1.
Berg, B.L.: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
2.
Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
3.
Devine, F., Heath, S.: Sociological research methods in context. Palgrave, Basingstoke (1999).
4.
Devine, F., Heath, S.: Doing social science: evidence and methods in empirical research. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).
5.
Gilbert, G.N., Stoneman, P. eds: Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
6.
Mason, J.: Qualitative researching. Sage, London (2002).
7.
May, T.: Social research: issues, methods and process. Open Universtiy Press, Maidenhead (2011).
8.
Silverman, D.: Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
9.
Silverman, D. ed: Qualitative research. Sage Publications, London (2016).
10.
Waller, V., Farquharson, K., Dempsey, D.: Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2016).
11.
A., B.: Chapter 19: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. In: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
12.
Loïc J. D. Wacquant: The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade. Theory and Society. 24, 489–535 (1995).
13.
Waller, V., Farquharson, K., Dempsey, D.: Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2016).
14.
A sample chapter 2: Qualitative Social Research: Contemporary Methods for the Digital Age, https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/72578_Waller_Qualitative_Social_Research.pdf.
15.
Qualitative Research, http://journals.sagepub.com/home/qrj.
16.
ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, https://www.ncrm.ac.uk/.
17.
Williams, D.: The Study of Development’. In: Currie-Alder, B., Kanbur, S.M.R., Malone, D., and Rohinton, M. (eds.) International development: ideas, experience, and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
18.
Bell, J.: Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2010).
19.
Berg, B.L.: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
20.
Burnham, P., Lutz, K.G., Grant, W., Layton-Henry, Z.: Research methods in politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
21.
Burton, D.: Research training for social scientists: a handbook for postgraduate researchers. Sage, London (2000).
22.
J., B.: Working Qualitatively’. In: Qualitative research practice. Sage, London (2004).
23.
A., B.: Chapter 16: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. In: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
24.
G, C.: Chapter 1: Conceptualising Social Life’. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
25.
M., E., J., G.: Chapter 4: ‘Searching and Reviewing Literature’. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
26.
Flick, U., Kardoff, E. von, Steinke, I.: A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London (2004).
27.
N., Gilbert.: Chapter 2: ‘Research, Theory and Method’. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
28.
N., G.: Chapter 3: ‘Formulating and Refining a Research Question’. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
29.
Mason, J.: Qualitative researching. Sage, London (2002).
30.
O’Connell Davidson, J., Layder, D.: Methods, sex and madness. Routledge, London (1994).
31.
Renzetti, C.M., Lee, R.M.: Researching sensitive topics. Sage, Newbury Park (1993).
32.
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J.: Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, London (2003).
33.
Silverman, D.: Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
34.
Silverman, D. ed: Qualitative research. Sage Publications, London (2016).
35.
N., S.: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. In: Researching society and culture. SAGE, Los Angeles (2012).
36.
Rubin, H.J.: Keeping on Target While Hanging Loose: Designing Qualitative Interviews. In: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. pp. 42–64. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995).
37.
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E.L., Kippen, S., Liamputtong, P.: Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research. 9, 61–79 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098031.
38.
Harvey, W.S.: Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research. 11, 431–441 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404329.
39.
Sarah Elsie, B., Rosalind, E.: How many qualitative interviews is enough.
40.
Roulston, K.: Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research. 10, 199–228 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109356739.
41.
Bergman Blix, S., Wettergren, Å.: The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qualitative Research. 15, 688–704 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114561348.
42.
Rosalind, E., Holland, J.: What is Qualitative Interviewing?
43.
Atkinson, R.: The life story interview. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1998).
44.
H. S, B., B., G.: Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison’. In: Issues in participant observation: a text and reader. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass (1969).
45.
K., B.: Interviewing survivors of marital rape. In: Researching sensitive topics. Sage, Newbury Park (1993).
46.
N., F., H., T.: Chapter 13: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
47.
