1
Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
2
Bryman A. Social research methods. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
3
Devine F, Heath S. Sociological research methods in context. Basingstoke: Palgrave 1999.
4
Devine F, Heath S. Doing social science: evidence and methods in empirical research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
5
Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, editors. Researching social life. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
6
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage 2002.
7
May T. Social research: issues, methods and process. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press 2011.
8
Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
9
Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: Sage Publications 2016.
10
Waller V, Farquharson K, Dempsey D. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd 2016.
11
A. B. Chapter 19: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
12
Loïc J. D. Wacquant. The Pugilistic Point of View: How Boxers Think and Feel about Their Trade. Theory and Society. 1995;24:489–535.
13
Waller V, Farquharson K, Dempsey D. Qualitative social research: contemporary methods for the digital age. London: SAGE Publications Ltd 2016.
14
A sample chapter 2: Qualitative Social Research: Contemporary Methods for the Digital Age.
16
ESRC National Centre for Research Methods. https://www.ncrm.ac.uk/
17
Williams D. The Study of Development’. In: Currie-Alder B, Kanbur SMR, Malone D, et al., eds. International development: ideas, experience, and prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
18
Bell J. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education, health and social science. 5th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2010.
19
Berg BL. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 8th ed., Pearson new international ed. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
20
Burnham P, Lutz KG, Grant W, et al. Research methods in politics. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
21
Burton D. Research training for social scientists: a handbook for postgraduate researchers. London: Sage 2000.
22
J. B. Working Qualitatively’. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage 2004.
23
A. B. Chapter 16: The Nature of Qualitative Research’. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
24
G C. Chapter 1: Conceptualising Social Life’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
25
M. E, J. G. Chapter 4: ‘Searching and Reviewing Literature’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
26
Flick U, Kardoff E von, Steinke I. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage 2004.
27
N. Gilbert. Chapter 2: ‘Research, Theory and Method’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
28
N. G. Chapter 3: ‘Formulating and Refining a Research Question’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
29
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage 2002.
30
O’Connell Davidson J, Layder D. Methods, sex and madness. London: Routledge 1994.
31
Renzetti CM, Lee RM. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: Sage 1993.
32
Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage 2003.
33
Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data. Fifth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
34
Silverman D, editor. Qualitative research. 4th edition. London: Sage Publications 2016.
35
N. S. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Researching society and culture. Los Angeles: SAGE 2012.
36
Rubin HJ. Keeping on Target While Hanging Loose: Designing Qualitative Interviews. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage 1995:42–64.
37
Dickson-Swift V, James EL, Kippen S, et al. Researching sensitive topics: qualitative research as emotion work. Qualitative Research. 2009;9:61–79. doi: 10.1177/1468794108098031
38
Harvey WS. Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research. 2011;11:431–41. doi: 10.1177/1468794111404329
39
Sarah Elsie B, Rosalind E. How many qualitative interviews is enough.
40
Roulston K. Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research. 2010;10:199–228. doi: 10.1177/1468794109356739
41
Bergman Blix S, Wettergren Å. The emotional labour of gaining and maintaining access to the field. Qualitative Research. 2015;15:688–704. doi: 10.1177/1468794114561348
42
Rosalind E, Holland J. What is Qualitative Interviewing?
43
Atkinson R. The life story interview. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage 1998.
44
H. S B, B. G. Participant observation and interviewing: a comparison’. Issues in participant observation: a text and reader. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley 1969.
45
K. B. Interviewing survivors of marital rape. Researching sensitive topics. Newbury Park: Sage 1993.
46
N. F, H. T. Chapter 13: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
47
A., F, J.H. F. The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE 2018:645–72.
48
Hubbard: The Usefulness of Indepth Life History Interviews. Published Online First: 2000.
49
MCCORMACK C. Storying stories: a narrative approach to in-depth interview conversations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2004;7:219–36. doi: 10.1080/13645570210166382
50
J. M. Chapter 4: ‘Qualitative Interviewing’. Qualitative researching. London: Sage 2002.
51
May T. Interviewing: methods and process’. Social research: issues, methods and process. Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press 2011.
52
J. M, B. G. The inside and the outside: finding realities in interviews’. In: Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research. London: Sage Publications 2016.
