Borowski, Martin. 2011. ‘Discourse, Principles, and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works’. Jurisprudence 2 (2): 575–95. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716899.
Carbado, D. W. 2011. ‘Critical What What’. Connecticut Law Review 43 (5): 1593–1644. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/conlr43&id=1611.
Cornell, D. 1994. ‘Loyalty and the Limits of Kantian Impartiality’. Harvard Law Review 107 (8): 2081–94. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hlr107&id=2101.
Cotterrell, Roger. 1998. ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’ Journal of Law and Society 25 (2): 171–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00086.
———. 2014. ‘Why Jurisprudence Is Not Legal Philosophy’. Jurisprudence 5 (1): 41–55. https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.1.41.
‘Crenshaw, “Demarginalising the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics”’. n.d. http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf.
Crenshaw, K. 2011. ‘Twenty Years of Critical Race Theory: Looking Back to Move Forward’. Connecticut Law Review 43 (5): 1253–1354. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/conlr43&id=1611.
Crowe, Jonathan. 2011. ‘Natural Law Beyond Finnis’. Jurisprudence 2 (2): 293–308. https://doi.org/10.5235/204033211798716871.
David Andrew Price. 1989. ‘Taking Rights Cynically: A Review of Critical Legal Studies’. The Cambridge Law Journal 48 (2): 271–301. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4507287?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Denise Meyerson. n.d. ‘Three Versions of Liberal Tolerance: Dworkin, Rawls, Raz’. Jurisprudence. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423535?src=recsys.
Donal Coffey. n.d. ‘Custom and Living Law’. Jurisprudence. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20403313.2012.11423536.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1998. ‘Conventionalism’. In Law’s Empire, 114–50. Oxford: Hart.
Dyzenhaus, D. 2011. ‘Austin, Hobbes, and Dicey’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (2): 411–30. https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/caljp24&id=409.
‘Feinberg, “The Nature and Value of Rights”’. n.d. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/BF00137935.pdf.
Finnis, John. 2011. ‘Evaluation and the Description of Law’. In Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd ed, Clarendon law series:3–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
G. A. Cohen. 1981. ‘Freedom, Justice and Capitalism’. New Left Review 126. https://newleftreview.org/I/126/g-a-cohen-freedom-justice-and-capitalism.
Gardner, J. 2001. ‘Legal Positivism: 5 1/2 Myths’. American Journal of Jurisprudence, no. 46: 199–228. https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/ajj46&i=203.
Gewirth, Alan. 1986. ‘Why Rights Are Indispensable’. Mind XCV (379): 329–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCV.379.329.
Gustav Radbruch. 2006. ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=20780215&site=ehost-live.
‘Harold Berman, “Toward an Integrative Jurisprudence: Politics, Morality, History” (1988) 76 Calif. Law Rev. 779-802’. n.d. http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1891&context=californialawreview.
Harris, Angela P. 1990. ‘Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory’. Stanford Law Review 42 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/1228886.
Hart, H. L. A. 1955. ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’ The Philosophical Review 64 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2182586.
Hart, H.L.A. 2012. ‘Law as the Union of Primary and Secondary Rules’. In The Concept of Law, 3rd ed, Clarendon law series:79–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
‘Hart, Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’. n.d. http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~horty/courses/readings/hart-1958-positivism-separation.pdf.
Ireland, Paddy. 2002. ‘History, Critical Legal Studies and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism’. The Modern Law Review 65 (1): 120–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00371.
Kline, M. 1989. ‘Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory’. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, no. 12: 115–50. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hwlj12&id=125.
Kymlicka, W., and S. Donaldson. 2014. ‘Animals and the Frontiers of Citizenship’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34 (2): 201–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu001.
‘L. Green “General Jurisprudence: A 25th Anniversary Essay”’. 2005. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=19525091&site=ehost-live.
‘“Law, State and Class Struggle” by Alan Hunt, Marxism Today, June 1976 - UNZ.Org’. n.d. http://www.unz.org/Pub/MarxismToday-1976jun-00178.
Lon L. Fuller. n.d. ‘“The Case of the Speluncean Explorers”’. https://turtletalk.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/the-speluncean-explorers.pdf.
Lyons, D. 1982. ‘New Indian Claims and Original Rights to Land’. In Reading Nozick: Essays on Anarchy, State and Utopia, 355–79. Oxford: Blackwell.
MacCormick, Neil. 1982. ‘Children’s Rights: A Test Case for Theories of Right’. In Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy, 154–66. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198255024.003.0008.
‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’. n.d. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf.
Menkel-Meadow, C. 1988. ‘Feminist Legal Theory, Critical Legal Studies, and Legal Education Or the Fem-Crits Go to Law School’. Journal of Legal Education 38 (1): 61–86. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/jled38&id=73.
Nozick, Robert. 1974a. ‘Distributive Justice (Section I)’. In Anarchy, State, and Utopia, 149–74. Oxford: Blackwell.
———. 1974b. ‘Distributive Justice (Section II)’. In Anarchy, State, and Utopia, 228–31. Oxford: Blackwell.
‘Nussbaum, “Rawls’s Political Liberalism: A Reassessment”’. n.d. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00471.x/epdf.
‘Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., The Path of the Law’. n.d. http://www.constitution.org/lrev/owh/path_law.htm.
Paulson, Stanley. 2001. ‘Continental Normativism and Its British Counterpart: How Different Are They?’ In Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence, 7th ed, 314–28. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
‘Perry, “Hart’s Methodological Positivism”’. n.d. http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2133&context=faculty_scholarship.
R. Kent Greenawalt. n.d. ‘“How Persuasive Is Natural Law Theory?”’ http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1614&context=ndlr.
Raz, J. J. 1984. ‘Legal Rights’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4 (1): 1–21. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/oxfjls4&id=7.
Scott J. Shapiro. n.d. ‘“The Hart-Dworkin Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed”’. https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Faculty/Shapiro_Hart_Dworkin_Debate.pdf.
Simmonds, Gur, Crowe, Rosler and Rundle. n.d. ‘Review Symposium: Freedom, Responsible Agency and Law’. Jurisprudence. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.5235/20403313.5.1.75.
Simmonds, S. 2013. ‘Utilitarianism’. In Central Issues in Jurisprudence: Justice, Law and Rights, 4th ed, 17–46. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Simpson, A. W. B. 1973. ‘Common Law and Legal Theory, The’. In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Second Series, 77–99. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 1995. ‘An Analytical Map of Social Scientific Approaches to the Concept of Law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15 (4): 501–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/15.4.501.
Tushnet, M. 1991. ‘Critical Legal Studies: A Political History’. Yale Law Journal 100 (5): 1515–44. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/ylr100&id=1529.
Vinx, L. 2011. ‘Austin, Kelsen, and the Model of Sovereignty’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (2): 473–92. https://heinonline-org.bris.idm.oclc.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/caljp24&i=471.
‘Waluchow, “Authority and the Practical Difference Thesis: A Defence of Inclusive Legal Positivism”’. n.d. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/034F507ECC20FF415AF6AAF2D461CF56/S1352325200061024a.pdf/authority_and_the_practical_difference_thesis.pdf.