[1]
B. L. Berg, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
[2]
A. Bryman, Social research methods, Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
[3]
F. Devine and S. Heath, Sociological research methods in context. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999.
[4]
F. Devine and S. Heath, Doing social science: evidence and methods in empirical research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
[5]
G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds., Researching social life, Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[6]
J. Mason, Qualitative researching, 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2002.
[7]
T. May, Social research: issues, methods and process, 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
[8]
D. Silverman, Interpreting qualitative data, Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
[9]
D. Silverman, Ed., Qualitative research, 4th edition. London: Sage Publications, 2016.
[10]
V. Waller, K. Farquharson, and D. Dempsey, Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016.
[11]
B. A., ‘Chapter 19: The Nature of Qualitative Research’’, in Social research methods, Fifth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
[12]
Loïc J. D. Wacquant, ‘The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade’, Theory and Society, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 489–535, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657882?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[13]
V. Waller, K. Farquharson, and D. Dempsey, Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016.
[14]
‘A sample chapter 2: Qualitative Social Research: Contemporary Methods for the Digital Age’. [Online]. Available: https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/72578_Waller_Qualitative_Social_Research.pdf
[15]
‘Qualitative Research’. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/qrj
[16]
‘ESRC National Centre for Research Methods’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ncrm.ac.uk/
[17]
D. Williams, ‘The Study of Development’’, in International development: ideas, experience, and prospects, B. Currie-Alder, S. M. R. Kanbur, D. Malone, and M. Rohinton, Eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[18]
J. Bell, Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science, 5th ed., vol. Open UP study skills. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3017225
[19]
B. L. Berg, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
[20]
P. Burnham, K. G. Lutz, W. Grant, and Z. Layton-Henry, Research methods in politics, 2nd edition., vol. Political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
[21]
D. Burton, Research training for social scientists: a handbook for postgraduate researchers. London: Sage, 2000.
[22]
B. J., ‘Working Qualitatively’’, in Qualitative research practice, London: Sage, 2004.
[23]
B. A., ‘Chapter 16: The Nature of Qualitative Research’’, in Social research methods, Fifth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
[24]
C. G, ‘Chapter 1: Conceptualising Social Life’’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[25]
E. M. and G. J., ‘Chapter 4: “Searching and Reviewing Literature”’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[26]
U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, and I. Steinke, A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage, 2004.
[27]
Gilbert. N., ‘Chapter 2: “Research, Theory and Method”’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[28]
G. N., ‘Chapter 3: “Formulating and Refining a Research Question”’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[29]
J. Mason, Qualitative researching, 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2002.
[30]
J. O’Connell Davidson and D. Layder, Methods, sex and madness. London: Routledge, 1994.
[31]
C. M. Renzetti and R. M. Lee, Researching sensitive topics, vol. Sage focus editions. Newbury Park: Sage, 1993.
[32]
J. Ritchie and J. Lewis, Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNDQ2MjkzNTE1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLnhsaW5rLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
[33]
D. Silverman, Interpreting qualitative data, Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
[34]
D. Silverman, Ed., Qualitative research, 4th edition. London: Sage Publications, 2016.
[35]
S. N., ‘Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods’, in Researching society and culture, 3rd ed., Los Angeles: SAGE, 2012.
[36]
H. J. Rubin, ‘Keeping on Target While Hanging Loose: Designing Qualitative Interviews’, in Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1995, pp. 42–64.
[37]
V. Dickson-Swift, E. L. James, S. Kippen, and P. Liamputtong, ‘Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work’, Qualitative Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 61–79, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1468794108098031.
[38]
W. S. Harvey, ‘Strategies for conducting elite interviews’, Qualitative Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 431–441, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1468794111404329.
[39]
B. Sarah Elsie and E. Rosalind, ‘How many qualitative interviews is enough’ [Online]. Available: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/
[40]
K. Roulston, ‘Considering quality in qualitative interviewing’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 199–228, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1468794109356739.
[41]
S. Bergman Blix and Å. Wettergren, ‘The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field’, Qualitative Research, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 688–704, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1468794114561348.
