Bibliography for POLI10003:Theories of International Relations BETA

Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (2010) Non-Western international relations theory: perspectives on and beyond Asia. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Adam Jones (1996) ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22(4), pp. 405–429. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097459.

Adler, E. and Pouliot, V. (2011) ‘International practices’, International Theory, 3(01), pp. 1–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X.

Alexander Wendt (1992) ‘Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46(2), pp. 391–425. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706858.

Axelrod, R. and Keohane, R.O. (1985) ‘Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions’, World Politics, 38(01), pp. 226–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357.

Baldwin, D.A. (1993) Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press.

Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. (2002) ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(1), pp. 109–127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.

Barry Buzan (2001) ‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’, Review of International Studies, 27(3), pp. 471–488. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097749?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds) (2014a) ‘Chapter 7 - Liberalism’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baylis, J., Smith, S. and Owens, P. (eds) (2014b) ‘Chapter 9 - Marxist Theories of International Relations’, in The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beardsworth, R. (2011) Cosmopolitanism and international relations theory. Cambridge: Polity.

Bellamy, A.J. (ed.) (2004) International Society and its Critics. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001.

Beth A. Simmons, Frank Dobbin and Geoffrey Garrett (2006) ‘Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism’, International Organization, 60(4), pp. 781–810. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3877847.

Biccum, A.R. (2005) ‘Development and the “New” Imperialism: a reinvention of colonial discourse in DFID promotional literature’, Third World Quarterly, 26(6), pp. 1005–1020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590500139656.

Bieler, A. and Morton, A.D. (2004) ‘A critical theory route to hegemony, world order and historical change: neo-Gramscian perspectives in International Relations’, Capital & Class, 28(1), pp. 85–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680408200106.

Björkdahl, A. (2002) ‘Norms in International Relations: Some Conceptual and Methodological Reflections’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 15(1), pp. 9–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570220126216.

Bloomsbury Collections - International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory (no date). Available at: https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/international-society-and-the-development-of-international-relations-theory/.

Booth, K. and Smith, S. (1995) ‘Chapter 11 - Neorealism in Theory and In Practice’, in International relations theory today. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Brock, G. (2009) Global Justice. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001.

Brooke Ackerly and Jacqui True (2008) ‘Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations’, International Studies Review, 10(4), pp. 693–707. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482017.

Brown, C. and Ainley, K. (2009) ‘Introduction: Defining International Relations’, in Understanding international relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–17.

Brown, G.W. (2009) Grounding cosmopolitanism: from Kant to the idea of a cosmopolitan constitution. Edinburgh [Scotland]: Edinburgh University Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1x04.

Brown, G.W. and Held, D. (eds) (2010a) ‘Editor’s Introduction’, in The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity.

Brown, G.W. and Held, D. (eds) (2010b) The cosmopolitanism reader. Cambridge: Polity.

Bull, H. (2002) The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. 3rd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bulmer, S. (2013) ‘Patriarchal Confusion? Making Sense of Gay and Lesbian Military Identity’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 15(2), pp. 137–156. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.746565.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013a) ‘Chapter 2 - Realism’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://r2.vlereader.com/EpubReader?ean=1781137311368.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013b) ‘Chapter 3 - Liberalism’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013c) ‘Chapter 4 - The English School’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013d) ‘Chapter 5 - Marx and Marxism’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013e) ‘Chapter 7 - Critical Theory’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013f) ‘Chapter 8 - Post-Structuralism’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013g) ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. (2013h) ‘Introduction’, in Theories of international relations. Fifth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Available at: https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=Bristol&isbn=9781137311368.

Burnham, P. (2001) ‘Marx, international political economy and globalisation’, Capital & Class, 25(3), pp. 103–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/030981680107500109.

Buzan, B. (2004) From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616617.

Buzan, B. (2014) An introduction to the English school of international relations: the societal approach. Cambridge: Polity.

Buzan, B. and Little, R. (2001) ‘Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it’, Millennium, 30(1), pp. 19–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.

Callinicos, A. (1989) ‘Chapter 3 - The Aporias of Poststructuralism’, in Against postmodernism: a marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 62–91.

