1.
Welcome – Blackboard Learn, https://www.ole.bris.ac.uk/webapps/portal/execute/tabs/tabAction?tab_tab_group_id=_17_1.
2.
POLI22202 Unit Summary, https://www.bris.ac.uk/unit-programme-catalogue/UnitDetails.jsa?ayrCode=19%2F20&unitCode=POLI22202.
3.
Philosophy & Public Affairs.
7.
Politics, Philosophy & Economics.
8.
Contemporary Political Theory.
9.
Journal of Political Philosophy.
10.
Social Philosophy and Policy.
11.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/.
12.
Stilz, A.: Why Does the State Matter Morally?’,. In: Varieties of Sovereignty and Citizenship. pp. 244–264. University of Pennsylvania Press (2012).
13.
Simmons, J.: The Problem and Its Significance. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? pp. 93–101. Cambridge University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809286.006.
14.
Simmons, J.: The Theories. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? pp. 102–120. Cambridge University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809286.007.
15.
Simmons, A. John: The Principle of Fair Play. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 8, 307–337.
16.
Wolff, R.P.: The Conflict between Authority and Autonomy. In: In defense of anarchism. pp. 20–31. Harper Torchbooks, New York (1976).
17.
Hampton, J.: Political philosophy. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo (1997).
18.
Raz, J.: The morality of freedom. Clarendon, Oxford (1986).
19.
Raz, J.: The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition. In: Ethics in the public domain: essays in the morality of law and politics. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1994).
20.
Rousseau, J.-J.: Book I, chapters 6-8. In: Discours Sur l’Oeconomie Politique; Du Contrat Social: Discourse on Political Economy and the Social Contract. Oxford University Press (1999).
21.
Huemer, M.: The problem of political authority: an examination of the right to coerce and the duty to obey. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).
22.
Morris, C.W.: An essay on the modern state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
23.
Scott, J.C.: Two cheers for anarchism: six easy pieces on autonomy, dignity, and meaningful work and play. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012).
24.
Simmons, A.J.: Moral principles and political obligations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1979).
25.
Stilz, A.: Liberal loyalty: freedom, obligation, and the state. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2009).
26.
Stiltz, A.: Robert Paul Wolff, In Defense of Anarchism. In: Levy, J.T. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory (2016).
27.
Renzo, M.: Political Authority and Unjust Wars. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 99, 336–357 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12487.
28.
Brennan, J.: The Right to a Competent Electorate. The Philosophical Quarterly. 61, 700–724 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.699.x.
29.
Anderson, E.: Democracy: Intrinsic vs Instrumental value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. pp. 213–227. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K. (2009).
30.
Christiano, T.: The Authority of Democracy*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 12, 266–290 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00200.x.
31.
Anderson, E.: Democracy Intrinsic and instrumental value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. pp. 213–228. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K. (2009).
32.
Kolodny, N.: Rule Over None II: Social Equality and the Justification of Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 42, 287–336 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12037.
33.
Abizadeh, A.: On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem. American Political Science Review. 106, 867–882 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000421.
34.
Anderson, E.: Democracy: Instrumental versus Non-Instrumental Value. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2009).
35.
Anderson, E.: The Epistemology of Democracy. Episteme. 3, 8–22 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2006.3.1-2.8.
36.
Arneson, R.J.: Democracy is not Intrinsically Just. In: Justice and democracy: essays for Brian Barry. pp. 40–58. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
37.
Arneson, R.J.: Defending the Purely Instrumental Account of Democratic Legitimacy. Journal of Political Philosophy. 11, 122–132 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00170.
38.
Brennan, J.: Polluting The Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 87, 535–549 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802587309.
39.
Christiano, T.: Democracy as Equality. In: Democracy. pp. 31–50. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2002).
40.
Dworkin, R.: Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000).
41.
Estlund, D.M.: Democratic authority: a philosophical framework. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008).
42.
Kolodny, N.: Rule Over None I: What Justifies Democracy? Philosophy & Public Affairs. 42, 195–229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12035.