[42]
E. Rosalind and J. Holland, ‘What is Qualitative Interviewing?’ [Online]. Available: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3276/1/complete_proofs.pdf
[43]
R. Atkinson, The life story interview, vol. Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1998.
[44]
B. H. S and G. B., ‘Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison’’, in Issues in participant observation: a text and reader, vol. Addison-Wesley series in behavioral science: quantitative methods, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley, 1969.
[45]
B. K., ‘Interviewing survivors of marital rape’, in Researching sensitive topics, vol. Sage focus editions, Newbury Park: Sage, 1993.
[46]
F. N. and T. H., ‘Chapter 13: “Qualitative Interviewing”’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[47]
F. A., and F. J.H., ‘The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’’, in The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, Fifth edition., N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2018, pp. 645–672.
[48]
‘Hubbard: The Usefulness of Indepth Life History Interviews’, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/4/hubbard.html
[49]
C. MCCORMACK, ‘Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 219–236, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1080/13645570210166382.
[50]
M. J., ‘Chapter 4: “Qualitative Interviewing”’, in Qualitative researching, 2nd ed., London: Sage, 2002.
[51]
T. May, ‘Interviewing: methods and process’’, in Social research: issues, methods and process, 4th ed., Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
[52]
M. J. and G. B., ‘The inside and the outside: finding realities in interviews’’, in Qualitative research, 4th edition., D. Silverman, Ed. London: Sage Publications, 2016.
[53]
R. Pawson, ‘Theorizing the Interview’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 47, no. 2, Jun. 1996, doi: 10.2307/591728.
[54]
R. L. Peabody, S. W. Hammond, J. Torcom, L. P. Brown, C. Thompson, and R. Kolodny, ‘Interviewing Political Elites’, PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 23, no. 3, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.2307/419807.
[55]
H. J. Rubin and I. S. Rubin, Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data, 3rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage, 2012.
[56]
S. D., ‘Chapter 4: “Interviews”’, in Interpreting qualitative data, Fifth edition., Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
[57]
J. Smithson, ‘Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–119, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1080/136455700405172.
[58]
J. Smithson, ‘Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–119, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1080/136455700405172.
[59]
Beverley Holbrook and Peter Jackson, ‘Shopping around: Focus Group Research in North London’, Area, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 136–142, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003650?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[60]
J. A. Belzile and G. Öberg, ‘Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design’, Qualitative Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 459–472, Aug. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1468794111433089.
[61]
Jenny Kitzinger, ‘Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings’ [Online]. Available: http://www.academia.edu/1621860/Focus_group_research_using_group_dynamics_to_explore_perceptions_experiences_and_understandings
[62]
J. Kitzinger, ‘Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups’, BMJ, vol. 311, no. 7000, pp. 299–302, Jul. 1995, doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299.
[63]
G. Fallon and R. B. Brown, ‘Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community’, Qualitative Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 195–208, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1177/146879410200200204.
[64]
W. A. Gamson, Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[65]
G. G., ‘Individual and Group Interviewing’’, in Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook, London: SAGE, 2000.
[66]
G. A., ‘Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html
[67]
L.-C. Hydén and P. Bülow, ‘Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups—some methodological considerations’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 305–321, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1080/13645570210124865.
[68]
R. A. Krueger and M. A. Casey, Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research, 5th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
[69]
D. L. Morgan, Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd ed., vol. Qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1997.
[70]
J. Munday, ‘Identity in Focus’, Sociology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 89–105, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0038038506058436.
[71]
T. L. Greenbaum, The handbook for focus group research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.
[72]
C. Överlien, K. Aronsson, and M. Hydén, ‘The Focus Group Interview as an In‐depth Method? Young Women Talking About Sexuality’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 331–344, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1364557042000119607.
[73]
D. J. Warr, ‘"It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 200–225, Apr. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1077800404273412.
[74]
S. Wilkinson, ‘Focus group methodology: a review’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 181–203, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874.
