1
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2020. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/educational-research-contemporary-issues-and-practical-approaches/
2
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
3
Sage Research Methods online resource (via the library). http://methods.sagepub.com/
4
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles: : SAGE Publications 2014.
5
Clough P, Nutbrown C. A student’s guide to methodology: justifying enquiry. 2nd ed. London: : Sage 2007.
6
Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education. 7th ed. London: : Routledge 2011.
7
Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed., International student ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 2018.
8
Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. London: : Sage 1998.
9
Denscombe M. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. 4th ed. Maidenhead: : Open University Press 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3017227
10
Punch K, Oancea A. Introduction to research methods in education. Second edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNDczOTA5MjA1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLnhsaW5rLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
11
Smith JA, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE Publications Ltd 2015.
12
International Journal of Research & Method in Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cwse20
13
International Journal of Social Research Methodology. http://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/command/detail?vid=0&sid=984b1532-bfde-4402-a118-d1b8dfd18f44%40sessionmgr104&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#jid=9EB&db=bth
14
Miller RL, Brewer JD. The A-Z of social research: a dictionary of key social science research concepts. London: : Sage 2003.
15
Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: : SAGE 2013.
16
Coolican H. Research methods and statistics in psychology. 5th ed. London: : Hodder Education 2009.
17
Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2018. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDIyOTY1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
18
Mason J. Qualitative researching. Third edition. Los Angeles: : Sage 2018.
19
Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sixth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: : SAGE Publications, Inc 2018.
20
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
21
McKeown S, Williams A, Pauker K. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 2017;27:381–7. doi:10.1002/casp.2316
22
Rose J. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society 2011;25:151–63. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x
23
Paulson J, Bellino MJ. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education 2017;53:351–78. doi:10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428
24
Olmedo A. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education 2017;43:69–87. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104
25
Yates L. What does good education research look like?: situating a field and its practices. Maidenhead: : Open University Press 2004.
26
Edwards A. Responsible Research: Ways of being a researcher. British Educational Research Journal 2002;28:157–68. doi:10.1080/01411920120122121
27
Frankham J, Howes A. Talk as action in ‘collaborative action research’: making and taking apart teacher/researcher relationships. British Educational Research Journal 2006;32:617–32. doi:10.1080/01411920600775324
28
Sanderson I. Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making. Research Papers in Education 2003;18:331–45. doi:10.1080/0267152032000176846
29
Cheruvelil KS, Soranno PA, Weathers KC, et al. Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2014;12:31–8. doi:10.1890/130001
30
Christie D, Cassidy C, Skinner D, et al. Building collaborative communities of enquiry in educational research. Educational Research and Evaluation 2007;13:263–78. doi:10.1080/13803610701632091
31
Leibowitz, Brenda. ‘It’s an amazing learning curve to be part of the project’: exploring academic identity in collaborative research. Studies in Higher Education;39.https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.801424
32
Nicolson M, Uematsu K. Collaborative learning, face-to-face or virtual: the advantages of a blended learning approach in an intercultural research group. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2013;36:268–78. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2013.819324
33
Paulus TM, Woodside M, Ziegler MF. "I Tell You, It’s a Journey, Isn’t It?” Understanding Collaborative Meaning Making in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry 2010;16:852–62. doi:10.1177/1077800410383124
34
Pryor J, Kuupole A, Kutor N, et al. Exploring the fault lines of cross‐cultural collaborative research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 2009;39:769–82. doi:10.1080/03057920903220130
35
Scager K, Boonstra J, Peeters T, et al. Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2016;15. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219
36
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
37
Dale A, Mason J. Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. London: : SAGE 2011.
38
Pring R. Philosophy of educational research. Second edition. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
39
Mason J. Chapter 1: Creative tensions in social research. In: Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. London: : SAGE 2011. https://methods-sagepub-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/understanding-social-research
40
Bridges, David. Philosophy and Educational Research: A Reconsideration of Epistemological Boundaries. Cambridge Journal of Education;27.https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764970270202
41
Bryman A. The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology 1984;35. doi:10.2307/590553
42
Bryman A. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research 2006;6:97–113. doi:10.1177/1468794106058877
43
Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods. https://groups.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/Darlaston-Jones_19(1).pdf
44
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
45
Brownhill S, Ungarova T, Bipazhanova A. ‘Jumping the first hurdle’: Framing action research questions using the Ice Cream Cone Model. Methodological Innovations 2017;10. doi:10.1177/2059799117741407
46
Pring R. Philosophy of educational research. Third edition. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015.
47
McKeown S, Williams A, Pauker K. Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 2017;27:381–7. doi:10.1002/casp.2316
48
Rose J. Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society 2011;25:151–63. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x
49
Olmedo A. Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education 2017;43:69–87. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104
50
Paulson J, Bellino MJ. Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education 2017;53:351–78. doi:10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428
51
Blaikie N. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: : Polity Press 2010.
