1.
Harold Berman, ‘Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: politics, morality, history’ (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802.
2.
L. Green ‘General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. (2005).
3.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law, http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm.
4.
Hart, H.L.A.: Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules. In: The concept of law. pp. 79–99. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
5.
Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals, http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~horty/courses/readings/hart-1958-positivism-separation.pdf.
6.
Dyzenhaus, D.: Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 24, 411–430 (2011).
7.
Vinx, L.: Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. 24, 473–492 (2011).
8.
Perry, ‘Hart’s Methodological Positivism’, http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&context=faculty_scholarship.
9.
Waluchow, ‘Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism’.
10.
Paulson, S.: Continental Normativism and its British Counterpart: How different are they? In: Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. pp. 314–328. Sweet and Maxwell, London (2001).
11.
Gardner, J.: Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths. American Journal of Jurisprudence. 199–228 (2001).
12.
Finnis, J.: Evaluation and the description of law. In: Natural law and natural rights. pp. 3–22. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
13.
Borowski, M.: Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works. Jurisprudence. 2, 575–595 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716899.
14.
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle: Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law. Jurisprudence.
15.
Crowe, J.: Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence. 2, 293–308 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716871.
16.
R. Kent Greenawalt: ‘How Persuasive is Natural Law Theory?’
17.
Gustav Radbruch: Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. (2006).
18.
Simpson, A.W.B.: Common Law and Legal Theory, The. In: Oxford essays in jurisprudence: second series. pp. 77–99. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1973).
19.
Dworkin, R.: Conventionalism. In: Law’s empire. pp. 114–150. Hart, Oxford (1998).
20.
Scott J. Shapiro: ‘The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’, https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Shapiro_Hart_Dworkin_Debate.pdf.
21.
Lon L. Fuller: ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’.
22.
MacCormick, N.: Children’s rights: a test case for theories of right. In: Legal right and social democracy: essays in legal and political philosophy. pp. 154–166. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1982). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.003.0008.
23.
Hart, H.L.A.: Are There Any Natural Rights? The Philosophical Review. 64, (1955). https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586.
24.
Gewirth, A.: Why Rights are Indispensable. Mind. XCV, 329–344 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCV.379.329.
25.
Feinberg, ‘The Nature and Value of Rights’.
26.
Kymlicka, W., Donaldson, S.: Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 34, 201–219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu001.
27.
Raz, J. J.: Legal Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 4, 1–21 (1984).
28.
Lyons, D.: New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land. In: Reading Nozick: essays on Anarchy, state and Utopia. pp. 355–379. Blackwell, Oxford (1982).
29.
Nozick, R.: Distributive justice (section II). In: Anarchy, state, and utopia. pp. 228–231. Blackwell, Oxford (1974).
30.
Nozick, R.: Distributive justice (section I). In: Anarchy, state, and utopia. pp. 149–174. Blackwell, Oxford (1974).
31.
Simmonds, S.: Utilitarianism. In: Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, law and rights. pp. 17–46. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
32.
Nussbaum, ‘Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment’.
33.
Denise Meyerson: Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz. Jurisprudence.
34.
Cotterrell, R.: Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy. Jurisprudence. 5, 41–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.1.41.
35.
Tamanaha, B.Z.: An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 15, 501–535 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/15.4.501.
36.
Cotterrell, R.: Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society. 25, 171–192 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00086.
37.
Donal Coffey: Custom and Living Law. Jurisprudence.
38.
‘Law, State and Class Struggle’ by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.org, http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178.
39.
Carbado, D. W.: Critical What What. Connecticut Law Review. 43, 1593–1644 (2011).
40.
Manifesto of the Communist Party, https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf.
41.
Ireland, P.: History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism. The Modern Law Review. 65, 120–140 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00371.
42.
G. A. Cohen: Freedom, Justice and Capitalism. New Left Review. 126, (1981).
43.
Tushnet, M.: Critical Legal Studies: A Political History. Yale Law Journal. 100, 1515–1544 (1991).
44.
David Andrew Price: Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies. The Cambridge Law Journal. 48, 271–301 (1989).
45.
Menkel-Meadow, C.: Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School. Journal of Legal Education. 38, 61–86 (1988).
46.
Cornell, D.: Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality. Harvard Law Review. 107, 2081–2094 (1994).
47.
Crenshaw, K.: Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking back to Move Forward. Connecticut Law Review. 43, 1253–1354 (2011).
48.
Crenshaw, ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’.
49.
Harris, A.P.: Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review. 42, (1990). https://doi.org/10.2307/1228886.
50.
Kline, M.: Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory. Harvard Women’s Law Journal. 115–150 (1989).