1
Welcome – Blackboard Learn. https://www.ole.bris.ac.uk/webapps/portal/execute/tabs/tabAction?tab_tab_group_id=_17_1
2
POLI22202 Unit Summary. https://www.bris.ac.uk/unit-programme-catalogue/UnitDetails.jsa?ayrCode=19%2F20&unitCode=POLI22202
3
Philosophy & Public Affairs. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10884963
4
Political Theory. http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ptx
5
Ethics. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/loi/et
6
Political Studies. http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/psx
7
Politics, Philosophy & Economics. http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ppe
8
Contemporary Political Theory. https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/41296
9
Journal of Political Philosophy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14679760
10
Social Philosophy and Policy. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/all-issues
11
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/
12
Stilz A. Why Does the State Matter Morally?’,. In: Varieties of Sovereignty and Citizenship. University of Pennsylvania Press 2012. 244–64.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3441798&ppg=253
13
Simmons J. The Problem and Its Significance. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge University Press 2005. 93–101. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809286.006
14
Simmons J. The Theories. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge University Press 2005. 102–20. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809286.007
15
Simmons, A. John. The Principle of Fair Play. Philosophy & Public Affairs;8:307–37.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265067?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
16
Wolff RP. The Conflict between Authority and Autonomy. In: In defense of anarchism. New York: : Harper Torchbooks 1976. 20–31.
17
Hampton J. Political philosophy. Boulder, Colo: : Westview Press 1997.
18
Raz J. The morality of freedom. Oxford: : Clarendon 1986. https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198248075.001.0001
19
Raz J. The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition. In: Ethics in the public domain: essays in the morality of law and politics. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198260691.001.0001/acprof-9780198260691-chapter-15
20
Rousseau J-J. Book I, chapters 6-8. In: Discours Sur l’Oeconomie Politique; Du Contrat Social: Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract. Oxford University Press 1999. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=737317&ppg=86
21
Huemer M. The problem of political authority: an examination of the right to coerce and the duty to obey. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
22
Morris CW. An essay on the modern state. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/an-essay-on-the-modern-state/8489C389B73031C1514B05AF9300B03E
23
Scott JC. Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1040747
24
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1979.
25
Stilz A. Liberal loyalty: freedom, obligation, and the state. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2009. https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rj1r
26
Stiltz A. Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism. In: Levy JT, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory. 2016. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198717133-e-7
27
Renzo M. Political Authority and Unjust Wars. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2019;99:336–57. doi:10.1111/phpr.12487
28
Brennan J. The Right to a Competent Electorate. The Philosophical Quarterly 2011;61:700–24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.699.x
29
Anderson E. Democracy: Intrinsic vs Instrumental value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009. 213–27.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=428114&ppg=1
30
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy 2004;12:266–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x
31
Anderson E. Democracy Intrinsic and instrumental value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009. 213–28.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=428114
32
Kolodny N. Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2014;42:287–336. doi:10.1111/papa.12037
33
Abizadeh A. On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem. American Political Science Review 2012;106:867–82. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000421
34
Anderson, E. Democracy: Instrumental versus Non-Instrumental Value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=428114&ppg=1
35
Anderson E. The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme 2006;3:8–22. doi:10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8
36
Arneson RJ. Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. In: Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004. 40–58.https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/justice-and-democracy/democracy-is-not-intrinsically-just/16D69C089CC31609D7177DF8019E99D0
37
Arneson RJ. Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy 2003;11:122–32. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00170
38
Brennan J. Polluting The Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 2009;87:535–49. doi:10.1080/00048400802587309
39
Christiano T. Democracy as Equality. In: Democracy. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2002. 31–50.
40
Dworkin R. Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2000.
41
Estlund DM. Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2008.
42
Kolodny N. Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy? Philosophy & Public Affairs 2014;42:195–229. doi:10.1111/papa.12035
43
Saunders B. Democracy, Political Equality and Majority Rule. Ethics 2010;121:148–77.https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/656474
44
Abizadeh A. Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory 2008;36:37–65.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20452610
45
Song S. The boundary problem in democratic theory: why the demos should be bounded by the state. International Theory 2012;4:39–68. doi:10.1017/S1752971911000248
46
Lopez-Guerra C. Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy 2005;13:216–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x
47
Goodin RE. Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2007;35:40–68. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x
48
Whelan FG. Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem. In: Liberal democracy (Nomos XXV). New York: : New York University Press 1983.
49
Miller D. Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2009;37:201–28. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x
50
Näsström S. The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies 2011;59:116–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x
51
Kolers A. The Territorial State in Cosmopolitan Justice. Social Theory & Practice 2002;28:29–50.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=6876301&site=ehost-live
52
Buchanan A. The Morality of Inclusion. Social Philosophy and Policy 1993;10:233–57. doi:10.1017/S0265052500004210
53
Mann M. The Dark Side of Democracy: The Modern Tradition of Ethnic and Political Cleansing. New Left Review 1999;235.https://newleftreview.org/I/235/michael-mann-the-dark-side-of-democracy-the-modern-tradition-of-ethnic-and-political-cleansing
54
Owen D. Constituting the polity, constituting the demos: on the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem. Ethics & Global Politics 2012;5:129–52. doi:10.3402/egp.v5i3.18617
55
Dahl RA. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1989.