[75]
S. Wilkinson, ‘How useful are focus groups in feminist research?’, in Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice, R. S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, Eds. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1046471
[76]
W. S., ‘Chapter 10: “Focus Group Research”’, in Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice, 3rd ed., London: SAGE, 2011.
[77]
D. Hobbs, Doing the business: entrepreneurship, the working class and detectives in the East End of London. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
[78]
D. F. and H. S., ‘“Chapter 7: Crime: Hobbs” Doing the Business’’, in Sociological research methods in context, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 1999.
[79]
C. L. Reeves, ‘A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 315–331, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1468794109360150.
[80]
T. Monahan and J. A. Fisher, ‘Benefits of “observer effects”: lessons from the field’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 357–376, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1468794110362874.
[81]
P. Spicker, ‘Ethical Covert Research’, Sociology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 118–133, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0038038510387195.
[82]
P. Atkinson, The ethnographic imagination: textual constructions of reality. London: Routledge, 1990.
[83]
A. M.V., and M. de P. K.A., ‘Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’’, in The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, Fifth edition., N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2018.
[84]
N. Barley, The innocent anthropologist: notes from a mud hut. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, 2000.
[85]
B. I. and D. N., ‘Chapter 2: Ethnography: Relating the Part to the Whole’’, in The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, Fifth edition., N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2018.
[86]
B. B., ‘Chapter 6: Ethnographic Field Strategies’’, in Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 8th ed., Pearson new international ed., Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
[87]
J. Bone, ‘“The longest day”: “flexible” contracts, performance-related pay and risk shifting in the UK direct selling sector’, Work, employment and society, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 109–127, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0950017006061276.
[88]
J. Bone, The Hard Sell: an Ethnographic Study of the Direct Selling Industry. Florence: Taylor and Francis, 2006.
[89]
P. I. Bourgois, In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio, Second edition., vol. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
[90]
B. A., ‘Chapter 17: Ethnography and Participant Observation’’, in Social research methods, Fifth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
[91]
M. Bulmer, ‘When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation’, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 251–264, 1982, doi: 10.1007/BF00986753.
[92]
M. Bulmer, Ed., Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers, 1982.
[93]
D. Calvey, ‘The Art and Politics of Covert Research’, Sociology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 905–918, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0038038508094569.
[94]
J. Clifford, G. E. Marcus, and K. Fortun, Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography, 25th anniversary ed. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2010.
[95]
A. Coffey, The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage, 1999.
[96]
M. Denscome, ‘Observation’, in The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects, Fifth edition., vol. Open UP study skills, Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education/Open University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1910221
[97]
F. N., ‘Chapter 14: “Ethnography”’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[98]
U. Flick, An introduction to qualitative research, Edition 5. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDY0MjI0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
[99]
U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, and I. Steinke, A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage, 2004.
[100]
D. E. Foley, ‘Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 469–490, Jul. 2002, doi: 10.1080/09518390210145534.
[101]
M. Hammersley and P. Atkinson, Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=308687
[102]
S. Holdaway, ‘Constructing and Sustaining “Race” within the Police Workforce’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 48, no. 1, Mar. 1997, doi: 10.2307/591908.
[103]
R. Homan, The ethics of social research, vol. Aspects of modern sociology. London: Longman, 1991.
[104]
C. D. Herrera, ‘Two arguments for “covert methods” in social research’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 331–343, Jun. 1999, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00331.x.
[105]
J. Lofland and L. H. Lofland, Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis, 2nd ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth, 1984.
[106]
M. Lynch, ‘Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 26–54, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1177/02632760022051202.
[107]
D. Mahoney, ‘Constructing Reflexive Fieldwork Relationships’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 573–594, May 2007, doi: 10.1177/1077800407300765.
[108]
M. J., ‘Chapter 5: Observing and Participating’’, in Qualitative researching, 2nd ed., London: Sage, 2002.
[109]
Robert K. Merton, ‘Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 9–47, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776569?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[110]
N. Polsky, Hustlers, beats and others, [Revised ed.]., vol. Pelican books. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.
