1.
Wellington, J.J.: Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2020).
2.
Matthews, B., Ross, L.: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
3.
Sage Research Methods online resource (via the library), http://methods.sagepub.com/.
4.
Creswell, J.W.: Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2014).
5.
Clough, P., Nutbrown, C.: A student’s guide to methodology: justifying enquiry. Sage, London (2007).
6.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research methods in education. Routledge, London (2011).
7.
Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D.: Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2018).
8.
Crotty, M.: The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage, London (1998).
9.
Denscombe, M.: The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2010).
10.
Punch, K., Oancea, A.: Introduction to research methods in education. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
11.
Smith, J.A. ed: Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. SAGE Publications Ltd, Los Angeles (2015).
12.
International Journal of Research & Method in Education.
13.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology.
14.
Miller, R.L., Brewer, J.D.: The A-Z of social research: a dictionary of key social science research concepts. Sage, London (2003).
15.
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. SAGE, London (2013).
16.
Coolican, H.: Research methods and statistics in psychology. Hodder Education, London (2009).
17.
Field, A.P.: Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
18.
Mason, J.: Qualitative researching. Sage, Los Angeles (2018).
19.
Yin, R.K.: Case study research and applications: design and methods. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California (2018).
20.
Matthews, B., Ross, L.: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
21.
McKeown, S., Williams, A., Pauker, K.: Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 27, 381–387 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2316.
22.
Rose, J.: Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 25, 151–163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x.
23.
Paulson, J., Bellino, M.J.: Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 53, 351–378 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428.
24.
Olmedo, A.: Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 43, 69–87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104.
25.
Yates, L.: What does good education research look like?: situating a field and its practices. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2004).
26.
Edwards, A.: Responsible Research: Ways of being a researcher. British Educational Research Journal. 28, 157–168 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120122121.
27.
Frankham, J., Howes, A.: Talk as action in ‘collaborative action research’: making and taking apart teacher/researcher relationships. British Educational Research Journal. 32, 617–632 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600775324.
28.
Sanderson, I.: Is it ‘what works’ that matters? Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making. Research Papers in Education. 18, 331–345 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176846.
29.
Cheruvelil, K.S., Soranno, P.A., Weathers, K.C., Hanson, P.C., Goring, S.J., Filstrup, C.T., Read, E.K.: Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 12, 31–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1890/130001.
30.
Christie, D., Cassidy, C., Skinner, D., Coutts, N., Sinclair, C., Rimpilainen, S., Wilson, A.: Building collaborative communities of enquiry in educational research. Educational Research and Evaluation. 13, 263–278 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701632091.
31.
Leibowitz, Brenda: ‘It’s an amazing learning curve to be part of the project’: exploring academic identity in collaborative research. Studies in Higher Education. 39,.
32.
Nicolson, M., Uematsu, K.: Collaborative learning, face-to-face or virtual: the advantages of a blended learning approach in an intercultural research group. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 36, 268–278 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.819324.
33.
Paulus, T.M., Woodside, M., Ziegler, M.F.: "I Tell You, It’s a Journey, Isn’t It?” Understanding Collaborative Meaning Making in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 16, 852–862 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383124.
34.
Pryor, J., Kuupole, A., Kutor, N., Dunne, M., Adu‐Yeboah, C.: Exploring the fault lines of cross‐cultural collaborative research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 39, 769–782 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920903220130.
35.
Scager, K., Boonstra, J., Peeters, T., Vulperhorst, J., Wiegant, F.: Collaborative Learning in Higher Education: Evoking Positive Interdependence. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 15, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-07-0219.
36.
Matthews, B., Ross, L.: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
37.
Dale, A., Mason, J.: Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. SAGE, London (2011).
38.
Pring, R.: Philosophy of educational research. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2015).
39.
Mason, J.: Chapter 1: Creative tensions in social research. In: Understanding social research: thinking creatively about method. SAGE, London (2011).
40.