43.
Saunders, B.: Democracy, Political Equality and Majority Rule. Ethics. 121, 148–177 (2010).
44.
Abizadeh, A.: Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory. 36, 37–65 (2008).
45.
Song, S.: The boundary problem in democratic theory: why the demos should be bounded by the state. International Theory. 4, 39–68 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971911000248.
46.
Lopez-Guerra, C.: Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 13, 216–234 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x.
47.
Goodin, R.E.: Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 35, 40–68 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2007.00098.x.
48.
Whelan, F.G.: Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem. In: Liberal democracy (Nomos XXV). New York University Press, New York (1983).
49.
Miller, D.: Democracy’s Domain. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 37, 201–228 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x.
50.
Näsström, S.: The Challenge of the All-Affected Principle. Political Studies. 59, 116–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00845.x.
51.
Kolers, A.: The Territorial State in Cosmopolitan Justice. Social Theory & Practice. 28, 29–50 (2002).
52.
Buchanan, A.: The Morality of Inclusion. Social Philosophy and Policy. 10, 233–257 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004210.
53.
Mann, M.: The Dark Side of Democracy: The Modern Tradition of Ethnic and Political Cleansing. New Left Review. 235, (1999).
54.
Owen, D.: Constituting the polity, constituting the demos: on the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem. Ethics & Global Politics. 5, 129–152 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i3.18617.
55.
Dahl, R.A.: Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press, New Haven (1989).
56.
Lopez-Guerra, C.: Should Expatriates Vote?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 13, 216–234 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.x.
57.
Owen, D.: Resident Aliens, Non-resident Citizens and Voting Rights. In: Citizenship acquisition and national belonging: migration, membership and the liberal democratic state. pp. 52–73. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010).
58.
Owen, D.: Transnational citizenship and the democratic state: modes of membership and voting rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 14, 641–663 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2011.617123.
59.
Waldron, J.: The harm in hate speech. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2012).
60.
Dworkin, R.: Foreword. In: Extreme speech and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
61.
Brison, S.J.: The Autonomy Defense of Free Speech. Ethics. 108, 312–339 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/233807.
62.
Braddon-Mitchell, D., West, C.: What is Free Speech? Journal of Political Philosophy. 12, 437–460 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00208.x.
63.
Dworkin, R.: Two Concepts of Liberty. In: Ullmann-Margalit, E. and Margalit, A. (eds.) Isaiah Berlin: a celebration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois (1991).
64.
Horton, J.: The Satanic Verses Controversy: A Brief Introduction. In: Liberalism, multiculturalism and toleration. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1993).
65.
Jones, P.: Respecting Beliefs and Rebuking Rushdie. In: Horton, J. and Nicholson, P.P. (eds.) Toleration: philosophy and practice. Avebury, Aldershot (1992).
66.
Mckinnon, C.: Should We Tolerate Holocaust Denial? Res Publica. 13, 9–28 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-006-9013-8.
67.
MacKinnon, C.A.: Feminism unmodified: discourses on life and law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1987).
68.
Miles, J.K.: Social Theory & Practice. 38, 213–230 (2012).
69.
Mill, J.S., Little, B.: On liberty. John W. Parker, London (1859).
70.
Scanlon, T.M.: A Theory of Freedom of Expression. In: The difficulty of tolerance: essays in political philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).
71.
Waldron, J.: Rushdie and Religion. In: Liberal rights: collected papers, 1981-1991. pp. 134–143. Cambridge Universtiy Press, Cambridge, [England] (1993).
72.
West, C.: The Free Speech Argument against Pornography. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 33, 391–422 (2003).
73.
Smith, W.: Democracy, Deliberation and Disobedience. Res Publica. 10, 353–377 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-004-2327-5.
74.
Delmas, C.: Political Resistance: A Matter of Fairness. Law and Philosophy. 33, 465–488 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-013-9189-y.
75.
Delmas, C.: Disobedience, Civil and Otherwise. Criminal Law and Philosophy. 11, 195–211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-014-9347-9.