56
Lopez-Guerra C. Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy 2005;13:216–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x
57
Owen D. Resident Aliens, Non-resident Citizens and Voting Rights. In: Citizenship acquisition and national belonging: migration, membership and the liberal democratic state. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010. 52–73.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230246775
58
Owen D. Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: modes of membership and voting rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2011;14:641–63. doi:10.1080/13698230.2011.617123
59
Waldron J. The harm in hate speech. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3301269
60
Dworkin, R. Foreword. In: Extreme speech and democracy. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.001.0001/acprof-9780199548781-miscMatter-4
61
Brison SJ. The Autonomy Defense of Free Speech. Ethics 1998;108:312–39. doi:10.1086/233807
62
Braddon-Mitchell D, West C. What is Free Speech? Journal of Political Philosophy 2004;12:437–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00208.x
63
Dworkin R. Two Concepts of Liberty. In: Ullmann-Margalit E, Margalit A, eds. Isaiah Berlin: a celebration. Chicago, Illinois: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
64
Horton J. The Satanic Verses Controversy: A Brief Introduction. In: Liberalism, multiculturalism and toleration. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1993.
65
Jones P. Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie. In: Horton J, Nicholson PP, eds. Toleration: philosophy and practice. Aldershot: : Avebury 1992.
66
Mckinnon C. Should We Tolerate Holocaust Denial? Res Publica 2007;13:9–28. doi:10.1007/s11158-006-9013-8
67
MacKinnon CA. Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1987.
68
Miles JK. Social Theory & Practice. 2012;38:213–30.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=75500645&site=ehost-live
69
Mill JS, Little B. On liberty. London: : John W. Parker 1859.
70
Scanlon TM. A Theory of Freedom of Expression. In: The difficulty of tolerance: essays in political philosophy. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/difficulty-of-tolerance/theory-of-freedom-of-expression/3F20BF32C62FC6F810ED20ADF9CE0065
71
Waldron J. Rushdie and Religion. In: Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991. Cambridge, [England]: : Cambridge Universtiy Press 1993. 134–43.
72
West C. The Free Speech Argument against Pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2003;33:391–422.https://www.jstor.org/stable/40232191
73
Smith W. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica 2004;10:353–77. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5
74
Delmas C. Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness. Law and Philosophy 2014;33:465–88. doi:10.1007/s10982-013-9189-y
75
Delmas C. Disobedience, Civil and Otherwise. Criminal Law and Philosophy 2017;11:195–211. doi:10.1007/s11572-014-9347-9
76
Brownlee K. Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica 2004;10:337–51. doi:10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6
77
Brownlee K. Conscience and conviction: the case for civil disobedience. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001/acprof-9780199592944
78
Celikates R. Democratizing civil disobedience. Philosophy & Social Criticism 2016;42:982–94. doi:10.1177/0191453716638562
79
Lefkowitz D. In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience. Res Publica Published Online First: 4 May 2017. doi:10.1007/s11158-017-9362-5
80
David Lyons. Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1998;27:31–49.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2672840
81
Weinstock D. How Democratic is Civil Disobedience? Criminal Law and Philosophy 2016;10:707–20. doi:10.1007/s11572-015-9367-0
82
Rawls J. A theory of justice. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1972.
83
Rawls J. Justice as fairness. In: A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1999. 3–46.
84
G. A. Cohen. Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1997;26.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2961909?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
85
Parfit D, Scanlon T. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values at UC Berkeley - Lecture Three: Contractualism. http://www.language.berkeley.edu/SA_MP3files/Tanner/1836_3.mp3
86
Freeman SR. The Original Position. In: Rawls. London: : Routledge 2007. 141–98.
87
Arneson RJ. Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 1999;93:77–112.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320904
88
Freeman S. ntroduction. In: The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521651670.001
89
Hampton J. Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory? The Journal of Philosophy 1980;77. doi:10.2307/2025640
90
Harsanyi JC. The Maximin Principle. In: Farrelly CP, ed. Contemporary political theory: a reader. London: : SAGE 2004. 22–31.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781848605411
91
Maffettone S. Rawls: an introduction. Cambridge: : Polity 2010.
92
Mandle J. Rawls’s A theory of justice: an introduction. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
93
Mandle J. What’s left of liberalism?: an interpretation and defense of justice as fairness. Lanham: : Lexington 2000.
94
Taylor RS. Rawls’s Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2003;31:246–71.https://www.jstor.org/stable/3558006
95
Anderson ES. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics 1999;109:287–337. doi:10.1086/233897
96
Ronald Dworkin. What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1981;10.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265047?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
97
Cohen GA. Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/selfownership-freedom-and-equality/26B021AEDD3ECE97D388586C27C90D18
98
Ryan CC. Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty. Ethics 1977;87:126–41.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2380061
99
Friedman MD. Nozick’s libertarian project: an elaboration and defense. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2012.