Bridges, David: Philosophy and Educational Research: A Reconsideration of Epistemological Boundaries. Cambridge Journal of Education. 27,.
41.
Bryman, A.: The Debate about Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Question of Method or Epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology. 35, (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/590553.
42.
Bryman, A.: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? Qualitative Research. 6, 97–113 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877.
43.
Making connections: The relationship between epistemology and research methods, https://groups.psychology.org.au/Assets/Files/Darlaston-Jones_19(1).pdf.
44.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
45.
Brownhill, S., Ungarova, T., Bipazhanova, A.: ‘Jumping the first hurdle’: Framing action research questions using the Ice Cream Cone Model. Methodological Innovations. 10, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117741407.
46.
Pring, R.: Philosophy of educational research. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2015).
47.
McKeown, S., Williams, A., Pauker, K.: Stories that move them: Changing children’s behaviour toward diverse peers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 27, 381–387 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2316.
48.
Rose, J.: Dilemmas of Inter-Professional Collaboration: Can they be Resolved? Children & Society. 25, 151–163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00268.x.
49.
Olmedo, A.: Something old, not much new, and a lot borrowed: philanthropy, business, and the changing roles of government in global education policy networks. Oxford Review of Education. 43, 69–87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2016.1259104.
50.
Paulson, J., Bellino, M.J.: Truth commissions, education, and positive peace: an analysis of truth commission final reports (1980–2015). Comparative Education. 53, 351–378 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1334428.
51.
Blaikie, N.: Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2010).
52.
Denscombe, M., dawsonera: The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2010).
53.
Greene, J.C.: The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 28, 207–211 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500256293.
54.
Johnson, R. Burke: Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher. 33,.
55.
Luttrell, W.: Crossing anxious borders: teaching across the quantitative–qualitative ‘divide’. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 28, 183–195 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01406720500256251.
56.
Simons, H., Kushner, S., Jones, K., James, D.: From evidence‐based practice to practice‐based evidence: the idea of situated generalisation. Research Papers in Education. 18, 347–364 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000176855.
57.
Updated: A re-replication of a psychological classic provides a cautionary tale about overhyped science – Research Digest, https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/08/15/a-re-replication-of-a-psychological-classic-provides-a-cautionary-tale-about-overhyped-science/#more-34535.
58.
Yin, R.K.: Case study research and applications: design and methods. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, California (2018).
59.
Tracy, S.J. (2010) Qualitative quality: Eight ‘big tent’ criterial for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837-851, https://www.sarahjtracy.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Tracy-QI-Qualitative-Quality-8-big-tent-criteria.pdf.
60.
Blaikie, N.: Chapter 2: Designing Social Research. In: Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Polity Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2010).
61.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
62.
Bourke, R., Loveridge, J.: Exploring informed consent and dissent through children’s participation in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 37, 151–165 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2013.817551.
63.
Floyd, A., Arthur, L.: Researching from within: external and internal ethical engagement. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 35, 171–180 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.670481.
64.
Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research, https://bera.us9.list-manage.com/track/click?u=b8740e3b8965b5fbdcd439462&id=a6fcb74be6&e=86da3cb8e5.
65.
Cowan, J.: Research methods in education - By Louis Cohen et al. British Journal of Educational Technology. 42, E110–E110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01222.x.
66.
David, Miriam: Children and School‐based Research: ‘informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? British Educational Research Journal. 27,.
67.
DePalma, R.: Socially just research for social justice: negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 33, 215–227 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511713.
68.
Gallagher, M., Haywood, S.L., Jones, M.W., Milne, S.: Negotiating Informed Consent with Children in School-Based Research: A Critical Review. Children & Society. 24, 471–482 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00240.x.
69.
Guillemin, M., Gillam, L.: Ethics, Reflexivity, and "Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 10, 261–280 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
70.