Callinicos, A. (2004) ‘Marxism and the International: The Future of the Capitalist State, Historical Materialism and Globalisation’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6(3), pp. 426–433. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00148.x.

Campbell, J.L. and Pedersen, O.K. (2001) The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Caney, S. (2010) ‘Climate change and the duties of the advantaged’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 13(1), pp. 203–228. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326331.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T. and Simmons, B.A. (2013a) ‘Chapter 1 “On the History and Historiography of International Relations”’, in Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T. and Simmons, B.A. (2013b) ‘Chapter 3 - Ethics and Norms in International Relations’, in Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

Carlsnaes, W., Risse-Kappen, T. and Simmons, B.A. (2013c) ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions and Debates’, in Handbook of international relations. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, [Calif.]: SAGE.

Carpenter, R.C. (2006) ‘Recognizing Gender-Based Violence Against Civilian Men and Boys in Conflict Situations’, Security Dialogue, 37(1), pp. 83–103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606064139.

Charvet, J. and Kaczynska-Nay, E. (2008) The Liberal Project and Human Rights: The Theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755972.

Checkel, J.T. (1998) ‘The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, 50(02), pp. 324–348. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008133.

Chowdhury, G. and Nair, S. (2002) ‘Introduction: Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations’, in Power, postcolonialism, and international relations: reading race, gender, and class. London: Routledge, pp. 1–32. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315017181.

‘Considine, L., “Back to the Rough Ground! A Grammatical Approach to Trust and International Relations”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 44(1)1 (2015), pp. 109-127.’ (no date). Available at: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/86659/1/Laura%20Considsine%20%27Back%20to%20the%20Rough%20Ground%27%20Millennium%20Article%20June%202015.pdf.

Cox, R.W. (1981) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), pp. 126–155.

Cox, R.W. (1983) ‘Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: An essay in method’, Millennium : journal of international studies., 12(2), pp. 162–175.

Cynthia Weber (1992) ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’, Review of International Studies, 18(3), pp. 199–216. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097298?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Darby, P. (2004) ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(1), pp. 1–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330010101.

David Campbell (1990) ‘Global Inscription: How Foreign Policy Constitutes the United States’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 15(3), pp. 263–286. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40644685?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Davis, N. (2014) ‘A rose by any other name’, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 25. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.021.

Della Porta, D. and Keating, M. (eds) (2008) ‘Chapter 5 - Constructivism: What It Is (Not) and How It Matters’, in Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: a pluralist perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938.

Dietzel, A. (2017) ‘The Paris Agreement - Protecting the Human Right to Health?’, Global Policy, 8(3), pp. 313–321. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12421.

Dietzel, A. (no date) ‘Global Justice’, in International Relations Theory: A Practical Introduction. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2018/01/02/global-justice-in-international-relations-theory/.

Doty, R. (1996) ‘The Logic of Differance in International Relations: US Colonization of the Philippines’, in F.A. Beer and R. Hariman (eds) Post-realism: the rhetorical turn in international relations. East Lansing: Michigan State University press, pp. 331–345.

Doyle, M.W. and Ikenberry, G.J. (1997) ‘Chapter 2 - Inventing International Relations: International Relations Theory after 1945’’, in New thinking in international relations theory. Oxford: Westview Press.

Dunn, B., ‘Can Marxism Explain the Crisis?’ The Socialist Review, 363 (November), 2011 (no date). Available at: http://socialistreview.org.uk/363/can-marxism-explain-crisis.

Dunne, T. (1998) Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Anthony’s College, Oxford.

Dunne, T., Hansen, L. and Wight, C. (2013) ‘The end of International Relations theory?’, European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), pp. 405–425. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (2013a) ‘Chapter 1 - International Relations and Social Science’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (2013b) ‘Chapter 16 - Still a Discipline After All these Debates?’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016a) ‘Chapter 3 - Classical Realism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016b) ‘Chapter 4 - Structural Realism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016c) ‘Chapter 5 - Liberalism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016d) ‘Chapter 6 - Neoliberalism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016e) ‘Chapter 8 - Marxism and Critical Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016f) ‘Chapter 9 - Constructivism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016g) ‘Chapter 10 - Feminism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016h) ‘Chapter 11 - Poststructuralism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016i) ‘Chapter 12 - Postcolonialism’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016j) ‘Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International Relations Theory’, in International relations theories: discipline and diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Edkins, J. and Pin-Fat, V. (2005) ‘Through the Wire: Relations of Power and Relations of Violence’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34(1), pp. 1–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050340010101.