[111]
S. D., ‘Chapter 3: Ethnography and Observation’’, in Interpreting qualitative data, Fifth edition., Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
[112]
L. Richardson, ‘Evaluating Ethnography’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 253–255, Jun. 2000, doi: 10.1177/107780040000600207.
[113]
J. Thomas, Doing critical ethnography, vol. Qualitative research methods. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage, 1993.
[114]
J. Van Maanen, Tales of the field: on writing ethnography, 2nd ed., vol. Chicago guides to writing, editing, and publishing. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
[115]
C. A. B. Warren, Gender issues in field research, vol. Qualitative research methods. Newbury Park: Sage, 1988.
[116]
L. Westmarland, ‘Blowing the Whistle on Police Violence. Gender, Ethnography and Ethics’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 523–535, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.3.523.
[117]
S. Winlow, ‘Get Ready to Duck. Bouncers and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 536–548, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.3.536.
[118]
J. Scott, ‘Assessing Documentary Sources’, in A matter of record: documentary sources in social research, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990, pp. 19–35.
[119]
L. Prior, ‘Doing things with Documents’, in Qualitative research: theory, method and practice, 2nd ed., London: SAGE, 2004, pp. 76–94.
[120]
H. J.C. and J. D.J., ‘A Tale of Two Analyses: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data’, vol. 17, pp. 1–9 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/2/1.html
[121]
L. Prior, ‘Repositioning Documents in Social Research’, Sociology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 821–836, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0038038508094564.
[122]
D. Stenvoll and P. Svensson, ‘Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data’, Qualitative Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 570–586, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1468794111413242.
[123]
A. N. and A. S., ‘Chapter 19: Secondary Analysis of Survey Data’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[124]
A. P. and C. A., ‘Chapter 4: Analysing Documentary Realities’, in Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice, 3rd ed., London: SAGE, 2011.
[125]
‘A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html
[126]
‘Commentary on “a Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/secondary Dualism” (Libby Bishop)’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/7.html
[127]
A. Broom, L. Cheshire, and M. Emmison, ‘Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing’, Sociology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1163–1180, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0038038509345704.
[128]
B. A, ‘Chapter 13: Secondary analysis and official statistics’, in Social research methods, Fifth edition., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
[129]
C. L., F. J., and T. P., ‘Archiving qualitative research data’’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html
[130]
C. L., ‘Social Research Update 2: Using diaries in social research’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU2.html
[131]
A. Dale, S. Arber, and M. Procter, Doing secondary analysis, vol. Contemporary social research series. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988.
[132]
W. J. Gibson and A. Brown, Working with qualitative data. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE, 2009.
[133]
Val Gillies, ‘Secondary Analysis in Exploring Family and Social Change: Addressing the Issue of Context’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/500/1077
[134]
C. Hakim, Secondary analysis in social research: a guide to data sources and methods with examples, vol. Contemporary social research series. London: Allen & Unwin, 1982.
[135]
M. Hammersley, Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage, 1993.
[136]
‘Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues’, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html
[137]
H. M., ‘Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems’’, Sociology, vol. 31 (1), pp. 131–142.
[138]
R. M. Lee, Unobtrusive methods in social research, vol. Understanding social research. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000.
[139]
H. J., ‘Social Research Update 22: Secondary analysis of qualitative data’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html
[140]
‘“Re-Using” Qualitative Data: on the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/3.html
[141]
‘(Re)Using Qualitative Data?’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html
[142]
P. J., ‘Evidence and proof in documentary research’’, The Sociological review, vol. 29.
[143]
K. Plummer, Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage, 2001.
[144]
Mike Savage, ‘Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 6, no. 1, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/502/1081
[145]
‘What’s [Yet] to Be Seen? Re-Using Qualitative Data’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/4.html
[146]
D. Harper, ‘An Argument for Visual Sociology’, in Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers, London: Falmer Press, 1998, pp. 24–41.
[147]
A. A., ‘Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People’’, vol. 17, no. 3 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/3/8.html
[148]
Rosalind Hurworth, ‘Social Research Update 40: Photo-Interviewing for research’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU40.html
[149]
B. M, ‘Research strategies’, in Visual methods in social research, 2nd edition., London: SAGE, 2015.
[150]
D. Harper, ‘Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation’, Visual Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–26, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/14725860220137345.
