1.
Harold Berman, ‘Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: politics, morality, history’ (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802.
2.
L. Green ‘General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2005).
3.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law. http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm.
4.
Hart, H. L. A. Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules. in The concept of law vol. Clarendon law series 79–99 (Oxford University Press, 2012).
5.
Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.
6.
Dyzenhaus, D. Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24, 411–430 (2011).
7.
Vinx, L. Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24, 473–492 (2011).
8.
Perry, ‘Hart’s Methodological Positivism’. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&context=faculty_scholarship.
9.
Waluchow, ‘Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism’.
10.
Paulson, S. Continental Normativism and its British Counterpart: How different are they? in Lloyd’s introduction to jurisprudence 314–328 (Sweet and Maxwell, 2001).
11.
Gardner, J. Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths. American Journal of Jurisprudence 199–228 (2001).
12.
Finnis, J. Evaluation and the description of law. in Natural law and natural rights vol. Clarendon law series 3–22 (Oxford University Press, 2011).
13.
Borowski, M. Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works. Jurisprudence 2, 575–595 (2011).
14.
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle. Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law. Jurisprudence.
15.
Crowe, J. Natural Law Beyond Finnis. Jurisprudence 2, 293–308 (2011).
16.
R. Kent Greenawalt. ‘How Persuasive is Natural Law Theory?’
17.
Gustav Radbruch. Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (2006).
18.
Simpson, A. W. B. Common Law and Legal Theory, The. in Oxford essays in jurisprudence: second series 77–99 (Clarendon Press, 1973).
19.
Dworkin, R. Conventionalism. in Law’s empire 114–150 (Hart, 1998).
20.
Scott J. Shapiro. ‘The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’.
21.
Lon L. Fuller. ‘The Case of the Speluncean Explorers’.
22.
MacCormick, N. Children’s rights: a test case for theories of right. in Legal right and social democracy: essays in legal and political philosophy 154–166 (Clarendon Press, 1982). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.003.0008.
23.
Hart, H. L. A. Are There Any Natural Rights? The Philosophical Review 64, (1955).
24.
Gewirth, A. Why Rights are Indispensable. Mind XCV, 329–344 (1986).
25.
Feinberg, ‘The Nature and Value of Rights’.
26.
Kymlicka, W. & Donaldson, S. Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34, 201–219 (2014).
27.
Raz, J. J. Legal Rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4, 1–21 (1984).
28.
Lyons, D. New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land. in Reading Nozick: essays on Anarchy, state and Utopia 355–379 (Blackwell, 1982).
29.
Nozick, R. Distributive justice (section II). in Anarchy, state, and utopia 228–231 (Blackwell, 1974).
30.
Nozick, R. Distributive justice (section I). in Anarchy, state, and utopia 149–174 (Blackwell, 1974).
31.
Simmonds, S. Utilitarianism. in Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, law and rights 17–46 (Sweet & Maxwell, 2013).
32.
Nussbaum, ‘Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment’.
33.
Denise Meyerson. Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz. Jurisprudence.
34.
Cotterrell, R. Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy. Jurisprudence 5, 41–55 (2014).
35.
Tamanaha, B. Z. An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15, 501–535 (1995).
36.
Cotterrell, R. Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically? Journal of Law and Society 25, 171–192 (1998).
37.
Donal Coffey. Custom and Living Law. Jurisprudence.
38.
‘Law, State and Class Struggle’ by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.org. http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178.
39.
Carbado, D. W. Critical What What. Connecticut Law Review 43, 1593–1644 (2011).
40.
Manifesto of the Communist Party.
41.
Ireland, P. History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism. The Modern Law Review 65, 120–140 (2002).
42.
G. A. Cohen. Freedom, Justice and Capitalism. New Left Review 126, (1981).
43.
Tushnet, M. Critical Legal Studies: A Political History. Yale Law Journal 100, 1515–1544 (1991).
44.
David Andrew Price. Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies. The Cambridge Law Journal 48, 271–301 (1989).
45.
Menkel-Meadow, C. Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School. Journal of Legal Education 38, 61–86 (1988).
46.
Cornell, D. Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality. Harvard Law Review 107, 2081–2094 (1994).
47.
Crenshaw, K. Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking back to Move Forward. Connecticut Law Review 43, 1253–1354 (2011).
48.
Crenshaw, ‘Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’.
49.
Harris, A. P. Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory. Stanford Law Review 42, (1990).
50.
Kline, M. Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 115–150 (1989).