Edkins, J. and Vaughan-Williams, N. (2009) Critical theorists and international relations. London: Routledge. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=411003.

Enloe, C.H. (2014) ‘Chapter 5 - Gender makes the World Go Round: Where are the Women?’, in Bananas, beaches and bases: making feminist sense of international politics. Second edition, completely revised and updated. Berkeley: University of California Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1687669.

Epstein, C. (2014) ‘The postcolonial perspective: an introduction’, International Theory, 6(02), pp. 294–311. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971914000219.

Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (2001) ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), pp. 391–416. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391.

Foucault, M. and Rabinow, P. (1986) The Foucault reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Franceschet, A. (1999) ‘The Ethical Foundations of Liberal Internationalism’, International Journal, 54(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/40203406.

Fukuyama, F. (2012) The end of history and the last man. Twentieth anniversary edition. London: Penguin Books.

G. John Ikenberry (2009) ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), pp. 71–87. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40407217?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

G. John Ikenberry (2011) ‘The Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America’, Foreign Affairs, 90(3), pp. 56–68. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23039408.

Gallagher, A.M. (2012) ‘A Clash of Responsibilities: Engaging with Realist Critiques of the R2P’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(3), pp. 334–357. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00403004.

Gardiner, S.M. (2010) Climate ethics: essential readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=547959.

Gardner, R.N. (1990) ‘The Comeback of Liberal Internationalism’, The Washington Quarterly, 13(3), pp. 23–39. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01636609009445391.

Gill, S.R. and Law, D. (1989) ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’, International Studies Quarterly, 33(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523.

Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q. and Nowell-Smith, G. (1971) Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

GROVOGUI, S.N. (2002) ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), pp. 315–338. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066102008003001.

Gruffydd Jones, B. (ed.) (2006) Decolonizing international relations. Lanham, Md: Rowman and Littlefield. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1343740.

‘Guzzini, G., “Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis” International Organization, 47(3), 1993, pp. 443-478.’ (no date). Available at: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:97877/FULLTEXT02.pdf.

Guzzini, S. (2004) ‘The Enduring Dilemmas of Realism in International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 10(4), pp. 533–568. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104047848.

Hansen, L. (2006) ‘Discourse Analysis, Identity and Foreign Policy’, in Security as practice: discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. London: Routledge, pp. 17–36. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/reader.action?docID=200689&ppg=33.

Hayden, P. (2005) Cosmopolitan global politics. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Held, D. (2003) ‘Cosmopolitanism: globalisation tamed?’, Review of International Studies, 29(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004650.

Held, D. (2010) Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities. Cambridge: Polity Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1180922.

Hoffmann, S. (1995) ‘The Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’, Foreign Policy [Preprint], (98). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1148964.

Hollinger, R. (1994) ‘“Chapter 7 - Modernity, Post-Modernism and International Relations”’, in Postmodernism and the social sciences: a thematic approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.

Hooper, C. (2001) Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Hopf, T. (1998) ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.

Immanuel Wallerstein (1974) ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), pp. 387–415. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015.

J. Ann Tickner (1997) ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), pp. 611–632. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Jabri, V. (2000) ‘Reflections on the Study of International Relations’, in Issues in international relations. London: Routledge, pp. 289–313.

Jackson, R. and Sorensen, G. (2010) ‘IR as an academic subject’, in Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 28–57.

Jackson, R.H. (2000) The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, R.H. and Sørensen, G. (2010) ‘Chapter 5 - International Society’, in Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jean-Yves Haine (2009) ‘The European Crisis of Liberal Internationalism’, International Journal, 64(2), pp. 453–479. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40204518.

Jervis, Robert (no date) ‘Hans Morgenthau, Realism, and the Scientific Study of International Politics’, Social Research, 61(4). Available at: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1297235334?accountid=9730&rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo.

Joseph M. Grieco (1988) ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization, 42(3), pp. 485–507. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706787?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Justin Rosenberg (1990) ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’, Review of International Studies, 16(4), pp. 285–303. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20097232.

