[1]
A., A. Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People’. 17, 3.
[2]
A, B. 2016. Chapter 13: Secondary analysis and official statistics. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[3]
A., B. 2016. Chapter 16: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[4]
A., B. 2016. Chapter 17: Ethnography and Participant Observation’. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[5]
A., B. 2016. Chapter 19: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[6]
A., F. and J.H., F. 2018. The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. SAGE. 645–672.
[7]
A., O. Gender, Methodology and People’s Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science’. Sociology. 32, 4, 707–731.
[8]
A., O. 1981. Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’. Doing feminist research. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[9]
AA, Y.J. 2004. ‘Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: The inside and outside of it’. Researching race and racism. Routledge.
[10]
A.N., J. 2005. Internet Behaviour and the Design of Virtual Methods’. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Berg. 21–34.
[11]
Archiving qualitative research data’: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html.
[12]
Atkinson, P. 1990. The ethnographic imagination: textual constructions of reality. Routledge.
[13]
Atkinson, R. 1998. The life story interview. Sage.
[14]
B., B. 2014. Chapter 6: Ethnographic Field Strategies’. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[15]
B. L., B. 2014. Chapter 3: Ethical Issues’. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[16]
Barley, N. 2000. The innocent anthropologist: notes from a mud hut. Waveland Press.
[17]
Becker, H.S. 1967. Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 14, 3 (Jan. 1967), 239–247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/799147.
[18]
Bell, J. 2010. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science. Open University Press.
[19]
Belzile, J.A. and Öberg, G. 2012. Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research. 12, 4 (Aug. 2012), 459–472. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111433089.
[20]
Berg, B.L. 2014. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[21]
Berg, B.L. 2014. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[22]
Bergman Blix, S. and Wettergren, Å. 2015. The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qualitative Research. 15, 6 (Dec. 2015), 688–704. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114561348.
[23]
Beverley Holbrook and Peter Jackson 1996. Shopping around: Focus Group Research in North London. Area. 28, 2 (1996), 136–142.
[24]
Bone, J. 2006. The Hard Sell: an Ethnographic Study of the Direct Selling Industry. Taylor and Francis.
[25]
Bone, J. 2006. ‘The longest day’: ‘flexible’ contracts, performance-related pay and risk shifting in the UK direct selling sector. Work, employment and society. 20, 1 (Mar. 2006), 109–127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006061276.
[26]
Bourgois, P.I. 2003. In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge University Press.
[27]
Brooke, S.-C. 2015. ‘Facebook Groups as Potential Political Publics? Exploring Ideas of the Political amongst Young British Facebook Users’. Muslims and political participation in Britain. T. Peace, ed. Routledge. 156–173.
[28]
Broom, A. et al. 2009. Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing. Sociology. 43, 6 (Dec. 2009), 1163–1180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509345704.
[29]
Bryman, A. 2016. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[30]
Bulmer, M. ed. 1982. Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. Holmes & Meier Publishers.
[31]
Bulmer, M. 1982. When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation. Qualitative Sociology. 5, 4 (1982), 251–264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986753.
[32]
Burnham, P. et al. 2008. Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[33]
Burton, D. 2000. Research training for social scientists: a handbook for postgraduate researchers. Sage.
[34]
C., R. On feminist methodology: male reason versus female empowerment’. Sociology. 26, 2, 207–212.
[35]
Calvey, D. 2008. The Art and Politics of Covert Research. Sociology. 42, 5 (Oct. 2008), 905–918. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094569.
[36]
Carter, D. 2005. Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society. 8, 2 (Jun. 2005), 148–167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146235.
[37]
CARTER, J. 2004. Research note: reflections on interviewing across the ethnic divide. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 7, 4 (Sep. 2004), 345–353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000094560.
[38]
Clark, T. 2010. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 10, 4 (Aug. 2010), 399–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796.
[39]
Clifford, J. et al. 2010. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.
[40]
Coffey, A. 1999. The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. Sage.
[41]
Cofff, H. and Chapman, H. 2014. Changing Facebook Profile Pictures as Part of a Campaign: Who Does it and Why? SSRN Electronic Journal. (2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440558.