[151]
A. White, N. Bushin, F. Carpena-Mendez, and C. Ni Laoire, ‘Using visual methodologies to explore contemporary Irish childhoods’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 143–158, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1468794109356735.
[152]
‘Social Research Update 11: Visual research methods’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html
[153]
D. Mannay, ‘Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible?’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 91–111, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1468794109348684.
[154]
‘Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires’’, doi: 10.1177/160940691000900203. [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/160940691000900203
[155]
Helen Pain, ‘A Literature Review to Evaluate the Choice and Use of Visual Methods’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 303–319, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/ijqm/index.php/IJQM/article/view/10397/14340
[156]
S. Pink, ‘More Visualising, More Methodologies: On Video, Reflexivity and Qualitative Research’, The Sociological Review, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 586–599, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00349.
[157]
J. Prosser, Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press, 1998.
[158]
G. Rose, Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials, Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2016.
[159]
S. Woodward, ‘Digital Photography and Research Relationships’, Sociology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 857–872, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0038038508094566.
[160]
S. Woodward, ‘Digital Photography and Research Relationships’, Sociology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 857–872, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0038038508094566.
[161]
A. C. Garcia, A. I. Standlee, and J. Bechkoff, ‘Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication’, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 52–84, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0891241607310839.
[162]
D. Carter, ‘Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 148–167, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1080/13691180500146235.
[163]
C. Manuel, ‘The Other Face of the Earth: Social Movements against the New Global Order’’, in The power of identity, 2nd ed. with new preface., vol. The information age : economy, society and culture, Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[164]
R. V. Kozinets, ‘Cultures and Communities’, in Netnography: doing ethnographic research online, Los Angeles, Calif: Sage, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/31333_01_Kozinets_Ch_01.pdf
[165]
K. R. V., ‘Chapter 2 ‘Understanding Culture Online’ [Online]. Available: http://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/31334_02_Kozinets_Ch_02.pdf
[166]
‘Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web’, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html
[167]
H. Cofff and H. Chapman, ‘Changing Facebook Profile Pictures as Part of a Campaign: Who Does it and Why?’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2440558.
[168]
D. E. DeLorme, G. M. Sinkhan, and W. French, ‘Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 271–286, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1011812620080.
[169]
H. G.J., F. D., and M. D. Johns, ‘“"Need help ASAP!!!”: A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics’’, in Online social research: methods, issues & ethics, vol. Digital formations, New York: P. Lang, 2004.
[170]
Tapio Häyhtiö, ‘Hard Rock Hallelujah! Empowering Reflexive Political Action on the Internet’, Journal for Cultural Research, vol. 11, no. 4 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14797580802038702
[171]
C. Hine, Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg, 2005.
[172]
N. James and H. Busher, Online interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage, 2009.
[173]
J. A.N., ‘Internet Behaviour and the Design of Virtual Methods’’, in Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet, Oxford: Berg, 2005, pp. 21–34.
[174]
M. M. Kazmer and B. Xie, ‘QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWING IN INTERNET STUDIES: Playing with the media, playing with the method’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 257–278, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1080/13691180801946333.
[175]
K. L, ‘Recontextualising "cyberspace”: methodological considerations for online research’’, in Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net, Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE, 1999, pp. 57–75.
[176]
C. Mann and F. Stewart, Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online, vol. New technologies for social research. London: SAGE, 2000.
[177]
‘Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software’, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/oconnor.html
[178]
S. T., ‘Researching the Online Sex Work Community’’, in Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet, Oxford: Berg, 2005, pp. 67–79.
[179]
L. Schrum, ‘Framing the Debate: Ethical Research in the Information Age’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 311–326, Sep. 1995, doi: 10.1177/107780049500100303.
[180]
S.-C. Brooke, ‘“Facebook Groups as Potential Political Publics? Exploring Ideas of the Political amongst Young British Facebook Users”’, in Muslims and political participation in Britain, vol. Routledge studies in religion and politics, T. Peace, Ed. London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 156–173.