A., F., J.H., F.: The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. pp. 645–672. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
48.
Hubbard: The Usefulness of Indepth Life History Interviews. (2000).
49.
MCCORMACK, C.: Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 7, 219–236 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210166382.
50.
J., M.: Chapter 4: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. In: Qualitative researching. Sage, London (2002).
51.
May, T.: Interviewing: methods and process’. In: Social research: issues, methods and process. Open Universtiy Press, Maidenhead (2011).
52.
J., M., B., G.: The inside and the outside: finding realities in interviews’. In: Silverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative research. Sage Publications, London (2016).
53.
Pawson, R.: Theorizing the Interview. The British Journal of Sociology. 47, (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/591728.
54.
Peabody, R.L., Hammond, S.W., Torcom, J., Brown, L.P., Thompson, C., Kolodny, R.: Interviewing Political Elites. PS: Political Science and Politics. 23, (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/419807.
55.
Rubin, H.J., Rubin, I.S.: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage, Los Angeles, Calif (2012).
56.
D., S.: Chapter 4: ‘Interviews’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
57.
Smithson, J.: Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 3, 103–119 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172.
58.
Smithson, J.: Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 3, 103–119 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172.
59.
Beverley Holbrook and Peter Jackson: Shopping around: Focus Group Research in North London. Area. 28, 136–142 (1996).
60.
Belzile, J.A., Öberg, G.: Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research. 12, 459–472 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111433089.
61.
Jenny Kitzinger: Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings.
62.
Kitzinger, J.: Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 311, 299–302 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
63.
Fallon, G., Brown, R.B.: Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2, 195–208 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200204.
64.
Gamson, W.A.: Talking Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
65.
G., G.: Individual and Group Interviewing’. In: Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. SAGE, London (2000).
66.
A., G.: Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html.
67.
Hydén, L.-C., Bülow, P.: Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups—some methodological considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 6, 305–321 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210124865.
68.
Krueger, R.A., Casey, M.A.: Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
69.
Morgan, D.L.: Focus groups as qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1997).
70.
Munday, J.: Identity in Focus. Sociology. 40, 89–105 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506058436.
71.
Greenbaum, T.L.: The handbook for focus group research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998).
72.
Överlien, C., Aronsson, K., Hydén, M.: The Focus Group Interview as an In‐depth Method? Young Women Talking About Sexuality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 8, 331–344 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557042000119607.
73.
Warr, D.J.: "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 11, 200–225 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412.
74.
Wilkinson, S.: Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 1, 181–203 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874.
75.
Wilkinson, S.: How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In: Barbour, R.S. and Kitzinger, J. (eds.) Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (1999).
76.
S., W.: Chapter 10: ‘Focus Group Research’. In: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE, London (2011).
77.
Hobbs, D.: Doing the business: entrepreneurship, the working class and detectives in the East End of London. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1988).
78.
F., D., S., H.: ‘Chapter 7: Crime: Hobbs’ Doing the Business’. In: Sociological research methods in context. Palgrave, Basingstoke (1999).
79.
Reeves, C.L.: A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research. 10, 315–331 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109360150.
80.
Monahan, T., Fisher, J.A.: Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field. Qualitative Research. 10, 357–376 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110362874.
81.
Spicker, P.: Ethical Covert Research. Sociology. 45, 118–133 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387195.
82.
Atkinson, P.: The ethnographic imagination: textual constructions of reality. Routledge, London (1990).
83.
M.V., A., K.A., M. de P.: Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
84.
Barley, N.: The innocent anthropologist: notes from a mud hut. Waveland Press, Long Grove, Ill (2000).
85.
I., B., N., D.: Chapter 2: Ethnography: Relating the Part to the Whole’. In: Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
86.
B., B.: Chapter 6: Ethnographic Field Strategies’. In: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
87.
Bone, J.: ‘The longest day’: ‘flexible’ contracts, performance-related pay and risk shifting in the UK direct selling sector. Work, employment and society. 20, 109–127 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017006061276.