[42]
Constance Holden 1979. Ethics in Social Science Research. Science. 206, 4418 (1979), 537–540.
[43]
Craig, C. 2008. Foreword. Engaging contradictions: theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship. University of California Press.
[44]
D., S. 2014. Chapter 3: Ethnography and Observation’. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE.
[45]
D., S. 2014. Chapter 4: ‘Interviews’. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE.
[46]
D., S. 2014. Chapter 9: Research Ethics’. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE.
[47]
D., S. 2014. Chapter 11: The Relevance of Qualitative Research’. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE.
[48]
Dale, A. et al. 1988. Doing secondary analysis. Unwin Hyman.
[49]
David, M. et al. 2001. Children and School-based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. 27, 3 (Jun. 2001), 347–365. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120048340.
[50]
David, M. 2002. Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 5, 1 (Jan. 2002), 11–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570110098037.
[51]
Deianira Ganga 2006. Cultural ‘Insiders’ and the Issue of Positionality in Qualitative Migration Research: Moving ‘Across’ and Moving ‘Along’ Researcher-Participant Divides. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 7, 3 (2006).
[52]
DeLorme, D.E. et al. 2001. Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics. 33, 4 (2001), 271–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011812620080.
[53]
Denscome, M. 2014. Observation. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw Hill Education/Open University Press.
[54]
Devine, F. and Heath, S. 2009. Doing social science: evidence and methods in empirical research. Palgrave Macmillan.
[55]
Devine, F. and Heath, S. 1999. Sociological research methods in context. Palgrave.
[56]
Dickson-Swift, V. et al. 2009. Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research. 9, 1 (Feb. 2009), 61–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098031.
[57]
Dodson, L. et al. 2007. Researching Inequality Through Interpretive Collaborations. Qualitative Inquiry. 13, 6 (Sep. 2007), 821–843. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407304458.
[58]
Doing research with refugeesIssues and guidelines - Policy Press Scholarship: http://policypress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1332/policypress/9781861345981.001.0001/upso-9781861345981.
[59]
ESRC National Centre for Research Methods: https://www.ncrm.ac.uk/.
[60]
F., D. and S., H. 1999. ‘Chapter 7: Crime: Hobbs’ Doing the Business’. Sociological research methods in context. Palgrave.
[61]
Fallon, G. and Brown, R.B. 2002. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2, 2 (Aug. 2002), 195–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200204.
[62]
FAWCETT, B. and HEARN, J. 2004. Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 7, 3 (Jul. 2004), 201–218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210163989.
[63]
Finlay, L. 2002. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research. 2, 2 (Aug. 2002), 209–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205.
[64]
Flick, U. et al. 2004. A companion to qualitative research. Sage.
[65]
Flick, U. et al. 2004. A companion to qualitative research. Sage.
[66]
Flick, U. 2014. An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE.
[67]
Foley, D.E. 2002. Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 15, 4 (Jul. 2002), 469–490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390210145534.
[68]
G, C. 2015. Chapter 1: Conceptualising Social Life’. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[69]
G., G. 2000. Individual and Group Interviewing’. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. SAGE.
[70]
Gamson, W.A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge University Press.
[71]
Garcia, A.C. et al. 2009. Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 38, 1 (Feb. 2009), 52–84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839.
[72]
Gibson, W.J. and Brown, A. 2009. Working with qualitative data. SAGE.
[73]
Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. eds. 2015. Researching social life. SAGE.
[74]
G.J., H. et al. 2004. ‘"Need help ASAP!!!’: A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics’. Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang.
[75]
Glucksmann, M. and Cavendish, R. 2009. Women on the line. Routledge.
[76]
Gomm, R. 2008. Evaluative and Emancipatory Research. Social research methodology: a critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. 322–343.
[77]
Goodson, L. and Phillimore, J. 2012. ‘Community research: opportunities and challenges’. Community research for participation: from theory to method. L. Goodson and J. Phillimore, eds. Policy.
[78]
Greenbaum, T.L. 1998. The handbook for focus group research. Sage.
