1
Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
2
Bryman A. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
3
Devine F, Heath S. Sociological research methods in context. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 1999.
4
Devine F, Heath S. Doing social science: evidence and methods in empirical research. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
5
Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
6
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: : Sage 2002.
7
May T. Social research: issues, methods and process. 4th ed. Maidenhead: : Open Universtiy Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
8
Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
9
Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: : Sage Publications 2016.
10
Waller V, Farquharson K, Dempsey D. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2016.
11
A. B. Chapter 19: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. In: Social research methods. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
12
Loïc J. D. Wacquant. The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade. Theory and Society 1995;24:489–535.http://www.jstor.org/stable/657882?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
13
Waller V, Farquharson K, Dempsey D. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2016.
14
A sample chapter 2: Qualitative Social Research: Contemporary Methods for the Digital Age. https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/72578_Waller_Qualitative_Social_Research.pdf
15
Qualitative Research. http://journals.sagepub.com/home/qrj
16
ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. https://www.ncrm.ac.uk/
17
Williams D. The Study of Development’. In: Currie-Alder B, Kanbur SMR, Malone D, et al., eds. International development: ideas, experience, and prospects. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
18
Bell J. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science. 5th ed. Maidenhead: : Open University Press 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3017225
19
Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
20
Burnham P, Lutz KG, Grant W, et al. Research methods in politics. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
21
Burton D. Research training for social scientists: a handbook for postgraduate researchers. London: : Sage 2000.
22
J. B. Working Qualitatively’. In: Qualitative research practice. London: : Sage 2004.
23
A. B. Chapter 16: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. In: Social research methods. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
24
G C. Chapter 1: Conceptualising Social Life’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
25
M. E, J. G. Chapter 4: ‘Searching and Reviewing Literature’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
26
Flick U, Kardoff E von, Steinke I. A companion to qualitative research. London: : Sage 2004.
27
N. Gilbert. Chapter 2: ‘Research, Theory and Method’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
28
N. G. Chapter 3: ‘Formulating and Refining a Research Question’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
29
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: : Sage 2002.
30
O’Connell Davidson J, Layder D. Methods, sex and madness. London: : Routledge 1994.
31
Renzetti CM, Lee RM. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: : Sage 1993.
32
Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: : Sage 2003. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNDQ2MjkzNTE1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLnhsaW5rLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
33
Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
34
Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: : Sage Publications 2016.
35
N. S. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. In: Researching society and culture. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012.
36
Rubin HJ. Keeping on Target While Hanging Loose: Designing Qualitative Interviews. In: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks: : Sage 1995. 42–64.
37
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, et al. Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research 2009;9:61–79. doi:10.1177/1468794108098031
38
Harvey WS. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research 2011;11:431–41. doi:10.1177/1468794111404329
39
Sarah Elsie B, Rosalind E. How many qualitative interviews is enough. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/
40
Roulston K. Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research 2010;10:199–228. doi:10.1177/1468794109356739
41
Bergman Blix S, Wettergren Å. The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qualitative Research 2015;15:688–704. doi:10.1177/1468794114561348
42
Rosalind E, Holland J. What is Qualitative Interviewing? http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3276/1/complete_proofs.pdf
43
Atkinson R. The life story interview. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage 1998.
44
H. S B, B. G. Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison’. In: Issues in participant observation: a text and reader. Reading, Mass: : Addison-Wesley 1969.
45
K. B. Interviewing survivors of marital rape. In: Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: : Sage 1993.
46
N. F, H. T. Chapter 13: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
47
A., F, J.H. F. The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2018. 645–72.
48
Hubbard: The Usefulness of Indepth Life History Interviews. Published Online First: 2000.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/4/hubbard.html
49
MCCORMACK C. Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2004;7:219–36. doi:10.1080/13645570210166382
50
J. M. Chapter 4: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. In: Qualitative researching. London: : Sage 2002.
51
May T. Interviewing: methods and process’. In: Social research: issues, methods and process. Maidenhead: : Open Universtiy Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
52
J. M, B. G. The inside and the outside: finding realities in interviews’. In: Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research. London: : Sage Publications 2016.