88.
Bone, J.: The Hard Sell: an Ethnographic Study of the Direct Selling Industry. Taylor and Francis, Florence (2006).
89.
Bourgois, P.I.: In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003).
90.
A., B.: Chapter 17: Ethnography and Participant Observation’. In: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
91.
Bulmer, M.: When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation. Qualitative Sociology. 5, 251–264 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986753.
92.
Bulmer, M. ed: Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. Holmes & Meier Publishers, New York (1982).
93.
Calvey, D.: The Art and Politics of Covert Research. Sociology. 42, 905–918 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094569.
94.
Clifford, J., Marcus, G.E., Fortun, K.: Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (2010).
95.
Coffey, A.: The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. Sage, London (1999).
96.
Denscome, M.: Observation. In: The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. McGraw Hill Education/Open University Press, Maidenhead (2014).
97.
N., F.: Chapter 14: ‘Ethnography’. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
98.
Flick, U.: An introduction to qualitative research. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
99.
Flick, U., Kardoff, E. von, Steinke, I.: A companion to qualitative research. Sage, London (2004).
100.
Foley, D.E.: Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 15, 469–490 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390210145534.
101.
Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P.: Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Taylor & Francis, Hoboken (2007).
102.
Holdaway, S.: Constructing and Sustaining ‘Race’ within the Police Workforce. The British Journal of Sociology. 48, (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/591908.
103.
Homan, R.: The ethics of social research. Longman, London (1991).
104.
Herrera, C.D.: Two arguments for ‘covert methods’ in social research. The British Journal of Sociology. 50, 331–343 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00331.x.
105.
Lofland, J., Lofland, L.H.: Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif (1984).
106.
Lynch, M.: Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society. 17, 26–54 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051202.
107.
Mahoney, D.: Constructing Reflexive Fieldwork Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 13, 573–594 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407300765.
108.
J., M.: Chapter 5: Observing and Participating’. In: Qualitative researching. Sage, London (2002).
109.
Robert K. Merton: Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology. 78, 9–47 (1972).
110.
Polsky, N.: Hustlers, beats and others. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1971).
111.
D., S.: Chapter 3: Ethnography and Observation’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
112.
Richardson, L.: Evaluating Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 6, 253–255 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600207.
113.
Thomas, J.: Doing critical ethnography. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif (1993).
114.
Van Maanen, J.: Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill (2011).
115.
Warren, C.A.B.: Gender issues in field research. Sage, Newbury Park (1988).
116.
Westmarland, L.: Blowing the Whistle on Police Violence. Gender, Ethnography and Ethics. British Journal of Criminology. 41, 523–535 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.523.
117.
Winlow, S.: Get Ready to Duck. Bouncers and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups. British Journal of Criminology. 41, 536–548 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.536.
118.
Scott, J.: Assessing Documentary Sources. In: A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. pp. 19–35. Polity Press, Cambridge (1990).
119.
Prior, L.: Doing things with Documents. In: Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. pp. 76–94. SAGE, London (2004).
120.
J.C., H., D.J., J.: A Tale of Two Analyses: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data. 17, 1–9.
121.
Prior, L.: Repositioning Documents in Social Research. Sociology. 42, 821–836 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564.
122.
Stenvoll, D., Svensson, P.: Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data. Qualitative Research. 11, 570–586 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111413242.
123.
N., A., S., A.: Chapter 19: Secondary Analysis of Survey Data. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
124.
P., A., A., C.: Chapter 4: Analysing Documentary Realities. In: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. SAGE, London (2011).
125.
A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism. (2007).
126.
Commentary on ‘a Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/secondary Dualism’ (Libby Bishop). (2007).
127.
Broom, A., Cheshire, L., Emmison, M.: Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing. Sociology. 43, 1163–1180 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509345704.
128.
A, B.: Chapter 13: Secondary analysis and official statistics. In: Social research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016).
