Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan, Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2010)
Adam Jones, ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22.4 (1996), 405–29 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459>
Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot, ‘International Practices’, International Theory, 3.01 (2011), 1–36 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X>
Alexander Wendt, ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46.2 (1992), 391–425 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858>
Axelrod, Robert, and Robert O. Keohane, ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics, 38.01 (1985), 226–54 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357>
Baldwin, David A., Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993), New directions in world politics
Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey, ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31.1 (2002), 109–27 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601>
Barry Buzan, ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’, Review of International Studies, 27.3 (2001), 471–88 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens, eds., ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’, in The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’, in The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Sixth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)
Beardsworth, Richard, Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory (Cambridge: Polity, 2011)
Bellamy, Alex J., ed., International Society and Its Critics (Oxford University Press, 2004) <https://doi.org/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001>
Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett, ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, 60.4 (2006), 781–810 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847>
Biccum, April R, ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: A Reinvention of Colonial Discourse in DFID Promotional Literature’, Third World Quarterly, 26.6 (2005), 1005–20 <https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500139656>
Bieler, Andreas, and Adam David Morton, ‘A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations’, Capital & Class, 28.1 (2004), 85–113 <https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106>
Björkdahl, Annika, ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15.1 (2002), 9–23 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216>
‘Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory’ <https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/>
Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith, ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’, in International Relations Theory Today (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995)
Brock, Gillian, Global Justice (Oxford University Press, 2009) <https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001>
Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True, ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’, International Studies Review, 10.4 (2008), 693–707 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017>
Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley, ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’, in Understanding International Relations, 4th ed (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), pp. 1–17
Brown, Garrett Wallace, Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution (Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press, 2009) <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04>
Brown, Garrett Wallace, and David Held, eds., ‘Editor’s Introduction’, in The Cosmopolitanism Reader (Cambridge: Polity, 2010)
———, eds., The Cosmopolitanism Reader (Cambridge: Polity, 2010)
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002)
Bulmer, Sarah, ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15.2 (2013), 137–56 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565>
Burchill, Scott, and Andrew Linklater, ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) <https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368>
———, ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>
———, ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>
———, ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>
———, ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>
———, ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)
———, ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>
———, ‘Introduction’, in Theories of International Relations, Fifth edition (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013) <https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&amp;isbn=9781137311368>
Burnham, Peter, ‘Marx, International Political Economy and Globalisation’, Capital & Class, 25.3 (2001), 103–12 <https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109>
Buzan, Barry, An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach (Cambridge: Polity, 2014)
———, From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Cambridge studies in international relations <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617>
Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little, ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’, Millennium, 30.1 (2001), 19–39 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401>
Callinicos, Alex, ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’, in Against Postmodernism: A Marxist Critique (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989), pp. 62–91
———, ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6.3 (2004), 426–33 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x>
Campbell, John L., and Ove K. Pedersen, The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001)
Caney, Simon, ‘Climate Change and the Duties of the Advantaged’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13.1 (2010), 203–28 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331>
Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse-Kappen, and Beth A. Simmons, ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’, in Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed (Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013)
———, ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’, in Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed (Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013)
———, ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’, in Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed (Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE, 2013)
Carpenter, R. Charli, ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’, Security Dialogue, 37.1 (2006), 83–103 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139>
Charvet, John, and Elisa Kaczynska-Nay, The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972>
Checkel, Jeffrey T., ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, 50.02 (1998), 324–48 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133>
Chowdhury, Geeta, and Sheila Nair, ‘Introduction: Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in International Relations’, in Power, Postcolonialism, and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender, and Class (London: Routledge, 2002), Routledge advances in international relations and global politics, 1–32 <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181>
‘Considine, L., “Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), Pp. 109-127.’ <http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf>
Cox, Robert W., ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’, Millennium : Journal of International Studies., 12.2 (1983), 162–75
———, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10.2 (1981), 126–55
Cynthia Weber, ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’, Review of International Studies, 18.3 (1992), 199–216 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Darby, Phillip, ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33.1 (2004), 1–32 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101>
David Campbell, ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 15.3 (1990), 263–86 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Davis, Neville, ‘A Rose by Any Other Name’, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 25 (2014) <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021>
Della Porta, Donatella, and Michael Keating, eds., ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’, in Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938>
Dietzel, A., ‘Global Justice’, in International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction <https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/>
Dietzel, Alix, ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’, Global Policy, 8.3 (2017), 313–21 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12421>
Doty, Roxanne, ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’, in Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations, ed. by Francis A. Beer and Robert Hariman (East Lansing: Michigan State University press, 1996), Rhetoric and public affairs series, 331–45