53
Pawson R. Theorizing the Interview. The British Journal of Sociology 1996;47. doi:10.2307/591728
54
Peabody RL, Hammond SW, Torcom J, et al. Interviewing Political Elites. PS: Political Science and Politics 1990;23. doi:10.2307/419807
55
Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: : Sage 2012.
56
D. S. Chapter 4: ‘Interviews’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
57
Smithson J. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2000;3:103–19. doi:10.1080/136455700405172
58
Smithson J. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2000;3:103–19. doi:10.1080/136455700405172
59
Beverley Holbrook and Peter Jackson. Shopping around: Focus Group Research in North London. Area 1996;28:136–42.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003650?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
60
Belzile JA, Öberg G. Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research 2012;12:459–72. doi:10.1177/1468794111433089
61
Jenny Kitzinger. Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings. http://www.academia.edu/1621860/Focus_group_research_using_group_dynamics_to_explore_perceptions_experiences_and_understandings
62
Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ 1995;311:299–302. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
63
Fallon G, Brown RB. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research 2002;2:195–208. doi:10.1177/146879410200200204
64
Gamson WA. Talking Politics. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
65
G. G. Individual and Group Interviewing’. In: Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London: : SAGE 2000.
66
A. G. Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html
67
Hydén L-C, Bülow P. Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups—some methodological considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2003;6:305–21. doi:10.1080/13645570210124865
68
Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
69
Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: : Sage 1997.
70
Munday J. Identity in Focus. Sociology 2006;40:89–105. doi:10.1177/0038038506058436
71
Greenbaum TL. The handbook for focus group research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: : Sage 1998.
72
Överlien C, Aronsson K, Hydén M. The Focus Group Interview as an In‐depth Method? Young Women Talking About Sexuality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005;8:331–44. doi:10.1080/1364557042000119607
73
Warr DJ. "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry 2005;11:200–25. doi:10.1177/1077800404273412
74
Wilkinson S. Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1998;1:181–203. doi:10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
75
Wilkinson S. How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, eds. Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 1999. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1046471
76
S. W. Chapter 10: ‘Focus Group Research’. In: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. London: : SAGE 2011.
77
Hobbs D. Doing the business: entrepreneurship, the working class and detectives in the East End of London. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1988.
78
F. D, S. H. ‘Chapter 7: Crime: Hobbs’ Doing the Business’. In: Sociological research methods in context. Basingstoke: : Palgrave 1999.
79
Reeves CL. A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research 2010;10:315–31. doi:10.1177/1468794109360150
80
Monahan T, Fisher JA. Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field. Qualitative Research 2010;10:357–76. doi:10.1177/1468794110362874
81
Spicker P. Ethical Covert Research. Sociology 2011;45:118–33. doi:10.1177/0038038510387195
82
Atkinson P. The ethnographic imagination: textual constructions of reality. London: : Routledge 1990.
83
M.V., A, K.A. M de P. Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2018.
84
Barley N. The innocent anthropologist: notes from a mud hut. Long Grove, Ill: : Waveland Press 2000.
85
I. B, N. D. Chapter 2: Ethnography: Relating the Part to the Whole’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2018.
86
B. B. Chapter 6: Ethnographic Field Strategies’. In: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
87
Bone J. ‘The longest day’: ‘flexible’ contracts, performance-related pay and risk shifting in the UK direct selling sector. Work, employment and society 2006;20:109–27. doi:10.1177/0950017006061276
88
Bone J. The Hard Sell: an Ethnographic Study of the Direct Selling Industry. Florence: : Taylor and Francis 2006.
89
Bourgois PI. In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio. Second edition. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808562
90
A. B. Chapter 17: Ethnography and Participant Observation’. In: Social research methods. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
91
Bulmer M. When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation. Qualitative Sociology 1982;5:251–64. doi:10.1007/BF00986753
92
Bulmer M, editor. Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. New York: : Holmes & Meier Publishers 1982.