[79]
Gunaratnam, Y. 2003. Researching race and ethnicity: methods, knowledge and power. SAGE.
[80]
H. S, B. and B., G. 1969. Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison’. Issues in participant observation: a text and reader. Addison-Wesley.
[81]
Hakim, C. 1982. Secondary analysis in social research: a guide to data sources and methods with examples. Allen & Unwin.
[82]
Hammersley, M. 1993. Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. Sage.
[83]
Hammersley, M. 2000. Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. Routledge.
[84]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Taylor & Francis.
[85]
Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. 2007. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Taylor & Francis.
[86]
Harding, S.G. 1987. Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Open University Press.
[87]
Harper, D. 1998. An Argument for Visual Sociology. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press. 24–41.
[88]
Harper, D. 2002. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies. 17, 1 (Jan. 2002), 13–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345.
[89]
Harvey, W.S. 2011. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research. 11, 4 (Aug. 2011), 431–441. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404329.
[90]
Helen Pain 2012. A Literature Review to Evaluate the Choice and Use of Visual Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE. 11, 4 (2012), 303–319.
[91]
Herrera, C.D. 1999. Two arguments for ‘covert methods’ in social research. The British Journal of Sociology. 50, 2 (Jun. 1999), 331–343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00331.x.
[92]
Hine, C. 2005. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Berg.
[93]
Hobbs, D. 1988. Doing the business: entrepreneurship, the working class and detectives in the East End of London. Clarendon Press.
[94]
Holdaway, S. 1997. Constructing and Sustaining ‘Race’ within the Police Workforce. The British Journal of Sociology. 48, 1 (Mar. 1997). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/591908.
[95]
Homan, R. 1991. The ethics of social research. Longman.
[96]
Hoong Sin, C. 2007. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 7, 4 (Nov. 2007), 477–499. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107082304.
[97]
Hoong Sin, C. 2007. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 7, 4 (Nov. 2007), 477–499. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107082304.
[98]
Hydén, L.-C. and Bülow, P. 2003. Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups—some methodological considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 6, 4 (Jan. 2003), 305–321. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210124865.
[99]
I., B. and N., D. 2018. Chapter 2: Ethnography: Relating the Part to the Whole’. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. SAGE.
[100]
Islam, N. 2000. Research as an Act of Betrayal: Researching Race in an Asian Community in Los Angeles. Racing research, researching race: methodological dilemmas in critical race studies. New York University Press. 35–66.
[101]
J., B. 2004. Working Qualitatively’. Qualitative research practice. Sage.
[102]
J., F. 1984. It’s great to have someone to talk to; the ethics and politics of interviewing women’. Social researching: politics, problems, practice. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[103]
J., M. 2002. Chapter 4: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. Qualitative researching. Sage.
[104]
J., M. 2002. Chapter 5: Observing and Participating’. Qualitative researching. Sage.
[105]
J., M. and B., G. 2016. The inside and the outside: finding realities in interviews’. Qualitative research. D. Silverman, ed. Sage Publications.
[106]
J., P. Evidence and proof in documentary research’. The Sociological review. 29.
[107]
James, N. and Busher, H. 2009. Online interviewing. Sage.
[108]
J.C., H. and D.J., J. A Tale of Two Analyses: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data. 17, 1–9.
[109]
Jenny Kitzinger Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings.
[110]
K., B. 1993. Interviewing survivors of marital rape. Researching sensitive topics. Sage.
[111]
Kazmer, M.M. and Xie, B. 2008. QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWING IN INTERNET STUDIES: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society. 11, 2 (Mar. 2008), 257–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946333.
[112]
Kitzinger, J. 1995. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 311, 7000 (Jul. 1995), 299–302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
[113]
Kozinets, R.V. 2010. Cultures and Communities. Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
[114]
Krueger, R.A. and Casey, M.A. 2014. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. SAGE.
[115]
L., B. and J., S. ‘Doing Research, Writing Research: the Dilemmas of political intervention in research on racism. Economy and society. 22, 2, 178–199.