53
Pawson R. Theorizing the Interview. The British Journal of Sociology. 1996;47. doi: 10.2307/591728
54
Peabody RL, Hammond SW, Torcom J, et al. Interviewing Political Elites. PS: Political Science and Politics. 1990;23. doi: 10.2307/419807
55
Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage 2012.
56
D. S. Chapter 4: ‘Interviews’. Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
57
Smithson J. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2000;3:103–19. doi: 10.1080/136455700405172
58
Smithson J. Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2000;3:103–19. doi: 10.1080/136455700405172
59
Beverley Holbrook and Peter Jackson. Shopping around: Focus Group Research in North London. Area. 1996;28:136–42.
60
Belzile JA, Öberg G. Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research. 2012;12:459–72. doi: 10.1177/1468794111433089
61
Jenny Kitzinger. Focus group research: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings.
62
Kitzinger J. Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311:299–302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
63
Fallon G, Brown RB. Focusing on focus groups: lessons from a research project involving a Bangladeshi community. Qualitative Research. 2002;2:195–208. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200204
64
Gamson WA. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
65
G. G. Individual and Group Interviewing’. Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: a practical handbook. London: SAGE 2000.
66
A. G. Social Research Update 19: Focus Groups. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html
67
Hydén L-C, Bülow P. Who’s talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups—some methodological considerations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2003;6:305–21. doi: 10.1080/13645570210124865
68
Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
69
Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage 1997.
70
Munday J. Identity in Focus. Sociology. 2006;40:89–105. doi: 10.1177/0038038506058436
71
Greenbaum TL. The handbook for focus group research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage 1998.
72
Överlien C, Aronsson K, Hydén M. The Focus Group Interview as an In‐depth Method? Young Women Talking About Sexuality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005;8:331–44. doi: 10.1080/1364557042000119607
73
Warr DJ. "It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: Analyzing Sociable Interaction in Focus Groups. Qualitative Inquiry. 2005;11:200–25. doi: 10.1177/1077800404273412
74
Wilkinson S. Focus group methodology: a review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 1998;1:181–203. doi: 10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
75
Wilkinson S. How useful are focus groups in feminist research? In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J, eds. Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd 1999.
76
S. W. Chapter 10: ‘Focus Group Research’. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. London: SAGE 2011.
77
Hobbs D. Doing the business: entrepreneurship, the working class and detectives in the East End of London. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1988.
78
F. D, S. H. ‘Chapter 7: Crime: Hobbs’ Doing the Business’. Sociological research methods in context. Basingstoke: Palgrave 1999.
79
Reeves CL. A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers. Qualitative Research. 2010;10:315–31. doi: 10.1177/1468794109360150
80
Monahan T, Fisher JA. Benefits of ‘observer effects’: lessons from the field. Qualitative Research. 2010;10:357–76. doi: 10.1177/1468794110362874
81
Spicker P. Ethical Covert Research. Sociology. 2011;45:118–33. doi: 10.1177/0038038510387195
82
Atkinson P. The ethnographic imagination: textual constructions of reality. London: Routledge 1990.
83
M.V., A, K.A. M de P. Rethinking Observation: From Method to Context’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE 2018.
84
Barley N. The innocent anthropologist: notes from a mud hut. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press 2000.
85
I. B, N. D. Chapter 2: Ethnography: Relating the Part to the Whole’. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE 2018.
86
B. B. Chapter 6: Ethnographic Field Strategies’. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
87
Bone J. ‘The longest day’: ‘flexible’ contracts, performance-related pay and risk shifting in the UK direct selling sector. Work, employment and society. 2006;20:109–27. doi: 10.1177/0950017006061276
88
Bone J. The Hard Sell: an Ethnographic Study of the Direct Selling Industry. Florence: Taylor and Francis 2006.
89
Bourgois PI. In search of respect: selling crack in El Barrio. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003.
90
A. B. Chapter 17: Ethnography and Participant Observation’. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
91
Bulmer M. When is disguise justified? Alternatives to covert participant observation. Qualitative Sociology. 1982;5:251–64. doi: 10.1007/BF00986753
92
Bulmer M, editor. Social research ethics: an examination of the merits of covert participant observation. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers 1982.