93
Calvey D. The Art and Politics of Covert Research. Sociology 2008;42:905–18. doi:10.1177/0038038508094569
94
Clifford J, Marcus GE, Fortun K. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. 25th anniversary ed. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2010.
95
Coffey A. The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: : Sage 1999.
96
Denscome, M. Observation. In: The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: : McGraw Hill Education/Open University Press 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1910221
97
N. F. Chapter 14: ‘Ethnography’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
98
Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. Edition 5. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDY0MjI0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
99
Flick U, Kardoff E von, Steinke I. A companion to qualitative research. London: : Sage 2004.
100
Foley DE. Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 2002;15:469–90. doi:10.1080/09518390210145534
101
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Hoboken: : Taylor & Francis 2007. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=308687
102
Holdaway S. Constructing and Sustaining ‘Race’ within the Police Workforce. The British Journal of Sociology 1997;48. doi:10.2307/591908
103
Homan R. The ethics of social research. London: : Longman 1991.
104
Herrera CD. Two arguments for ‘covert methods’ in social research. The British Journal of Sociology 1999;50:331–43. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00331.x
105
Lofland J, Lofland LH. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 2nd ed. Belmont, Calif: : Wadsworth 1984.
106
Lynch M. Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society 2000;17:26–54. doi:10.1177/02632760022051202
107
Mahoney D. Constructing Reflexive Fieldwork Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry 2007;13:573–94. doi:10.1177/1077800407300765
108
J. M. Chapter 5: Observing and Participating’. In: Qualitative researching. London: : Sage 2002.
109
Robert K. Merton. Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology 1972;78:9–47.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776569?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
110
Polsky N. Hustlers, beats and others. [Revised ed.]. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1971.
111
D. S. Chapter 3: Ethnography and Observation’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
112
Richardson L. Evaluating Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry 2000;6:253–5. doi:10.1177/107780040000600207
113
Thomas J. Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, Calif: : Sage 1993.
114
Van Maanen J. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: : University of Chicago Press 2011.
115
Warren CAB. Gender issues in field research. Newbury Park: : Sage 1988.
116
Westmarland L. Blowing the Whistle on Police Violence. Gender, Ethnography and Ethics. British Journal of Criminology 2001;41:523–35. doi:10.1093/bjc/41.3.523
117
Winlow S. Get Ready to Duck. Bouncers and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups. British Journal of Criminology 2001;41:536–48. doi:10.1093/bjc/41.3.536
118
Scott J. Assessing Documentary Sources. In: A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1990. 19–35.
119
Prior L. Doing things with Documents. In: Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: : SAGE 2004. 76–94.
120
J.C. H, D.J. J. A Tale of Two Analyses: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data. ;17:1–9.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/2/1.html
121
Prior L. Repositioning Documents in Social Research. Sociology 2008;42:821–36. doi:10.1177/0038038508094564
122
Stenvoll D, Svensson P. Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data. Qualitative Research 2011;11:570–86. doi:10.1177/1468794111413242
123
N. A, S. A. Chapter 19: Secondary Analysis of Survey Data. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
124
P. A, A. C. Chapter 4: Analysing Documentary Realities. In: Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. London: : SAGE 2011.
125
A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism. Published Online First: 2007.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/2.html
126
Commentary on ‘a Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/secondary Dualism’ (Libby Bishop). Published Online First: 2007.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/7.html
127
Broom A, Cheshire L, Emmison M. Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing. Sociology 2009;43:1163–80. doi:10.1177/0038038509345704
128
A B. Chapter 13: Secondary analysis and official statistics. In: Social research methods. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2016. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMTkyNjM2NjE0L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDAwX0FDb3Zlci5odG1sIn0%3D
129
L., C, J. F, P. T. Archiving qualitative research data’. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html
130
L. C. Social Research Update 2: Using diaries in social research. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU2.html
131
Dale A, Arber S, Procter M. Doing secondary analysis. London: : Unwin Hyman 1988.