129.
L., C., J., F., P., T.: Archiving qualitative research data’, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html.
130.
L., C.: Social Research Update 2: Using diaries in social research, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU2.html.
131.
Dale, A., Arber, S., Procter, M.: Doing secondary analysis. Unwin Hyman, London (1988).
132.
Gibson, W.J., Brown, A.: Working with qualitative data. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2009).
133.
Val Gillies: Secondary Analysis in Exploring Family and Social Change: Addressing the Issue of Context. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6, (2005).
134.
Hakim, C.: Secondary analysis in social research: a guide to data sources and methods with examples. Allen & Unwin, London (1982).
135.
Hammersley, M.: Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. Sage, London (1993).
136.
Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues. (2010).
137.
M., H.: Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems’. Sociology. 31 (1), 131–142.
138.
Lee, R.M.: Unobtrusive methods in social research. Open University Press, Buckingham (2000).
139.
J., H.: Social Research Update 22: Secondary analysis of qualitative data, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html.
140.
‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: on the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology. (2007).
141.
(Re)Using Qualitative Data? (2007).
142.
J., P.: Evidence and proof in documentary research’. The Sociological review. 29,.
143.
Plummer, K.: Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. Sage, London (2001).
144.
Mike Savage: Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6, (2005).
145.
What’s [Yet] to Be Seen? Re-Using Qualitative Data. (2007).
146.
Harper, D.: An Argument for Visual Sociology. In: Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. pp. 24–41. Falmer Press, London (1998).
147.
A., A.: Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People’. 17,.
148.
Rosalind Hurworth: Social Research Update 40: Photo-Interviewing for research, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU40.html.
149.
M, B.: Research strategies. In: Visual methods in social research. SAGE, London (2015).
150.
Harper, D.: Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies. 17, 13–26 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345.
151.
White, A., Bushin, N., Carpena-Mendez, F., Ni Laoire, C.: Using visual methodologies to explore contemporary Irish childhoods. Qualitative Research. 10, 143–158 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109356735.
152.
Social Research Update 11: Visual research methods, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html.
153.
Mannay, D.: Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research. 10, 91–111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348684.
154.
Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires’. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900203.
155.
Helen Pain: A Literature Review to Evaluate the Choice and Use of Visual Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE. 11, 303–319 (2012).
156.
Pink, S.: More Visualising, More Methodologies: On Video, Reflexivity and Qualitative Research. The Sociological Review. 49, 586–599 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00349.
157.
Prosser, J.: Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press, London (1998).
158.
Rose, G.: Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE, Los Angeles (2016).
159.
Woodward, S.: Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 42, 857–872 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094566.
160.
Woodward, S.: Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 42, 857–872 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094566.
161.
Garcia, A.C., Standlee, A.I., Bechkoff, J.: Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 38, 52–84 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607310839.
162.
Carter, D.: Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society. 8, 148–167 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146235.
163.
Manuel, C.: The Other Face of the Earth: Social Movements against the New Global Order’. In: The power of identity. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2010).
164.
Kozinets, R.V.: Cultures and Communities. In: Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. Sage, Los Angeles, Calif (2010).
165.
R. V., K.: Chapter 2 ‘Understanding Culture Online.
166.
Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web. (1999).
167.
Cofff, H., Chapman, H.: Changing Facebook Profile Pictures as Part of a Campaign: Who Does it and Why? SSRN Electronic Journal. (2014). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2440558.
168.
DeLorme, D.E., Sinkhan, G.M., French, W.: Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics. 33, 271–286 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011812620080.
169.
G.J., H., D., F., Johns, M.D.: ‘"Need help ASAP!!!’: A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics’. In: Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. P. Lang, New York (2004).
170.
Tapio Häyhtiö: Hard Rock Hallelujah! Empowering Reflexive Political Action on the Internet. Journal for Cultural Research. 11,.
171.
Hine, C.: Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Berg, Oxford (2005).
172.