93
Calvey D. The Art and Politics of Covert Research. Sociology. 2008;42:905–18. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094569
94
Clifford J, Marcus GE, Fortun K. Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. 25th anniversary ed. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press 2010.
95
Coffey A. The ethnographic self: fieldwork and the representation of identity. London: Sage 1999.
96
Denscome, M. Observation. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Education/Open University Press 2014.
97
N. F. Chapter 14: ‘Ethnography’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
98
Flick U. An introduction to qualitative research. Edition 5. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
99
Flick U, Kardoff E von, Steinke I. A companion to qualitative research. London: Sage 2004.
100
Foley DE. Critical ethnography: The reflexive turn. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 2002;15:469–90. doi: 10.1080/09518390210145534
101
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis 2007.
102
Holdaway S. Constructing and Sustaining ‘Race’ within the Police Workforce. The British Journal of Sociology. 1997;48. doi: 10.2307/591908
103
Homan R. The ethics of social research. London: Longman 1991.
104
Herrera CD. Two arguments for ‘covert methods’ in social research. The British Journal of Sociology. 1999;50:331–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00331.x
105
Lofland J, Lofland LH. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 2nd ed. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth 1984.
106
Lynch M. Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge. Theory, Culture & Society. 2000;17:26–54. doi: 10.1177/02632760022051202
107
Mahoney D. Constructing Reflexive Fieldwork Relationships. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13:573–94. doi: 10.1177/1077800407300765
108
J. M. Chapter 5: Observing and Participating’. Qualitative researching. London: Sage 2002.
109
Robert K. Merton. Insiders and Outsiders: A Chapter in the Sociology of Knowledge. American Journal of Sociology. 1972;78:9–47.
110
Polsky N. Hustlers, beats and others. [Revised ed.]. Harmondsworth: Penguin 1971.
111
D. S. Chapter 3: Ethnography and Observation’. Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
112
Richardson L. Evaluating Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry. 2000;6:253–5. doi: 10.1177/107780040000600207
113
Thomas J. Doing critical ethnography. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage 1993.
114
Van Maanen J. Tales of the field: on writing ethnography. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press 2011.
115
Warren CAB. Gender issues in field research. Newbury Park: Sage 1988.
116
Westmarland L. Blowing the Whistle on Police Violence. Gender, Ethnography and Ethics. British Journal of Criminology. 2001;41:523–35. doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.3.523
117
Winlow S. Get Ready to Duck. Bouncers and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups. British Journal of Criminology. 2001;41:536–48. doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.3.536
118
Scott J. Assessing Documentary Sources. A matter of record: documentary sources in social research. Cambridge: Polity Press 1990:19–35.
119
Prior L. Doing things with Documents. Qualitative research: theory, method and practice. London: SAGE 2004:76–94.
120
Haynes J, Jones D. A Tale of Two Analyses: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data. Sociological Research Online. 2012;17:1–9.
121
Prior L. Repositioning Documents in Social Research. Sociology. 2008;42:821–36. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094564
122
Stenvoll D, Svensson P. Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data. Qualitative Research. 2011;11:570–86. doi: 10.1177/1468794111413242
123
N. A, S. A. Chapter 19: Secondary Analysis of Survey Data. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
124
P. A, A. C. Chapter 4: Analysing Documentary Realities. Qualitative research: issues of theory, method and practice. London: SAGE 2011.
125
A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism. Published Online First: 2007.
126
Commentary on ‘a Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/secondary Dualism’ (Libby Bishop). Published Online First: 2007.
127
Broom A, Cheshire L, Emmison M. Qualitative Researchers’ Understandings of Their Practice and the Implications for Data Archiving and Sharing. Sociology. 2009;43:1163–80. doi: 10.1177/0038038509345704
128
A B. Chapter 13: Secondary analysis and official statistics. Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.
129
L., C, J. F, P. T. Archiving qualitative research data’. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU10.html
130
L. C. Social Research Update 2: Using diaries in social research. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU2.html
131
Dale A, Arber S, Procter M. Doing secondary analysis. London: Unwin Hyman 1988.
132
Gibson WJ, Brown A. Working with qualitative data. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2009.
133
Val Gillies. Secondary Analysis in Exploring Family and Social Change: Addressing the Issue of Context. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2005;6.
