1
Harold Berman, ‘Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: politics, morality, history’ (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802. http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1891&context=californialawreview
2
L. Green ‘General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Published Online First: 2005.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=19525091&site=ehost-live
3
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law. http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm
4
Hart HLA. Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules. In: The concept of law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. 79–99.
5
Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~horty/courses/readings/hart-1958-positivism-separation.pdf
6
Dyzenhaus, D. Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2011;24:411–30.https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/caljp24&id=409
7
Vinx, L. Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2011;24:473–92.https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/caljp24&i=471
8
Perry, ‘Hart’s Methodological Positivism’. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&context=faculty_scholarship
9
Waluchow, ‘Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism’. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/034F507ECC20FF415AF6AAF2D461CF56/S1352325200061024a.pdf/authority_and_the_practical_difference_thesis.pdf
10
Paulson S. Continental Normativism and its British Counterpart: How different are they? In: Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence. London: : Sweet and Maxwell 2001. 314–28.
11
Gardner, J. Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths. American Journal of Jurisprudence 2001;:199–228.https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajj46&i=203
12
Finnis J. Evaluation and the description of law. In: Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. 3–22.
13
Borowski M. Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works. Jurisprudence 2011;2:575–95. doi:10.5235/204033211798716899
14
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle. Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law. Jurisprudencehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5235/20403313.5.1.75
15
Crowe J. Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence 2011;2:293–308. doi:10.5235/204033211798716871
16
R. Kent Greenawalt. ‘How Persuasive is Natural Law Theory?’ http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1614&context=ndlr
17
Gustav Radbruch. Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies Published Online First: 2006.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=20780215&site=ehost-live
18
Simpson AWB. Common Law and Legal Theory, The. In: Oxford essays in jurisprudence: second series. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1973. 77–99.
19
Dworkin R. Conventionalism. In: Law’s empire. Oxford: : Hart 1998. 114–50.
20
Scott J. Shapiro. ‘The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’. https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Shapiro_Hart_Dworkin_Debate.pdf
21
Lon L. Fuller. ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’. https://turtletalk.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/the-speluncean-explorers.pdf
22
MacCormick N. Children’s rights: a test case for theories of right. In: Legal right and social democracy: essays in legal and political philosophy. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1982. 154–66. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.003.0008
23
Hart HLA. Are There Any Natural Rights? The Philosophical Review 1955;64. doi:10.2307/2182586
24
Gewirth A. Why Rights are Indispensable. Mind 1986;XCV:329–44. doi:10.1093/mind/XCV.379.329
25
Feinberg, ‘The Nature and Value of Rights’. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00137935.pdf
26
Kymlicka W, Donaldson S. Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2014;34:201–19. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqu001
27
Raz, J. J. Legal Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1984;4:1–21.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/oxfjls4&id=7
28
Lyons D. New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land. In: Reading Nozick: essays on Anarchy, state and Utopia. Oxford: : Blackwell 1982. 355–79.
29
Nozick R. Distributive justice (section II). In: Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: : Blackwell 1974. 228–31.
30
Nozick R. Distributive justice (section I). In: Anarchy, state, and utopia. Oxford: : Blackwell 1974. 149–74.
31
Simmonds S. Utilitarianism. In: Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, law and rights. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2013. 17–46.
32
Nussbaum, ‘Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment’. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00471.x/epdf
33
Denise Meyerson. Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz. Jurisprudencehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423535?src=recsys
34
Cotterrell R. Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy. Jurisprudence 2014;5:41–55. doi:10.5235/20403313.5.1.41
35
Tamanaha BZ. An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1995;15:501–35. doi:10.1093/ojls/15.4.501
36
Cotterrell R. Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society 1998;25:171–92. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00086
37
Donal Coffey. Custom and Living Law. Jurisprudencehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423536
38
‘Law, State and Class Struggle’ by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.org. http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178
39
Carbado, D. W. Critical What What. Connecticut Law Review 2011;43:1593–644.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/conlr43&id=1611
40
Manifesto of the Communist Party. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf
41
Ireland P. History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism. The Modern Law Review 2002;65:120–40. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00371
42
G. A. Cohen. Freedom, Justice and Capitalism. New Left Review 1981;126.https://newleftreview.org/I/126/g-a-cohen-freedom-justice-and-capitalism
43
Tushnet, M. Critical Legal Studies: A Political History. Yale Law Journal 1991;100:1515–44.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ylr100&id=1529
44
David Andrew Price. Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies. The Cambridge Law Journal 1989;48:271–301.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4507287?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
45
Menkel-Meadow, C. Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School. Journal of Legal Education 1988;38:61–86.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jled38&id=73
46
Cornell, D. Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality. Harvard Law Review 1994;107:2081–94.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hlr107&id=2101
47
Crenshaw, K. Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking back to Move Forward. Connecticut Law Review 2011;43:1253–354.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/conlr43&id=1611
48
Crenshaw, ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
49
Harris AP. Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review 1990;42. doi:10.2307/1228886
50
Kline, M. Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 1989;:115–50.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hwlj12&id=125