Doyle, Michael W., and G. John Ikenberry, ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’, in New Thinking in International Relations Theory (Oxford: Westview Press, 1997)
‘Dunn, B., “Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?” The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011’ <http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis>
Dunne, T., L. Hansen, and C. Wight, ‘The End of International Relations Theory?’, European Journal of International Relations, 19.3 (2013), 405–25 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485>
Dunne, Timothy, Inventing International Society: A History of the English School (Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford, 1998), St Anthony’s series
Dunne, Timothy, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, eds., ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
———, ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All These Debates?’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 3rd ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)
———, eds., ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’, in International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, Fourth edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)
Edkins, Jenny, and Véronique Pin-Fat, ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34.1 (2005), 1–24 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101>
Edkins, Jenny, and Nick Vaughan-Williams, Critical Theorists and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009), Interventions <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003>
Enloe, Cynthia H., ‘Chapter 5 - Gender Makes the World Go Round: Where Are the Women?’, in Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Second edition, completely revised and updated (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669>
Epstein, Charlotte, ‘The Postcolonial Perspective: An Introduction’, International Theory, 6.02 (2014), 294–311 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219>
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 4.1 (2001), 391–416 <https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391>
Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow, The Foucault Reader (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1986)
Franceschet, Antonio, ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’, International Journal, 54.3 (1999) <https://doi.org/10.2307/40203406>
Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man, Twentieth anniversary edition (London: Penguin Books, 2012)
G. John Ikenberry, ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7.1 (2009), 71–87 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
———, ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’, Foreign Affairs, 90.3 (2011), 56–68 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408>
Gallagher, Adrian M., ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 4.3 (2012), 334–57 <https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00403004>
Gardiner, Stephen Mark, Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959>
Gardner, Richard N., ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’, The Washington Quarterly, 13.3 (1990), 23–39 <https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445391>
Gill, Stephen R., and David Law, ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’, International Studies Quarterly, 33.4 (1989) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523>
Gramsci, Antonio, Quintin Hoare, and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1971)
GROVOGUI, SIBA N., ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, 8.3 (2002), 315–38 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001>
Gruffydd Jones, Branwen, ed., Decolonizing International Relations (Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740>
‘Guzzini, G., “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis” International Organization, 47(3), 1993, Pp. 443-478.’ <http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf>
Guzzini, Stefano, ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 10.4 (2004), 533–68 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047848>
Hansen, Lene, ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’, in Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London: Routledge, 2006), The new international relations series, 17–36 <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&amp;ppg=33>
Hayden, Patrick, Cosmopolitan Global Politics (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005), Ethics and global politics
Held, David, ‘Cosmopolitanism: Globalisation Tamed?’, Review of International Studies, 29.04 (2003) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004650>
———, Cosmopolitanism: Ideals and Realities (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922>
Hoffmann, Stanley, ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’, Foreign Policy, 98, 1995 <https://doi.org/10.2307/1148964>
Hollinger, Robert, ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’, in Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: A Thematic Approach (Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1994), Contemporary social theory
Hooper, Charlotte, Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations, and Gender Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001)
Hopf, Ted, ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23.1 (1998) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267>
Immanuel Wallerstein, ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16.4 (1974), 387–415 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015>
J. Ann Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41.4 (1997), 611–32 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Jabri, Vivienne, ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’, in Issues in International Relations (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 289–313
Jackson, Robert H., The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)
Jackson, Robert H., and Georg Sørensen, ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’, in Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)
Jackson, Robert, and Georg Sorensen, ‘IR as an Academic Subject’, in Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, 4th ed (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 28–57
Jean-Yves Haine, ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’, International Journal, 64.2 (2009), 453–79 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518>
Jervis, Robert, ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’, Social Research, 61.4 <https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&amp;rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo>
Joseph M. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, 42.3 (1988), 485–507 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Justin Rosenberg, ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’, Review of International Studies, 16.4 (1990), 285–303 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232>
Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security, 25.1 (2000), 5–41 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772>
Keohane, Robert O., ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, 32.4 (1988) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589>
Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin, ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, 20.1 (1995) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214>
Keohane, Robert O., and Kenneth Neal Waltz, Neorealism and Its Critics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), The political economy of international change
Koivisto, Marjo, and Tim Dunne, ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38.3 (2010), 615–40 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810363509>
Lawrence, Peter, Justice for Future Generations: Climate Change and International Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014)
Lawson, Stephanie, ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’, in Theories of International Relations: Contending Approaches to World Politics (Cambridge, England: Polity, 2015) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448>
Lebow, Richard Ned, ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’, International Relations, 19.3 (2005), 329–36 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805055410>
Linklater, Andrew, The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348>
Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami, The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), Cambridge Studies in International Relations <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528>
Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons, ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’, International Organization, 52.4 (1998), 729–57 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356>
LITTLE, RICHARD, ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 6.3 (2000), 395–422 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004>
Lu, Catherine, ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 8.2 (2000), 244–67 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101>