[181]
Maurizio Teli, ‘The Internet as a Library-Of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 8, no. 3, 2007, doi: 10.17169/fqs-8.3.283. [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/283
[182]
B. B. L., ‘Chapter 3: Ethical Issues’’, in Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 8th ed., Pearson new international ed., Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
[183]
R. McAreavey and J. Muir, ‘Research ethics committees: values and power in higher education’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 391–405, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1080/13645579.2011.565635.
[184]
E. Pittaway, L. Bartolomei, and R. Hugman, ‘“Stop Stealing Our Stories”: The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 229–251, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huq004.
[185]
H. M, ‘Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research’ [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/16.html
[186]
M. David, R. Edwards, and P. Alldred, ‘Children and School-based Research: “informed consent” or “educated consent”?’, British Educational Research Journal, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 347–365, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1080/01411920120048340.
[187]
Constance Holden, ‘Ethics in Social Science Research’, Science, vol. 206, no. 4418, pp. 537–540, 1979 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1749232
[188]
G. N., ‘Chapter 8: The Ethics of Social Research’’, in Researching social life, Fourth edition., G. N. Gilbert and P. Stoneman, Eds. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2015.
[189]
M. Glucksmann and R. Cavendish, Women on the line. London: Routledge, 2009.
[190]
M. Hammersley and P. Atkinson, Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=308687
[191]
‘Can’t Talk, Won’t Talk?: Methodological Issues in Researching Children’, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/2/harden.html
[192]
‘Social Science Gets the Ethics Treatment: Research governance and ethical review’ [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/4/williamson.html
[193]
M. Tim, ‘Values and ethics in the research process’’ [Online]. Available: http://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335206123.pdf
[194]
M. Punch, The politics and ethics of fieldwork, vol. Qualitative research methods. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1986.
[195]
J. RODGERS, ‘Trying to Get it Right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties’, Disability & Society, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 421–433, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1080/09687599926046.
[196]
Wolff-Michael Roth, ‘(Un-) Political Ethics, (un-) Ethical Politics’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 5, no. 3, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/573/1244
[197]
A. Ryen, ‘Ethical Issues’’, in Qualitative research practice, C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, and D. Silverman, Eds. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2007, pp. 230–247 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1046494
[198]
S. D., ‘Chapter 9: Research Ethics’’, in Interpreting qualitative data, Fifth edition., Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
[199]
S. P., ‘Research without consent’’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU51.pdf
[200]
‘Ethics and the Ruling Relations of Research Production’ [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/truman.html
[201]
W. Rose, Sue Heath, Graham Crow, and Vikki Charles, ‘Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review’. [Online]. Available: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/85/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-001.pdf
[202]
N. Islam, ‘Research as an Act of Betrayal: Researching Race in an Asian Community in Los Angeles’, in Racing research, researching race: methodological dilemmas in critical race studies, New York: New York University Press, 2000, pp. 35–66.
[203]
N. Tang, ‘Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women’, Sociology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 703–721, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0038038502036003011.
[204]
H. S. Becker, ‘Whose Side Are We On?’, Social Problems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 239–247, Jan. 1967, doi: 10.2307/799147.
[205]
A. Oakley, ‘Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift’, Sociology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 195–213, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0038038515580253.
[206]
Y. Gunaratnam, Researching race and ethnicity: methods, knowledge and power. London: SAGE, 2003.
[207]
B. FAWCETT and J. HEARN, ‘Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 201–218, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1080/13645570210163989.
[208]
‘“Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research”’ [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/4/letherby.html
[209]
T. Clark, ‘On “being researched”: why do people engage with qualitative research?’, Qualitative Research, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 399–419, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1468794110366796.
[210]
B. L. and S. J., ‘‘Doing Research, Writing Research: the Dilemmas of political intervention in research on racism’, Economy and society, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 178–199.
[211]
B. M., ‘Chapter 16: Addressing Social Problems through qualitative research’’, in Qualitative research, 4th edition., D. Silverman, Ed. London: Sage Publications, 2016.