134
Hakim C. Secondary analysis in social research: a guide to data sources and methods with examples. London: Allen & Unwin 1982.
135
Hammersley M. Social research: philosophy, politics and practice. London: Sage 1993.
136
Can We Re-Use Qualitative Data Via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues. Published Online First: 2010.
137
M. H. Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems’. Sociology. ;31 (1):131–42.
138
Lee RM. Unobtrusive methods in social research. Buckingham: Open University Press 2000.
139
J. H. Social Research Update 22: Secondary analysis of qualitative data. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU22.html
140
‘Re-Using’ Qualitative Data: on the Merits of an Investigative Epistemology. Published Online First: 2007.
141
(Re)Using Qualitative Data? Published Online First: 2007.
142
J. P. Evidence and proof in documentary research’. The Sociological review. ;29.
143
Plummer K. Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage 2001.
144
Mike Savage. Revisiting Classic Qualitative Studies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2005;6.
145
What’s [Yet] to Be Seen? Re-Using Qualitative Data. Published Online First: 2007.
146
Harper D. An Argument for Visual Sociology. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press 1998:24–41.
147
Allan A. Power, Participation and Privilege - Methodological Lessons from Using Visual Methods in Research with Young People’. Sociological Research Online. 2012;17:256–66.
148
Rosalind Hurworth. Social Research Update 40: Photo-Interviewing for research. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU40.html
149
M B. Research strategies. Visual methods in social research. London: SAGE 2015.
150
Harper D. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies. 2002;17:13–26. doi: 10.1080/14725860220137345
151
White A, Bushin N, Carpena-Mendez F, et al. Using visual methodologies to explore contemporary Irish childhoods. Qualitative Research. 2010;10:143–58. doi: 10.1177/1468794109356735
152
Social Research Update 11: Visual research methods. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU11/SRU11.html
153
Mannay D. Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research. 2010;10:91–111. doi: 10.1177/1468794109348684
154
Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires’. doi: 10.1177/160940691000900203
155
Helen Pain. A Literature Review to Evaluate the Choice and Use of Visual Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods - ARCHIVE. 2012;11:303–19.
156
Pink S. More Visualising, More Methodologies: On Video, Reflexivity and Qualitative Research. The Sociological Review. 2001;49:586–99. doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.00349
157
Prosser J. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. London: Falmer Press 1998.
158
Rose G. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. Fourth edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2016.
159
Woodward S. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 2008;42:857–72. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094566
160
Woodward S. Digital Photography and Research Relationships. Sociology. 2008;42:857–72. doi: 10.1177/0038038508094566
161
Garcia AC, Standlee AI, Bechkoff J. Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2009;38:52–84. doi: 10.1177/0891241607310839
162
Carter D. Living in virtual communities: an ethnography of human relationships in cyberspace. Information, Communication & Society. 2005;8:148–67. doi: 10.1080/13691180500146235
163
Manuel C. The Other Face of the Earth: Social Movements against the New Global Order’. The power of identity. Malden, Mass: Wiley-Blackwell 2010.
164
Kozinets RV. Cultures and Communities. Netnography: doing ethnographic research online. Los Angeles, Calif: Sage 2010.
165
R. V. K. Chapter 2 ‘Understanding Culture Online.
166
Realtime Interviewing Using the World Wide Web. Published Online First: 1999.
167
Cofff H, Chapman H. Changing Facebook Profile Pictures as Part of a Campaign: Who Does it and Why? SSRN Electronic Journal. Published Online First: 2014. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2440558
168
DeLorme DE, Sinkhan GM, French W. Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics. 2001;33:271–86. doi: 10.1023/A:1011812620080
169
G.J., H, D. F, Johns MD. ‘"Need help ASAP!!!’: A feminist communitarian approach to online research ethics’. Online social research: methods, issues & ethics. New York: P. Lang 2004.
170
Tapio Häyhtiö. Hard Rock Hallelujah! Empowering Reflexive Political Action on the Internet. Journal for Cultural Research. ;11.
171
Hine C. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg 2005.
172
James N, Busher H. Online interviewing. Los Angeles: Sage 2009.
