schweiger, G. Recognition theory and global poverty. Journal of Global Ethics 10, 267–273 (2014).
119.
Liberto, H. Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17, 619–629 (2014).
120.
Wellman, C. H. Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics 119, 109–141 (2008).
121.
Bertram, C. Justifying a Migration Regime from an impartial perspective. in Do states have the right to exclude immigrants? 29–63 (Polity Press, 2018).
122.
Abizadeh, A. Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller. Political Theory 38, 121–130 (2010).
123.
Fine, S. The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude. Philosophy Compass 8, 254–268 (2013).
124.
Wellman, C. H. & Cole, P. Debating the ethics of immigration: is there a right to exclude? (Oxford University Press, 2011).
125.
Carens, J. H. The ethics of immigration. (Oxford University Press, 2013).
126.
Huemer, M. Is There a Right to Immigrate? Social Theory & Practice 36, 429–461 (2010).
127.
Oberman, K. Immigration as a Human Right. in Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership (eds. Fine, S. & Ypi, L.) (Oxford University Press, 2016). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0003.
128.
Miller, D. Is there a Human Right to Immigrate? in Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership (eds. Fine, S. & Ypi, L.) (Oxford University Press, 2016). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.001.0001.
129.
Miller, D. Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh. Political Theory 38, 111–120 (2010).
130.
Okin, S. M. Justice and Gender. Philosophy & Public Affairs 16, 42–72 (1987).
131.
Brighouse, H. & Olin Wright, E. Strong Gender Egalitarianism. Politics & Society 36, 360–372 (2008).
132.
Schouten, G. Restricting Justice: Political Interventions in the Home and in the Market. Philosophy & Public Affairs 41, 357–388 (2013).
133.
Baehr, A. R. Perfectionism, Feminism and Public Reason. Law and Philosophy 27, 193–222 (2008).
134.
Chambers, C. Sex, culture, and justice: the limits of choice. (Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008).
135.
Chambers, C. Gender. in Issues in political theory 265–288 (Oxford University Press, 2008).
136.
Cohen, G. A. Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy Public Affairs 26, 3–30 (1997).
137.
Brake, E. Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1, 293–309 (2004).
138.
Schouten, G. Citizenship, reciprocity, and the gendered division of labor. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 16, 174–209 (2017).
139.
Satz, D. Gender. in The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy (ed. Estlund, D.) (2012).
140.
Okin, S. M. ‘Forty acres and a mule’ for women: Rawls and feminism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4, 233–248 (2005).
141.
Swift, A. Justice, Luck and the family. in Unequal chances: family background and economic success (eds. Bowles, S., Gintis, H. & Osborne Groves, M.) 256–276 (Russell Sage Foundation, 2005).
142.
Okin, S. M. & Howard, M. Is multiculturalism bad for women? (Princeton University Press, 1999).
143.
Rawls, J. The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review 64, (1997).
144.
Simmons, J. The Theories. in Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? 102–120 (Cambridge University Press, 2005). doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809286.007.