52
Denscombe M, dawsonera. The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. 4th ed. Maidenhead: : Open University Press 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=3017227
53
Greene JC. The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2005;28:207–11. doi:10.1080/01406720500256293
54
Johnson, R. Burke. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher;33.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.3102/0013189X033007014
55
Luttrell W. Crossing anxious borders: teaching across the quantitative–qualitative ‘divide’. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2005;28:183–95. doi:10.1080/01406720500256251
56
Simons H, Kushner S, Jones K, et al. From evidence‐based practice to practice‐based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education 2003;18:347–64. doi:10.1080/0267152032000176855
57
Updated: A re-replication of a psychological classic provides a cautionary tale about overhyped science – Research Digest. https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/08/15/a-re-replication-of-a-psychological-classic-provides-a-cautionary-tale-about-overhyped-science/#more-34535
58
Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. Sixth edition. Thousand Oaks, California: : SAGE Publications, Inc 2018.
59
Tracy, S.J. (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big tent’ criterial for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851. https://www.sarahjtracy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Tracy-QI-Qualitative-Quality-8-big-tent-criteria.pdf
60
Blaikie N. Chapter 2: Designing Social Research. In: Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Cambridge, U.K.: : Polity Press 2010.
61
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
62
Bourke R, Loveridge J. Exploring informed consent and dissent through children’s participation in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2014;37:151–65. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2013.817551
63
Floyd A, Arthur L. Researching from within: external and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2012;35:171–80. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481
64
Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. https://bera.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b8740e3b8965b5fbdcd439462&id=a6fcb74be6&e=86da3cb8e5
65
Cowan J. Research methods in education - By Louis Cohen et al. British Journal of Educational Technology 2011;42:E110–E110. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01222.x
66
David, Miriam. Children and School‐based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal;27.https://www.jstor.org/stable/1501900?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
67
DePalma R. Socially just research for social justice: negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2010;33:215–27. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2010.511713
68
Gallagher M, Haywood SL, Jones MW, et al. Negotiating Informed Consent with Children in School-Based Research: A Critical Review. Children & Society 2010;24:471–82. doi:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00240.x
69
Guillemin M, Gillam L. Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry 2004;10:261–80. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360
70
Heath S, Charles V, Crow G, et al. Informed consent, gatekeepers and go‐betweens: negotiating consent in child‐ and youth‐orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal 2007;33:403–17. doi:10.1080/01411920701243651
71
Honan E, Hamid MO, Alhamdan B, et al. Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2013;36:386–99. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.705275
72
James N, Busher H. Ethical issues in online educational research: protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2007;30:101–13. doi:10.1080/17437270701207868
73
Kidger J. Measuring effectiveness in school sex education—methodological dilemmas in researching an intervention involving young mothers. British Educational Research Journal 2006;32:291–305. doi:10.1080/01411920600569230
74
Maguire, Lisa K. Respecting and Fulfilling the Right of Post-Primary Pupils to Consent to Participate in Trials and Evaluative Research: A Discussion Paper. International Journal of Research & Method in Education;41. doi:b>10.1080/1743727X.2016.1200028
75
McNess E, Arthur L, Crossley M. ‘Ethnographic dazzle’ and the construction of the ‘Other’: revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 2015;45:295–316. doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.854616
76
O’Neill J. One chairperson’s experience of ethical review: balancing principle, convention, relationship and risk in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2010;33:229–43. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2010.511715
77
Degabriele Pace G. Doing close-relative research: sticking points, method and ethical considerations. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2015;38:341–56. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.928685
78
Pope CC, De Luca R, Tolich M. How an exchange of perspectives led to tentative ethical guidelines for visual ethnography. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2010;33:301–15. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2010.511712
79
Wiles R, Coffey A, Robinson J, et al. Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2012;15:41–53. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.564423
80
Yee WC, Andrews J. Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review 2006;58:397–413. doi:10.1080/00131910600971859
81
British Psychological Society (2014) Code of Human Research Ethics (2nd Edition). Leicester, UK: BPS. https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/bps.org.uk/files/Policy%20-%20Files/BPS%20Code%20of%20Human%20Research%20Ethics.pdf
82
Katyal KR. Gate-keeping and the ambiguities in the nature of ‘informed consent’ in Confucian societies. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2011;34:147–59. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2011.578823
83
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
84
How many qualitative interviews is enough. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/
85
Forgasz H, Tan H, Leder G, et al. Enhancing survey participation: Facebook advertisements for recruitment in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2018;41:257–70. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2017.1295939
86
The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3757/
87
Matthews B, Ross L. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
88
Bold C. Using narrative in research. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2012.
89
Cormier G. The language variable in educational research: an exploration of researcher positionality, translation, and interpretation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2018;41:328–41. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2017.1307335
90
Domingo M. Development of methodologies for researching online: the case of food blogs. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/3704/4/food_blogs.pdf
91
An Introduction to Using Video for Research. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2259/
92
Mason J. Qualitative researching. Third edition. Los Angeles: : Sage 2018.