Kenneth N. Waltz (2000) ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’, International Security, 25(1), pp. 5–41. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772.

Keohane, R.O. (1988) ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’, International Studies Quarterly, 32(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600589.

Keohane, R.O. and Martin, L.L. (1995) ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security, 20(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.

Keohane, R.O. and Waltz, K.N. (1986) Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Koivisto, M. and Dunne, T. (2010) ‘Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 38(3), pp. 615–640. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829810363509.

Lawrence, P. (2014) Justice for future generations: climate change and international law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lawson, S. (2015) ‘Chapter 5 - Liberal International Theory’, in Theories of international relations: contending approaches to world politics. Cambridge, England: Polity. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1956448.

Lebow, R.N. (2005) ‘Tragedy, Politics and Political Science’, International Relations, 19(3), pp. 329–336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805055410.

Linklater, A. (2011) The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790348.

Linklater, A. and Suganami, H. (2006) The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491528.

Lisa L. Martin and Beth A. Simmons (1998) ‘Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions’, International Organization, 52(4), pp. 729–757. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601356.

LITTLE, R. (2000) ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), pp. 395–422. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.

Lu, C. (2000) ‘The One and Many Faces of Cosmopolitanism’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(2), pp. 244–267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00101.

Maclean, J. (1988) ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(2), pp. 295–319. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.

Martha Finnemore (2001) ‘Exporting the English School?’, Review of International Studies, 27(3), pp. 509–513. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097753.

Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52(4), pp. 887–917. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Matin, K. (2013) ‘Redeeming the universal: Postcolonialism and the inner life of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), pp. 353–377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111425263.

Mearsheimer, J., ‘Hans Morgenthau and the Iraq War: Realism Versus Neoconservatism.’ (no date). Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-americanpower/morgenthau_2522.jsp.

Mearsheimer, J.J. (1990) ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’, International Security, 15(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.

Michael C. Williams (1993) ‘Neo-Realism and the Future of Strategy’, Review of International Studies, 19(2), pp. 103–121. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097326?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Michael W. Doyle (2005) ‘Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace’, The American Political Science Review, 99(3), pp. 463–466. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30038953.

MILLIKEN, J. (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations’:, European Journal of International Relations, 5(2), pp. 225–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.

Morgenthau, H.J. (1952) ‘Another "Great Debate”: The National Interest of the United States.’, American Political Science Review, 46(04), pp. 961–988. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952108.

Moss, J. (ed.) (2015) Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316145340.

NICHOLSON, M. (2000) ‘What’s the use of International Relations?’, Review of International Studies, 26(2), pp. 183–198. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500001832.

Nye, J.S. (1988) ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’, World Politics, 40(02), pp. 235–251. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.

el-Ojeili, C. (2015) ‘Reflections on Wallerstein: The Modern World-System, Four Decades on’, Critical Sociology, 41(4–5), pp. 679–700. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513497377.

Onuf, N.G. (2013) Making sense, making worlds: constructivism in social theory and international relations. New York: Routledge.

‘Peterson V. S., “Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR” Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 2004, pp. 1-11.’ (no date). Available at: http://www.u.arizona.edu/~spikep/Publications/VSP%20Fem%20in&bey%20IR%20BrownJ%20P&P2004.pdf.

Pinar Bilgin (2008) ‘Thinking past “Western” IR?’, Third World Quarterly, 29(1), pp. 5–23. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20455023.

Powell, R. (1994) ‘Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate’, International Organization, 48(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.

R. Charli Carpenter (2011) ‘Vetting the Advocacy Agenda: Network Centrality and the Paradox of Weapons Norms’, International Organization, 65(1), pp. 69–102. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23016104.

Randall D. Germain and Michael Kenny (1998) ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’, Review of International Studies, 24(1), pp. 3–21. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097503.

Reus-Smit, C. (2002) ‘Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 4(3), pp. 487–509. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00091.

Reus-Smit, C. and Snidal, D. (2008) ‘Chapter 11 - Neoliberal Institutionalism’, in The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richard K. Ashley (1984) ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, 38(2), pp. 225–286. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706440.

