[1]
Badley, G. 2009. Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education. 14, 2 (Apr. 2009), 209–219. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902757294.
[2]
Bazeley, P. and Jackson, K. 2014. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. SAGE.
[3]
Blaikie, N. 2010. Chapter 2: Designing Social Research. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Polity Press.
[4]
Blaikie, N. 2010. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Polity Press.
[5]
Bold, C. 2012. Using narrative in research. SAGE.
[6]
Boote, D.N. and Beile, P. 2005. Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher. 34, 6 (Aug. 2005), 3–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003.
[7]
Bourke, R. and Loveridge, J. 2014. Exploring informed consent and dissent through children’s participation in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 37, 2 (Apr. 2014), 151–165. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.817551.
[8]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
[9]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2013. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. SAGE.
[10]
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[11]
Bridges, David Philosophy and Educational Research: A Reconsideration of Epistemological Boundaries. Cambridge Journal of Education. 27, 2.
[12]
Brownhill, S. et al. 2017. ‘Jumping the first hurdle’: Framing action research questions using the Ice Cream Cone Model. Methodological Innovations. 10, 3 (Jul. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117741407.
[13]
Bryman, A. 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research. 6, 1 (Feb. 2006), 97–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
[14]
Bryman, A. 1984. The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology. 35, 1 (Mar. 1984). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/590553.
[15]
Canagarajah, A. Suresh From Critical Research Practice to Critical Research Reporting. TESOL Quarterly. 30, 2.
[16]
Cheruvelil, K.S. et al. 2014. Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 12, 1 (Feb. 2014), 31–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1890/130001.
[17]
Christie, D. et al. 2007. Building collaborative communities of enquiry in educational research. Educational Research and Evaluation. 13, 3 (Jun. 2007), 263–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701632091.
[18]
Clough, P. and Nutbrown, C. 2007. A student’s guide to methodology: justifying enquiry. Sage.
[19]
Cohen, L. et al. 2011. Research methods in education. Routledge.
[20]
Coleman, M. and Briggs, A.R.J. 2002. Research methods in educational leadership and management. Paul Chapman.
[21]
Coles, A. and Scott, H. 2015. Planning for the unexpected in the mathematics classroom: an account of teacher and student change. Research in Mathematics Education. 17, 2 (May 2015), 128–147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1047787.
[22]
Cook, B.G. et al. 2013. Moving Research into Practice: Can We Make Dissemination Stick? Exceptional Children. 79, 3 (Jan. 2013), 163–180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900203.
[23]
Coolican, H. 2009. Research methods and statistics in psychology. Hodder Education.
[24]
Cormier, G. 2018. The language variable in educational research: an exploration of researcher positionality, translation, and interpretation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 3 (May 2018), 328–341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1307335.
[25]
Cowan, J. 2011. Research methods in education - By Louis Cohen et al. British Journal of Educational Technology. 42, 5 (Sep. 2011), E110–E110. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01222.x.
[26]
Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
[27]
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. 2018. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
[28]
Crotty, M. 1998. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.
[29]
Dale, A. and Mason, J. 2011. Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. SAGE.
[30]
David, Miriam Children and School‐based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. 27, 3.
[31]
Degabriele Pace, G. 2015. Doing close-relative research: sticking points, method and ethical considerations. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 38, 4 (Oct. 2015), 341–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.928685.
[32]
Denscombe, M. 2010. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press.
[33]
Denscombe, M. and dawsonera 2010. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press.
[34]
DePalma, R. 2010. Socially just research for social justice: negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 33, 3 (Nov. 2010), 215–227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511713.
[35]
Discovering Statistics – The adventure begins …: https://www.discoveringstatistics.com/.
[36]
Domingo, M. Development of methodologies for researching online: the case of food blogs.
[37]
Edwards, A. 2002. Responsible Research: Ways of being a researcher. British Educational Research Journal. 28, 2 (Apr. 2002), 157–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120122121.
[38]
Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research: https://bera.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b8740e3b8965b5fbdcd439462&id=a6fcb74be6&e=86da3cb8e5.
[39]
Field, A.P. 2018. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
[40]
Field, A.P. 2018. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
[41]
Field, A.P. 2018. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE.
[42]
Floyd, A. and Arthur, L. 2012. Researching from within: external and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 35, 2 (Jul. 2012), 171–180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481.
[43]
Forgasz, H. et al. 2018. Enhancing survey participation: Facebook advertisements for recruitment in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 3 (May 2018), 257–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1295939.
[44]
Foster, L. et al. 2015. Beginning statistics: an introduction for social scientists. SAGE.
[45]
Frankham, J. and Howes, A. 2006. Talk as action in ‘collaborative action research’: making and taking apart teacher/researcher relationships. British Educational Research Journal. 32, 4 (Aug. 2006), 617–632. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600775324.
