Borowski, M. (2011). Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works. Jurisprudence, 2(2), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716899
Carbado, D. W. (2011). Critical What What. Connecticut Law Review, 43(5), 1593–1644. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/conlr43&id=1611
Cornell, D. (1994). Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality. Harvard Law Review, 107(8), 2081–2094. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hlr107&id=2101
Cotterrell, R. (1998). Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society, 25(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00086
Cotterrell, R. (2014). Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy. Jurisprudence, 5(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.1.41
Crenshaw, ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’. (n.d.). http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf
Crenshaw, K. (2011). Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking back to Move Forward. Connecticut Law Review, 43(5), 1253–1354. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/conlr43&id=1611
Crowe, J. (2011). Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence, 2(2), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716871
David Andrew Price. (1989). Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies. The Cambridge Law Journal, 48(2), 271–301. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4507287?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Denise Meyerson. (n.d.). Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz. Jurisprudence. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423535?src=recsys
Donal Coffey. (n.d.). Custom and Living Law. Jurisprudence. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423536
Dworkin, R. (1998). Conventionalism. In Law’s empire (pp. 114–150). Hart.
Dyzenhaus, D. (2011). Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 24(2), 411–430. https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/caljp24&id=409
Feinberg, ‘The Nature and Value of Rights’. (n.d.). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00137935.pdf
Finnis, J. (2011). Evaluation and the description of law. In Natural law and natural rights: Vol. Clarendon law series (2nd ed, pp. 3–22). Oxford University Press.
G. A. Cohen. (1981). Freedom, Justice and Capitalism. New Left Review, 126. https://newleftreview.org/I/126/g-a-cohen-freedom-justice-and-capitalism
Gardner, J. (2001). Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 46, 199–228. https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajj46&i=203
Gewirth, A. (1986). Why Rights are Indispensable. Mind, XCV(379), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCV.379.329
Gustav Radbruch. (2006). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=20780215&site=ehost-live
Harold Berman, ‘Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: politics, morality, history’ (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802. (n.d.). http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1891&context=californialawreview
Harris, A. P. (1990). Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/1228886
Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are There Any Natural Rights? The Philosophical Review, 64(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586
Hart, H. L. A. (2012). Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules. In The concept of law: Vol. Clarendon law series (3rd ed, pp. 79–99). Oxford University Press.
Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals. (n.d.). http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~horty/courses/readings/hart-1958-positivism-separation.pdf
Ireland, P. (2002). History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism. The Modern Law Review, 65(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00371
Kline, M. (1989). Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 12, 115–150. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hwlj12&id=125
Kymlicka, W., & Donaldson, S. (2014). Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu001
L. Green ‘General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay’. (2005). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=19525091&site=ehost-live
‘Law, State and Class Struggle’ by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.org. (n.d.). http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178
Lon L. Fuller. (n.d.-a). ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’. https://turtletalk.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/the-speluncean-explorers.pdf
Lyons, D. (1982). New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land. In Reading Nozick: essays on Anarchy, state and Utopia (pp. 355–379). Blackwell.
MacCormick, N. (1982). Children’s rights: a test case for theories of right. In Legal right and social democracy: essays in legal and political philosophy (pp. 154–166). Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.003.0008
Manifesto of the Communist Party. (n.d.). https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf
Menkel-Meadow, C. (1988). Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School. Journal of Legal Education, 38(1), 61–86. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jled38&id=73
Nozick, R. (1974a). Distributive justice (section I). In Anarchy, state, and utopia (pp. 149–174). Blackwell.
Nozick, R. (1974b). Distributive justice (section II). In Anarchy, state, and utopia (pp. 228–231). Blackwell.
Nussbaum, ‘Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment’. (n.d.). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00471.x/epdf
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law. (n.d.). http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm
Paulson, S. (2001). Continental Normativism and its British Counterpart: How different are they? In Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence (7th ed, pp. 314–328). Sweet and Maxwell.
Perry, ‘Hart’s Methodological Positivism’. (n.d.). http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&context=faculty_scholarship
R. Kent Greenawalt. (n.d.-b). ‘How Persuasive is Natural Law Theory?’ http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1614&context=ndlr
Raz, J. J. (1984). Legal Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 4(1), 1–21. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/oxfjls4&id=7
Scott J. Shapiro. (n.d.-c). ‘The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’. https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Shapiro_Hart_Dworkin_Debate.pdf
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle. (n.d.). Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law. Jurisprudence. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5235/20403313.5.1.75
Simmonds, S. (2013). Utilitarianism. In Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, law and rights (4th ed, pp. 17–46). Sweet & Maxwell.
Simpson, A. W. B. (1973). Common Law and Legal Theory, The. In Oxford essays in jurisprudence: second series (pp. 77–99). Clarendon Press.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (1995). An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 15(4), 501–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/15.4.501
Tushnet, M. (1991). Critical Legal Studies: A Political History. Yale Law Journal, 100(5), 1515–1544. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ylr100&id=1529
Vinx, L. (2011). Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 24(2), 473–492. https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/caljp24&i=471
Waluchow, ‘Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism’. (n.d.). https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/034F507ECC20FF415AF6AAF2D461CF56/S1352325200061024a.pdf/authority_and_the_practical_difference_thesis.pdf