(1)
Harold Berman, ‘Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History’ (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802.
(2)
L. Green ‘General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2005.
(3)
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law. http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm.
(4)
Hart, H. L. A. Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules. In The concept of law; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2012; Vol. Clarendon law series, pp 79–99.
(5)
Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.
(6)
Dyzenhaus, D. Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2011, 24 (2), 411–430.
(7)
Vinx, L. Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 2011, 24 (2), 473–492.
(8)
Perry, ‘Hart’s Methodological Positivism’. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&context=faculty_scholarship.
(9)
Waluchow, ‘Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism’.
(10)
Paulson, S. Continental Normativism and Its British Counterpart: How Different Are They? In Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence; Sweet and Maxwell: London, 2001; pp 314–328.
(11)
Gardner, J. Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths. American Journal of Jurisprudence 2001, No. 46, 199–228.
(12)
Finnis, J. Evaluation and the Description of Law. In Natural law and natural rights; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2011; Vol. Clarendon law series, pp 3–22.
(13)
Borowski, M. Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works. Jurisprudence 2011, 2 (2), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716899.
(14)
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle. Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law. Jurisprudence.
(15)
Crowe, J. Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence 2011, 2 (2), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716871.
(16)
R. Kent Greenawalt. ‘How Persuasive Is Natural Law Theory?’
(17)
Gustav Radbruch. Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2006.
(18)
Simpson, A. W. B. Common Law and Legal Theory, The. In Oxford essays in jurisprudence: second series; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1973; pp 77–99.
(19)
Dworkin, R. Conventionalism. In Law’s empire; Hart: Oxford, 1998; pp 114–150.
(20)
Scott J. Shapiro. ‘The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’.
(21)
Lon L. Fuller. ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’.
(22)
MacCormick, N. Children’s Rights: A Test Case for Theories of Right. In Legal right and social democracy: essays in legal and political philosophy; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1982; pp 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.003.0008.
(23)
Hart, H. L. A. Are There Any Natural Rights? The Philosophical Review 1955, 64 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586.
(24)
Gewirth, A. Why Rights Are Indispensable. Mind 1986, XCV (379), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCV.379.329.
(25)
Feinberg, ‘The Nature and Value of Rights’.
(26)
Kymlicka, W.; Donaldson, S. Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2014, 34 (2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu001.
(27)
Raz, J. J. Legal Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1984, 4 (1), 1–21.
(28)
Lyons, D. New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land. In Reading Nozick: essays on Anarchy, state and Utopia; Blackwell: Oxford, 1982; pp 355–379.
(29)
Nozick, R. Distributive Justice (Section II). In Anarchy, state, and utopia; Blackwell: Oxford, 1974; pp 228–231.
(30)
Nozick, R. Distributive Justice (Section I). In Anarchy, state, and utopia; Blackwell: Oxford, 1974; pp 149–174.
(31)
Simmonds, S. Utilitarianism. In Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, law and rights; Sweet & Maxwell: London, 2013; pp 17–46.
(32)
Nussbaum, ‘Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment’.
(33)
Denise Meyerson. Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz. Jurisprudence.
(34)
Cotterrell, R. Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy. Jurisprudence 2014, 5 (1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.1.41.
(35)
Tamanaha, B. Z. An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1995, 15 (4), 501–535. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/15.4.501.
(36)
Cotterrell, R. Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society 1998, 25 (2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00086.
(37)
Donal Coffey. Custom and Living Law. Jurisprudence.
(38)
‘Law, State and Class Struggle’ by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.org. http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178.
(39)
Carbado, D. W. Critical What What. Connecticut Law Review 2011, 43 (5), 1593–1644.
(40)
Manifesto of the Communist Party.
(41)
Ireland, P. History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism. The Modern Law Review 2002, 65 (1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00371.
(42)
G. A. Cohen. Freedom, Justice and Capitalism. New Left Review 1981, 126.
(43)
Tushnet, M. Critical Legal Studies: A Political History. Yale Law Journal 1991, 100 (5), 1515–1544.
(44)
David Andrew Price. Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies. The Cambridge Law Journal 1989, 48 (2), 271–301.
(45)
Menkel-Meadow, C. Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School. Journal of Legal Education 1988, 38 (1), 61–86.
(46)
Cornell, D. Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality. Harvard Law Review 1994, 107 (8), 2081–2094.
(47)
Crenshaw, K. Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back to Move Forward. Connecticut Law Review 2011, 43 (5), 1253–1354.
(48)
Crenshaw, ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’.
(49)
Harris, A. P. Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review 1990, 42 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/1228886.
(50)
Kline, M. Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 1989, No. 12, 115–150.