1.
Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences [Internet]. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
2.
Bryman A. Social research methods [Internet]. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
3.
Devine F, Heath S. Sociological research methods in context. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1999.
4.
Devine F, Heath S. Doing social science: evidence and methods in empirical research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
5.
Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
6.
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2002.
7.
May T. Social research: issues, methods and process [Internet]. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
8.
Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
9.
Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: Sage Publications; 2016.
10.
Waller V, Farquharson K, Dempsey D. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016.
11.
A. B. Chapter 19: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. In: Social research methods [Internet]. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
12.
Loïc J. D. Wacquant. The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade. Theory and Society [Internet]. 1995;24(4):489–535. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657882?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
13.
Waller V, Farquharson K, Dempsey D. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016.
14.
A sample chapter 2: Qualitative Social Research: Contemporary Methods for the Digital Age [Internet]. Available from: https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/72578_Waller_Qualitative_Social_Research.pdf
15.
Qualitative Research [Internet]. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/qrj
16.
ESRC National Centre for Research Methods [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncrm.ac.uk/
17.
Williams D. The Study of Development’. In: Currie-Alder B, Kanbur SMR, Malone D, Rohinton M, editors. International development: ideas, experience, and prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
18.
Bell J. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science [Internet]. 5th ed. Vol. Open UP study skills. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3017225
19.
Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences [Internet]. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
20.
Burnham P, Lutz KG, Grant W, Layton-Henry Z. Research methods in politics. 2nd edition. Vol. Political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
21.
Burton D. Research training for social scientists: a handbook for postgraduate researchers. London: Sage; 2000.
22.
J. B. Working Qualitatively’. In: Qualitative research practice. London: Sage; 2004.
23.
A. B. Chapter 16: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. In: Social research methods [Internet]. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
24.
G C. Chapter 1: Conceptualising Social Life’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
25.
M. E, J. G. Chapter 4: ‘Searching and Reviewing Literature’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
26.
Flick U, Kardoff E von, Steinke I. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage; 2004.
27.
N. Gilbert. Chapter 2: ‘Research, Theory and Method’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
28.
N. G. Chapter 3: ‘Formulating and Refining a Research Question’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
29.
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2002.
30.
O’Connell Davidson J, Layder D. Methods, sex and madness. London: Routledge; 1994.
31.
Renzetti CM, Lee RM. Researching sensitive topics. Vol. Sage focus editions. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993.
32.
Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers [Internet]. London: Sage; 2003. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNDQ2MjkzNTE1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLnhsaW5rLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
33.
Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
34.
Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: Sage Publications; 2016.
35.
N. S. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. In: Researching society and culture. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2012.
36.
Rubin HJ. Keeping on Target While Hanging Loose: Designing Qualitative Interviews. In: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995. p. 42–64.
37.
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, Liamputtong P. Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research. 2009 Feb 1;9(1):61–79.
38.
Harvey WS. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research. 2011 Aug;11(4):431–41.
39.
Sarah Elsie B, Rosalind E. How many qualitative interviews is enough. Available from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/
40.
Roulston K. Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research. 2010 Apr 1;10(2):199–228.
41.
Bergman Blix S, Wettergren Å. The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qualitative Research. 2015 Dec;15(6):688–704.
42.
Rosalind E, Holland J. What is Qualitative Interviewing? Available from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3276/1/complete_proofs.pdf
43.
Atkinson R. The life story interview. Vol. Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1998.
44.
H. S B, B. G. Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison’. In: Issues in participant observation: a text and reader. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley; 1969.
45.
K. B. Interviewing survivors of marital rape. In: Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993.
46.
N. F, H. T. Chapter 13: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
47.
A., F, J.H. F. The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018. p. 645–72.
48.
Hubbard: The Usefulness of Indepth Life History Interviews. 2000; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/4/hubbard.html
49.
MCCORMACK C. Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2004 Jul;7(3):219–36.