76.
Brownlee, K.: Features of a Paradigm Case of Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. 10, 337–351 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-004-2326-6.
77.
Brownlee, K.: Conscience and conviction: the case for civil disobedience. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
78.
Celikates, R.: Democratizing civil disobedience. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 42, 982–994 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453716638562.
79.
Lefkowitz, D.: In Defense of Penalizing (but not Punishing) Civil Disobedience. Res Publica. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-017-9362-5.
80.
David Lyons: Moral Judgment, Historical Reality, and Civil Disobedience. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 27, 31–49 (1998).
81.
Weinstock, D.: How Democratic is Civil Disobedience? Criminal Law and Philosophy. 10, 707–720 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-015-9367-0.
82.
Rawls, J.: A theory of justice. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1972).
83.
Rawls, J.: Justice as fairness. In: A theory of justice. pp. 3–46. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999).
84.
G. A. Cohen: Where the Action is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 26, (1997).
85.
Parfit, D., Scanlon, T.: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values at UC Berkeley - Lecture Three: Contractualism, http://www.language.berkeley.edu/SA_MP3files/Tanner/1836_3.mp3.
86.
Freeman, S.R.: The Original Position. In: Rawls. pp. 141–198. Routledge, London (2007).
87.
Arneson, R.J.: Against Rawlsian Equality of Opportunity. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 93, 77–112 (1999).
88.
Freeman, S.: ntroduction. In: The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521651670.001.
89.
Hampton, J.: Contracts and Choices: Does Rawls Have a Social Contract Theory? The Journal of Philosophy. 77, (1980). https://doi.org/10.2307/2025640.
90.
Harsanyi, J.C.: The Maximin Principle. In: Farrelly, C.P. (ed.) Contemporary political theory: a reader. pp. 22–31. SAGE, London (2004).
91.
Maffettone, S.: Rawls: an introduction. Polity, Cambridge (2010).
92.
Mandle, J.: Rawls’s A theory of justice: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
93.
Mandle, J.: What’s left of liberalism?: an interpretation and defense of justice as fairness. Lexington, Lanham (2000).
94.
Taylor, R.S.: Rawls’s Defense of the Priority of Liberty: A Kantian Reconstruction. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 31, 246–271 (2003).
95.
Anderson, E.S.: What Is the Point of Equality? Ethics. 109, 287–337 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1086/233897.
96.
Ronald Dworkin: What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 10, (1981).
97.
Cohen, G.A.: Self-ownership, freedom, and equality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995).
98.
Ryan, C.C.: Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty. Ethics. 87, 126–141 (1977).
99.
Friedman, M.D.: Nozick’s libertarian project: an elaboration and defense. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2012).
100.
Mack, E.: Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 1, 237–276 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X02001002004.
101.
Mack, E.: Libertarianism. In: Klosko, G. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy (2011).
102.
Mack, E.: Self-ownership, Marxism, and Egalitarianism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 1, 75–108 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X02001001004.
103.
Tomasi, J.: Free market fairness. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2013).
104.
Steiner, H.: The Natural Right to the Means of Production. The Philosophical Quarterly. 27, (1977). https://doi.org/10.2307/2218927.
105.
Vallentyne, P.: Libertarianism and the State. Social Philosophy and Policy. 24, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052507070082.
106.
Stemplowska, Z.: Rescuing Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy. 44, 402–419 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12039.
107.
Lazenby, H.: One Kiss Too Many? Giving, Luck Egalitarianism and Other-affecting Choice*. Journal of Political Philosophy. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00335.x.
108.
Tan, K.-C.: A Defense of Luck Egalitarianism. The Journal of Philosophy. 105, 665–690 (2008).
109.
Otsuka, M.: Luck, Insurance, and Equality. Ethics. 113, 40–54 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1086/341322.
110.
Dworkin, R.: Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2000).
111.
Stemplowska, Z.: Global Poverty. In: McKinnon, C., Jubb, R., and Tomlin, P. (eds.) Issues in political theory. pp. 199–219. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2019).