Heath, S., Charles, V., Crow, G., Wiles, R.: Informed consent, gatekeepers and go‐betweens: negotiating consent in child‐ and youth‐orientated institutions. British Educational Research Journal. 33, 403–417 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701243651.
71.
Honan, E., Hamid, M.O., Alhamdan, B., Phommalangsy, P., Lingard, B.: Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 36, 386–399 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.705275.
72.
James, N., Busher, H.: Ethical issues in online educational research: protecting privacy, establishing authenticity in email interviewing. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 30, 101–113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701207868.
73.
Kidger, J.: Measuring effectiveness in school sex education—methodological dilemmas in researching an intervention involving young mothers. British Educational Research Journal. 32, 291–305 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600569230.
74.
Maguire, Lisa K.: Respecting and Fulfilling the Right of Post-Primary Pupils to Consent to Participate in Trials and Evaluative Research: A Discussion Paper. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41,. https://doi.org/b>10.1080/1743727X.2016.1200028.
75.
McNess, E., Arthur, L., Crossley, M.: ‘Ethnographic dazzle’ and the construction of the ‘Other’: revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. 45, 295–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.854616.
76.
O’Neill, J.: One chairperson’s experience of ethical review: balancing principle, convention, relationship and risk in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 33, 229–243 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511715.
77.
Degabriele Pace, G.: Doing close-relative research: sticking points, method and ethical considerations. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 38, 341–356 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2014.928685.
78.
Pope, C.C., De Luca, R., Tolich, M.: How an exchange of perspectives led to tentative ethical guidelines for visual ethnography. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 33, 301–315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511712.
79.
Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robinson, J., Heath, S.: Anonymisation and visual images: issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 15, 41–53 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2011.564423.
80.
Yee, W.C., Andrews, J.: Professional researcher or a ‘good guest’? Ethical dilemmas involved in researching children and families in the home setting. Educational Review. 58, 397–413 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910600971859.
81.
British Psychological Society (2014) Code of Human Research Ethics (2nd Edition). Leicester, UK: BPS, https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/bps.org.uk/files/Policy%20-%20Files/BPS%20Code%20of%20Human%20Research%20Ethics.pdf.
82.
Katyal, K.R.: Gate-keeping and the ambiguities in the nature of ‘informed consent’ in Confucian societies. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 34, 147–159 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.578823.
83.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
84.
How many qualitative interviews is enough.
85.
Forgasz, H., Tan, H., Leder, G., McLeod, A.: Enhancing survey participation: Facebook advertisements for recruitment in educational research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 257–270 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1295939.
86.
The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews.
87.
Matthews, B., Ross, L.: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
88.
Bold, C.: Using narrative in research. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2012).
89.
Cormier, G.: The language variable in educational research: an exploration of researcher positionality, translation, and interpretation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 328–341 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1307335.
90.
Domingo, M.: Development of methodologies for researching online: the case of food blogs.
91.
An Introduction to Using Video for Research.
92.
Mason, J.: Qualitative researching. Sage, Los Angeles (2018).
93.
O’Boyle, A.: Encounters with identity: reflexivity and positioning in an interdisciplinary research project. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 41, 353–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1310835.
94.
Parker, Andrew: Focus Group Method And Methodology: Current Practice And Recent Debate. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 29,.
95.
Porter, J.: Be careful how you ask! Using focus groups and nominal group technique to explore the barriers to learning. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 36, 33–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.675554.
96.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
97.
Thematic analysis - an introduction - YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zFcC10vOVY&feature=youtu.be.
98.
Wellington, J.J.: Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2015).
99.
Bazeley, P., Jackson, K.: Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
100.
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
101.
Field, A.P.: Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
102.
Mavers, D (2012) Transcribing Video, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2877/4/NCRM_working_paper0512.pdf.
103.
Saldaña, J.: The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2013).
104.
Foster, L., Diamond, I., Jefferies, J., Diamond, I.: Beginning statistics: an introduction for social scientists. SAGE, Los Angeles (2015).
