Borowski, Martin. ‘Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works’. Jurisprudence 2.2 (2011): 575–595. Web.
Carbado, D. W. ‘Critical What What’. Connecticut Law Review 43.5 (2011): 1593–1644. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/conlr43&amp;id=1611>.
Cornell, D. ‘Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality’. Harvard Law Review 107.8 (1994): 2081–2094. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/hlr107&amp;id=2101>.
Cotterrell, Roger. ‘Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy’. Jurisprudence 5.1 (2014): 41–55. Web.
---. ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’ Journal of Law and Society 25.2 (1998): 171–192. Web.
‘Crenshaw, “Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”’. n. pag. Web. <http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&amp;context=uclf>.
Crenshaw, K. ‘Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back to Move Forward’. Connecticut Law Review 43.5 (2011): 1253–1354. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/conlr43&amp;id=1611>.
Crowe, Jonathan. ‘Natural Law Beyond Finnis’. Jurisprudence 2.2 (2011): 293–308. Web.
David Andrew Price. ‘Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies’. The Cambridge Law Journal 48.2 (1989): 271–301. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4507287?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.
Denise Meyerson. ‘Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz’. Jurisprudence n. pag. Web. <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423535?src=recsys>.
Donal Coffey. ‘Custom and Living Law’. Jurisprudence n. pag. Web. <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423536>.
Dworkin, Ronald. ‘Conventionalism’. Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart, 1998. 114–150. Print.
Dyzenhaus, D. ‘Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24.2 (2011): 411–430. Web. <https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/caljp24&amp;id=409>.
‘Feinberg, “The Nature and Value of Rights”’. n. pag. Web. <https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00137935.pdf>.
Finnis, John. ‘Evaluation and the Description of Law’. Natural Law and Natural Rights. 2nd ed. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. 3–22. Print.
G. A. Cohen. ‘Freedom, Justice and Capitalism’. New Left Review 126 (1981): n. pag. Web. <https://newleftreview.org/I/126/g-a-cohen-freedom-justice-and-capitalism>.
Gardner, J. ‘Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 46 (2001): 199–228. Web. <https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajj46&amp;i=203>.
Gewirth, Alan. ‘Why Rights Are Indispensable’. Mind XCV.379 (1986): 329–344. Web.
Gustav Radbruch. ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2006): n. pag. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=bth&amp;AN=20780215&amp;site=ehost-live>.
‘Harold Berman, “Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History” (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802’. n. pag. Web. <http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1891&amp;context=californialawreview>.
Harris, Angela P. ‘Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory’. Stanford Law Review 42.3 (1990): n. pag. Web.
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’ The Philosophical Review 64.2 (1955): n. pag. Web.
Hart, H.L.A. ‘Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules’. The Concept of Law. 3rd ed. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. 79–99. Print.
‘Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’. Web. <http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~horty/courses/readings/hart-1958-positivism-separation.pdf>.
Ireland, Paddy. ‘History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism’. The Modern Law Review 65.1 (2002): 120–140. Web.
Kline, M. ‘Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory’. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 12 (1989): 115–150. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/hwlj12&amp;id=125>.
Kymlicka, W., and S. Donaldson. ‘Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34.2 (2014): 201–219. Web.
‘L. Green “General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay”’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;db=bth&amp;AN=19525091&amp;site=ehost-live>.
‘“Law, State and Class Struggle” by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.Org’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178>.
Lon L. Fuller. ‘“The Case of the Speluncean Explorers”’. n. pag. Web. <https://turtletalk.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/the-speluncean-explorers.pdf>.
Lyons, D. ‘New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land’. Reading Nozick: Essays on Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982. 355–379. Print.
MacCormick, Neil. ‘Children’s Rights: A Test Case for Theories of Right’. Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982. 154–166. Web. <https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.001.0001/acprof-9780198255024>.
‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’. Web. <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf>.
Menkel-Meadow, C. ‘Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School’. Journal of Legal Education 38.1 (1988): 61–86. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/jled38&amp;id=73>.
Nozick, Robert. ‘Distributive Justice (Section I)’. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974. 149–174. Print.
---. ‘Distributive Justice (Section II)’. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1974. 228–231. Print.
‘Nussbaum, “Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment”’. n. pag. Web. <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00471.x/epdf>.
‘Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm>.
Paulson, Stanley. ‘Continental Normativism and Its British Counterpart: How Different Are They?’ Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence. 7th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2001. 314–328. Print.
‘Perry, “Hart’s Methodological Positivism”’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&amp;context=faculty_scholarship>.
R. Kent Greenawalt. ‘“How Persuasive Is Natural Law Theory?”’ n. pag. Web. <http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1614&amp;context=ndlr>.
Raz, J. J. ‘Legal Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4.1 (1984): 1–21. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/oxfjls4&amp;id=7>.
Scott J. Shapiro. ‘“The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed”’. Web. <https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Shapiro_Hart_Dworkin_Debate.pdf>.
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle. ‘Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law’. Jurisprudence n. pag. Web. <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5235/20403313.5.1.75>.
Simmonds, S. ‘Utilitarianism’. Central Issues in Jurisprudence: Justice, Law and Rights. 4th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. 17–46. Print.
Simpson, A. W. B. ‘Common Law and Legal Theory, The’. Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Second Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973. 77–99. Print.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. ‘An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15.4 (1995): 501–535. Web.
Tushnet, M. ‘Critical Legal Studies: A Political History’. Yale Law Journal 100.5 (1991): 1515–1544. Web. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&amp;handle=hein.journals/ylr100&amp;id=1529>.
Vinx, L. ‘Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24.2 (2011): 473–492. Web. <https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/caljp24&amp;i=471>.
‘Waluchow, “Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism”’. n. pag. Web. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/034F507ECC20FF415AF6AAF2D461CF56/S1352325200061024a.pdf/authority_and_the_practical_difference_thesis.pdf>.