112.
Zwolinski, M.: Sweatshops, Choice, and Exploitation. Business Ethics Quarterly. 17, 689–727 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20071745.
113.
Caney, S.: Justice beyond borders: a global political theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
114.
Gilabert, P.: The Duty to Eradicate Global Poverty: Positive or Negative? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 7, 537–550 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-6489-9.
115.
Daskal, S.: Confining Pogge’s Analysis of Global Poverty to Genuinely Negative Duties. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 16, 369–391 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9349-4.
116.
Gauri, V., Sonderholm, J.: Global poverty: four normative positions. Journal of Global Ethics. 8, 193–213 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2012.705787.
117.
Christiano, T., Christman, J.P.: Distributive Justice at Home and Abroad. In: Contemporary debates in political philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U.K. (2009).
118.
Schweiger, G.: Recognition theory and global poverty. Journal of Global Ethics. 10, 267–273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2014.969439.
119.
Liberto, H.: Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 17, 619–629 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9494-z.
120.
Wellman, C.H.: Immigration and Freedom of Association. Ethics. 119, 109–141 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1086/592311.
121.
Bertram, C.: Justifying a Migration Regime from an impartial perspective. In: Do states have the right to exclude immigrants? pp. 29–63. Polity Press (2018).
122.
Abizadeh, A.: Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller. Political Theory. 38, 121–130 (2010).
123.
Fine, S.: The Ethics of Immigration: Self-Determination and the Right to Exclude. Philosophy Compass. 8, 254–268 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12019.
124.
Wellman, C.H., Cole, P.: Debating the ethics of immigration: is there a right to exclude? Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
125.
Carens, J.H.: The ethics of immigration. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013).
126.
Huemer, M.: Is There a Right to Immigrate? Social Theory & Practice. 36, 429–461 (2010).
127.
Oberman, K.: Immigration as a Human Right. In: Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.) Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.003.0003.
128.
Miller, D.: Is there a Human Right to Immigrate? In: Fine, S. and Ypi, L. (eds.) Migration in political theory: the ethics of movement and membership. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676606.001.0001.
129.
Miller, D.: Why Immigration Controls Are Not Coercive: A Reply to Arash Abizadeh. Political Theory. 38, 111–120 (2010).
130.
Okin, S.M.: Justice and Gender. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 16, 42–72 (1987).
131.
Brighouse, H., Olin Wright, E.: Strong Gender Egalitarianism. Politics & Society. 36, 360–372 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208320566.
132.
Schouten, G.: Restricting Justice: Political Interventions in the Home and in the Market. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 41, 357–388 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12022.
133.
Baehr, A.R.: Perfectionism, Feminism and Public Reason. Law and Philosophy. 27, 193–222 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-007-9017-3.
134.
Chambers, C.: Sex, culture, and justice: the limits of choice. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania (2008).
135.
Chambers, C.: Gender. In: Issues in political theory. pp. 265–288. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
136.
Cohen, G.A.: Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice. Philosophy Public Affairs. 26, 3–30 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00048.x.
137.
Brake, E.: Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy. 1, 293–309 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/174046810400100305.
138.
Schouten, G.: Citizenship, reciprocity, and the gendered division of labor. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 16, 174–209 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X15600830.
139.
Satz, D.: Gender. In: Estlund, D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy (2012).
140.
Okin, S.M.: ‘Forty acres and a mule’ for women: Rawls and feminism. Politics, Philosophy & Economics. 4, 233–248 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X05052540.
141.
Swift, A.: Justice, Luck and the family. In: Bowles, S., Gintis, H., and Osborne Groves, M. (eds.) Unequal chances: family background and economic success. pp. 256–276. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2005).
142.
Okin, S.M., Howard, M.: Is multiculturalism bad for women? Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey (1999).
143.
Rawls, J.: The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review. 64, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/1600311.
144.
Simmons, J.: The Theories. In: Is There a Duty to Obey the Law? pp. 102–120. Cambridge University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809286.007.