50.
J. M. Chapter 4: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. In: Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2002.
51.
May T. Interviewing: methods and process’. In: Social research: issues, methods and process [Internet]. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
52.
J. M, B. G. The inside and the outside: finding realities in interviews’. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: Sage Publications; 2016.
53.
Pawson R. Theorizing the Interview. The British Journal of Sociology. 1996 Jun;47(2).
54.
Peabody RL, Hammond SW, Torcom J, Brown LP, Thompson C, Kolodny R. Interviewing Political Elites. PS: Political Science and Politics. 1990 Sep;23(3).
55.
Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage; 2012.
56.
D. S. Chapter 4: ‘Interviews’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
57.
Smithson J. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2000 Jan;3(2):103–19.
58.
Smithson J. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2000 Jan;3(2):103–19.
59.
Beverley Holbrook and Peter Jackson. Shopping around: Focus Group Research in North London. Area [Internet]. 1996;28(2):136–42. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003650?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60.
Belzile JA, Öberg G. Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research. 2012 Aug;12(4):459–72.
61.
Jenny Kitzinger. Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings. Available from: http://www.academia.edu/1621860/Focus_group_research_using_group_dynamics_to_explore_perceptions_experiences_and_understandings
62.
Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299–302.
63.
Fallon G, Brown RB. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2002 Aug 1;2(2):195–208.
64.
Gamson WA. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
65.
G. G. Individual and Group Interviewing’. In: Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London: SAGE; 2000.
66.
A. G. Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html
67.
Hydén LC, Bülow P. Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups—some methodological considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2003 Jan;6(4):305–21.
68.
Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
69.
Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Vol. Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1997.
70.
Munday J. Identity in Focus. Sociology. 2006 Feb;40(1):89–105.
71.
Greenbaum TL. The handbook for focus group research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
72.
Överlien C, Aronsson K, Hydén M. The Focus Group Interview as an In‐depth Method? Young Women Talking About Sexuality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005 Oct;8(4):331–44.
73.
Warr DJ. "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 2005 Apr;11(2):200–25.
74.
Wilkinson S. Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 1998 Jan;1(3):181–203.
75.
Wilkinson S. How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, editors. Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1999. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1046471
76.
S. W. Chapter 10: ‘Focus Group Research’. In: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. 3rd ed. London: SAGE; 2011.
77.
Hobbs D. Doing the business: entrepreneurship, the working class and detectives in the East End of London. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1988.
78.
F. D, S. H. ‘Chapter 7: Crime: Hobbs’ Doing the Business’. In: Sociological research methods in context. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 1999.
79.
Reeves CL. A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research. 2010 Jun 1;10(3):315–31.
80.
Monahan T, Fisher JA. Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field. Qualitative Research. 2010 Jun 1;10(3):357–76.
81.
Spicker P. Ethical Covert Research. Sociology. 2011 Feb;45(1):118–33.
82.
Atkinson P. The ethnographic imagination: textual constructions of reality. London: Routledge; 1990.
83.
M.V., A, K.A. M de P. Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018.
84.
Barley N. The innocent anthropologist: notes from a mud hut. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press; 2000.
85.
I. B, N. D. Chapter 2: Ethnography: Relating the Part to the Whole’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2018.
86.
B. B. Chapter 6: Ethnographic Field Strategies’. In: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences [Internet]. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
87.
Bone J. ‘The longest day’: ‘flexible’ contracts, performance-related pay and risk shifting in the UK direct selling sector. Work, employment and society. 2006 Mar;20(1):109–27.
88.
Bone J. The Hard Sell: an Ethnographic Study of the Direct Selling Industry. Florence: Taylor and Francis; 2006.
89.
Bourgois PI. In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
90.
A. B. Chapter 17: Ethnography and Participant Observation’. In: Social research methods [Internet]. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
91.
Bulmer M. When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation. Qualitative Sociology. 1982;5(4):251–64.