[212]
‘Evaluating an Empowering Research Strategy: Reflections on Action-Research with South Asian Women’, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/1.html
[213]
C. Craig, ‘Foreword’, in Engaging contradictions: theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship, vol. Global, area, and international archive, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=470852
[214]
J. CARTER, ‘Research note: reflections on interviewing across the ethnic divide’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 345–353, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000094560.
[215]
M. David, ‘Problems of participation: The limits of action research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–17, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/13645570110098037.
[216]
L. Dodson, D. Piatelli, and L. Schmalzbauer, ‘Researching Inequality Through Interpretive Collaborations’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 821–843, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1077800407304458.
[217]
F. J., ‘It’s great to have someone to talk to; the ethics and politics of interviewing women’’, in Social researching: politics, problems, practice, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.
[218]
L. Finlay, ‘Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice’, Qualitative Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 209–230, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1177/146879410200200205.
[219]
Deianira Ganga, ‘Cultural “Insiders” and the Issue of Positionality in Qualitative Migration Research: Moving “Across” and Moving “Along” Researcher-Participant Divides’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/134/290
[220]
‘Knowing your Place: Gender and Reflexivity in two Ethnographies’ [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/gill.html
[221]
R. Gomm, ‘Evaluative and Emancipatory Research’, in Social research methodology: a critical introduction, 2nd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, pp. 322–343 [Online]. Available: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMjMwMjI5MTEyL2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDVfdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
[222]
L. Goodson and J. Phillimore, ‘“Community research: opportunities and challenges”’, in Community research for participation: from theory to method, L. Goodson and J. Phillimore, Eds. Bristol: Policy, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=978127
[223]
H. M., ‘On Feminist Methodology’, Sociology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 187–206.
[224]
M. Hammersley, Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. London: Routledge, 2000.
[225]
‘Bias in Social Research’, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/2.html
[226]
S. G. Harding, Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.
[227]
C. Hoong Sin, ‘Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’’, Qualitative Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 477–499, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1468794107082304.
[228]
‘From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals?’, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/3.html
[229]
K. L., B. S., and R. L., ‘Researching Women’s Lives or Studying Women’s Oppression? Reflections on what Constitutes Feminist Research’, in Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective, vol. Gender and society : feminist perspectives on the past and present, London: Taylor & Francis, 1994.
[230]
A. Liebling, ‘Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 472–484, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.3.472.
[231]
G. Letherby, Feminist research in theory and practice, vol. Feminist controversies. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003.
[232]
M. T., ‘Chapter 3: Values and Ethics in the Research Process’’, in Social research: issues, methods and process, 4th ed., Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
[233]
L. Nencel, ‘Feeling Gender Speak’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 345–361, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1350506805054274.
[234]
O. A., ‘Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’’, in Doing feminist research, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
[235]
O. A., ‘Gender, Methodology and People’s Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science’’, Sociology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 707–731.
[236]
R. C., ‘On feminist methodology: male reason versus female empowerment’’, Sociology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 207–212.
[237]
S. Reinharz and L. Davidman, Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
[238]
H. Roberts, Doing feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981.
[239]
S. D., ‘Chapter 11: The Relevance of Qualitative Research’’, in Interpreting qualitative data, Fifth edition., Los Angeles: SAGE, 2014.
[240]
C. Hoong Sin, ‘Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’’, Qualitative Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 477–499, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1468794107082304.
[241]
L. Stanley, Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: Routledge, 1990.
[242]
T. B and M. M, ‘Doing research with refugeesIssues and guidelines - Policy Press Scholarship’. [Online]. Available: http://policypress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1332/policypress/9781861345981.001.0001/upso-9781861345981
[243]
‘Social Research Update 34: Undertaking Action Research: Negotiating the Road Ahead’. [Online]. Available: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU34.html
[244]
C. Truman, D. M. Mertens, and B. Humphries, Research and inequality. London: UCL Press, 2000.
[245]
Y. J. AA, ‘“Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: The inside and outside of it”’, in Researching race and racism, London: Routledge, 2004.