173
A.N. J. Internet Behaviour and the Design of Virtual Methods’. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg 2005:21–34.
174
Kazmer MM, Xie B. QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWING IN INTERNET STUDIES: Playing with the media, playing with the method. Information, Communication & Society. 2008;11:257–78. doi: 10.1080/13691180801946333
175
L K. Recontextualising "cyberspace”: methodological considerations for online research’. Doing Internet research: critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE 1999:57–75.
176
Mann C, Stewart F. Internet communication and qualitative research: a handbook for researching online. London: SAGE 2000.
177
Cyber-Mothers: Online Synchronous Interviewing using Conferencing Software. Published Online First: 2001.
178
T. S. Researching the Online Sex Work Community’. Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg 2005:67–79.
179
Schrum L. Framing the Debate: Ethical Research in the Information Age. Qualitative Inquiry. 1995;1:311–26. doi: 10.1177/107780049500100303
180
Brooke S-C. ‘Facebook Groups as Potential Political Publics? Exploring Ideas of the Political amongst Young British Facebook Users’. In: Peace T, ed. Muslims and political participation in Britain. London: Routledge 2015:156–73.
181
Maurizio Teli. The Internet as a Library-Of-People: For a Cyberethnography of Online Groups. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2007;8. doi: 10.17169/fqs-8.3.283
182
B. L. B. Chapter 3: Ethical Issues’. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2014.
183
McAreavey R, Muir J. Research ethics committees: values and power in higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2011;14:391–405. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2011.565635
184
Pittaway E, Bartolomei L, Hugman R. ‘Stop Stealing Our Stories’: The Ethics of Research with Vulnerable Groups. Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2010;2:229–51. doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huq004
185
M H. Creeping ethical regulation and the strangling of research.
186
David M, Edwards R, Alldred P. Children and School-based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. 2001;27:347–65. doi: 10.1080/01411920120048340
187
Constance Holden. Ethics in Social Science Research. Science. 1979;206:537–40.
188
N. G. Chapter 8: The Ethics of Social Research’. In: Gilbert GN, Stoneman P, eds. Researching social life. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
189
Glucksmann M, Cavendish R. Women on the line. London: Routledge 2009.
190
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice Third Edition. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis 2007.
191
Can’t Talk, Won’t Talk?: Methodological Issues in Researching Children. Published Online First: 2000.
192
Social Science Gets the Ethics Treatment: Research governance and ethical review.
193
Tim M. Values and ethics in the research process’.
194
Punch M. The politics and ethics of fieldwork. Beverly Hills: Sage 1986.
195
RODGERS J. Trying to Get it Right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society. 1999;14:421–33. doi: 10.1080/09687599926046
196
Wolff-Michael Roth. (Un-) Political Ethics, (un-) Ethical Politics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2004;5.
197
Ryen A. Ethical Issues’. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, et al., eds. Qualitative research practice. London: SAGE Publications Ltd 2007:230–47.
198
D. S. Chapter 9: Research Ethics’. Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
199
P. S. Research without consent’.
200
Ethics and the Ruling Relations of Research Production.
201
Rose, W, Sue Heath, Graham Crow, et al. Informed Consent in Social Research: A Literature Review.
202
Islam N. Research as an Act of Betrayal: Researching Race in an Asian Community in Los Angeles. Racing research, researching race: methodological dilemmas in critical race studies. New York: New York University Press 2000:35–66.
203
Tang N. Interviewer and Interviewee Relationships Between Women. Sociology. 2002;36:703–21. doi: 10.1177/0038038502036003011
204
Becker HS. Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems. 1967;14:239–47.
205
Oakley A. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology. 2016;50:195–213. doi: 10.1177/0038038515580253
206
Gunaratnam Y. Researching race and ethnicity: methods, knowledge and power. London: SAGE 2003.
207
FAWCETT B, HEARN J. Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2004;7:201–18. doi: 10.1080/13645570210163989
208
‘Claims and Disclaimers: Knowledge, Reflexivity and Representation in Feminist Research’.
209
Clark T. On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research. 2010;10:399–419. doi: 10.1177/1468794110366796
210
L. B, J. S. ‘Doing Research, Writing Research: the Dilemmas of political intervention in research on racism. Economy and society. ;22:178–99.