[46]
Free Excel Tutorial: Learn Excel in five hours with this course.: http://excelcentral.com/.
[47]
Free Statistics Book: http://onlinestatbook.com/.
[48]
Gallagher, M. et al. 2010. Negotiating Informed Consent with Children in School-Based Research: A Critical Review. Children & Society. 24, 6 (Nov. 2010), 471–482. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00240.x.
[49]
Greene, J.C. 2005. The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 28, 2 (Oct. 2005), 207–211. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500256293.
[50]
Guillemin, M. and Gillam, L. 2004. Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 10, 2 (Apr. 2004), 261–280. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
[51]
Heath, S. et al. 2007. Informed consent, gatekeepers and go‐betweens: negotiating consent in child‐ and youth‐orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal. 33, 3 (Jun. 2007), 403–417. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243651.
[52]
Honan, E. et al. 2013. Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 36, 4 (Nov. 2013), 386–399. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.705275.
[53]
Hoveid, M.H. 2012. Educational Research and Useful Knowledge: Production, Dissemination, Reception, Implementation. European Educational Research Journal. 11, 1 (Mar. 2012), 58–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.58.
[54]
HyperStat Online: An Introductory Statistics Textbook and Discussion of whether most published research is false: http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/.
[55]
IDRE Stats – Statistical Consulting Web Resources: https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/.
[56]
James, N. and Busher, H. 2007. Ethical issues in online educational research: protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 30, 1 (Apr. 2007), 101–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701207868.
[57]
Jay, Tim Finding ‘Mathematics’: Parents Questioning School-Centered Approaches to Involvement in Children’s Mathematics Learning. School Community Journal. 27, 1.
[58]
Johnson, R. Burke Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher. 33, 7.
[59]
Katyal, K.R. 2011. Gate-keeping and the ambiguities in the nature of ‘informed consent’ in Confucian societies. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 34, 2 (Jul. 2011), 147–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.578823.
[60]
Kidger, J. 2006. Measuring effectiveness in school sex education—methodological dilemmas in researching an intervention involving young mothers. British Educational Research Journal. 32, 2 (Apr. 2006), 291–305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600569230.
[61]
Leibowitz, Brenda ‘It’s an amazing learning curve to be part of the project’: exploring academic identity in collaborative research. Studies in Higher Education. 39, 7.
[62]
Luttrell, W. 2005. Crossing anxious borders: teaching across the quantitative–qualitative ‘divide’. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 28, 2 (Oct. 2005), 183–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500256251.
[63]
MacInnes, J. 2017. An introduction to secondary data analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE.
[64]
Maguire, Lisa K. Respecting and Fulfilling the Right of Post-Primary Pupils to Consent to Participate in Trials and Evaluative Research: A Discussion Paper. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 1. DOI:https://doi.org/b>10.1080/1743727X.2016.1200028.
[65]
Mason, J. 2011. Chapter 1: Creative tensions in social research. Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. SAGE.
[66]
Mason, J. 2018. Qualitative researching. Sage.
[67]
Mason, J. 2018. Qualitative researching. Sage.
[68]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[69]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[70]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[71]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[72]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[73]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[74]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[75]
Matthews, B. et al. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[76]
Matthews, B. and Ross, L. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[77]
Matthews, B. and Ross, L. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[78]
Matthews, B. and Ross, L. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[79]
Matthews, B. and Ross, L. 2010. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education.
[80]
McKeown, S. et al. 2017. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 27, 5 (Sep. 2017), 381–387. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2316.
[81]
McKeown, S. et al. 2017. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 27, 5 (Sep. 2017), 381–387. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2316.
[82]
McNess, E. et al. 2015. ‘Ethnographic dazzle’ and the construction of the ‘Other’: revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 45, 2 (Mar. 2015), 295–316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.854616.
[83]
Miller, R.L. and Brewer, J.D. 2003. The A-Z of social research: a dictionary of key social science research concepts. Sage.
[84]
Nicolson, M. and Uematsu, K. 2013. Collaborative learning, face-to-face or virtual: the advantages of a blended learning approach in an intercultural research group. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 36, 3 (Aug. 2013), 268–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.819324.
[85]
O’Boyle, A. 2018. Encounters with identity: reflexivity and positioning in an interdisciplinary research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 3 (May 2018), 353–366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1310835.
[86]
Olmedo, A. 2017. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 43, 1 (Jan. 2017), 69–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104.
[87]
Olmedo, A. 2017. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 43, 1 (Jan. 2017), 69–87. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104.
[88]
O’Neill, J. 2010. One chairperson’s experience of ethical review: balancing principle, convention, relationship and risk in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 33, 3 (Nov. 2010), 229–243. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511715.
[89]
Online course | Centre for Multilevel Modelling | University of Bristol: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/online-course/.
[90]
Open Learning - OpenLearn - Open University: http://www.open.edu/openlearn/.