Richard Price (1995) ‘A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo’, International Organization, 49(1), pp. 73–103. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706867?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Rita Abrahamsen (2003) ‘African Studies and the Postcolonial Challenge’, African Affairs, 102(407), pp. 189–210. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3518676.

Robert G. Gilpin (1984) ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, International Organization, 38(2), pp. 287–304. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706441.

Robert Jervis (1999) ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, 24(1), pp. 42–63. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347.

Roff, H.M. (2016) ‘Gendering a Warbot’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2015.1094246.

Ronen Palan (2000) ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 26(4), pp. 575–598. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097700.

Rosenau, P. (1990) ‘Once Again Into the Fray: International Relations Confronts the Humanities’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 19(1), pp. 83–110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298900190010701.

Schroeder, P.W. (1997) ‘History and International Relations Theory: Not Use or Abuse, but Fit or Misfit’, International Security, 22(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539329.

Seth, S. (ed.) (2013) Postcolonial theory and international relations: a critical introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.

‘Seth, Sanjay (2011), “Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40 (1), pp. 167-183.’ (no date). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325?journalCode=mila.

Shapiro, M. (1989) ‘Textualising Global Politics’, in International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books, pp. 11–22.

Shapiro, M.J. and Der Derian, J. (1989) International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.

Shepherd, L.J. (ed.) (2015) Gender matters in global politics: a feminist introduction to international relations. Second edition. London: Routledge. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315879819.

Shue, H. (2014) Climate justice: vulnerability and protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=1695931.

Smith, S., Booth, K. and Zalewski, M. (1996a) ‘Chapter 2 - The Timeless Wisdom of Realism’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Smith, S., Booth, K. and Zalewski, M. (1996b) ‘’Chapter 11 - The Achievements of Poststructuralism’, in International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.013.

Smith, S., Booth, K. and Zalewski, M. (1996c) ‘Chapter 16 - The future of international relations: Fears and hopes’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Smith, S., Booth, K. and Zalewski, M. (1996d) ‘Chapter 18 - All these theories yet the bodies keep piling up: Theory, Theorists, Theorising’, in International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.

Steans, J. (2003) ‘Engaging from the Margins: Feminist Encounters with the “Mainstream” of International Relations’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(3), pp. 428–454. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00114.

Steans, J. (2006) ‘Gender, Feminism, and International Relations’, in Gender and international relations: issues, debates and future directions. 2nd ed., rev.expanded. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 7–19.

Tan, K.-C. (2004) Justice without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490385.

TAYLOR, L. (2012) ‘Decolonizing International Relations: Perspectives from Latin America’, International Studies Review, 14(3), pp. 386–400. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01125.x.

Terrell Carver, Molly Cochran and Judith Squires (1998) ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review of International Studies, 24(2), pp. 283–297. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523.

Tickner, A.B. (2013) ‘Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), pp. 627–646. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323.

Tickner, J.A. (1992) ‘Chapter 1 - Engendered Insecurities: Feminist Perspectives on International Relations’, in Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press.

Vasilaki, R. (2012) ‘Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and Prospects in Post-Western IR Theory’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(1), pp. 3–22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.

Wallerstein, I. (2004) ‘Chapter 2 - The Modern World-System as a Capitalist World-Economy’, in World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, pp. 23–41.

Walt, S.M. (1998) ‘International Relations: One World, Many Theories’, Foreign Policy [Preprint], (110). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275.

Waltz, K.N. (1979) Theory of international politics. London: McGraw-Hill.

WAYLEN, G. (2006) ‘You still don’t understand: why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE’, Review of International Studies, 32(01). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506006966.

Weber, C. (1994) ‘Good girls, little girls and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations’’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23, pp. 337–349.

WEISS, T.G. (2010) ‘How United Nations ideas change history’, Review of International Studies, 36(S1), pp. 3–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051100009X.

Weldes, J. (1996) ‘Constructing National Interests’’, European journal of international relations, 2, pp. 275–318. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1354066196002003001.

Wheeler, N.J. (1992) ‘Pluralist or Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21(3), pp. 463–487. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030201.

Wheeler, N.J. (2000) Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3052740.

William Bain (2000) ‘Deconfusing Morgenthau: Moral Inquiry and Classical Realism Reconsidered’, Review of International Studies, 26(3), pp. 445–464. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097688.