1
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2020.
2
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
3
Sage Research Methods online resource (via the library).
4
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications 2014.
5
Clough P, Nutbrown C. A student’s guide to methodology: justifying enquiry. 2nd ed. London: Sage 2007.
6
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 7th ed. London: Routledge 2011.
7
Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed., International student ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications 2018.
8
Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage 1998.
9
Denscombe M. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2010.
10
Punch K, Oancea A. Introduction to research methods in education. Second edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
11
Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd 2015.
12
International Journal of Research & Method in Education.
13
International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
14
Miller RL, Brewer JD. The A-Z of social research: a dictionary of key social science research concepts. London: Sage 2003.
15
Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE 2013.
16
Coolican H. Research methods and statistics in psychology. 5th ed. London: Hodder Education 2009.
17
Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2018.
18
Mason J. Qualitative researching. Third edition. Los Angeles: Sage 2018.
19
Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sixth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc 2018.
20
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
21
McKeown S, Williams A, Pauker K. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2017;27:381–7. doi: 10.1002/casp.2316
22
Rose J. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 2011;25:151–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x
23
Paulson J, Bellino MJ. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 2017;53:351–78. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428
24
Olmedo A. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 2017;43:69–87. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104
25
Yates L. What does good education research look like?: situating a field and its practices. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2004.
26
Edwards A. Responsible Research: Ways of being a researcher. British Educational Research Journal. 2002;28:157–68. doi: 10.1080/01411920120122121
27
Frankham J, Howes A. Talk as action in ‘collaborative action research’: making and taking apart teacher/researcher relationships. British Educational Research Journal. 2006;32:617–32. doi: 10.1080/01411920600775324
28
Sanderson I. Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making. Research Papers in Education. 2003;18:331–45. doi: 10.1080/0267152032000176846
29
Cheruvelil KS, Soranno PA, Weathers KC, et al. Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2014;12:31–8. doi: 10.1890/130001
30
Christie D, Cassidy C, Skinner D, et al. Building collaborative communities of enquiry in educational research. Educational Research and Evaluation. 2007;13:263–78. doi: 10.1080/13803610701632091
31
Leibowitz, Brenda. ‘It’s an amazing learning curve to be part of the project’: exploring academic identity in collaborative research. Studies in Higher Education. ;39.
32
Nicolson M, Uematsu K. Collaborative learning, face-to-face or virtual: the advantages of a blended learning approach in an intercultural research group. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2013;36:268–78. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2013.819324
33
Paulus TM, Woodside M, Ziegler MF. "I Tell You, It’s a Journey, Isn’t It?” Understanding Collaborative Meaning Making in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16:852–62. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383124
34
Pryor J, Kuupole A, Kutor N, et al. Exploring the fault lines of cross‐cultural collaborative research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2009;39:769–82. doi: 10.1080/03057920903220130
35
Scager K, Boonstra J, Peeters T, et al. Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2016;15. doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
36
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
37
Dale A, Mason J. Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. London: SAGE 2011.
38
Pring R. Philosophy of educational research. Second edition. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
39
Mason J. Chapter 1: Creative tensions in social research. Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. London: SAGE 2011.
40
Bridges, David. Philosophy and Educational Research: A Reconsideration of Epistemological Boundaries. Cambridge Journal of Education. ;27.
41
Bryman A. The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology. 1984;35. doi: 10.2307/590553
42
Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research. 2006;6:97–113. doi: 10.1177/1468794106058877
43
Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods.
44
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
45
Brownhill S, Ungarova T, Bipazhanova A. ‘Jumping the first hurdle’: Framing action research questions using the Ice Cream Cone Model. Methodological Innovations. 2017;10. doi: 10.1177/2059799117741407
46
Pring R. Philosophy of educational research. Third edition. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
47
McKeown S, Williams A, Pauker K. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2017;27:381–7. doi: 10.1002/casp.2316
48
Rose J. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 2011;25:151–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x
49
Olmedo A. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 2017;43:69–87. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104
50
Paulson J, Bellino MJ. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 2017;53:351–78. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428
51
Blaikie N. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press 2010.
52
Denscombe M, dawsonera. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press 2010.