[91]
Parker, Andrew Focus Group Method And Methodology: Current Practice And Recent Debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 29, 1.
[92]
Paulson, J. and Bellino, M.J. 2017. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 53, 3 (Jul. 2017), 351–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428.
[93]
Paulson, J. and Bellino, M.J. 2017. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 53, 3 (Jul. 2017), 351–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428.
[94]
Paulus, T.M. et al. 2010. "I Tell You, It’s a Journey, Isn’t It?” Understanding Collaborative Meaning Making in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 16, 10 (Dec. 2010), 852–862. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383124.
[95]
Pope, C.C. et al. 2010. How an exchange of perspectives led to tentative ethical guidelines for visual ethnography. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 33, 3 (Nov. 2010), 301–315. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511712.
[96]
Porter, J. 2013. Be careful how you ask! Using focus groups and nominal group technique to explore the barriers to learning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 36, 1 (Feb. 2013), 33–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.675554.
[97]
Pring, R. 2015. Philosophy of educational research. Bloomsbury Academic.
[98]
Pring, R. 2015. Philosophy of educational research. Bloomsbury Academic.
[99]
Pryor, J. et al. 2009. Exploring the fault lines of cross‐cultural collaborative research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 39, 6 (Dec. 2009), 769–782. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920903220130.
[100]
Punch, K. 2014. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage.
[101]
Punch, K. and Oancea, A. 2014. Introduction to research methods in education. SAGE.
[102]
Rose, J. 2011. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 25, 2 (Mar. 2011), 151–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x.
[103]
Rose, J. 2011. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 25, 2 (Mar. 2011), 151–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x.
[104]
Saldaña, J. 2013. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
[105]
Salkind, N.J. 2014. Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. SAGE.
[106]
Sanderson, I. 2003. Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making. Research Papers in Education. 18, 4 (Dec. 2003), 331–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176846.
[107]
Scager, K. et al. 2016. Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 15, 4 (Dec. 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219.
[108]
Simons, H. et al. 2003. From evidence‐based practice to practice‐based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education. 18, 4 (Dec. 2003), 347–364. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176855.
[109]
Smith, J.A. ed. 2015. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. SAGE Publications Ltd.
[110]
SPSS On-Line Training Workshop: http://calcnet.mth.cmich.edu/org/spss/toc.htm.
[111]
The Everyday Maths Project: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/research/impact/social-sciences-law/soe/impact-story-rose-everyday-maths-resources/.
[112]
Trainor, A.A. and Graue, E. 2014. Evaluating Rigor in Qualitative Methodology and Research Dissemination. Remedial and Special Education. 35, 5 (Sep. 2014), 267–274. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100.
[113]
Updated: A re-replication of a psychological classic provides a cautionary tale about overhyped science – Research Digest: https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/08/15/a-re-replication-of-a-psychological-classic-provides-a-cautionary-tale-about-overhyped-science/#more-34535.
[114]
Watton, P. et al. Reflective Writing: Guidance notes for students.
[115]
Wellington, J.J. 2020. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic.
[116]
Wellington, J.J. 2015. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic.
[117]
Wellington, J.J. 2015. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic.
[118]
Wellington, J.J. 2015. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic.
[119]
White, P. 2009. Chapter 5: Answering research questions: claims, evidence and warrant. Developing research questions: a guide for social scientists. Palgrave Macmillan.
[120]
Wiles, R. et al. 2012. Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 15, 1 (Jan. 2012), 41–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.564423.
[121]
Writing up your research - Developing Your Research Project: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/research-project/0/steps/4071.
[122]
Yates, L. 2004. What does good education research look like?: situating a field and its practices. Open University Press.
[123]
Yee, W.C. and Andrews, J. 2006. Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review. 58, 4 (Nov. 2006), 397–413. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910600971859.
[124]
Yin, R.K. 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[125]
Yin, R.K. 2018. Case study research and applications: design and methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.
[126]
An Introduction to Using Video for Research.
[127]
British Psychological Society (2014) Code of Human Research Ethics (2nd Edition). Leicester, UK: BPS.
[128]
How many qualitative interviews is enough.
[129]
International Journal of Research & Method in Education.
[130]
International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
[131]
Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods.
[132]
Mavers, D (2012) Transcribing Video.
[133]
Mind maps, presentational knowledge and the dissemination of qualitative research.
[134]
Paulson, J. (2015) ‘Whether and how?’ History education about recent and ongoing conflict: A review of research.
[135]
Sage Research Methods online resource (via the library). SAGE Publishing Ltd.
[137]
The Everyday Maths Project: Empowering parents of primary school pupils to support their children’s maths learning, through the mathematics they use in everyday life.
[138]
The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews.
[139]
Thematic analysis - an introduction - YouTube.
[140]
Tracy, S.J. (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big tent’ criterial for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
