1.
Welcome – Blackboard Learn [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ole.bris.ac.uk/webapps/portal/execute/tabs/tabAction?tab_tab_group_id=_17_1
2.
POLI22202 Unit Summary [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bris.ac.uk/unit-programme-catalogue/UnitDetails.jsa?ayrCode=19%2F20&unitCode=POLI22202
3.
Philosophy & Public Affairs. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10884963
4.
Political Theory. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ptx
5.
Ethics. Available from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/loi/et
6.
Political Studies. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/psx
7.
Politics, Philosophy & Economics. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/ppe
8.
Contemporary Political Theory. Available from: https://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/41296
9.
Journal of Political Philosophy. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14679760
10.
Social Philosophy and Policy. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/social-philosophy-and-policy/all-issues
11.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy [Internet]. Available from: https://plato.stanford.edu/
12.
Stilz A. Why Does the State Matter Morally?’,. In: Varieties of Sovereignty and Citizenship [Internet]. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2012. p. 244–64. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=3441798&ppg=253
13.
Simmons J. The Problem and Its Significance. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 93–101. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511809286A014/type/book_part
14.
Simmons J. The Theories. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 102–20. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511809286A015/type/book_part
15.
Simmons, A. John. The Principle of Fair Play. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. 8(4):307–37. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265067?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
16.
Wolff RP. The Conflict between Authority and Autonomy. In: In defense of anarchism. New York: Harper Torchbooks; 1976. p. 20–31.
17.
Hampton J. Political philosophy. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 1997.
18.
Raz J. The morality of freedom [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 1986. Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198248075.001.0001
19.
Raz J. The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition. In: Ethics in the public domain: essays in the morality of law and politics [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1994. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198260691.001.0001/acprof-9780198260691-chapter-15
20.
Rousseau JJ. Book I, chapters 6-8. In: Discours Sur l’Oeconomie Politique; Du Contrat Social: Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1999. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=737317&ppg=86
21.
Huemer M. The problem of political authority: an examination of the right to coerce and the duty to obey. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
22.
Morris CW. An essay on the modern state [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/an-essay-on-the-modern-state/8489C389B73031C1514B05AF9300B03E
23.
Scott JC. Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play [Internet]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1040747
24.
Simmons AJ. Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1979.
25.
Stilz A. Liberal loyalty: freedom, obligation, and the state [Internet]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2009. Available from: https://bris.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rj1r
26.
Stiltz A. Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism. In: Levy JT, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198717133-e-7
27.
Renzo M. Political Authority and Unjust Wars. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 2019 Sep;99(2):336–57.
28.
Brennan J. The Right to a Competent Electorate. The Philosophical Quarterly. 2011 Oct;61(245):700–24.
29.
Anderson E. Democracy: Intrinsic vs Instrumental value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy [Internet]. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 213–27. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=428114&ppg=1
30.
Christiano T. The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004 Sep;12(3):266–90.
31.
Anderson E. Democracy Intrinsic and instrumental value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy [Internet]. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 213–28. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=428114
32.
Kolodny N. Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2014 Sep;42(4):287–336.
33.
Abizadeh A. On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem. American Political Science Review. 2012 Nov;106(04):867–82.
34.
Anderson, E. Democracy: Instrumental versus Non-Instrumental Value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=428114&ppg=1
35.
Anderson E. The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme. 2006 Jun;3(1–2):8–22.
36.
Arneson RJ. Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. In: Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 40–58. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/justice-and-democracy/democracy-is-not-intrinsically-just/16D69C089CC31609D7177DF8019E99D0
37.
Arneson RJ. Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2003 Mar;11(1):122–32.
38.
Brennan J. Polluting The Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 2009 Dec;87(4):535–49.
39.
Christiano T. Democracy as Equality. In: Democracy. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2002. p. 31–50.
40.
Dworkin R. Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2000.
41.
Estlund DM. Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2008.
42.
Kolodny N. Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy? Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2014 Jun;42(3):195–229.
43.
Saunders B. Democracy, Political Equality and Majority Rule. Ethics [Internet]. 2010;121(1):148–77. Available from: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/656474
44.
Abizadeh A. Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory [Internet]. 2008;36(1):37–65. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20452610
45.
Song S. The boundary problem in democratic theory: why the demos should be bounded by the state. International Theory. 2012 Mar;4(01):39–68.
46.
Lopez-Guerra C. Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2005 Jun;13(2):216–34.
47.
Goodin RE. Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2007 Jan;35(1):40–68.
48.
Whelan FG. Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem. In: Liberal democracy (Nomos XXV). New York: New York University Press; 1983.
49.
Miller D. Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2009 Jun;37(3):201–28.
50.
Näsström S. The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies. 2011 Mar;59(1):116–34.
51.
Kolers A. The Territorial State in Cosmopolitan Justice. Social Theory & Practice [Internet]. 2002;28(1):29–50. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=6876301&site=ehost-live
52.
Buchanan A. The Morality of Inclusion. Social Philosophy and Policy. 1993 Jun;10(02):233–57.
53.