53
Greene JC. The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2005;28:207–11. doi: 10.1080/01406720500256293
54
Johnson, R. Burke. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher. ;33.
55
Luttrell W. Crossing anxious borders: teaching across the quantitative–qualitative ‘divide’. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2005;28:183–95. doi: 10.1080/01406720500256251
56
Simons H, Kushner S, Jones K, et al. From evidence‐based practice to practice‐based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education. 2003;18:347–64. doi: 10.1080/0267152032000176855
57
Updated: A re-replication of a psychological classic provides a cautionary tale about overhyped science – Research Digest. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/08/15/a-re-replication-of-a-psychological-classic-provides-a-cautionary-tale-about-overhyped-science/#more-34535
58
Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sixth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc 2018.
59
Tracy, S.J. (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big tent’ criterial for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851.
60
Blaikie N. Chapter 2: Designing Social Research. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press 2010.
61
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
62
Bourke R, Loveridge J. Exploring informed consent and dissent through children’s participation in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2014;37:151–65. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2013.817551
63
Floyd A, Arthur L. Researching from within: external and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2012;35:171–80. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481
64
Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. https://bera.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b8740e3b8965b5fbdcd439462&id=a6fcb74be6&e=86da3cb8e5
65
Cowan J. Research methods in education - By Louis Cohen et al. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2011;42:E110–E110. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01222.x
66
David, Miriam. Children and School‐based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. ;27.
67
DePalma R. Socially just research for social justice: negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33:215–27. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2010.511713
68
Gallagher M, Haywood SL, Jones MW, et al. Negotiating Informed Consent with Children in School-Based Research: A Critical Review. Children & Society. 2010;24:471–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00240.x
69
Guillemin M, Gillam L. Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2004;10:261–80. doi: 10.1177/1077800403262360
70
Heath S, Charles V, Crow G, et al. Informed consent, gatekeepers and go‐betweens: negotiating consent in child‐ and youth‐orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal. 2007;33:403–17. doi: 10.1080/01411920701243651
71
Honan E, Hamid MO, Alhamdan B, et al. Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2013;36:386–99. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.705275
72
James N, Busher H. Ethical issues in online educational research: protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2007;30:101–13. doi: 10.1080/17437270701207868
73
Kidger J. Measuring effectiveness in school sex education—methodological dilemmas in researching an intervention involving young mothers. British Educational Research Journal. 2006;32:291–305. doi: 10.1080/01411920600569230
74
Maguire, Lisa K. Respecting and Fulfilling the Right of Post-Primary Pupils to Consent to Participate in Trials and Evaluative Research: A Discussion Paper. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. ;41. doi: b>10.1080/1743727X.2016.1200028
75
McNess E, Arthur L, Crossley M. ‘Ethnographic dazzle’ and the construction of the ‘Other’: revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 2015;45:295–316. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2013.854616
76
O’Neill J. One chairperson’s experience of ethical review: balancing principle, convention, relationship and risk in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33:229–43. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2010.511715
77
Degabriele Pace G. Doing close-relative research: sticking points, method and ethical considerations. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2015;38:341–56. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2014.928685
78
Pope CC, De Luca R, Tolich M. How an exchange of perspectives led to tentative ethical guidelines for visual ethnography. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2010;33:301–15. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2010.511712
79
Wiles R, Coffey A, Robinson J, et al. Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2012;15:41–53. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2011.564423
80
Yee WC, Andrews J. Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review. 2006;58:397–413. doi: 10.1080/00131910600971859
81
British Psychological Society (2014) Code of Human Research Ethics (2nd Edition). Leicester, UK: BPS.
82
Katyal KR. Gate-keeping and the ambiguities in the nature of ‘informed consent’ in Confucian societies. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2011;34:147–59. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2011.578823
83
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
84
How many qualitative interviews is enough.
85
Forgasz H, Tan H, Leder G, et al. Enhancing survey participation: Facebook advertisements for recruitment in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2018;41:257–70. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2017.1295939
86
The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews.
87
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
88
Bold C. Using narrative in research. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2012.