132
Gibson WJ, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2009.
133
Val Gillies. Secondary Analysis in Exploring Family and Social Change: Addressing the Issue of Context. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2005;6.http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/500/1077
134
Hakim C. Secondary analysis in social research: a guide to data sources and methods with examples. London: : Allen & Unwin 1982.
135
Hammersley M. Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. London: : Sage 1993.
136
Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues. Published Online First: 2010.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/1/5.html
137
M. H. Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems’. Sociology;31 (1):131–42.
138
Lee RM. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Buckingham: : Open University Press 2000.
139
J. H. Social Research Update 22: Secondary analysis of qualitative data. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html
140
‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: on the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology. Published Online First: 2007.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/3.html
141
(Re)Using Qualitative Data? Published Online First: 2007.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html
142
J. P. Evidence and proof in documentary research’. The Sociological review;29.
143
Plummer K. Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. London: : Sage 2001.
144
Mike Savage. Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2005;6.http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/502/1081
145
What’s [Yet] to Be Seen? Re-Using Qualitative Data. Published Online First: 2007.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/3/4.html
146
Harper D. An Argument for Visual Sociology. In: Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: : Falmer Press 1998. 24–41.
147
A. A. Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People’. ;17.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/3/8.html
148
Rosalind Hurworth. Social Research Update 40: Photo-Interviewing for research. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU40.html
149
M B. Research strategies. In: Visual methods in social research. London: : SAGE 2015.
150
Harper D. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies 2002;17:13–26. doi:10.1080/14725860220137345
151
White A, Bushin N, Carpena-Mendez F, et al. Using visual methodologies to explore contemporary Irish childhoods. Qualitative Research 2010;10:143–58. doi:10.1177/1468794109356735
152
Social Research Update 11: Visual research methods. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html
153
Mannay D. Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research 2010;10:91–111. doi:10.1177/1468794109348684
154
Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires’. doi:10.1177/160940691000900203
155
Helen Pain. A Literature Review to Evaluate the Choice and Use of Visual Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE 2012;11:303–19.https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/ijqm/index.php/IJQM/article/view/10397/14340
156
Pink S. More Visualising, More Methodologies: On Video, Reflexivity and Qualitative Research. The Sociological Review 2001;49:586–99. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00349
157
Prosser J. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: : Falmer Press 1998.
158
Rose G. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2016.
159
Woodward S. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology 2008;42:857–72. doi:10.1177/0038038508094566
160
Woodward S. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology 2008;42:857–72. doi:10.1177/0038038508094566
161
Garcia AC, Standlee AI, Bechkoff J. Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 2009;38:52–84. doi:10.1177/0891241607310839
162
Carter D. Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society 2005;8:148–67. doi:10.1080/13691180500146235
163
Manuel C. The Other Face of the Earth: Social Movements against the New Global Order’. In: The power of identity. Malden, Mass: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
164
Kozinets RV. Cultures and Communities. In: Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. Los Angeles, Calif: : Sage 2010. http://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/31333_01_Kozinets_Ch_01.pdf
165
R. V. K. Chapter 2 ‘Understanding Culture Online. http://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/31334_02_Kozinets_Ch_02.pdf
166
Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web. Published Online First: 1999.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html
167
Cofff H, Chapman H. Changing Facebook Profile Pictures as Part of a Campaign: Who Does it and Why? SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2014. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2440558
168
DeLorme DE, Sinkhan GM, French W. Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics 2001;33:271–86. doi:10.1023/A:1011812620080
169
G.J., H, D. F, Johns MD. ‘"Need help ASAP!!!’: A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics’. In: Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. New York: : P. Lang 2004.
170
Tapio Häyhtiö. Hard Rock Hallelujah! Empowering Reflexive Political Action on the Internet. Journal for Cultural Research;11.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14797580802038702
171
Hine C. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: : Berg 2005.
172
James N, Busher H. Online interviewing. Los Angeles: : Sage 2009.
173
A.N. J. Internet Behaviour and the Design of Virtual Methods’. In: Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: : Berg 2005. 21–34.