92.
Bulmer M, editor. Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers; 1982.
93.
Calvey D. The Art and Politics of Covert Research. Sociology. 2008 Oct;42(5):905–18.
94.
Clifford J, Marcus GE, Fortun K. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. 25th anniversary ed. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2010.
95.
Coffey A. The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage; 1999.
96.
Denscome, M. Observation. In: The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects [Internet]. Fifth edition. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education/Open University Press; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1910221
97.
N. F. Chapter 14: ‘Ethnography’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
98.
Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research [Internet]. Edition 5. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDY0MjI0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
99.
Flick U, Kardoff E von, Steinke I. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage; 2004.
100.
Foley DE. Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2002 Jul;15(4):469–90.
101.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition [Internet]. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis; 2007. Available from: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=308687
102.
Holdaway S. Constructing and Sustaining ‘Race’ within the Police Workforce. The British Journal of Sociology. 1997 Mar;48(1).
103.
Homan R. The ethics of social research. Vol. Aspects of modern sociology. London: Longman; 1991.
104.
Herrera CD. Two arguments for ‘covert methods’ in social research. The British Journal of Sociology. 1999 Jun;50(2):331–43.
105.
Lofland J, Lofland LH. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 2nd ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth; 1984.
106.
Lynch M. Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society. 2000 Jun;17(3):26–54.
107.
Mahoney D. Constructing Reflexive Fieldwork Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007 May;13(4):573–94.
108.
J. M. Chapter 5: Observing and Participating’. In: Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2002.
109.
Robert K. Merton. Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 1972;78(1):9–47. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776569?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
110.
Polsky N. Hustlers, beats and others. [Revised ed.]. Vol. Pelican books. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1971.
111.
D. S. Chapter 3: Ethnography and Observation’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
112.
Richardson L. Evaluating Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 2000 Jun;6(2):253–5.
113.
Thomas J. Doing critical ethnography. Vol. Qualitative research methods. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1993.
114.
Van Maanen J. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. 2nd ed. Vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 2011.
115.
Warren CAB. Gender issues in field research. Vol. Qualitative research methods. Newbury Park: Sage; 1988.
116.
Westmarland L. Blowing the Whistle on Police Violence. Gender, Ethnography and Ethics. British Journal of Criminology. 2001 Jun 1;41(3):523–35.
117.
Winlow S. Get Ready to Duck. Bouncers and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups. British Journal of Criminology. 2001 Jun 1;41(3):536–48.
118.
Scott J. Assessing Documentary Sources. In: A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1990. p. 19–35.
119.
Prior L. Doing things with Documents. In: Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. 2nd ed. London: SAGE; 2004. p. 76–94.
120.
J.C. H, D.J. J. A Tale of Two Analyses: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data. 17:1–9. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/2/1.html
121.
Prior L. Repositioning Documents in Social Research. Sociology. 2008 Oct;42(5):821–36.
122.
Stenvoll D, Svensson P. Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data. Qualitative Research. 2011 Oct;11(5):570–86.
123.
N. A, S. A. Chapter 19: Secondary Analysis of Survey Data. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
124.
P. A, A. C. Chapter 4: Analysing Documentary Realities. In: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. 3rd ed. London: SAGE; 2011.
125.
A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism. 2007; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html
126.
Commentary on ‘a Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/secondary Dualism’ (Libby Bishop). 2007; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/7.html
127.
Broom A, Cheshire L, Emmison M. Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing. Sociology. 2009 Dec;43(6):1163–80.
128.
A B. Chapter 13: Secondary analysis and official statistics. In: Social research methods [Internet]. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
129.
L., C, J. F, P. T. Archiving qualitative research data’ [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html
130.
L. C. Social Research Update 2: Using diaries in social research [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU2.html
131.
Dale A, Arber S, Procter M. Doing secondary analysis. Vol. Contemporary social research series. London: Unwin Hyman; 1988.
132.