[116]
L, K. 1999. Recontextualising "cyberspace”: methodological considerations for online research’. Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net. SAGE. 57–75.
[117]
L., K. et al. 1994. Researching Women’s Lives or Studying Women’s Oppression? Reflections on what Constitutes Feminist Research. Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. Taylor & Francis.
[118]
Lee, R.M. 2000. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Open University Press.
[119]
Letherby, G. 2003. Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press.
[120]
Liebling, A. 2001. Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research. British Journal of Criminology. 41, 3 (Jun. 2001), 472–484. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.472.
[121]
Lofland, J. and Lofland, L.H. 1984. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth.
[122]
Loïc J. D. Wacquant 1995. The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade. Theory and Society. 24, 4 (1995), 489–535.
[123]
Lynch, M. 2000. Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society. 17, 3 (Jun. 2000), 26–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202.
[124]
M., B. 2016. Chapter 16: Addressing Social Problems through qualitative research’. Qualitative research. D. Silverman, ed. Sage Publications.
[125]
M, B. 2015. Research strategies. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[126]
M., E. and J., G. 2015. Chapter 4: ‘Searching and Reviewing Literature’. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[127]
M, H. Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research.
[128]
M., H. On Feminist Methodology. Sociology. 26, 2, 187–206.
[129]
M., H. Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems’. Sociology. 31 (1), 131–142.
[130]
Mahoney, D. 2007. Constructing Reflexive Fieldwork Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 13, 4 (May 2007), 573–594. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407300765.
[131]
Mann, C. and Stewart, F. 2000. Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. SAGE.
[132]
Mannay, D. 2010. Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research. 10, 1 (Feb. 2010), 91–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348684.
[133]
Manuel, C. 2010. The Other Face of the Earth: Social Movements against the New Global Order’. The power of identity. Wiley-Blackwell.
[134]
Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative researching. Sage.
[135]
Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative researching. Sage.
[136]
Maurizio Teli 2007. The Internet as a Library-Of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 8, 3 (2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.3.283.
[137]
May, T. 2011. Interviewing: methods and process’. Social research: issues, methods and process. Open Universtiy Press.
[138]
May, T. 2011. Social research: issues, methods and process. Open Universtiy Press.
[139]
McAreavey, R. and Muir, J. 2011. Research ethics committees: values and power in higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 14, 5 (Sep. 2011), 391–405. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.565635.
[140]
MCCORMACK, C. 2004. Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 7, 3 (Jul. 2004), 219–236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210166382.
[141]
Mike Savage 2005. Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6, 1 (2005).
[142]
Monahan, T. and Fisher, J.A. 2010. Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field. Qualitative Research. 10, 3 (Jun. 2010), 357–376. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110362874.
[143]
Morgan, D.L. 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage.
[144]
Munday, J. 2006. Identity in Focus. Sociology. 40, 1 (Feb. 2006), 89–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506058436.
[145]
M.V., A. and K.A., M. de P. 2018. Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. SAGE.
[146]
N., A. and S., A. 2015. Chapter 19: Secondary Analysis of Survey Data. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[147]
N., F. 2015. Chapter 14: ‘Ethnography’. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[148]
N., F. and H., T. 2015. Chapter 13: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[149]
N., G. 2015. Chapter 3: ‘Formulating and Refining a Research Question’. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[150]
N., G. 2015. Chapter 8: The Ethics of Social Research’. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[151]
N., Gilbert. 2015. Chapter 2: ‘Research, Theory and Method’. Researching social life. G.N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, eds. SAGE.
[152]
N., S. 2012. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Researching society and culture. SAGE.
[153]
Nencel, L. 2005. Feeling Gender Speak. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 12, 3 (Aug. 2005), 345–361. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805054274.
[154]
Oakley, A. 2016. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 50, 1 (Feb. 2016), 195–213. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515580253.
[155]
O’Connell Davidson, J. and Layder, D. 1994. Methods, sex and madness. Routledge.
[156]
Överlien, C. et al. 2005. The Focus Group Interview as an In‐depth Method? Young Women Talking About Sexuality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 8, 4 (Oct. 2005), 331–344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557042000119607.