174
Kazmer MM, Xie B. QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWING IN INTERNET STUDIES: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society 2008;11:257–78. doi:10.1080/13691180801946333
175
L K. Recontextualising "cyberspace”: methodological considerations for online research’. In: Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : SAGE 1999. 57–75.
176
Mann C, Stewart F. Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. London: : SAGE 2000.
177
Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software. Published Online First: 2001.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/oconnor.html
178
T. S. Researching the Online Sex Work Community’. In: Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: : Berg 2005. 67–79.
179
Schrum L. Framing the Debate: Ethical Research in the Information Age. Qualitative Inquiry 1995;1:311–26. doi:10.1177/107780049500100303
180
Brooke S-C. ‘Facebook Groups as Potential Political Publics? Exploring Ideas of the Political amongst Young British Facebook Users’. In: Peace T, ed. Muslims and political participation in Britain. London: : Routledge 2015. 156–73.
181
Maurizio Teli. The Internet as a Library-Of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2007;8. doi:10.17169/fqs-8.3.283
182
B. L. B. Chapter 3: Ethical Issues’. In: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5137314
183
McAreavey R, Muir J. Research ethics committees: values and power in higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2011;14:391–405. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.565635
184
Pittaway E, Bartolomei L, Hugman R. ‘Stop Stealing Our Stories’: The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice 2010;2:229–51. doi:10.1093/jhuman/huq004
185
M H. Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/15/4/16.html
186
David M, Edwards R, Alldred P. Children and School-based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal 2001;27:347–65. doi:10.1080/01411920120048340
187
Constance Holden. Ethics in Social Science Research. Science 1979;206:537–40.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1749232
188
N. G. Chapter 8: The Ethics of Social Research’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
189
Glucksmann M, Cavendish R. Women on the line. London: : Routledge 2009.
190
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Hoboken: : Taylor & Francis 2007. http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=308687
191
Can’t Talk, Won’t Talk?: Methodological Issues in Researching Children. Published Online First: 2000.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/2/harden.html
192
Social Science Gets the Ethics Treatment: Research governance and ethical review. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/4/williamson.html
193
Tim M. Values and ethics in the research process’. http://www.mheducation.co.uk/openup/chapters/0335206123.pdf
194
Punch M. The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Beverly Hills: : Sage 1986.
195
RODGERS J. Trying to Get it Right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society 1999;14:421–33. doi:10.1080/09687599926046
196
Wolff-Michael Roth. (Un-) Political Ethics, (un-) Ethical Politics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2004;5.http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/573/1244
197
Ryen A. Ethical Issues’. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, et al., eds. Qualitative research practice. London: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2007. 230–47.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1046494
198
D. S. Chapter 9: Research Ethics’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
199
P. S. Research without consent’. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU51.pdf
200
Ethics and the Ruling Relations of Research Production. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/1/truman.html
201
Rose, W, Sue Heath, Graham Crow, et al. Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/85/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-001.pdf
202
Islam N. Research as an Act of Betrayal: Researching Race in an Asian Community in Los Angeles. In: Racing research, researching race: methodological dilemmas in critical race studies. New York: : New York University Press 2000. 35–66.
203
Tang N. Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women. Sociology 2002;36:703–21. doi:10.1177/0038038502036003011
204
Becker HS. Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems 1967;14:239–47. doi:10.2307/799147
205
Oakley A. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology 2016;50:195–213. doi:10.1177/0038038515580253
206
Gunaratnam Y. Researching race and ethnicity: methods, knowledge and power. London: : SAGE 2003.
207
FAWCETT B, HEARN J. Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2004;7:201–18. doi:10.1080/13645570210163989
208
‘Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research’. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/4/letherby.html
209
Clark T. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research 2010;10:399–419. doi:10.1177/1468794110366796
210
L. B, J. S. ‘Doing Research, Writing Research: the Dilemmas of political intervention in research on racism. Economy and society;22:178–99.