Gibson WJ, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE; 2009.
133.
Val Gillies. Secondary Analysis in Exploring Family and Social Change: Addressing the Issue of Context. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Internet]. 2005;6(1). Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/500/1077
134.
Hakim C. Secondary analysis in social research: a guide to data sources and methods with examples. Vol. Contemporary social research series. London: Allen & Unwin; 1982.
135.
Hammersley M. Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage; 1993.
136.
Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues. 2010; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html
137.
M. H. Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems’. Sociology. 31 (1):131–42.
138.
Lee RM. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Vol. Understanding social research. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2000.
139.
J. H. Social Research Update 22: Secondary analysis of qualitative data [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html
140.
‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: on the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology. 2007; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/3.html
141.
(Re)Using Qualitative Data? 2007; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html
142.
J. P. Evidence and proof in documentary research’. The Sociological review. 29.
143.
Plummer K. Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage; 2001.
144.
Mike Savage. Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Internet]. 2005;6(1). Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/502/1081
145.
What’s [Yet] to Be Seen? Re-Using Qualitative Data. 2007; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/4.html
146.
Harper D. An Argument for Visual Sociology. In: Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press; 1998. p. 24–41.
147.
A. A. Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People’. 17(3). Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/3/8.html
148.
Rosalind Hurworth. Social Research Update 40: Photo-Interviewing for research [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU40.html
149.
M B. Research strategies. In: Visual methods in social research. 2nd edition. London: SAGE; 2015.
150.
Harper D. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies. 2002 Jan;17(1):13–26.
151.
White A, Bushin N, Carpena-Mendez F, Ni Laoire C. Using visual methodologies to explore contemporary Irish childhoods. Qualitative Research. 2010 Apr 1;10(2):143–58.
152.
Social Research Update 11: Visual research methods [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html
153.
Mannay D. Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research. 2010 Feb 1;10(1):91–111.
154.
Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires’. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/160940691000900203
155.
Helen Pain. A Literature Review to Evaluate the Choice and Use of Visual Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE [Internet]. 2012;11(4):303–19. Available from: https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/ijqm/index.php/IJQM/article/view/10397/14340
156.
Pink S. More Visualising, More Methodologies: On Video, Reflexivity and Qualitative Research. The Sociological Review. 2001 Nov;49(4):586–99.
157.
Prosser J. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press; 1998.
158.
Rose G. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2016.
159.
Woodward S. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 2008 Oct;42(5):857–72.
160.
Woodward S. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 2008 Oct;42(5):857–72.
161.
Garcia AC, Standlee AI, Bechkoff J. Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2009 Feb;38(1):52–84.
162.
Carter D. Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society. 2005 Jun;8(2):148–67.
163.
Manuel C. The Other Face of the Earth: Social Movements against the New Global Order’. In: The power of identity. 2nd ed. with new preface. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
164.
Kozinets RV. Cultures and Communities. In: Netnography: doing ethnographic research online [Internet]. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage; 2010. Available from: http://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/31333_01_Kozinets_Ch_01.pdf
165.
R. V. K. Chapter 2 ‘Understanding Culture Online. Available from: http://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/31334_02_Kozinets_Ch_02.pdf
166.
Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web. 1999; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html
167.
Cofff H, Chapman H. Changing Facebook Profile Pictures as Part of a Campaign: Who Does it and Why? SSRN Electronic Journal. 2014;
168.
DeLorme DE, Sinkhan GM, French W. Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics. 2001;33(4):271–86.
169.
G.J., H, D. F, Johns MD. ‘"Need help ASAP!!!’: A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics’. In: Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. New York: P. Lang; 2004.
170.
Tapio Häyhtiö. Hard Rock Hallelujah! Empowering Reflexive Political Action on the Internet. Journal for Cultural Research [Internet]. 11(4). Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14797580802038702
171.
Hine C. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg; 2005.
172.
James N, Busher H. Online interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage; 2009.