Mann M. The Dark Side of Democracy: The Modern Tradition of Ethnic and Political Cleansing. New Left Review [Internet]. 1999;235. Available from: https://newleftreview.org/I/235/michael-mann-the-dark-side-of-democracy-the-modern-tradition-of-ethnic-and-political-cleansing
54.
Owen D. Constituting the polity, constituting the demos: on the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem. Ethics & Global Politics. 2012 Jan;5(3):129–52.
55.
Dahl RA. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1989.
56.
Lopez-Guerra C. Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2005 Jun;13(2):216–34.
57.
Owen D. Resident Aliens, Non-resident Citizens and Voting Rights. In: Citizenship acquisition and national belonging: migration, membership and the liberal democratic state [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. p. 52–73. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780230246775
58.
Owen D. Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: modes of membership and voting rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2011 Dec;14(5):641–63.
59.
Waldron J. The harm in hate speech [Internet]. Vol. 2009. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3301269
60.
Dworkin, R. Foreword. In: Extreme speech and democracy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.001.0001/acprof-9780199548781-miscMatter-4
61.
Brison SJ. The Autonomy Defense of Free Speech. Ethics. 1998 Jan;108(2):312–39.
62.
Braddon-Mitchell D, West C. What is Free Speech? Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004 Dec;12(4):437–60.
63.
Dworkin R. Two Concepts of Liberty. In: Ullmann-Margalit E, Margalit A, editors. Isaiah Berlin: a celebration. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press; 1991.
64.
Horton J. The Satanic Verses Controversy: A Brief Introduction. In: Liberalism, multiculturalism and toleration. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1993.
65.
Jones P. Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie. In: Horton J, Nicholson PP, editors. Toleration: philosophy and practice. Aldershot: Avebury; 1992.
66.
Mckinnon C. Should We Tolerate Holocaust Denial? Res Publica. 2007 May 7;13(1):9–28.
67.
MacKinnon CA. Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1987.
68.
Miles JK. Social Theory & Practice. 2012;38(2):213–30. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=75500645&site=ehost-live
69.
Mill JS, Little B. On liberty. London: John W. Parker; 1859.
70.
Scanlon TM. A Theory of Freedom of Expression. In: The difficulty of tolerance: essays in political philosophy [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/difficulty-of-tolerance/theory-of-freedom-of-expression/3F20BF32C62FC6F810ED20ADF9CE0065
71.
Waldron J. Rushdie and Religion. In: Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991. Cambridge, [England]: Cambridge Universtiy Press; 1993. p. 134–43.
72.
West C. The Free Speech Argument against Pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 2003;33(3):391–422. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40232191
73.
Smith W. Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica. 2004 Dec;10(4):353–77.
74.
Delmas C. Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness. Law and Philosophy. 2014 Jul;33(4):465–88.
75.
Delmas C. Disobedience, Civil and Otherwise. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 2017 Mar;11(1):195–211.
76.
Brownlee K. Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. 2004 Dec;10(4):337–51.
77.
Brownlee K. Conscience and conviction: the case for civil disobedience [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592944.001.0001/acprof-9780199592944
78.
Celikates R. Democratizing civil disobedience. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 2016 Dec;42(10):982–94.
79.
Lefkowitz D. In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. 2017 May 4;
80.
David Lyons. Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. 1998;27(1):31–49. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2672840
81.
Weinstock D. How Democratic is Civil Disobedience? Criminal Law and Philosophy. 2016 Dec;10(4):707–20.
82.
Rawls J. A theory of justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1972.
83.
Rawls J. Justice as fairness. In: A theory of justice. Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1999. p. 3–46.
84.
G. A. Cohen. Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. 1997;26(1). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2961909?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
85.
Parfit D, Scanlon T. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values at UC Berkeley - Lecture Three: Contractualism [Internet]. Available from: http://www.language.berkeley.edu/SA_MP3files/Tanner/1836_3.mp3
86.
Freeman SR. The Original Position. In: Rawls. London: Routledge; 2007. p. 141–98.
87.
Arneson RJ. Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition [Internet]. 1999;93(1):77–112. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4320904
88.
Freeman S. ntroduction. In: The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
89.
Hampton J. Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory? The Journal of Philosophy. 1980 Jun;77(6).
90.
Harsanyi JC. The Maximin Principle. In: Farrelly CP, editor. Contemporary political theory: a reader [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2004. p. 22–31. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.bris.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781848605411
91.
Maffettone S. Rawls: an introduction. Cambridge: Polity; 2010.
92.
Mandle J. Rawls’s A theory of justice: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
93.
Mandle J. What’s left of liberalism?: an interpretation and defense of justice as fairness. Lanham: Lexington; 2000.
94.
Taylor RS. Rawls’s Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. 2003;31(3):246–71. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3558006
95.
Anderson ES. What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics. 1999 Jan;109(2):287–337.
96.
Ronald Dworkin. What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. 1981;10(4). Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265047?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
97.
Cohen GA. Self-ownership, freedom, and equality [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/selfownership-freedom-and-equality/26B021AEDD3ECE97D388586C27C90D18
98.
Ryan CC. Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty. Ethics [Internet]. 1977;87(2):126–41. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2380061
99.