[157]
P., A. and A., C. 2011. Chapter 4: Analysing Documentary Realities. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE.
[158]
P., S. Research without consent’.
[159]
Pawson, R. 1996. Theorizing the Interview. The British Journal of Sociology. 47, 2 (Jun. 1996). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/591728.
[160]
Peabody, R.L. et al. 1990. Interviewing Political Elites. PS: Political Science and Politics. 23, 3 (Sep. 1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/419807.
[161]
Pink, S. 2001. More Visualising, More Methodologies: On Video, Reflexivity and Qualitative Research. The Sociological Review. 49, 4 (Nov. 2001), 586–599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00349.
[162]
Pittaway, E. et al. 2010. ‘Stop Stealing Our Stories’: The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2, 2 (Jul. 2010), 229–251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huq004.
[163]
Plummer, K. 2001. Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. Sage.
[164]
Polsky, N. 1971. Hustlers, beats and others. Penguin.
[165]
Prior, L. 2004. Doing things with Documents. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. SAGE. 76–94.
[166]
Prior, L. 2008. Repositioning Documents in Social Research. Sociology. 42, 5 (Oct. 2008), 821–836. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564.
[167]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[168]
Punch, M. 1986. The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Sage.
[169]
R. V., K. Chapter 2 ‘Understanding Culture Online.
[170]
Reeves, C.L. 2010. A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research. 10, 3 (Jun. 2010), 315–331. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109360150.
[171]
Reinharz, S. and Davidman, L. 1992. Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press.
[172]
Renzetti, C.M. and Lee, R.M. 1993. Researching sensitive topics. Sage.
[173]
Richardson, L. 2000. Evaluating Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 6, 2 (Jun. 2000), 253–255. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600207.
[174]
Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. 2003. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.
[175]
Robert K. Merton 1972. Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology. 78, 1 (1972), 9–47.
[176]
Roberts, H. 1981. Doing feminist research. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
[177]
RODGERS, J. 1999. Trying to Get it Right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society. 14, 4 (Jul. 1999), 421–433. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926046.
[178]
Rosalind, E. and Holland, J. What is Qualitative Interviewing?
[179]
Rose, G. 2016. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE.
[180]
Rose, W. et al. Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review.
[181]
Roulston, K. 2010. Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research. 10, 2 (Apr. 2010), 199–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109356739.
[182]
Rubin, H.J. 1995. Keeping on Target While Hanging Loose: Designing Qualitative Interviews. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage. 42–64.
[183]
Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I.S. 2012. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage.
[184]
Ryen, A. 2007. Ethical Issues’. Qualitative research practice. C. Seale et al., eds. SAGE Publications Ltd. 230–247.
[185]
S., W. 2011. Chapter 10: ‘Focus Group Research’. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE.
[186]
Sarah Elsie, B. and Rosalind, E. How many qualitative interviews is enough.
[187]
Schrum, L. 1995. Framing the Debate: Ethical Research in the Information Age. Qualitative Inquiry. 1, 3 (Sep. 1995), 311–326. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100303.
[188]
Scott, J. 1990. Assessing Documentary Sources. A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. Polity Press. 19–35.
[189]
Silverman, D. 2014. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE.
[190]
Silverman, D. 2014. Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE.
[191]
Silverman, D. ed. 2016. Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[192]
Silverman, D. ed. 2016. Qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[193]
Smithson, J. 2000. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 3, 2 (Jan. 2000), 103–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172.
[194]
Smithson, J. 2000. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 3, 2 (Jan. 2000), 103–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172.
[195]
Social Research Update 2: Using diaries in social research: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU2.html.
[196]
Social Research Update 11: Visual research methods: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html.
[197]
Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html.
[198]
Social Research Update 22: Secondary analysis of qualitative data: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html.
[199]
Social Research Update 34: Undertaking Action Research: Negotiating the Road Ahead: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU34.html.
[200]
Social Research Update 40: Photo-Interviewing for research: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU40.html.
[201]
Spicker, P. 2011. Ethical Covert Research. Sociology. 45, 1 (Feb. 2011), 118–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387195.