93
O’Boyle A. Encounters with identity: reflexivity and positioning in an interdisciplinary research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2018;41:353–66. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2017.1310835
94
Parker, Andrew. Focus Group Method And Methodology: Current Practice And Recent Debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education;29.https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500537304
95
Porter J. Be careful how you ask! Using focus groups and nominal group technique to explore the barriers to learning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 2013;36:33–51. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.675554
96
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
97
Thematic analysis - an introduction - YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zFcC10vOVY&feature=youtu.be
98
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/educational-research-contemporary-issues-and-practical-approaches/
99
Bazeley P, Jackson K. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Second edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
100
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2006;3:77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
101
Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2018. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDIyOTY1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
102
Mavers, D (2012) Transcribing Video. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2877/4/NCRM_working_paper0512.pdf
103
Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif: : SAGE 2013.
104
Foster L, Diamond I, Jefferies J, et al. Beginning statistics: an introduction for social scientists. Second edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2015.
105
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
106
White P. Chapter 5: Answering research questions: claims, evidence and warrant. In: Developing research questions: a guide for social scientists. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=6234682
107
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.bris.idm.oclc.org/book/educational-research-contemporary-issues-and-practical-approaches/
108
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
109
Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: : SAGE 2013.
110
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
111
Coleman M, Briggs ARJ. Research methods in educational leadership and management. London: : Paul Chapman 2002.
112
Punch K. Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Third edition. Los Angeles: : Sage 2014.
113
Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 5th edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2018. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNTI2NDIyOTY1L2VwdWIvT0VCUFMvdG9jLmh0bWwifQ%3D%3D
114
MacInnes J. An introduction to secondary data analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. London: : SAGE 2017.
115
Salkind NJ. Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. 5 edition. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014.
116
Free Statistics Book. http://onlinestatbook.com/
117
Online course | Centre for Multilevel Modelling | University of Bristol. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/online-course/
118
HyperStat Online: An Introductory Statistics Textbook and Discussion of whether most published research is false. http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/
119
Discovering Statistics – The adventure begins …. https://www.discoveringstatistics.com/
120
Open Learning - OpenLearn - Open University. http://www.open.edu/openlearn/
121
IDRE Stats – Statistical Consulting Web Resources. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/
122
Statistics Shell. http://www.discoveringstatistics.com/docs/revisespss.pdf
123
SPSS On-Line Training Workshop. http://calcnet.mth.cmich.edu/org/spss/toc.htm
124
Free Excel Tutorial: Learn Excel in five hours with this course. http://excelcentral.com/
125
Matthews B, Ross L, dawsonera. Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Harlow: : Pearson Education 2010. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/bristol/detail.action?docID=5186165
126
Writing up your research - Developing Your Research Project. https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/research-project/0/steps/4071
127
The Everyday Maths Project. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/research/impact/social-sciences-law/soe/impact-story-rose-everyday-maths-resources/
128
Jay, Tim. Finding ‘Mathematics’: Parents Questioning School-Centered Approaches to Involvement in Children’s Mathematics Learning. School Community Journal;27.https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Finding+%22Mathematics%22%3a+Parents+Questioning+School-Centered+Approaches+to+Involvement+in+Children%27s+Mathematics+Learnin&id=EJ1146482
129
The Everyday Maths Project: Empowering parents of primary school pupils to support their children’s maths learning, through the mathematics they use in everyday life. http://www.everydaymaths.org/images/docs/EverydayMathsBooklet.pdf
130
Coles A, Scott H. Planning for the unexpected in the mathematics classroom: an account of teacher and student change. Research in Mathematics Education 2015;17:128–47. doi:10.1080/14794802.2015.1047787
131
Badley G. Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education 2009;14:209–19. doi:10.1080/13562510902757294
132
Canagarajah, A. Suresh. From Critical Research Practice to Critical Research Reporting. TESOL Quarterly;30.https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2307/3588146
133
Cook BG, Cook L, Landrum TJ. Moving Research into Practice: Can We Make Dissemination Stick? Exceptional Children 2013;79:163–80. doi:10.1177/001440291307900203
134
Hoveid MH. Educational Research and Useful Knowledge: Production, Dissemination, Reception, Implementation. European Educational Research Journal 2012;11:58–61. doi:10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.58
135
Mind maps, presentational knowledge and the dissemination of qualitative research. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1577/1/0910_mindmaps.pdf
136
Trainor AA, Graue E. Evaluating Rigor in Qualitative Methodology and Research Dissemination. Remedial and Special Education 2014;35:267–74. doi:10.1177/0741932514528100
137
Wellington JJ. Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUniversityOfBristol?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxNDcyNTIyMDA5L3BkZjJodG1sZXgvaW5kZXguaHRtbCJ9
138
Paulson, J. (2015) ‘Whether and how?’ History education about recent and ongoing conflict: A review of research. https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/files/99531923/Paulson_JEiE_2015.pdf
139
Watton P, Collings J, Moon J. Reflective Writing: Guidance notes for students. https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/2/2542/reflective-writing-guidance__1_.pdf
140
Boote DN, Beile P. Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher 2005;34:3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X034006003