173.
A.N. J. Internet Behaviour and the Design of Virtual Methods’. In: Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg; 2005. p. 21–34.
174.
Kazmer MM, Xie B. QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWING IN INTERNET STUDIES: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society. 2008 Mar;11(2):257–78.
175.
L K. Recontextualising "cyberspace”: methodological considerations for online research’. In: Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 1999. p. 57–75.
176.
Mann C, Stewart F. Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. Vol. New technologies for social research. London: SAGE; 2000.
177.
Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software. 2001; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/oconnor.html
178.
T. S. Researching the Online Sex Work Community’. In: Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg; 2005. p. 67–79.
179.
Schrum L. Framing the Debate: Ethical Research in the Information Age. Qualitative Inquiry. 1995 Sep;1(3):311–26.
180.
Brooke SC. ‘Facebook Groups as Potential Political Publics? Exploring Ideas of the Political amongst Young British Facebook Users’. In: Peace T, editor. Muslims and political participation in Britain. London: Routledge; 2015. p. 156–73.
181.
Maurizio Teli. The Internet as a Library-Of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Internet]. 2007;8(3). Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/283
182.
B. L. B. Chapter 3: Ethical Issues’. In: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences [Internet]. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
183.
McAreavey R, Muir J. Research ethics committees: values and power in higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2011 Sep;14(5):391–405.
184.
Pittaway E, Bartolomei L, Hugman R. ‘Stop Stealing Our Stories’: The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2010 Jul 1;2(2):229–51.
185.
M H. Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/16.html
186.
David M, Edwards R, Alldred P. Children and School-based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. 2001 Jun;27(3):347–65.
187.
Constance Holden. Ethics in Social Science Research. Science [Internet]. 1979;206(4418):537–40. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1749232
188.
N. G. Chapter 8: The Ethics of Social Research’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
189.
Glucksmann M, Cavendish R. Women on the line. London: Routledge; 2009.
190.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition [Internet]. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis; 2007. Available from: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=308687
191.
Can’t Talk, Won’t Talk?: Methodological Issues in Researching Children. 2000; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/2/harden.html
192.
Social Science Gets the Ethics Treatment: Research governance and ethical review. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/4/williamson.html
193.
Tim M. Values and ethics in the research process’. Available from: http://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335206123.pdf
194.
Punch M. The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Vol. Qualitative research methods. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1986.
195.
RODGERS J. Trying to Get it Right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society. 1999 Jul;14(4):421–33.
196.
Wolff-Michael Roth. (Un-) Political Ethics, (un-) Ethical Politics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Internet]. 2004;5(3). Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/573/1244
197.
Ryen A. Ethical Issues’. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, Silverman D, editors. Qualitative research practice [Internet]. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2007. p. 230–47. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1046494
198.
D. S. Chapter 9: Research Ethics’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
199.
P. S. Research without consent’ [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU51.pdf
200.
Ethics and the Ruling Relations of Research Production. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/truman.html
201.
Rose, W, Sue Heath, Graham Crow, Vikki Charles. Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review [Internet]. Available from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/85/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-001.pdf
202.
Islam N. Research as an Act of Betrayal: Researching Race in an Asian Community in Los Angeles. In: Racing research, researching race: methodological dilemmas in critical race studies. New York: New York University Press; 2000. p. 35–66.
203.
Tang N. Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women. Sociology. 2002 Aug;36(3):703–21.
204.
Becker HS. Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 1967 Jan;14(3):239–47.
205.
Oakley A. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 2016 Feb;50(1):195–213.
206.
Gunaratnam Y. Researching race and ethnicity: methods, knowledge and power. London: SAGE; 2003.
207.
FAWCETT B, HEARN J. Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2004 Jul;7(3):201–18.
208.
‘Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research’. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/4/letherby.html
209.
Clark T. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 2010 Aug 1;10(4):399–419.
210.
