[1]
Borowski, M. 2011. Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works. Jurisprudence. 2, 2 (Dec. 2011), 575–595. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716899.
[2]
Carbado, D. W. 2011. Critical What What. Connecticut Law Review. 43, 5 (2011), 1593–1644.
[3]
Cornell, D. 1994. Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality. Harvard Law Review. 107, 8 (1994), 2081–2094.
[4]
Cotterrell, R. 2014. Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy. Jurisprudence. 5, 1 (Jul. 2014), 41–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.1.41.
[5]
Cotterrell, R. 1998. Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society. 25, 2 (Jun. 1998), 171–192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00086.
[6]
Crenshaw, K. 2011. Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking back to Move Forward. Connecticut Law Review. 43, 5 (2011), 1253–1354.
[7]
Crowe, J. 2011. Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence. 2, 2 (Dec. 2011), 293–308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716871.
[8]
David Andrew Price 1989. Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies. The Cambridge Law Journal. 48, 2 (1989), 271–301.
[9]
Denise Meyerson Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz. Jurisprudence.
[10]
Donal Coffey Custom and Living Law. Jurisprudence.
[11]
Dworkin, R. 1998. Conventionalism. Law’s empire. Hart. 114–150.
[12]
Dyzenhaus, D. 2011. Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 24, 2 (2011), 411–430.
[13]
Finnis, J. 2011. Evaluation and the description of law. Natural law and natural rights. Oxford University Press. 3–22.
[14]
G. A. Cohen 1981. Freedom, Justice and Capitalism. New Left Review. 126, (1981).
[15]
Gardner, J. 2001. Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths. American Journal of Jurisprudence. 46 (2001), 199–228.
[16]
Gewirth, A. 1986. Why Rights are Indispensable. Mind. XCV, 379 (1986), 329–344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCV.379.329.
[17]
Gustav Radbruch 2006. Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. (2006).
[18]
Harris, A.P. 1990. Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review. 42, 3 (Feb. 1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1228886.
[19]
Hart, H.L.A. 1955. Are There Any Natural Rights? The Philosophical Review. 64, 2 (Apr. 1955). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586.
[20]
Hart, H.L.A. 2012. Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules. The concept of law. Oxford University Press. 79–99.
[21]
Ireland, P. 2002. History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism. The Modern Law Review. 65, 1 (Jan. 2002), 120–140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00371.
[22]
Kline, M. 1989. Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory. Harvard Women’s Law Journal. 12 (1989), 115–150.
[23]
Kymlicka, W. and Donaldson, S. 2014. Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 34, 2 (Jun. 2014), 201–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu001.
[24]
‘Law, State and Class Struggle’ by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.org: http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178.
[25]
Lon L. Fuller ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’.
[26]
Lyons, D. 1982. New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land. Reading Nozick: essays on Anarchy, state and Utopia. Blackwell. 355–379.
[27]
MacCormick, N. 1982. Children’s rights: a test case for theories of right. Legal right and social democracy: essays in legal and political philosophy. Clarendon Press. 154–166.
[28]
Menkel-Meadow, C. 1988. Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School. Journal of Legal Education. 38, 1 (1988), 61–86.
[29]
Nozick, R. 1974. Distributive justice (section I). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Blackwell. 149–174.
[30]
Nozick, R. 1974. Distributive justice (section II). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Blackwell. 228–231.
[31]
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law: http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm.
[32]
Paulson, S. 2001. Continental Normativism and its British Counterpart: How different are they? Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. Sweet and Maxwell. 314–328.
[33]
Perry, ‘Hart’s Methodological Positivism’: http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&context=faculty_scholarship.
[34]
R. Kent Greenawalt ‘How Persuasive is Natural Law Theory?’
[35]
Raz, J. J. 1984. Legal Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 4, 1 (1984), 1–21.
[36]
Scott J. Shapiro ‘The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’.
[37]
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law. Jurisprudence.
[38]
Simmonds, S. 2013. Utilitarianism. Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, law and rights. Sweet & Maxwell. 17–46.
[39]
Simpson, A.W.B. 1973. Common Law and Legal Theory, The. Oxford essays in jurisprudence: second series. Clarendon Press. 77–99.
[40]
Tamanaha, B.Z. 1995. An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 15, 4 (1995), 501–535. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/15.4.501.
[41]
Tushnet, M. 1991. Critical Legal Studies: A Political History. Yale Law Journal. 100, 5 (1991), 1515–1544.
[42]
Vinx, L. 2011. Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 24, 2 (2011), 473–492.
[43]
Crenshaw, ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’.
[44]
Feinberg, ‘The Nature and Value of Rights’.
[45]
Harold Berman, ‘Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: politics, morality, history’ (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802.
[46]
Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.
[47]
2005. L. Green ‘General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. (2005).
[48]
Manifesto of the Communist Party.
[49]
Nussbaum, ‘Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment’.
[50]
Waluchow, ‘Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism’.