James, N., Busher, H.: Online interviewing. Sage, Los Angeles (2009).
173.
A.N., J.: Internet Behaviour and the Design of Virtual Methods’. In: Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. pp. 21–34. Berg, Oxford (2005).
174.
Kazmer, M.M., Xie, B.: QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWING IN INTERNET STUDIES: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society. 11, 257–278 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946333.
175.
L, K.: Recontextualising "cyberspace”: methodological considerations for online research’. In: Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net. pp. 57–75. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1999).
176.
Mann, C., Stewart, F.: Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. SAGE, London (2000).
177.
Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software. (2001).
178.
T., S.: Researching the Online Sex Work Community’. In: Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. pp. 67–79. Berg, Oxford (2005).
179.
Schrum, L.: Framing the Debate: Ethical Research in the Information Age. Qualitative Inquiry. 1, 311–326 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100303.
180.
Brooke, S.-C.: ‘Facebook Groups as Potential Political Publics? Exploring Ideas of the Political amongst Young British Facebook Users’. In: Peace, T. (ed.) Muslims and political participation in Britain. pp. 156–173. Routledge, London (2015).
181.
Maurizio Teli: The Internet as a Library-Of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 8, (2007). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-8.3.283.
182.
B. L., B.: Chapter 3: Ethical Issues’. In: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2014).
183.
McAreavey, R., Muir, J.: Research ethics committees: values and power in higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 14, 391–405 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.565635.
184.
Pittaway, E., Bartolomei, L., Hugman, R.: ‘Stop Stealing Our Stories’: The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2, 229–251 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huq004.
185.
M, H.: Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research.
186.
David, M., Edwards, R., Alldred, P.: Children and School-based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. 27, 347–365 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120048340.
187.
Constance Holden: Ethics in Social Science Research. Science. 206, 537–540 (1979).
188.
N., G.: Chapter 8: The Ethics of Social Research’. In: Gilbert, G.N. and Stoneman, P. (eds.) Researching social life. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
189.
Glucksmann, M., Cavendish, R.: Women on the line. Routledge, London (2009).
190.
Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P.: Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Taylor & Francis, Hoboken (2007).
191.
Can’t Talk, Won’t Talk?: Methodological Issues in Researching Children. (2000).
192.
Social Science Gets the Ethics Treatment: Research governance and ethical review.
193.
Tim, M.: Values and ethics in the research process’.
194.
Punch, M.: The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Sage, Beverly Hills (1986).
195.
RODGERS, J.: Trying to Get it Right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society. 14, 421–433 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926046.
196.
Wolff-Michael Roth: (Un-) Political Ethics, (un-) Ethical Politics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 5, (2004).
197.
Ryen, A.: Ethical Issues’. In: Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F., and Silverman, D. (eds.) Qualitative research practice. pp. 230–247. SAGE Publications Ltd, London (2007).
198.
D., S.: Chapter 9: Research Ethics’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
199.
P., S.: Research without consent’, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU51.pdf.
200.
Ethics and the Ruling Relations of Research Production.
201.
Rose, W., Sue Heath, Graham Crow, Vikki Charles: Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/85/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-001.pdf.
202.
Islam, N.: Research as an Act of Betrayal: Researching Race in an Asian Community in Los Angeles. In: Racing research, researching race: methodological dilemmas in critical race studies. pp. 35–66. New York University Press, New York (2000).
203.
Tang, N.: Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women. Sociology. 36, 703–721 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038502036003011.
204.
Becker, H.S.: Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 14, 239–247 (1967). https://doi.org/10.2307/799147.
205.
Oakley, A.: Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 50, 195–213 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515580253.
206.
Gunaratnam, Y.: Researching race and ethnicity: methods, knowledge and power. SAGE, London (2003).
207.
FAWCETT, B., HEARN, J.: Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 7, 201–218 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570210163989.
208.
‘Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research’.
209.
Clark, T.: On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 10, 399–419 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796.
210.