L. B, J. S. ‘Doing Research, Writing Research: the Dilemmas of political intervention in research on racism. Economy and society. 22(2):178–99.
211.
M. B. Chapter 16: Addressing Social Problems through qualitative research’. In: Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: Sage Publications; 2016.
212.
Evaluating an Empowering Research Strategy: Reflections on Action-Research with South Asian Women. 1996; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/1.html
213.
Craig C. Foreword. In: Engaging contradictions: theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2008. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=470852
214.
CARTER J. Research note: reflections on interviewing across the ethnic divide. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2004 Sep;7(4):345–53.
215.
David M. Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2002 Jan;5(1):11–7.
216.
Dodson L, Piatelli D, Schmalzbauer L. Researching Inequality Through Interpretive Collaborations. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007 Sep;13(6):821–43.
217.
J. F. It’s great to have someone to talk to; the ethics and politics of interviewing women’. In: Social researching: politics, problems, practice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1984.
218.
Finlay L. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research. 2002 Aug 1;2(2):209–30.
219.
Deianira Ganga. Cultural ‘Insiders’ and the Issue of Positionality in Qualitative Migration Research: Moving ‘Across’ and Moving ‘Along’ Researcher-Participant Divides. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [Internet]. 2006;7(3). Available from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/134/290
220.
Knowing your Place: Gender and Reflexivity in two Ethnographies. Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/gill.html
221.
Gomm R. Evaluative and Emancipatory Research. In: Social research methodology: a critical introduction [Internet]. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. p. 322–43. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMjMwMjI5MTEyL2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDVfdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
222.
Goodson L, Phillimore J. ‘Community research: opportunities and challenges’. In: Goodson L, Phillimore J, editors. Community research for participation: from theory to method [Internet]. Bristol: Policy; 2012. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=978127
223.
M. H. On Feminist Methodology. Sociology. 26(2):187–206.
224.
Hammersley M. Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. London: Routledge; 2000.
225.
Bias in Social Research. 1997; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/2.html
226.
Harding SG. Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press; 1987.
227.
Hoong Sin C. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 2007 Nov 1;7(4):477–99.
228.
From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals? 1997; Available from: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/3.html
229.
L. K, S. B, L. R. Researching Women’s Lives or Studying Women’s Oppression? Reflections on what Constitutes Feminist Research. In: Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. London: Taylor & Francis; 1994.
230.
Liebling A. Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research. British Journal of Criminology. 2001 Jun 1;41(3):472–84.
231.
Letherby G. Feminist research in theory and practice. Vol. Feminist controversies. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2003.
232.
T. M. Chapter 3: Values and Ethics in the Research Process’. In: Social research: issues, methods and process [Internet]. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press; 2011. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
233.
Nencel L. Feeling Gender Speak. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2005 Aug;12(3):345–61.
234.
A. O. Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’. In: Doing feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1981.
235.
A. O. Gender, Methodology and People’s Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science’. Sociology. 32(4):707–31.
236.
C. R. On feminist methodology: male reason versus female empowerment’. Sociology. 26(2):207–12.
237.
Reinharz S, Davidman L. Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
238.
Roberts H. Doing feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1981.
239.
D. S. Chapter 11: The Relevance of Qualitative Research’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
240.
Hoong Sin C. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 2007 Nov 1;7(4):477–99.
241.
Stanley L. Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: Routledge; 1990.
242.
B T, M M. Doing research with refugeesIssues and guidelines - Policy Press Scholarship [Internet]. Available from: http://policypress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1332/policypress/9781861345981.001.0001/upso-9781861345981
243.
Social Research Update 34: Undertaking Action Research: Negotiating the Road Ahead [Internet]. Available from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU34.html
244.
Truman C, Mertens DM, Humphries B. Research and inequality. London: UCL Press; 2000.
245.
AA YJ. ‘Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: The inside and outside of it’. In: Researching race and racism. London: Routledge; 2004.