105.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
106.
White, P.: Chapter 5: Answering research questions: claims, evidence and warrant. In: Developing research questions: a guide for social scientists. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009).
107.
Wellington, J.J.: Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2015).
108.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
109.
Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. SAGE, London (2013).
110.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
111.
Coleman, M., Briggs, A.R.J.: Research methods in educational leadership and management. Paul Chapman, London (2002).
112.
Punch, K.: Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Sage, Los Angeles (2014).
113.
Field, A.P.: Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
114.
MacInnes, J.: An introduction to secondary data analysis with IBM SPSS Statistics. SAGE, London (2017).
115.
Salkind, N.J.: Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics. SAGE, Los Angeles (2014).
116.
Free Statistics Book, http://onlinestatbook.com/.
117.
Online course | Centre for Multilevel Modelling | University of Bristol, http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/online-course/.
118.
HyperStat Online: An Introductory Statistics Textbook and Discussion of whether most published research is false, http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/.
119.
Discovering Statistics – The adventure begins …, https://www.discoveringstatistics.com/.
120.
Open Learning - OpenLearn - Open University, http://www.open.edu/openlearn/.
121.
IDRE Stats – Statistical Consulting Web Resources, https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/.
122.
Statistics Shell, http://www.discoveringstatistics.com/docs/revisespss.pdf.
123.
SPSS On-Line Training Workshop, http://calcnet.mth.cmich.edu/org/spss/toc.htm.
124.
Free Excel Tutorial: Learn Excel in five hours with this course., http://excelcentral.com/.
125.
Matthews, B., Ross, L., dawsonera: Research methods: a practical guide for the social sciences. Pearson Education, Harlow (2010).
126.
Writing up your research - Developing Your Research Project, https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/research-project/0/steps/4071.
127.
The Everyday Maths Project, http://www.bristol.ac.uk/research/impact/social-sciences-law/soe/impact-story-rose-everyday-maths-resources/.
128.
Jay, Tim: Finding ‘Mathematics’: Parents Questioning School-Centered Approaches to Involvement in Children’s Mathematics Learning. School Community Journal. 27,.
129.
The Everyday Maths Project: Empowering parents of primary school pupils to support their children’s maths learning, through the mathematics they use in everyday life., http://www.everydaymaths.org/images/docs/EverydayMathsBooklet.pdf.
130.
Coles, A., Scott, H.: Planning for the unexpected in the mathematics classroom: an account of teacher and student change. Research in Mathematics Education. 17, 128–147 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2015.1047787.
131.
Badley, G.: Academic writing as shaping and re-shaping. Teaching in Higher Education. 14, 209–219 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902757294.
132.
Canagarajah, A. Suresh: From Critical Research Practice to Critical Research Reporting. TESOL Quarterly. 30,.
133.
Cook, B.G., Cook, L., Landrum, T.J.: Moving Research into Practice: Can We Make Dissemination Stick? Exceptional Children. 79, 163–180 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291307900203.
134.
Hoveid, M.H.: Educational Research and Useful Knowledge: Production, Dissemination, Reception, Implementation. European Educational Research Journal. 11, 58–61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.1.58.
135.
Mind maps, presentational knowledge and the dissemination of qualitative research., http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1577/1/0910_mindmaps.pdf.
136.
Trainor, A.A., Graue, E.: Evaluating Rigor in Qualitative Methodology and Research Dissemination. Remedial and Special Education. 35, 267–274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100.
137.
Wellington, J.J.: Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Bloomsbury Academic, London (2015).
138.
Paulson, J. (2015) ‘Whether and how?’ History education about recent and ongoing conflict: A review of research.
139.
Watton, P., Collings, J., Moon, J.: Reflective Writing: Guidance notes for students., https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/2/2542/reflective-writing-guidance__1_.pdf.
140.
Boote, D.N., Beile, P.: Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation. Educational Researcher. 34, 3–15 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003.