211
M. B. Chapter 16: Addressing Social Problems through qualitative research’. In: Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research. London: : Sage Publications 2016.
212
Evaluating an Empowering Research Strategy: Reflections on Action-Research with South Asian Women. Published Online First: 1996.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/1.html
213
Craig C. Foreword. In: Engaging contradictions: theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2008. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=470852
214
CARTER J. Research note: reflections on interviewing across the ethnic divide. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2004;7:345–53. doi:10.1080/1364557032000094560
215
David M. Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2002;5:11–7. doi:10.1080/13645570110098037
216
Dodson L, Piatelli D, Schmalzbauer L. Researching Inequality Through Interpretive Collaborations. Qualitative Inquiry 2007;13:821–43. doi:10.1177/1077800407304458
217
J. F. It’s great to have someone to talk to; the ethics and politics of interviewing women’. In: Social researching: politics, problems, practice. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1984.
218
Finlay L. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research 2002;2:209–30. doi:10.1177/146879410200200205
219
Deianira Ganga. Cultural ‘Insiders’ and the Issue of Positionality in Qualitative Migration Research: Moving ‘Across’ and Moving ‘Along’ Researcher-Participant Divides. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2006;7.http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/134/290
220
Knowing your Place: Gender and Reflexivity in two Ethnographies. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/7/2/gill.html
221
Gomm R. Evaluative and Emancipatory Research. In: Social research methodology: a critical introduction. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. 322–43.https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgwMjMwMjI5MTEyL2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvMDVfdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
222
Goodson L, Phillimore J. ‘Community research: opportunities and challenges’. In: Goodson L, Phillimore J, eds. Community research for participation: from theory to method. Bristol: : Policy 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=978127
223
M. H. On Feminist Methodology. Sociology;26:187–206.
224
Hammersley M. Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. London: : Routledge 2000.
225
Bias in Social Research. Published Online First: 1997.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/2.html
226
Harding SG. Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Milton Keynes: : Open University Press 1987.
227
Hoong Sin C. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research 2007;7:477–99. doi:10.1177/1468794107082304
228
From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals? Published Online First: 1997.http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/3.html
229
L. K, S. B, L. R. Researching Women’s Lives or Studying Women’s Oppression? Reflections on what Constitutes Feminist Research. In: Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. London: : Taylor & Francis 1994.
230
Liebling A. Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research. British Journal of Criminology 2001;41:472–84. doi:10.1093/bjc/41.3.472
231
Letherby G. Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham: : Open University Press 2003.
232
T. M. Chapter 3: Values and Ethics in the Research Process’. In: Social research: issues, methods and process. Maidenhead: : Open Universtiy Press 2011. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=729519
233
Nencel L. Feeling Gender Speak. European Journal of Women’s Studies 2005;12:345–61. doi:10.1177/1350506805054274
234
A. O. Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’. In: Doing feminist research. London: : Routledge and Kegan Paul 1981.
235
A. O. Gender, Methodology and People’s Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science’. Sociology;32:707–31.
236
C. R. On feminist methodology: male reason versus female empowerment’. Sociology;26:207–12.
237
Reinharz S, Davidman L. Feminist methods in social research. New York: : Oxford University Press 1992.
238
Roberts H. Doing feminist research. London: : Routledge and Kegan Paul 1981.
239
D. S. Chapter 11: The Relevance of Qualitative Research’. In: Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
240
Hoong Sin C. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research 2007;7:477–99. doi:10.1177/1468794107082304
241
Stanley L. Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: : Routledge 1990.
242
B T, M M. Doing research with refugeesIssues and guidelines - Policy Press Scholarship. http://policypress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1332/policypress/9781861345981.001.0001/upso-9781861345981
243
Social Research Update 34: Undertaking Action Research: Negotiating the Road Ahead. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU34.html
244
Truman C, Mertens DM, Humphries B. Research and inequality. London: : UCL Press 2000.
245
AA YJ. ‘Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: The inside and outside of it’. In: Researching race and racism. London: : Routledge 2004.