L., B., J., S.: ‘Doing Research, Writing Research: the Dilemmas of political intervention in research on racism. Economy and society. 22, 178–199.
211.
M., B.: Chapter 16: Addressing Social Problems through qualitative research’. In: Silverman, D. (ed.) Qualitative research. Sage Publications, London (2016).
212.
Evaluating an Empowering Research Strategy: Reflections on Action-Research with South Asian Women. (1996).
213.
Craig, C.: Foreword. In: Engaging contradictions: theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship. University of California Press, Berkeley (2008).
214.
CARTER, J.: Research note: reflections on interviewing across the ethnic divide. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 7, 345–353 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000094560.
215.
David, M.: Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 5, 11–17 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570110098037.
216.
Dodson, L., Piatelli, D., Schmalzbauer, L.: Researching Inequality Through Interpretive Collaborations. Qualitative Inquiry. 13, 821–843 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407304458.
217.
J., F.: It’s great to have someone to talk to; the ethics and politics of interviewing women’. In: Social researching: politics, problems, practice. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1984).
218.
Finlay, L.: Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research. 2, 209–230 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200205.
219.
Deianira Ganga: Cultural ‘Insiders’ and the Issue of Positionality in Qualitative Migration Research: Moving ‘Across’ and Moving ‘Along’ Researcher-Participant Divides. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 7, (2006).
220.
Knowing your Place: Gender and Reflexivity in two Ethnographies.
221.
Gomm, R.: Evaluative and Emancipatory Research. In: Social research methodology: a critical introduction. pp. 322–343. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
222.
Goodson, L., Phillimore, J.: ‘Community research: opportunities and challenges’. In: Goodson, L. and Phillimore, J. (eds.) Community research for participation: from theory to method. Policy, Bristol (2012).
223.
M., H.: On Feminist Methodology. Sociology. 26, 187–206.
224.
Hammersley, M.: Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. Routledge, London (2000).
225.
Bias in Social Research. (1997).
226.
Harding, S.G.: Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Open University Press, Milton Keynes (1987).
227.
Hoong Sin, C.: Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 7, 477–499 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107082304.
228.
From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals? (1997).
229.
L., K., S., B., L., R.: Researching Women’s Lives or Studying Women’s Oppression? Reflections on what Constitutes Feminist Research. In: Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. Taylor & Francis, London (1994).
230.
Liebling, A.: Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research. British Journal of Criminology. 41, 472–484 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/41.3.472.
231.
Letherby, G.: Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press, Buckingham (2003).
232.
T., M.: Chapter 3: Values and Ethics in the Research Process’. In: Social research: issues, methods and process. Open Universtiy Press, Maidenhead (2011).
233.
Nencel, L.: Feeling Gender Speak. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 12, 345–361 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506805054274.
234.
A., O.: Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’. In: Doing feminist research. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1981).
235.
A., O.: Gender, Methodology and People’s Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science’. Sociology. 32, 707–731.
236.
C., R.: On feminist methodology: male reason versus female empowerment’. Sociology. 26, 207–212.
237.
Reinharz, S., Davidman, L.: Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press, New York (1992).
238.
Roberts, H.: Doing feminist research. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1981).
239.
D., S.: Chapter 11: The Relevance of Qualitative Research’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
240.
Hoong Sin, C.: Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 7, 477–499 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107082304.
241.
Stanley, L.: Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. Routledge, London (1990).
242.
B, T., M, M.: Doing research with refugeesIssues and guidelines - Policy Press Scholarship, http://policypress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1332/policypress/9781861345981.001.0001/upso-9781861345981.
243.
Social Research Update 34: Undertaking Action Research: Negotiating the Road Ahead, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU34.html.
244.
Truman, C., Mertens, D.M., Humphries, B.: Research and inequality. UCL Press, London (2000).
245.
AA, Y.J.: ‘Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: The inside and outside of it’. In: Researching race and racism. Routledge, London (2004).
