Borowski M, ‘Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works’ (2011) 2 Jurisprudence 575
Carbado, D. W., ‘Critical What What’ (2011) 43 Connecticut Law Review 1593 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/conlr43&amp;id=1611>
Cornell, D., ‘Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality’ (1994) 107 Harvard Law Review 2081 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/hlr107&amp;id=2101>
Cotterrell R, ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’ (1998) 25 Journal of Law and Society 171
——, ‘Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy’ (2014) 5 Jurisprudence 41
‘Crenshaw, “Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”’ <http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&amp;context=uclf>
Crenshaw, K., ‘Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back to Move Forward’ (2011) 43 Connecticut Law Review 1253 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/conlr43&amp;id=1611>
Crowe J, ‘Natural Law Beyond Finnis’ (2011) 2 Jurisprudence 293
David Andrew Price, ‘Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies’ (1989) 48 The Cambridge Law Journal 271 <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4507287?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>
Denise Meyerson, ‘Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz’ Jurisprudence <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423535?src=recsys>
Donal Coffey, ‘Custom and Living Law’ Jurisprudence <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423536>
Dworkin R, ‘Conventionalism’, Law’s empire (Hart 1998)
Dyzenhaus, D., ‘Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey’ (2011) 24 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 411 <https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/caljp24&amp;id=409>
‘Feinberg, “The Nature and Value of Rights”’ <https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00137935.pdf>
Finnis J, ‘Evaluation and the Description of Law’, Natural law and natural rights, vol Clarendon law series (2nd ed, Oxford University Press 2011)
G. A. Cohen, ‘Freedom, Justice and Capitalism’ (1981) 126 New Left Review <https://newleftreview.org/I/126/g-a-cohen-freedom-justice-and-capitalism>
Gardner, J., ‘Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths’ [2001] American Journal of Jurisprudence 199 <https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajj46&amp;i=203>
Gewirth A, ‘Why Rights Are Indispensable’ (1986) XCV Mind 329
Gustav Radbruch, ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).’ [2006] Oxford Journal of Legal Studies <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=bth&amp;AN=20780215&amp;site=ehost-live>
‘Harold Berman, “Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History” (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802’ <http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1891&amp;context=californialawreview>
Harris AP, ‘Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory’ (1990) 42 Stanford Law Review
Hart HLA, ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’ (1955) 64 The Philosophical Review
Hart HLA, ‘Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules’, The concept of law, vol Clarendon law series (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2012)
‘Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’ <http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~horty/courses/readings/hart-1958-positivism-separation.pdf>
Ireland P, ‘History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism’ (2002) 65 The Modern Law Review 120
Kline, M., ‘Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory’ [1989] Harvard Women’s Law Journal 115 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/hwlj12&amp;id=125>
Kymlicka W and Donaldson S, ‘Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 201
‘L. Green “General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay”’ [2005] Oxford Journal of Legal Studies <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=bth&amp;AN=19525091&amp;site=ehost-live>
‘“Law, State and Class Struggle” by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.Org’ <http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178>
Lon L. Fuller, ‘“The Case of the Speluncean Explorers”’ <https://turtletalk.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/the-speluncean-explorers.pdf>
Lyons D, ‘New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land’, Reading Nozick: essays on Anarchy, state and Utopia (Blackwell 1982)
MacCormick N, ‘Children’s Rights: A Test Case for Theories of Right’, Legal right and social democracy: essays in legal and political philosophy (Clarendon Press 1982) <https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.001.0001/acprof-9780198255024>
‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’ <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf>
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School’ (1988) 38 Journal of Legal Education 61 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/jled38&amp;id=73>
Nozick R, ‘Distributive Justice (Section I)’, Anarchy, state, and utopia (Blackwell 1974)
——, ‘Distributive Justice (Section II)’, Anarchy, state, and utopia (Blackwell 1974)
‘Nussbaum, “Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment”’ <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00471.x/epdf>
‘Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law’ <http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm>
Paulson S, ‘Continental Normativism and Its British Counterpart: How Different Are They?’, Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence (7th ed, Sweet and Maxwell 2001)
‘Perry, “Hart’s Methodological Positivism”’ <http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&amp;context=faculty_scholarship>
R. Kent Greenawalt, ‘“How Persuasive Is Natural Law Theory?”’ <http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1614&amp;context=ndlr>
Raz, J. J., ‘Legal Rights’ (1984) 4 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/oxfjls4&amp;id=7>
Scott J. Shapiro, ‘“The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed”’ <https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Shapiro_Hart_Dworkin_Debate.pdf>
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle, ‘Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law’ Jurisprudence <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5235/20403313.5.1.75>
Simmonds S, ‘Utilitarianism’, Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, law and rights (4th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
Simpson AWB, ‘Common Law and Legal Theory, The’, Oxford essays in jurisprudence: second series (Clarendon Press 1973)
Tamanaha BZ, ‘An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law’ (1995) 15 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 501
Tushnet, M., ‘Critical Legal Studies: A Political History’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 1515 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/ylr100&amp;id=1529>
Vinx, L., ‘Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty’ (2011) 24 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 473 <https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/caljp24&amp;i=471>
‘Waluchow, “Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism”’ <https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/034F507ECC20FF415AF6AAF2D461CF56/S1352325200061024a.pdf/authority_and_the_practical_difference_thesis.pdf>