Maclean, John, ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17.2 (1988), 295–319 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201>
Martha Finnemore, ‘Exporting the English School?’, Review of International Studies, 27.3 (2001), 509–13 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753>
Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52.4 (1998), 887–917 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Matin, Kamran, ‘Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations, 19.2 (2013), 353–77 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263>
‘Mearsheimer, J., “Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.”’ <https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp>
Mearsheimer, John J., ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, 15.1 (1990) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981>
Michael C. Williams, ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’, Review of International Studies, 19.2 (1993), 103–21 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Michael W. Doyle, ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’, The American Political Science Review, 99.3 (2005), 463–66 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953>
MILLIKEN, JENNIFER, ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’:, European Journal of International Relations, 5.2 (1999), 225–54 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003>
Morgenthau, Hans J., ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’, American Political Science Review, 46.04 (1952), 961–88 <https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108>
Moss, Jeremy, ed., Climate Change and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340>
NICHOLSON, MICHAEL, ‘What’s the Use of International Relations?’, Review of International Studies, 26.2 (2000), 183–98 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500001832>
Nye, Joseph S., ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’, World Politics, 40.02 (1988), 235–51 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363>
el-Ojeili, Chamsy, ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades On’, Critical Sociology, 41.4–5 (2015), 679–700 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513497377>
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood, Making Sense, Making Worlds: Constructivism in Social Theory and International Relations (New York: Routledge, 2013), The new international relations
‘Peterson V. S., “Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, Pp. 1-11.’ <http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf>
Pinar Bilgin, ‘Thinking Past “Western” IR?’, Third World Quarterly, 29.1 (2008), 5–23 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023>
Powell, Robert, ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’, International Organization, 48.02 (1994) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204>
R. Charli Carpenter, ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’, International Organization, 65.1 (2011), 69–102 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104>
Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny, ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’, Review of International Studies, 24.1 (1998), 3–21 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503>
Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4.3 (2002), 487–509 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00091>
Reus-Smit, Christian, and Duncan Snidal, ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Oxford handbooks of political science
Richard K. Ashley, ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, 38.2 (1984), 225–86 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440>
Richard Price, ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’, International Organization, 49.1 (1995), 73–103 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Rita Abrahamsen, ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’, African Affairs, 102.407 (2003), 189–210 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676>
Robert G. Gilpin, ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, International Organization, 38.2 (1984), 287–304 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441>
Robert Jervis, ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, 24.1 (1999), 42–63 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347>
Roff, Heather M., ‘Gendering a Warbot’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18.1 (2016), 1–18 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246>
Ronen Palan, ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 26.4 (2000), 575–98 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700>
Rosenau, Pauline, ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19.1 (1990), 83–110 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190010701>
Schroeder, Paul W., ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’, International Security, 22.1 (1997) <https://doi.org/10.2307/2539329>
Seth, Sanjay, ed., Postcolonial Theory and International Relations: A Critical Introduction (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013), Interventions
‘Seth, Sanjay (2011), “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), Pp. 167-183.’ <https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila>
Shapiro, Michael, ‘Textualising Global Politics’, in International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989), World Politics Series, 11–22
Shapiro, Michael J., and James Der Derian, International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics (Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, 1989), World Politics Series
Shepherd, Laura J., ed., Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations, Second edition (London: Routledge, 2015) <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819>
Shue, Henry, Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931>
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski, ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054>
———, ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013>
———, ‘Chapter 16 - The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054>
———, ‘Chapter 18 - All These Theories yet the Bodies Keep Piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054>
Steans, Jill, ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5.3 (2003), 428–54 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00114>
———, ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’, in Gender and International Relations: Issues, Debates and Future Directions, 2nd ed., rev.expanded (Cambridge: Polity, 2006), pp. 7–19
Tan, Kok-Chor, Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Contemporary Political Theory <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385>
TAYLOR, LUCY, ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’, International Studies Review, 14.3 (2012), 386–400 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x>
Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires, ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review of International Studies, 24.2 (1998), 283–97 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523>
Tickner, Arlene B., ‘Core, Periphery and (Neo)Imperialist International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 19.3 (2013), 627–46 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323>
Tickner, J. Ann, ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’, in Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992), New directions in world politics
Vasilaki, Rosa, ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41.1 (2012), 3–22 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720>
Wallerstein, Immanuel, ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’, in World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2004), A John Hope Franklin Center book, 23–41
Walt, Stephen M., ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’, Foreign Policy, 110, 1998 <https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275>
Waltz, Kenneth Neal, Theory of International Politics (London: McGraw-Hill, 1979)
WAYLEN, GEORGINA, ‘You Still Don’t Understand: Why Troubled Engagements Continue between Feminists and (Critical) IPE’, Review of International Studies, 32.01 (2006) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006966>
Weber, Cindy, ‘Good Girls, Little Girls and Bad Girls: Male Paranoia in Robert Keohane’s Critique of Feminist International Relations’’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23 (1994), 337–49
WEISS, THOMAS G., ‘How United Nations Ideas Change History’, Review of International Studies, 36.S1 (2010), 3–23 <https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051100009X>
Weldes, Jutta, ‘Constructing National Interests’’, European Journal of International Relations, 2 (1996), 275–318 <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001>
Wheeler, Nicholas J., ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21.3 (1992), 463–87 <https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030201>
———, Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740>
William Bain, ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’, Review of International Studies, 26.3 (2000), 445–64 <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688>