211
M. B. Chapter 16: Addressing Social Problems through qualitative research’. In: Silverman D, ed. Qualitative research. London: Sage Publications 2016.
212
Evaluating an Empowering Research Strategy: Reflections on Action-Research with South Asian Women. Published Online First: 1996.
213
Craig C. Foreword. Engaging contradictions: theory, politics, and methods of activist scholarship. Berkeley: University of California Press 2008.
214
CARTER J. Research note: reflections on interviewing across the ethnic divide. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2004;7:345–53. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000094560
215
David M. Problems of participation: The limits of action research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2002;5:11–7. doi: 10.1080/13645570110098037
216
Dodson L, Piatelli D, Schmalzbauer L. Researching Inequality Through Interpretive Collaborations. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007;13:821–43. doi: 10.1177/1077800407304458
217
J. F. It’s great to have someone to talk to; the ethics and politics of interviewing women’. Social researching: politics, problems, practice. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul 1984.
218
Finlay L. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative Research. 2002;2:209–30. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200205
219
Deianira Ganga. Cultural ‘Insiders’ and the Issue of Positionality in Qualitative Migration Research: Moving ‘Across’ and Moving ‘Along’ Researcher-Participant Divides. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2006;7.
220
Knowing your Place: Gender and Reflexivity in two Ethnographies.
221
Gomm R. Evaluative and Emancipatory Research. Social research methodology: a critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2008:322–43.
222
Goodson L, Phillimore J. ‘Community research: opportunities and challenges’. In: Goodson L, Phillimore J, eds. Community research for participation: from theory to method. Bristol: Policy 2012.
223
M. H. On Feminist Methodology. Sociology. ;26:187–206.
224
Hammersley M. Taking sides in social research: essays on partisanship and bias. London: Routledge 2000.
225
Bias in Social Research. Published Online First: 1997.
226
Harding SG. Feminism and methodology: social science issues. Milton Keynes: Open University Press 1987.
227
Hoong Sin C. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 2007;7:477–99. doi: 10.1177/1468794107082304
228
From Critical Thought to Emancipatory Action: Contradictory Research Goals? Published Online First: 1997.
229
L. K, S. B, L. R. Researching Women’s Lives or Studying Women’s Oppression? Reflections on what Constitutes Feminist Research. Researching women’s lives from a feminist perspective. London: Taylor & Francis 1994.
230
Liebling A. Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research. British Journal of Criminology. 2001;41:472–84. doi: 10.1093/bjc/41.3.472
231
Letherby G. Feminist research in theory and practice. Buckingham: Open University Press 2003.
232
T. M. Chapter 3: Values and Ethics in the Research Process’. Social research: issues, methods and process. Maidenhead: Open Universtiy Press 2011.
233
Nencel L. Feeling Gender Speak. European Journal of Women’s Studies. 2005;12:345–61. doi: 10.1177/1350506805054274
234
A. O. Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms’. Doing feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1981.
235
A. O. Gender, Methodology and People’s Ways of Knowing: Some Problems with Feminism and the Paradigm Debate in Social Science’. Sociology. ;32:707–31.
236
C. R. On feminist methodology: male reason versus female empowerment’. Sociology. ;26:207–12.
237
Reinharz S, Davidman L. Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press 1992.
238
Roberts H. Doing feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1981.
239
D. S. Chapter 11: The Relevance of Qualitative Research’. Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
240
Hoong Sin C. Ethnic-matching in qualitative research: reversing the gaze on `white others’ and `white’ as `other’. Qualitative Research. 2007;7:477–99. doi: 10.1177/1468794107082304
241
Stanley L. Feminist praxis: research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology. London: Routledge 1990.
242
B T, M M. Doing research with refugeesIssues and guidelines - Policy Press Scholarship. http://policypress.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1332/policypress/9781861345981.001.0001/upso-9781861345981
243
Social Research Update 34: Undertaking Action Research: Negotiating the Road Ahead. http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU34.html
244
Truman C, Mertens DM, Humphries B. Research and inequality. London: UCL Press 2000.
245
AA YJ. ‘Experiences in ethnographic interviewing about race: The inside and outside of it’. Researching race and racism. London: Routledge 2004.