[202]
Stanley, L. 1990. Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. Routledge.
[203]
Stenvoll, D. and Svensson, P. 2011. Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data. Qualitative Research. 11, 5 (Oct. 2011), 570–586. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413242.
[204]
T., M. 2011. Chapter 3: Values and Ethics in the Research Process’. Social research: issues, methods and process. Open Universtiy Press.
[205]
T., S. 2005. Researching the Online Sex Work Community’. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Berg. 67–79.
[206]
Tang, N. 2002. Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women. Sociology. 36, 3 (Aug. 2002), 703–721. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036003011.
[207]
Tapio Häyhtiö Hard Rock Hallelujah! Empowering Reflexive Political Action on the Internet. Journal for Cultural Research. 11, 4.
[208]
Thomas, J. 1993. Doing critical ethnography. Sage.
[209]
Tim, M. Values and ethics in the research process’.
[210]
Truman, C. et al. 2000. Research and inequality. UCL Press.
[211]
Val Gillies 2005. Secondary Analysis in Exploring Family and Social Change: Addressing the Issue of Context. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6, 1 (2005).
[212]
Van Maanen, J. 2011. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press.
[213]
Waller, V. et al. 2016. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[214]
Waller, V. et al. 2016. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[215]
Warr, D.J. 2005. "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 11, 2 (Apr. 2005), 200–225. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412.
[216]
Warren, C.A.B. 1988. Gender issues in field research. Sage.
[217]
Westmarland, L. 2001. Blowing the Whistle on Police Violence. Gender, Ethnography and Ethics. British Journal of Criminology. 41, 3 (Jun. 2001), 523–535. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.523.
[218]
White, A. et al. 2010. Using visual methodologies to explore contemporary Irish childhoods. Qualitative Research. 10, 2 (Apr. 2010), 143–158. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109356735.
[219]
Wilkinson, S. 1998. Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 1, 3 (Jan. 1998), 181–203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874.
[220]
Wilkinson, S. 1999. How useful are focus groups in feminist research? Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. R.S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, eds. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[221]
Williams, D. 2014. The Study of Development’. International development: ideas, experience, and prospects. B. Currie-Alder et al., eds. Oxford University Press.
[222]
Winlow, S. 2001. Get Ready to Duck. Bouncers and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups. British Journal of Criminology. 41, 3 (Jun. 2001), 536–548. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.536.
[223]
Wolff-Michael Roth 2004. (Un-) Political Ethics, (un-) Ethical Politics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 5, 3 (2004).
[224]
Woodward, S. 2008. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 42, 5 (Oct. 2008), 857–872. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094566.
[225]
Woodward, S. 2008. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 42, 5 (Oct. 2008), 857–872. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094566.
[226]
2007. A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism. (2007).
[227]
A sample chapter 2: Qualitative Social Research: Contemporary Methods for the Digital Age.
[228]
1997. Bias in Social Research. (1997).
[229]
2010. Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues. (2010).
[230]
2000. Can’t Talk, Won’t Talk?: Methodological Issues in Researching Children. (2000).
[231]
‘Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research’.
[232]
2007. Commentary on ‘a Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/secondary Dualism’ (Libby Bishop). (2007).
[233]
2001. Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software. (2001).
[234]
Ethics and the Ruling Relations of Research Production.
[235]
1996. Evaluating an Empowering Research Strategy: Reflections on Action-Research with South Asian Women. (1996).
[236]
1997. From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals? (1997).
[237]
2000. Hubbard: The Usefulness of Indepth Life History Interviews. (2000).
[238]
Knowing your Place: Gender and Reflexivity in two Ethnographies.
[239]
Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires’. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900203.
[240]
Qualitative Research.
[241]
1999. Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web. (1999).
[242]
2007. (Re)Using Qualitative Data? (2007).
[243]
2007. ‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: on the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology. (2007).
[244]
Social Science Gets the Ethics Treatment: Research governance and ethical review.
[245]
2007. What’s [Yet] to Be Seen? Re-Using Qualitative Data. (2007).