100
Mack E. Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2002;1:237–76. doi:10.1177/1470594X02001002004
101
Mack E. Libertarianism. In: Klosko G, ed. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy. 2011. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238804.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199238804-e-41
102
Mack E. Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2002;1:75–108. doi:10.1177/1470594X02001001004
103
Tomasi J. Free market fairness. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2013. http://princeton.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.001.0001/upso-9780691144467
104
Steiner H. The Natural Right to the Means of Production. The Philosophical Quarterly 1977;27. doi:10.2307/2218927
105
Vallentyne P. Libertarianism and the State. Social Philosophy and Policy 2007;24. doi:10.1017/S0265052507070082
106
Stemplowska Z. Rescuing Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy 2013;44:402–19. doi:10.1111/josp.12039
107
Lazenby H. One Kiss Too Many? Giving, Luck Egalitarianism and Other-affecting Choice*. Journal of Political Philosophy Published Online First: April 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00335.x
108
Tan K-C. A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism. The Journal of Philosophy 2008;105:665–90.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20620136
109
Otsuka M. Luck, Insurance, and Equality. Ethics 2002;113:40–54. doi:10.1086/341322
110
Dworkin R. Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 2000.
111
Stemplowska Z. Global Poverty. In: McKinnon C, Jubb R, Tomlin P, eds. Issues in political theory. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2019. 199–219.
112
Zwolinski M. Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly 2007;17:689–727. doi:10.5840/beq20071745
113
Caney S. Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005.
114
Gilabert P. The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2005;7:537–50. doi:10.1007/s10677-005-6489-9
115
Daskal S. Confining Pogge’s Analysis of Global Poverty to Genuinely Negative Duties. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2013;16:369–91. doi:10.1007/s10677-012-9349-4
116
Gauri V, Sonderholm J. Global poverty: four normative positions. Journal of Global Ethics 2012;8:193–213. doi:10.1080/17449626.2012.705787
117
Christiano T, Christman JP. Distributive Justice at Home and Abroad. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=428114
118
Schweiger G. Recognition theory and global poverty. Journal of Global Ethics 2014;10:267–73. doi:10.1080/17449626.2014.969439
119
Liberto H. Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2014;17:619–29. doi:10.1007/s10677-014-9494-z
120
Wellman CH. Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics 2008;119:109–41. doi:10.1086/592311
121
Bertram C. Justifying a Migration Regime from an impartial perspective. In: Do states have the right to exclude immigrants? Polity Press 2018. 29–63.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=5439385&ppg=29
122
Abizadeh A. Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller. Political Theory 2010;38:121–30.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655537
123
Fine S. The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude. Philosophy Compass 2013;8:254–68. doi:10.1111/phc3.12019
124
Wellman CH, Cole P. Debating the ethics of immigration: is there a right to exclude? Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=800832
125
Carens JH. The ethics of immigration. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1336461
126
Huemer M. Is There a Right to Immigrate? Social Theory & Practice 2010;36:429–61.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=52811108&site=ehost-live
127
Oberman K. Immigration as a Human Right. In: Fine S, Ypi L, eds. Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0003
128
Miller D. Is there a Human Right to Immigrate? In: Fine S, Ypi L, eds. Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.001.0001
129
Miller D. Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh. Political Theory 2010;38:111–20.https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655536
130
Okin SM. Justice and Gender. Philosophy & Public Affairs 1987;16:42–72.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265205
131
Brighouse H, Olin Wright E. Strong Gender Egalitarianism. Politics & Society 2008;36:360–72. doi:10.1177/0032329208320566
132
Schouten G. Restricting Justice: Political Interventions in the Home and in the Market. Philosophy & Public Affairs 2013;41:357–88. doi:10.1111/papa.12022
133
Baehr AR. Perfectionism, Feminism and Public Reason. Law and Philosophy 2008;27:193–222. doi:10.1007/s10982-007-9017-3
134
Chambers C. Sex, culture, and justice: the limits of choice. University Park, Pennsylvania: : Pennsylvania State University Press 2008.
135
Chambers C. Gender. In: Issues in political theory. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008. 265–88.https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/view/10.1093/hepl/9780198784067.001.0001/hepl-9780198784067
136
Cohen GA. Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy Public Affairs 1997;26:3–30. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00048.x
137
Brake E. Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy 2004;1:293–309. doi:10.1177/174046810400100305
138
Schouten G. Citizenship, reciprocity, and the gendered division of labor. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2017;16:174–209. doi:10.1177/1470594X15600830
139
Satz D. Gender. In: Estlund D, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. 2012. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195376692-e-19
140
Okin SM. ‘Forty acres and a mule’ for women: Rawls and feminism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 2005;4:233–48. doi:10.1177/1470594X05052540
141
Swift A. Justice, Luck and the family. In: Bowles S, Gintis H, Osborne Groves M, eds. Unequal chances: family background and economic success. New York: : Russell Sage Foundation 2005. 256–76.
142
Okin SM, Howard M. Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton, New Jersey: : Princeton University Press 1999. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5542046
143
Rawls J. The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review 1997;64. doi:10.2307/1600311
144
Simmons J. The Theories. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? Cambridge University Press 2005. 102–20. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809286.007