89
Cormier G. The language variable in educational research: an exploration of researcher positionality, translation, and interpretation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2018;41:328–41. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2017.1307335
90
Domingo M. Development of methodologies for researching online: the case of food blogs.
91
An Introduction to Using Video for Research.
92
Mason J. Qualitative researching. Third edition. Los Angeles: Sage 2018.
93
O’Boyle A. Encounters with identity: reflexivity and positioning in an interdisciplinary research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2018;41:353–66. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2017.1310835
94
Parker, Andrew. Focus Group Method And Methodology: Current Practice And Recent Debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. ;29.
95
Porter J. Be careful how you ask! Using focus groups and nominal group technique to explore the barriers to learning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2013;36:33–51. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.675554
96
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
97
Thematic analysis - an introduction - YouTube.
98
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
99
Bazeley P, Jackson K. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Second edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
100
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3:77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
101
Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2018.
102
Mavers, D (2012) Transcribing Video.
103
Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE 2013.
104
Foster L, Diamond I, Jefferies J, et al. Beginning statistics: an introduction for social scientists. Second edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2015.
105
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
106
White P. Chapter 5: Answering research questions: claims, evidence and warrant. Developing research questions: a guide for social scientists. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
107
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
108
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
109
Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE 2013.
110
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
111
Coleman M, Briggs ARJ. Research methods in educational leadership and management. London: Paul Chapman 2002.
112
Punch K. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Third edition. Los Angeles: Sage 2014.
113
Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2018.
114
MacInnes J. An introduction to secondary data analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. London: SAGE 2017.
115
Salkind NJ. Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. 5 edition. Los Angeles: SAGE 2014.
116
Free Statistics Book. http://onlinestatbook.com/
117
Online course | Centre for Multilevel Modelling | University of Bristol. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/online-course/
118
HyperStat Online: An Introductory Statistics Textbook and Discussion of whether most published research is false. http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/
119
Discovering Statistics – The adventure begins …. https://www.discoveringstatistics.com/
120
Open Learning - OpenLearn - Open University. http://www.open.edu/openlearn/
121
IDRE Stats – Statistical Consulting Web Resources. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/
123
SPSS On-Line Training Workshop. http://calcnet.mth.cmich.edu/org/spss/toc.htm
124
Free Excel Tutorial: Learn Excel in five hours with this course. http://excelcentral.com/
125
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: Pearson Education 2010.
126
Writing up your research - Developing Your Research Project. https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/research-project/0/steps/4071
127
The Everyday Maths Project. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/research/impact/social-sciences-law/soe/impact-story-rose-everyday-maths-resources/
128
Jay, Tim. Finding ‘Mathematics’: Parents Questioning School-Centered Approaches to Involvement in Children’s Mathematics Learning. School Community Journal. ;27.
129
The Everyday Maths Project: Empowering parents of primary school pupils to support their children’s maths learning, through the mathematics they use in everyday life.
130
Coles A, Scott H. Planning for the unexpected in the mathematics classroom: an account of teacher and student change. Research in Mathematics Education. 2015;17:128–47. doi: 10.1080/14794802.2015.1047787
131
Badley G. Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education. 2009;14:209–19. doi: 10.1080/13562510902757294
132
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. From Critical Research Practice to Critical Research Reporting. TESOL Quarterly. ;30.
133
Cook BG, Cook L, Landrum TJ. Moving Research into Practice: Can We Make Dissemination Stick? Exceptional Children. 2013;79:163–80. doi: 10.1177/001440291307900203
134
Hoveid MH. Educational Research and Useful Knowledge: Production, Dissemination, Reception, Implementation. European Educational Research Journal. 2012;11:58–61. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.58
135
Mind maps, presentational knowledge and the dissemination of qualitative research.
136
Trainor AA, Graue E. Evaluating Rigor in Qualitative Methodology and Research Dissemination. Remedial and Special Education. 2014;35:267–74. doi: 10.1177/0741932514528100
137
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
138
Paulson, J. (2015) ‘Whether and how?’ History education about recent and ongoing conflict: A review of research.
139
Watton P, Collings J, Moon J. Reflective Writing: Guidance notes for students.
140
Boote DN, Beile P. Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher. 2005;34:3–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X034006003