Friedman MD. Nozick’s libertarian project: an elaboration and defense. London: Bloomsbury Academic; 2012.
100.
Mack E. Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 2002 Jun;1(2):237–76.
101.
Mack E. Libertarianism. In: Klosko G, editor. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238804.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199238804-e-41
102.
Mack E. Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 2002 Feb;1(1):75–108.
103.
Tomasi J. Free market fairness [Internet]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2013. Available from: http://princeton.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.23943/princeton/9780691144467.001.0001/upso-9780691144467
104.
Steiner H. The Natural Right to the Means of Production. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1977 Jan;27(106).
105.
Vallentyne P. Libertarianism and the State. Social Philosophy and Policy. 2007 Jan;24(01).
106.
Stemplowska Z. Rescuing Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy. 2013 Dec;44(4):402–19.
107.
Lazenby H. One Kiss Too Many? Giving, Luck Egalitarianism and Other-affecting Choice*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2009 Apr;
108.
Tan KC. A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism. The Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 2008;105(11):665–90. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20620136
109.
Otsuka M. Luck, Insurance, and Equality. Ethics. 2002 Oct;113(1):40–54.
110.
Dworkin R. Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2000.
111.
Stemplowska Z. Global Poverty. In: McKinnon C, Jubb R, Tomlin P, editors. Issues in political theory. Fourth Edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2019. p. 199–219.
112.
Zwolinski M. Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly [Internet]. 2007 Oct;17(4):689–727. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/stable/27673206?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
113.
Caney S. Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
114.
Gilabert P. The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2005 Jan;7(5):537–50.
115.
Daskal S. Confining Pogge’s Analysis of Global Poverty to Genuinely Negative Duties. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2013 Apr;16(2):369–91.
116.
Gauri V, Sonderholm J. Global poverty: four normative positions. Journal of Global Ethics. 2012 Dec;8(2–3):193–213.
117.
Christiano T, Christman JP. Distributive Justice at Home and Abroad. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy [Internet]. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=428114
118.
Schweiger G. Recognition theory and global poverty. Journal of Global Ethics. 2014 Sep 2;10(3):267–73.
119.
Liberto H. Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2014 Aug;17(4):619–29.
120.
Wellman CH. Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics. 2008 Oct;119(1):109–41.
121.
Bertram C. Justifying a Migration Regime from an impartial perspective. In: Do states have the right to exclude immigrants? [Internet]. Polity Press; 2018. p. 29–63. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=5439385&ppg=29
122.
Abizadeh A. Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller. Political Theory [Internet]. 2010;38(1):121–30. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655537
123.
Fine S. The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude. Philosophy Compass. 2013 Mar;8(3):254–68.
124.
Wellman CH, Cole P. Debating the ethics of immigration: is there a right to exclude? [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=800832
125.
Carens JH. The ethics of immigration [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1336461
126.
Huemer M. Is There a Right to Immigrate? Social Theory & Practice [Internet]. 2010;36(3):429–61. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=52811108&site=ehost-live
127.
Oberman K. Immigration as a Human Right. In: Fine S, Ypi L, editors. Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
128.
Miller D. Is there a Human Right to Immigrate? In: Fine S, Ypi L, editors. Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
129.
Miller D. Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh. Political Theory [Internet]. 2010;38(1):111–20. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25655536
130.
Okin SM. Justice and Gender. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. 1987;16(1):42–72. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2265205
131.
Brighouse H, Olin Wright E. Strong Gender Egalitarianism. Politics & Society. 2008 Sep;36(3):360–72.
132.
Schouten G. Restricting Justice: Political Interventions in the Home and in the Market. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2013 Sep;41(4):357–88.
133.
Baehr AR. Perfectionism, Feminism and Public Reason. Law and Philosophy. 2008 Mar;27(2):193–222.
134.
Chambers C. Sex, culture, and justice: the limits of choice. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2008.
135.
Chambers C. Gender. In: Issues in political theory [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 265–88. Available from: https://www-oxfordpoliticstrove-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/view/10.1093/hepl/9780198784067.001.0001/hepl-9780198784067
136.
Cohen GA. Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy  Public Affairs. 1997 Jan;26(1):3–30.
137.
Brake E. Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2004 Nov 1;1(3):293–309.
138.
Schouten G. Citizenship, reciprocity, and the gendered division of labor. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 2017 May;16(2):174–209.
139.
Satz D. Gender. In: Estlund D, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780195376692-e-19
140.
Okin SM. ‘Forty acres and a mule’ for women: Rawls and feminism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 2005 Jun;4(2):233–48.
141.
Swift A. Justice, Luck and the family. In: Bowles S, Gintis H, Osborne Groves M, editors. Unequal chances: family background and economic success. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2005. p. 256–76.
142.
Okin SM, Howard M. Is multiculturalism bad for women? [Internet]. Cohen J, Nussbaum MC, editors. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1999. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5542046
143.
Rawls J. The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review. 1997 Summer;64(3).
144.
Simmons J. The Theories. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 102–20. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511809286A015/type/book_part